US preparing for War with Iran

[QUOTE="hokies1313"]

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]This was planned long ago, next is North Korea.mfacek

Rather North Korea than Iran. Atleast the North Koreas would want us there, and the South Koreans have an extremely well trained military to assist the US.

You obviously know NOTHING about North Korea. Or South Korea for that matter. Hey remeber when we claimed Iraqis will "Hail us as liberators"? I do, and how did that turn out? North Koreans hail jim Jong Il as a living God, they worship him. They are brainwashed at birth, and live in a state where everything good thing is attributed to him, while the bad is forgotten. An invasion would kill millions of civilians as they would try everything to fight of troops, kind of like how the Japanese would have during WW2 in the event of an invasion, they worshipped their Emperor as an God too.

Quite frankly it's statements like "Atleast North koreans would want us there" that put us in 5+ year, drawn out, costly wars like Iraq. And if you think South Korea would support an invasion, you're dreaming. They want a unified Korea through Peace, not force. They feal a korea divided is a terrible thing, and give the second largest amount of aid to North Korea, next to the U.S., but they would shun killing of Koreans, because they are both Koreans. North and south.

Obviously you know nothing of the current political situation in North Korea. The people are starving, many are thrown in soviet style gulags. The only people reliablely getting food are the people in the military and high up in the party. Ever heard of the voical minority? How many people are just giving Kim Jong Ill the lip service?

We've been a 50+ year war in Korea, that war has never officially ended. American servicemen and women have been killed over there since the cease fire. South Korea would love to help the people of North Korea, and if the US was dead set on invasion, they would most likely do whatever they could to make it expediant and for the betterment of all Korean peoples.

Yeah, they may not like it alot, but in the end they would help.

the US will NOT attack iran first. this is a scenario that i consider very likely: isreal in the coming months bombs iran's nuclear sites. iran in response fires thousands of missiles at places in isreal and US military bases in the area, as iran has said they consider an attack by either enemy (US/Isreal) as an attack by both. iran will also probably shut down the straight of hormuz were 40% of the world's oil passes through. either of these acts would be considered an act of war and the US will then respond militarily with air power. i seriously doubt there will be a ground invasion.ItalStallion777

[QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]This was planned long ago, next is North Korea.hokies1313

Rather North Korea than Iran. Atleast the North Koreas would want us there, and the South Koreans have an extremely well trained military to assist the US.

You obviously know NOTHING about North Korea. Or South Korea for that matter. Hey remeber when we claimed Iraqis will "Hail us as liberators"? I do, and how did that turn out? North Koreans hail jim Jong Il as a living God, they worship him. They are brainwashed at birth, and live in a state where everything good thing is attributed to him, while the bad is forgotten. An invasion would kill millions of civilians as they would try everything to fight of troops, kind of like how the Japanese would have during WW2 in the event of an invasion, they worshipped their Emperor as an God too.

Quite frankly it's statements like "Atleast North koreans would want us there" that put us in 5+ year, drawn out, costly wars like Iraq. And if you think South Korea would support an invasion, you're dreaming. They want a unified Korea through Peace, not force. They feal a korea divided is a terrible thing, and give the second largest amount of aid to North Korea, next to the U.S., but they would shun killing of Koreans, because they are both Koreans. North and south.

Obviously you know nothing of the current political situation in North Korea. The people are starving, many are thrown in soviet style gulags. The only people reliablely getting food are the people in the military and high up in the party. Ever heard of the voical minority? How many people are just giving Kim Jong Ill the lip service?

We've been a 50+ year war in Korea, that war has never officially ended. American servicemen and women have been killed over there since the cease fire. South Korea would love to help the people of North Korea, and if the US was dead set on invasion, they would most likely do whatever they could to make it expediant and for the betterment of all Korean peoples.

Yeah, they may not like it alot, but in the end they would help.

People like you are what make me not want to be proud as an American. I'm sick and tired of policing the world.

[QUOTE="hokies1313"][QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]This was planned long ago, next is North Korea.-RocBoys9489-

Rather North Korea than Iran. Atleast the North Koreas would want us there, and the South Koreans have an extremely well trained military to assist the US.

You obviously know NOTHING about North Korea. Or South Korea for that matter. Hey remeber when we claimed Iraqis will "Hail us as liberators"? I do, and how did that turn out? North Koreans hail jim Jong Il as a living God, they worship him. They are brainwashed at birth, and live in a state where everything good thing is attributed to him, while the bad is forgotten. An invasion would kill millions of civilians as they would try everything to fight of troops, kind of like how the Japanese would have during WW2 in the event of an invasion, they worshipped their Emperor as an God too.

Quite frankly it's statements like "Atleast North koreans would want us there" that put us in 5+ year, drawn out, costly wars like Iraq. And if you think South Korea would support an invasion, you're dreaming. They want a unified Korea through Peace, not force. They feal a korea divided is a terrible thing, and give the second largest amount of aid to North Korea, next to the U.S., but they would shun killing of Koreans, because they are both Koreans. North and south.

Obviously you know nothing of the current political situation in North Korea. The people are starving, many are thrown in soviet style gulags. The only people reliablely getting food are the people in the military and high up in the party. Ever heard of the voical minority? How many people are just giving Kim Jong Ill the lip service?

We've been a 50+ year war in Korea, that war has never officially ended. American servicemen and women have been killed over there since the cease fire. South Korea would love to help the people of North Korea, and if the US was dead set on invasion, they would most likely do whatever they could to make it expediant and for the betterment of all Korean peoples.

Yeah, they may not like it alot, but in the end they would help.

People like you are what make me not want to be proud as an American. I'm sick and tired of policing the world.

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

hokies1313

And there won't be any other superpowers in the next 20-30 years?

The EU and NATO could step up and do some policing.

[QUOTE="hokies1313"]

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

-RocBoys9489-

And there won't be any other superpowers in the next 20-30 years?

The EU and NATO could step up and do some policing.

Well right now we're the only superpower, that may change, but I don't know.

NATO involves the US. Actually pretty reliant on US assets. That isn't to say that the European military community isn't on par with the US, but they don't have the assets the US has. I also think they're limited by their home governments. EU forces rarely deploy outside of the continent besides NATO and peacekeeping deployments. They're doing a great job in Afghanistan but again, reliant on the US to move troops into theatre.

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="hokies1313"][QUOTE="mfacek"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]This was planned long ago, next is North Korea.hokies1313

Rather North Korea than Iran. Atleast the North Koreas would want us there, and the South Koreans have an extremely well trained military to assist the US.

You obviously know NOTHING about North Korea. Or South Korea for that matter. Hey remeber when we claimed Iraqis will "Hail us as liberators"? I do, and how did that turn out? North Koreans hail jim Jong Il as a living God, they worship him. They are brainwashed at birth, and live in a state where everything good thing is attributed to him, while the bad is forgotten. An invasion would kill millions of civilians as they would try everything to fight of troops, kind of like how the Japanese would have during WW2 in the event of an invasion, they worshipped their Emperor as an God too.

Quite frankly it's statements like "Atleast North koreans would want us there" that put us in 5+ year, drawn out, costly wars like Iraq. And if you think South Korea would support an invasion, you're dreaming. They want a unified Korea through Peace, not force. They feal a korea divided is a terrible thing, and give the second largest amount of aid to North Korea, next to the U.S., but they would shun killing of Koreans, because they are both Koreans. North and south.

Obviously you know nothing of the current political situation in North Korea. The people are starving, many are thrown in soviet style gulags. The only people reliablely getting food are the people in the military and high up in the party. Ever heard of the voical minority? How many people are just giving Kim Jong Ill the lip service?

We've been a 50+ year war in Korea, that war has never officially ended. American servicemen and women have been killed over there since the cease fire. South Korea would love to help the people of North Korea, and if the US was dead set on invasion, they would most likely do whatever they could to make it expediant and for the betterment of all Korean peoples.

Yeah, they may not like it alot, but in the end they would help.

People like you are what make me not want to be proud as an American. I'm sick and tired of policing the world.

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

we're suppose to be promoting peace and freedom, not violence.

NATO has done a crap job in Afghanistan. Many countries aren't contributing what they should. Canada is kind of running the show. It's been 7 years in Afghanistan; NATO is the biggest army on earth and the job shouldve been over.CruxisXIII

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

hokies1313

And there won't be any other superpowers in the next 20-30 years?

The EU and NATO could step up and do some policing.

Well right now we're the only superpower, that may change, but I don't know.

NATO involves the US. Actually pretty reliant on US assets. That isn't to say that the European military community isn't on par with the US, but they don't have the assets the US has. I also think they're limited by their home governments. EU forces rarely deploy outside of the continent besides NATO and peacekeeping deployments. They're doing a great job in Afghanistan but again, reliant on the US to move troops into theatre.

Just create a world goverment, please world, I beg you!

[QUOTE="CruxisXIII"]NATO has done a crap job in Afghanistan. Many countries aren't contributing what they should. Canada is kind of running the show. It's been 7 years in Afghanistan; NATO is the biggest army on earth and the job shouldve been over.-RocBoys9489-

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

hokies1313

And there won't be any other superpowers in the next 20-30 years?

The EU and NATO could step up and do some policing.

Well right now we're the only superpower, that may change, but I don't know.

NATO involves the US. Actually pretty reliant on US assets. That isn't to say that the European military community isn't on par with the US, but they don't have the assets the US has. I also think they're limited by their home governments. EU forces rarely deploy outside of the continent besides NATO and peacekeeping deployments. They're doing a great job in Afghanistan but again, reliant on the US to move troops into theatre.

Just create a world goverment, please world, I beg you!

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]

[QUOTE="CruxisXIII"]NATO has done a crap job in Afghanistan. Many countries aren't contributing what they should. Canada is kind of running the show. It's been 7 years in Afghanistan; NATO is the biggest army on earth and the job shouldve been over.CruxisXIII

[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

I usually say that to other americans.

I'm not looking to police the world, but that doesn't mean that if push came to shove, the US could invade North Korea. We're a super power, the only one left. We've got to remember that.

hokies1313

And there won't be any other superpowers in the next 20-30 years?

The EU and NATO could step up and do some policing.

Well right now we're the only superpower, that may change, but I don't know.

NATO involves the US. Actually pretty reliant on US assets. That isn't to say that the European military community isn't on par with the US, but they don't have the assets the US has. I also think they're limited by their home governments. EU forces rarely deploy outside of the continent besides NATO and peacekeeping deployments. They're doing a great job in Afghanistan but again, reliant on the US to move troops into theatre.

Just create a world goverment, please world, I beg you!

:lol:

This was planned long ago, next is North Korea.X360PS3AMD05

[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"]the US will NOT attack iran first. this is a scenario that i consider very likely: isreal in the coming months bombs iran's nuclear sites. iran in response fires thousands of missiles at places in isreal and US military bases in the area, as iran has said they consider an attack by either enemy (US/Isreal) as an attack by both. iran will also probably shut down the straight of hormuz were 40% of the world's oil passes through. either of these acts would be considered an act of war and the US will then respond militarily with air power. i seriously doubt there will be a ground invasion.CruxisXIII

[QUOTE="Pessu"]Nah they cant go to war with Iran because that is financially impossible .blackacidevil96

The wars have put the U.S. in large financial debts.

Even with our tax dollars, the iraq war machine is eating up the dollars.

Kudos to you, genius.