Them aesthetic pics to motivate some people
And I know you all want to look this, go out there and achieve it!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="FrostMTG"][QUOTE="Alacoque72"]
I squeeze my arms inwards hard as I do pushups. Is that enough to gain some mass? Is there any other things like that I can do with pushups?
Stanley09
I'm reading through this thread and facepalming as people insist to do body weight stuff only and hope to gain mass.
GO TO THE GYM.
SQUATS
DEADLIFTS
BENCHPRESS
BB ROWS
OHP
Jesus christ.
Eat oats.
This is what ive been saying all along...i totally agree. If someone truly wants to get bigger / stronger they need to just focus on the compoundsIndeed. Many people don't know what compound means.:D
In factGo to the site of multiple chans, go to the /fit/ forum, and insist on doing body weight exercises instead of compound movements.
They will either label you as a troll or an idiot.
Compound. Just man up and go to the gym, do them.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
[QUOTE="Stanley09"]haha Im not posting pics, but here is my routine if you wish. A week would look like this.....monday: A wed: B Fri: A Mon: B etc etc Workout A 3x5 Squat 3x5 Bench Press 1x5 Deadlift dips bicep exercise abs Workout B 3x5 Squat 3x5 Standing military press 3x5 Pendlay Rows shrug pullups absStanley09
Not bad for someone just starting out...kind of lacking in quite a few areas/groups.
I would start someone out with more variety and longer sessions in the first months, but that is just me.
-seems rather short and only focuses on some major groups
Also, listing a routine does not demonstrate that you are knowledgeable.
Lifting is one of those things where the proof is in the pudding...what we can see
1. too little time spent lifting...only 6 exercises with hardly any sets at all
2. you are not hitting the major groups enough...1 bicep exercise, really?
3. missing the minor groups of muscles
That workout looks like it would take about 25 min tops to complete. Either that or you are taking waaaay too long b/w sets
This is what ive been saying all along...i totally agree. If someone truly wants to get bigger / stronger they need to just focus on the compounds[QUOTE="Stanley09"][QUOTE="FrostMTG"]
I'm reading through this thread and facepalming as people insist to do body weight stuff only and hope to gain mass.
GO TO THE GYM.
SQUATS
DEADLIFTS
BENCHPRESS
BB ROWS
OHP
Jesus christ.
Eat oats.
FrostMTG
Indeed. Many people don't know what compound means.:D
In factGo to the site of multiple chans, go to the /fit/ forum, and insist on doing body weight exercises instead of compound movements.
They will either label you as a troll or an idiot.
Compound. Just man up and go to the gym, do them.
I think a main reason many people just stay at home and do pushups/crunches is also because they are insecure about going to a gym, totally understandable though. But everyone has to start somewhereWhat areas exactly? This isnt some random thing i flopped together either, this is rippetoes.[QUOTE="Stanley09"]
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
Not bad for someone just starting out...kind of lacking in quite a few areas/groups.
I would start someone out with more variety and longer sessions in the first months, but that is just me.
-seems rather short and only focuses on some major groupsAlso, listing a routine does not demonstrate that you are knowledgeable.
Lifting is one of those things where the proof is in the pudding...what we can seerawsavon
1. too little time spent lifting...only 6 exercises with hardly any sets at all
2. you are not hitting the major groups enough...1 bicep exercise, really?
3. missing the minor groups of muscles
That workout looks like it would take about 25 min tops to complete. Either that or you are taking waaaay too long b/w sets
Time is irrelevant.major groups? your hitting them all through compound lifts.
bicep is not a major group, that is an isolation. what minor groups? You hit all of them through the compound lifts
edit: gs quick reply sucks. it wont let me press enter.
But if you just want to gain muscle, cardio isnt really needed, and actually cardio would be bad in this case because it burns extra caloriesStanley09But you need to at leats get your muscles limbered up for lifting. If you walk in and start lifting, the chance of injury becomes greater.
But you need to at leats get your muscles limbered up for lifting. If you walk in and start lifting, the chance of injury becomes greater.[QUOTE="Stanley09"] But if you just want to gain muscle, cardio isnt really needed, and actually cardio would be bad in this case because it burns extra caloriesCalvin079
10-15 minutes of cardio is fine before working out, it is.
Doing intense cardio 3 or more times a week can affect gains.
Hit them versus hit them enough...big difference. I don't think there is any way this workout is doing what you think it is for you. But (as I have said many times), perhaps I am wrong...please show us otherwise[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="Stanley09"] Time is irrelevant. major groups? your hitting them all through compound lifts. bicep is not a major group, that is an isolation what minor groups? You hit all of them through the compound lifts FrostMTG
I always thought the gamespot OT forum would be a decent place to start various fitness discussions.
Nah.
Misinformed neck beards everywhere.
He already told you to go look up rippletoe's to get more info on it.
You refuse because you wish to troll.
Get out.
haha i know right? someone "so experienced" has never even heard of Rippetoes and thinks it wont work. how great![QUOTE="Stanley09"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Please back this claim up with something more than a weightlifting website rawsavonYou dont need to back up common sense.... someone pushing an increasingly heavy weight away from their body is going to progress better than someone doing a standard pushup over and over again Well then, if it so common, you should have no problem backing up said claims, right? It is common sense though. The amount of weight you can lift is proportional to muscle mass. So more weight = more muscle. Hence why bodybuilders are huge. Really, its that obvious.
[QUOTE="FrostMTG"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Hit them versus hit them enough...big difference. I don't think there is any way this workout is doing what you think it is for you. But (as I have said many times), perhaps I am wrong...please show us otherwiseStanley09
I always thought the gamespot OT forum would be a decent place to start various fitness discussions.
Nah.
Misinformed neck beards everywhere.
He already told you to go look up rippletoe's to get more info on it.
You refuse because you wish to troll.
Get out.
haha i know right? someone "so experienced" has never even heard of Rippetoes and thinks it wont work. how great!You've already told him to look up rippletoes for a wealth of information.
I already explained to him that it doesn't matter how many exercises you do, and I told him that low rep and high weight builds mass.
I already proved him wrong when he said "hurr durr stanley you're not hitting the major muscle groups hurr durr"
I completely proved him wrong by listing all the muscle groups it works out, see my above post.
Watch him deny that too, brb popcorn.
FrostMTGHe said he had been lifting for over a year. So when you say "When you start out weight lifting'...it does not apply...he should be far beyond where he is. After a year and a half he should be hitting individual muscles a great deal more than he is. There is a difference in hitting something with a compound exercise and iso one [QUOTE="Stanley09"] Thousands of people have used Rippetoe's Starting Strength to great avail...search it for yourself if you want. After this long, you should still not be using the starting strength routine :?
But you need to at leats get your muscles limbered up for lifting. If you walk in and start lifting, the chance of injury becomes greater. oh im not talking about warm up here. I actually warm up with 5 minutes on the treadmil before i step foot in the weight section[QUOTE="Stanley09"] But if you just want to gain muscle, cardio isnt really needed, and actually cardio would be bad in this case because it burns extra caloriesCalvin079
[QUOTE="FrostMTG"]rawsavonHe said he had been lifting for over a year. So when you say "When you start out weight lifting'...it does not apply...he should be far beyond where he is. After a year and a half he should be hitting individual muscles a great deal more than he is. There is a difference in hitting something with a compound exercise and iso one
Thousands of people have used Rippetoe's Starting Strength to great avail...search it for yourself if you want.Stanley09After this long, you should still not be using the starting strength routine :?
http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/strengthtraining/a/compound_ex.htm
The sources are at the bottom, so if you blow this off then this further proves that you a indeed a troll.
Well then, if it so common, you should have no problem backing up said claims, right? It is common sense though. The amount of weight you can lift is proportional to muscle mass. So more weight = more muscle. Hence why bodybuilders are huge. Really, its that obvious. All you have to do is make FB workouts more intense. ITT I have said 'reach your natural peak' from the very start. -you will reach your natural peak with both just as easily Now if you push past the natural peak of your body, that is something else entirely (what bodybuilders are...not normal people) You can go back to the start of this where I said that if you like[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="Stanley09"] You dont need to back up common sense.... someone pushing an increasingly heavy weight away from their body is going to progress better than someone doing a standard pushup over and over againbobaban
What should a cardio workout include? I already run 15 mins minimum before a work out and another 15 on an elliptical machine (aftera workout). But I should concentrate on cardio in 2 workout session and would like some tips. What exercises would be good for this?
After this long, you should still not be using the starting strength routine :?[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="FrostMTG"] He said he had been lifting for over a year. So when you say "When you start out weight lifting'...it does not apply...he should be far beyond where he is. After a year and a half he should be hitting individual muscles a great deal more than he is. There is a difference in hitting something with a compound exercise and iso one [QUOTE="Stanley09"] Thousands of people have used Rippetoe's Starting Strength to great avail...search it for yourself if you want.FrostMTG
http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/strengthtraining/a/compound_ex.htm
The sources are at the bottom, so if you blow this off then this further proves that you a indeed a troll.
I never said that compound exercises were not good...I said that they are not enough for someone that has been working out as long as TC claims...he should be doing both (compund and iso). A quick 25 min workout with that few exercises (compound or not) is not enough[QUOTE="FrostMTG"]rawsavonHe said he had been lifting for over a year. So when you say "When you start out weight lifting'...it does not apply...he should be far beyond where he is. After a year and a half he should be hitting individual muscles a great deal more than he is. There is a difference in hitting something with a compound exercise and iso one [QUOTE="Stanley09"] Thousands of people have used Rippetoe's Starting Strength to great avail...search it for yourself if you want. After this long, you should still not be using the starting strength routine :? I was doing a "strength and conditioning" program for 1.5 years, it was all about athleticism. We NEVER back squatted or bench pressed. WAAYY too much cardio/ agility BS. I eventually realized that if I wanted to get bigger / stronger i would have to go to a gym and follow a good routine. Ive only been going to an actual gym for the past 2 weeks. So its safe to say im pretty new to powerlifting/ heavy weight training. Which is why starting strength is good to get into a more powerlifting shape. This isnt only for beginners either, anyone can benefit.
hmm....what exactly are your fitness goals?What should a cardio workout include? I already run 15 mins minimum before a work out and another 15 on an elliptical machine (aftera workout). But I should concentrate on cardio in 2 workout session and would like some tips. What exercises would be good for this?
Calvin079
[QUOTE="bobaban"]It is common sense though. The amount of weight you can lift is proportional to muscle mass. So more weight = more muscle. Hence why bodybuilders are huge. Really, its that obvious. All you have to do is make FB workouts more intense. ITT I have said 'reach your natural peak' from the very start. -you will reach your natural peak with both just as easily Now if you push past the natural peak of your body, that is something else entirely (what bodybuilders are...not normal people) You can go back to the start of this where I said that if you like Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable.[QUOTE="rawsavon"] Well then, if it so common, you should have no problem backing up said claims, right?rawsavon
Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable. bobaban
From the book "Building the Gymnastic Body":
It's weight training using the weight of your own body. Just in case you think that it's impossible to get the same or better results with bodyweight exercises as you would if using actual weights or weight machines, consider that gymnasts have awesome physiques with which they can perform amazing feats of strength and skill- and they rely almost exclusively on bodyweight exercises...both scientific and anecdotal explanations as well as the specific exercises that can be done to get you in better shape than lifting weights ever could. While there is some equipment that you need to do all the exercises, like gymnastic rings and parallel bars, there are also many exercises that don't require anything more than a floor and a wall to perform....I've been doing L-sits, dips, and handstand pushups with nothing but the floor, the wall, and sometimes two chairs back to back. I also have a pull up bar, which is excellent for building strength and muscle mass...However, I've noticed an increase in muscle mass and strength which also feels much more functional than what I experienced with weight lifting. There's less risk of injury with bodyweight exercises because it's more difficult to use too much weight and each workout is custom tailored to you because it's your body. Resistance can easily be adjusted to account for level of physical fitness just by varying body positions
Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable. bobabanI'm not sure what the term is, but I don't think it's mechanics (physics). It if were physics, everyone would be doing really wide squats, not squatting to parallel, and making huge gains even though they'd be neglecting hamstrings and full quadricep involvement...I can lift more weight with a wider stance, but that's mechanics, not pure muscle strength.
I don't mean to "nitpick"; I want clarity.
[QUOTE="bobaban"]Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable. rawsavon
From the book "Building the Gymnastic Body":
It's weight training using the weight of your own body. Just in case you think that it's impossible to get the same or better results with bodyweight exercises as you would if using actual weights or weight machines, consider that gymnasts have awesome physiques with which they can perform amazing feats of strength and skill- and they rely almost exclusively on bodyweight exercises...both scientific and anecdotal explanations as well as the specific exercises that can be done to get you in better shape than lifting weights ever could. While there is some equipment that you need to do all the exercises, like gymnastic rings and parallel bars, there are also many exercises that don't require anything more than a floor and a wall to perform....I've been doing L-sits, dips, and handstand pushups with nothing but the floor, the wall, and sometimes two chairs back to back. I also have a pull up bar, which is excellent for building strength and muscle mass...However, I've noticed an increase in muscle mass and strength which also feels much more functional than what I experienced with weight lifting. There's less risk of injury with bodyweight exercises because it's more difficult to use too much weight and each workout is custom tailored to you because it's your body. Resistance can easily be adjusted to account for level of physical fitness just by varying body positions
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
[QUOTE="bobaban"]Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable. Stanley09
From the book "Building the Gymnastic Body":
It's weight training using the weight of your own body. Just in case you think that it's impossible to get the same or better results with bodyweight exercises as you would if using actual weights or weight machines, consider that gymnasts have awesome physiques with which they can perform amazing feats of strength and skill- and they rely almost exclusively on bodyweight exercises...both scientific and anecdotal explanations as well as the specific exercises that can be done to get you in better shape than lifting weights ever could. While there is some equipment that you need to do all the exercises, like gymnastic rings and parallel bars, there are also many exercises that don't require anything more than a floor and a wall to perform....I've been doing L-sits, dips, and handstand pushups with nothing but the floor, the wall, and sometimes two chairs back to back. I also have a pull up bar, which is excellent for building strength and muscle mass...However, I've noticed an increase in muscle mass and strength which also feels much more functional than what I experienced with weight lifting. There's less risk of injury with bodyweight exercises because it's more difficult to use too much weight and each workout is custom tailored to you because it's your body. Resistance can easily be adjusted to account for level of physical fitness just by varying body positions
What are you talking about...they are huge (for their size/frame).
They can't help that they are small. But they are bigger for their frame than almost any other group of athletes (not counting lineman)
...prety big for a guy that is so small (height and bone structure)
[QUOTE="bobaban"]Still it is much faster to build muscle by lifting heavy weights, its physics, not debatable. rawsavon
From the book "Building the Gymnastic Body":
It's weight training using the weight of your own body. Just in case you think that it's impossible to get the same or better results with bodyweight exercises as you would if using actual weights or weight machines, consider that gymnasts have awesome physiques with which they can perform amazing feats of strength and skill- and they rely almost exclusively on bodyweight exercises...both scientific and anecdotal explanations as well as the specific exercises that can be done to get you in better shape than lifting weights ever could. While there is some equipment that you need to do all the exercises, like gymnastic rings and parallel bars, there are also many exercises that don't require anything more than a floor and a wall to perform....I've been doing L-sits, dips, and handstand pushups with nothing but the floor, the wall, and sometimes two chairs back to back. I also have a pull up bar, which is excellent for building strength and muscle mass...However, I've noticed an increase in muscle mass and strength which also feels much more functional than what I experienced with weight lifting. There's less risk of injury with bodyweight exercises because it's more difficult to use too much weight and each workout is custom tailored to you because it's your body. Resistance can easily be adjusted to account for level of physical fitness just by varying body positions
I actually find this intresting, from my perosnal expeience, I have been lifting wieght s for 2 years now, and I got satisfying results, but I always thought I could be better, recently I abandoned lift wieghts for the a new hardcore programme which focuses on repitiations and bodywieht excersices and I have to admit, my stamina went up, my muscles became more defined, I dun think they became bigger, but they definitely stronger.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment