The US has the income equality of a third world country, why?

  • 153 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Wut? the quoted text are all from analysis and interpretations of the american dream. The american dream is not only a personal interpretation, it is a social movement used by the US government and politicians to promote the US. People even talk about the american dream when migrating there. All those authors historical interpretation of the american dream as a social construct agree with my believe that the american dream basically turned into a way to promote mindless consumerism and I'm not the only one who thinks that.airshocker

I don't agree with that. At least not the analysis you posted.

"Mindless" consumerism sounds catchy and derogatory but this "mindless" consumerism drives our economy.

And that's why most economies are in trouble now IMO because they are driven by mindless consumerism. No way a mindless system like that is sustainable.
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Wut? the quoted text are all from analysis and interpretations of the american dream. The american dream is not only a personal interpretation, it is a social movement used by the US government and politicians to promote the US. People even talk about the american dream when migrating there. All those authors historical interpretation of the american dream as a social construct agree with my believe that the american dream basically turned into a way to promote mindless consumerism and I'm not the only one who thinks that.airshocker

I don't agree with that. At least not the analysis you posted.

"Mindless" consumerism sounds catchy and derogatory but this "mindless" consumerism drives our economy.

Economy always will have ups and downs but if it weren't for consumerism you'd be milking cows right now.

Avatar image for delol
delol

8793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#103 delol
Member since 2005 • 8793 Posts

Rich are too weathy poors are in misery .That´s why

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

Rich are too weathy poors are in misery .That´s why

delol
OK, thanks for clearing that up.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

And that's why most economies are in trouble now IMO because they are driven by mindless consumerism. No way a mindless system like that is sustainable.kuraimen

Something being mindless is very subjective. Like right now I'm of the mind to go pick up my gaming headset I bought through Best Buy online. That certainly isn't mindless since I put thought into my buying decision, chose Best Buy because of the labor day weekend discount, and submitted my order. I'm also of the mind that I want a Monster energy drink while I drive, so I'm going to stop at the Gulf station before I get onto the Thruway. What about that is mindless?

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Economy always will have ups and downs but if it weren't for consumerism you'd be milking cows right now.

Cow4ever

Why are you talking to me? I'm not the one against consumerism.

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

Sooooo many logical fallacies in this thread. The biggest one: third world countries tend to have higher income inequality. This does not mean income inequality has any relation to being a third-world country or becoming a third-world country. The only thing this tells me is what everyone here already knew, which is that the U.S is more conservative than western Europe and doesn't redistribute income as heavily. That's the only thing we can extrapolate from this data.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"]

Yet the US has one of the highest real median annual household incomes in the world.

coolbeans90

This pretty much sums up my opinion on the matter.

But that doesn't mean there aren't poor people in the US.
Avatar image for Cow4ever
Cow4ever

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Cow4ever
Member since 2011 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="Cow4ever"]

Economy always will have ups and downs but if it weren't for consumerism you'd be milking cows right now.

airshocker

Why are you talking to me? I'm not the one against consumerism.

Glitchspot, I was quoting that other guy
Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

The US is an Economy based of afew main things Medicine, Military Development, Banking and investment, Cars, Agriculture, Electronics and Chemicals.
The first and second bring little in the way of GDP advancement and takes money from the poor in terms of Insurance and Tax distributing it to higher earners, the 3rd does a similar thing as not many American banks have a large presence outside the US and just redistributes Mortgage income. The rest are fair dues but American cars don't sell well outside America and most major electrical companies are Japanesse.

Then you have the problem that your top earners are the politicians and this results in them keeping things cosy for themselves and tax on the above industries low as theey own most of them resulting in a viscious cycle. Your College system is one of the most expensive in the world with little state funding making social mobility through education difficult.

Basically it's your distain of Communism led you to blieve that a degree of Socialism is also inherently a bad thing.

Edit: My 'E' button seems to be enjoying double posting atm

Avatar image for deactivated-5806da829a153
deactivated-5806da829a153

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 deactivated-5806da829a153
Member since 2011 • 93 Posts

"Injustice"?

You mean inequality? Nothing about the distribution of wealth is related with injustice, it's the other way around if anything :?N30F3N1X

Then you have a pretty twisted sense of morality if you ask me. One man shouldn't have the combined wealth of 100 million poor people.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Nah it doesn't help the middle class at all. It's very much a case of the rich get richer and everyone else gets more poor.airshocker

I'm middle-class and I've been getting richer.

Your a minority.. The middle class in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Wut? the quoted text are all from analysis and interpretations of the american dream. The american dream is not only a personal interpretation, it is a social movement used by the US government and politicians to promote the US. People even talk about the american dream when migrating there. All those authors historical interpretation of the american dream as a social construct agree with my believe that the american dream basically turned into a way to promote mindless consumerism and I'm not the only one who thinks that.kuraimen

I don't agree with that. At least not the analysis you posted.

"Mindless" consumerism sounds catchy and derogatory but this "mindless" consumerism drives our economy.

And that's why most economies are in trouble now IMO because they are driven by mindless consumerism. No way a mindless system like that is sustainable.

yea it cant be because of the over spending of governments.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Nah it doesn't help the middle class at all. It's very much a case of the rich get richer and everyone else gets more poor.sSubZerOo

I'm middle-class and I've been getting richer.

Your a minority.. The middle class in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

Technically, since median household income (PPP) has been stagnant, things are remaining the same, not becoming worse. The metric takes into account the purchasing power of the median household income.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#115 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

I'm middle-class and I've been getting richer.

coolbeans90

Your a minority.. The middle class in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

Technically, since median household income (PPP) has been stagnant, things are remaining the same, not becoming worse. The metric takes into account the purchasing power of the median household income.

This isnt' for just the current few years.. This is for the past 2 decades..

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Your a minority.. The middle class in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

sSubZerOo

Technically, since median household income (PPP) has been stagnant, things are remaining the same, not becoming worse. The metric takes into account the purchasing power of the median household income.

This isnt' for just the current few years.. This is for the past 2 decades..

Three, actually.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

I don't agree with that. At least not the analysis you posted.

"Mindless" consumerism sounds catchy and derogatory but this "mindless" consumerism drives our economy.

surrealnumber5

And that's why most economies are in trouble now IMO because they are driven by mindless consumerism. No way a mindless system like that is sustainable.

yea it cant be because of the over spending of governments.

Could be also but I think the real problems stem from much deeper roots into the foundation of the whole system.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#118 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

Technically, since median household income (PPP) has been stagnant, things are remaining the same, not becoming worse. The metric takes into account the purchasing power of the median household income.

coolbeans90

This isnt' for just the current few years.. This is for the past 2 decades..

Three, actually.

And the prices have gone up in numerous things, nothing has changed the same.. Fossil fuels being at the forefront when it comes to the costs.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

This isnt' for just the current few years.. This is for the past 2 decades..

sSubZerOo

Three, actually.

And the prices have gone up in numerous things, nothing has changed the same.. Fossil fuels being at the forefront when it comes to the costs.

And you do realize that nominal median household income has risen - adjusting for inflation, however, there is a stagnation.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] And that's why most economies are in trouble now IMO because they are driven by mindless consumerism. No way a mindless system like that is sustainable.kuraimen

yea it cant be because of the over spending of governments.

Could be also but I think the real problems stem from much deeper roots into the foundation of the whole system.

countries have called into question their ability to pay off their debts, the people within those countries have no direct control over what their politicians spend money on. the dollar and the euro are the two largest currencies and have the two largest economies backing them and only the over spending of the governments within has called the currencies into question.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] yea it cant be because of the over spending of governments. surrealnumber5

Could be also but I think the real problems stem from much deeper roots into the foundation of the whole system.

countries have called into question their ability to pay off their debts, the people within those countries have no direct control over what their politicians spend money on. the dollar and the euro are the two largest currencies and have the two largest economies backing them and only the over spending of the governments within has called the currencies into question.

Yes and you're talking about some superficial structural problems of the system I'm talking about structural problems on its foundations. The fact that the system is based on creating wealth for the sake of it is the biggest problem with it. It puts profit above anything else. If that's not changed then all the changes in government spending will be only cosmetic changes that hide the real problem and it will eventually collapse anyway.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
More signs of third woldness http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/middle-income-schools-bigger-classes-underpaid-teachers-173541184.html
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23357 Posts
That's absurd. Everyone knows that wealth given to the upper classes trickles down to the bottom.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

That's absurd. Everyone knows that wealth given to the upper classes trickles down to the bottom.mattbbpl

:P

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Could be also but I think the real problems stem from much deeper roots into the foundation of the whole system.

kuraimen

countries have called into question their ability to pay off their debts, the people within those countries have no direct control over what their politicians spend money on. the dollar and the euro are the two largest currencies and have the two largest economies backing them and only the over spending of the governments within has called the currencies into question.

Yes and you're talking about some superficial structural problems of the system I'm talking about structural problems on its foundations. The fact that the system is based on creating wealth for the sake of it is the biggest problem with it. It puts profit above anything else. If that's not changed then all the changes in government spending will be only cosmetic changes that hide the real problem and it will eventually collapse anyway.

filling the needs and wants for others so that you may fill your needs and wants is part of the trade system. what are you proposing as a better alternative? a feudalistic(or despotic)? or a communist one? those are the only other two that i can think of and they dont work in theory or practice anywhere near what a free enterprise trade system does. letting each person work to better his lot by positively impacting his neighbors is a mutually beneficial system where the other two options are zero sum systems.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] countries have called into question their ability to pay off their debts, the people within those countries have no direct control over what their politicians spend money on. the dollar and the euro are the two largest currencies and have the two largest economies backing them and only the over spending of the governments within has called the currencies into question. surrealnumber5

Yes and you're talking about some superficial structural problems of the system I'm talking about structural problems on its foundations. The fact that the system is based on creating wealth for the sake of it is the biggest problem with it. It puts profit above anything else. If that's not changed then all the changes in government spending will be only cosmetic changes that hide the real problem and it will eventually collapse anyway.

filling the needs and wants for others so that you may fill your needs and wants is part of the trade system. what are you proposing as a better alternative? a feudalistic(or despotic)? or a communist one? those are the only other two that i can think of and they dont work in theory or practice anywhere near what a free enterprise trade system does. letting each person work to better his lot by positively impacting his neighbors is a mutually beneficial system where the other two options are zero sum systems.

A system that puts humans and the environments as the central aspects of it and not profit. That means that the economic system will work for the people and not the other way around like it is now. Policies now are made based on how the stock market fluctuates but they should be made on how many people are starving and how damaged the environment is becoming, you know real and tangible things. Unless the central focus of the system is not changed then the inherent problems it has won't change because the system is based on pieces of paper and numbers on a screen.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yes and you're talking about some superficial structural problems of the system I'm talking about structural problems on its foundations. The fact that the system is based on creating wealth for the sake of it is the biggest problem with it. It puts profit above anything else. If that's not changed then all the changes in government spending will be only cosmetic changes that hide the real problem and it will eventually collapse anyway.kuraimen

filling the needs and wants for others so that you may fill your needs and wants is part of the trade system. what are you proposing as a better alternative? a feudalistic(or despotic)? or a communist one? those are the only other two that i can think of and they dont work in theory or practice anywhere near what a free enterprise trade system does. letting each person work to better his lot by positively impacting his neighbors is a mutually beneficial system where the other two options are zero sum systems.

A system that puts humans and the environments as the central aspects of it and not profit. That means that the economic system will work for the people and not the other way around like it is now. Policies now are made based on how the stock market fluctuates but they should be made on how many people are starving and how damaged the environment is becoming, you know real and tangible things. Unless the central focus of the system is not changed then the inherent problems it has won't change because the system is based on pieces of paper and numbers on a screen.

so you want a system of good will where people either get equal what they put in or operate at a loss, this system would be inherently self destructive..... or at best stagnate and with any growth what so ever in the population the few resources within would have to be spread to the next generation.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] filling the needs and wants for others so that you may fill your needs and wants is part of the trade system. what are you proposing as a better alternative? a feudalistic(or despotic)? or a communist one? those are the only other two that i can think of and they dont work in theory or practice anywhere near what a free enterprise trade system does. letting each person work to better his lot by positively impacting his neighbors is a mutually beneficial system where the other two options are zero sum systems.

surrealnumber5

A system that puts humans and the environments as the central aspects of it and not profit. That means that the economic system will work for the people and not the other way around like it is now. Policies now are made based on how the stock market fluctuates but they should be made on how many people are starving and how damaged the environment is becoming, you know real and tangible things. Unless the central focus of the system is not changed then the inherent problems it has won't change because the system is based on pieces of paper and numbers on a screen.

so you want a system of good will where people either get equal what they put in or operate at a loss, this system would be inherently self destructive..... or at best stagnate and with any growth what so ever in the population the few resources within would have to be spread to the next generation.

No it can be a system made of rules but that it has those basic principles as its foundations. In this topic I explain one such a system as described by a renowned economist http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28812331/a-new-economic-system?page=0. People like him and many others think the current system is inherently self-destructive and I think we are witnessing its downfall (finally). Like he says growth shouldn't be equal to development or progress like it is now, another of the foundational failures of this system.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23357 Posts

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]That's absurd. Everyone knows that wealth given to the upper classes trickles down to the bottom.magicalclick

If and only if, the wealthy is confident that the money trickles down makes a good "investment return". Wealthy is not dumb, they don't "invest" without a good profitable return. Meaning, they would secure as much as they have when the economy is bad.The gap is mainly caused by the "ability to secure properties and income" rather than the ability to make more money.

It's difficult to understand what you're trying to say, but it seems like you're describing the merits of a demand driven recovery - in which case I agree. Companies increase capacity when they see an increase in demand (i.e. the opportunity to earn greater profits by producing more of their products/services).
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

Lack of leaders, innovation, hard workers, educated pop.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Your a minority.. The middle class in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

sSubZerOo

I'm not a minority. I've simply made smart decisions and work hard.

Something you conveniently left out is that tuition costs stem from government involvement. So long as most students are guaranteed to get a loan backed by the government, colleges can charge whatever they want for tuition. It's also cute of you to ignore the fact that government raises the cost of living artificially.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#135 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Your a minority.. The middle ****in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

airshocker

I'm not a minority. I've simply made smart decisions and work hard.

Something you conveniently left out is that tuition costs stem from government involvement. So long as most students are guaranteed to get a loan backed by the government, colleges can charge whatever they want for tuition. It's also cute of you to ignore the fact that government raises the cost of living artificially.

but inflation is always good, where have you been airshocker

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

but inflation is always good, where have you been airshocker

surrealnumber5

Out of the loop I guess. :P My Mom always said I can do anything I want if I work hard enough. Turns out she was right.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

TC doesn't understand what "wealth" really is and obviously believes in the zero-sum game fallacy.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#139 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

We have to split the US in half.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#140 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Your a minority.. The middle ****in large numbers has been evaporating due to stagnating wages and increase cost of living... Its little wonder why we are in debt trouble as a nation? One can't even get into college most of the time inless they are willing to put themselves significantly indebt. Things get worse when the fact of the matter is the tax code is basically controlled by the corporations and lobbying.. Regulations as of late have been for the large businesses instead of trying to be for the people instead.. Hell we saw this with the economic regulation plan released over a year back.. It has been mangled and toothless after originally set out to protect the consumer and regulating certain aspects of the private market that was being abused..

surrealnumber5

I'm not a minority. I've simply made smart decisions and work hard.

Something you conveniently left out is that tuition costs stem from government involvement. So long as most students are guaranteed to get a loan backed by the government, colleges can charge whatever they want for tuition. It's also cute of you to ignore the fact that government raises the cost of living artificially.

but inflation is always good, where have you been airshocker

Lol at the logic of this pic. I know a few people who have degrees and can't even get a job in what they are major in. They are still working in fast food stuff.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16916 Posts

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"]

Yet the US has one of the highest real median annual household incomes in the world.

coolbeans90

This pretty much sums up my opinion on the matter.

hmm if thats the case I guess you won't care until the medium income drops about $10000 lower, the national debt increases by another 10 trillion, pay taxes up the *** and the rich have about 90% of all generated wealth. Well even then at that point we'll still be better off than the poor people right?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#143 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

I'm not a minority. I've simply made smart decisions and work hard.

Something you conveniently left out is that tuition costs stem from government involvement. So long as most students are guaranteed to get a loan backed by the government, colleges can charge whatever they want for tuition. It's also cute of you to ignore the fact that government raises the cost of living artificially.

Gaming-Planet

but inflation is always good, where have you been airshocker

Lol at the logic of this pic. I know a few people who have degrees and can't even get a job in what they are major in. They are still working in fast food stuff.

degrees in what? a degree is not a set for life contract, nor does it make you useful

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="cybrcatter"]

Yet the US has one of the highest real median annual household incomes in the world.

blaznwiipspman1

This pretty much sums up my opinion on the matter.

hmm if thats the case I guess you won't care until the medium income drops about $10000 lower, the national debt increases by another 10 trillion, pay taxes up the ass and the rich have about 90% of all generated wealth. Well even then at that point we'll still be better off than the poor people right?

What the f*** am I reading and how is it even remotely related to my post?

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

What the f*** am I reading and how is it even remotely related to my post?

coolbeans90

Better edit out his bad words, CB. Mods have hit me with a couple warnings for quoting people who have their posts moderated.

On topic though, I couldn't even begin to tell you. I don't think he even read what you said.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I blame globalism.

When you export a great deal of your jobs abroad to be done by slave labour, businesses only need their population to consume, not to do paid work. The profits go directly to the business owners, not trickling down to the local population via their workforce.

They have managed to get away with it for so long, because consumers could just go into debt to live beyond their means. Paying off the cost of products little by little using credit. But now cheap credit is gone, and the population are either jobless or too indebted to consume.

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts

[QUOTE="Gaming-Planet"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] but inflation is always good, where have you been airshocker

surrealnumber5

Lol at the logic of this pic. I know a few people who have degrees and can't even get a job in what they are major in. They are still working in fast food stuff.

degrees in what? a degree is not a set for life contract, nor does it make you useful

The type of degree doesn't matter because the premises is if one works hard they can be whatever they want. Clearly, that's not true. The cartoon doesn't say "If you have the right degree you can be whatever you want." It merely says if you "work hard". And that is what he was pointing out. Working hard is not an end all to being happy and doing what you want to do in life. There are many factors involved.

the cartoon is not true depicition of reality in any sense.

Avatar image for helwa1988
helwa1988

2157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 helwa1988
Member since 2007 • 2157 Posts
its time for america to stop this capitalism crap. uk and france is socialist and their people have free healthcare and more affordable university education
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

uk and france is socialist and their people have free healthcarehelwa1988

Sorry, but I cringe whenever an American says we have "free" health care :P We all pay for the NHS via our taxes. When it comes to prescriptions, we also pay a low fixed fee (regardless of whether it is £4 or £400). It means people get the medical care they need without great expense, because we all pool our money to pay for it.

Avatar image for cybrcatter
cybrcatter

16210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 cybrcatter
Member since 2003 • 16210 Posts

its time for america to stop this capitalism crap. uk and france is socialist and their people have free healthcare and more affordable university educationhelwa1988
Do you understand what those terms mean?