US to attack Iran on the 6th of April...?

  • 117 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

What do you guys think? Would they actually do it? I could post 100's of sites..but you need only google, really. What do you think Russia means by..."If the US doesn't back out from the attack, there will be serious concequences that may lead to 'world' disorder"? - This is not a direct quote...this is just an example....this is what Russia said. They threatened the US...they've some balls if you ask me.

 

http://www.peacechicken.com/2007/03/26/war-on-iran-coming-april-6th/

-

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/03/366291.html

-

http://www.inteldaily.com/?c=166&a=1478

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
If GS OT knows about it, Iran knows about it.

Not going to happen.
Avatar image for samurai93745
samurai93745

520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 samurai93745
Member since 2003 • 520 Posts

As if....lol

Avatar image for formaldehyde27
formaldehyde27

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 formaldehyde27
Member since 2003 • 285 Posts
IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?formaldehyde27
It's called "Freedom of Speech"
Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
Bush cannot be that dumb... I hope they don't.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
Wow....so far the poll is pretty even.
Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts
i think america should get its troops out of other countrys, and keep itself out of other countrys affairs
Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#9 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

it's funny when people mistake

"the US can attack Iran by April 6th"

for

"the US will attack Iran on April 6th"

 

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

it's funny when people mistake

"the US can attack Iran by April 6th"

for

"the US will attack Iran on April 6th"

jrhawk42
What kind of a title would that make? It IS the second one, there is a (...?) after it. That means it's more of a question about what you think. Russia said the US WILL, WILL attack on the 6th of April. WILL!
Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts

it's funny when people mistake

"the US can attack Iran by April 6th"

for

"the US will attack Iran on April 6th"

jrhawk42
And wouldn't they be able to attack them any time?:PIt's not like April 6th will pass and they just can't.:lol:
Avatar image for enormousaxie
enormousaxie

9366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 enormousaxie
Member since 2006 • 9366 Posts

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

enormousaxie
And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?
Avatar image for enormousaxie
enormousaxie

9366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 enormousaxie
Member since 2006 • 9366 Posts
[QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

bluezy
And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

yay... >__>
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
What what I inferred, Russia pretty much threatened that they will attack "something" if the US goes on with it's plan. This really would mean WW3....there is really no doubt.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?formaldehyde27

It was the Russians...

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
[QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?a55assin
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

National security. Besides, this april 6th thing came from some Russian intelligence report that got leaked from the Kremlin. If they did it, it would be behind Congress's back and sure would have a lot of political fallout. But as much as I don't think this will happen on the 6th, now is the perfect time do to it before the 2008 election season begins.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

bluezy

And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

What other countries exactly? All other middle eastern countries is insignificant....military wise

Avatar image for enormousaxie
enormousaxie

9366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 enormousaxie
Member since 2006 • 9366 Posts
What what I inferred, Russia pretty much threatened that they will attack "something" if the US goes on with it's plan. This really would mean WW3....there is really no doubt. a55assin
I'm starting to get worried when China is going to interfere with this...
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

Ivashov noted that it was not to be excluded that the Pentagon would use smaller tactical nuclear weapons against targets of the Iranian nuclear industry. These attacks could paralyze everyday life, create panic in the population, and generally produce an atmosphere of chaos and uncertainty all over Iran, Ivashov told RIA-Novosti.Indymedia

Aside from the fact that April 6th is Good Friday, and knowing the current administration there's no way they'd plan an attack coinciding on a Christian holiday, this quote made the entire article lose credibility. The US would never use a tactical nuke for something like this. That's like saying "Can we please start WWIII now? pleeeeeeeeeeeease?" for something as small as disabling a facility that could otherwise be destroyed by just tossing down a few conventional weapons instead.

And even supposing this was actully slated to happen, its probably been cancelled now that the news is out. 

Avatar image for Hexum-311
Hexum-311

1158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Hexum-311
Member since 2007 • 1158 Posts
I voted other because I think it will happen. Bush has wanted to go into Iran for years and expand the war in order to bankrupt the US, leaving he and his cronies with all the money and ultimate power.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#22 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?Darthmatt
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

National security. Besides, this april 6th thing came from some Russian intelligence report that got leaked from the Kremlin. If they did it, it would be behind Congress's back and sure would have a lot of political fallout. But as much as I don't think this will happen on the 6th, now is the perfect time do to it before the 2008 election season begins.

No..What I meant is that the US gov't couldn't do ANYTHING about Russia leaking that information. And when I said "freedom of speech". I was referring to the websites and tv networks.
Avatar image for enormousaxie
enormousaxie

9366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 enormousaxie
Member since 2006 • 9366 Posts
[QUOTE="bluezy"][QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

jointed

And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

What other countries exactly? All other middle eastern countries is insignificant....military wise

weren't the Vietcong also insignificant... >__>

Avatar image for Theempire30
Theempire30

2420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 Theempire30
Member since 2006 • 2420 Posts
World War 3 if it happens.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
Oh...btw, the Russian sources also mentioned that the attack would be led by airplane bombings and the US forces that are currently on stand-by near the Iranian borders.
Avatar image for daniel52587
daniel52587

3028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 daniel52587
Member since 2005 • 3028 Posts
Why in the hell would we attack Iran? There is no reason to........
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="bluezy"][QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

enormousaxie

And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

What other countries exactly? All other middle eastern countries is insignificant....military wise

weren't the Vietcong also insignificant... >__>

no.....what's your point?

It's not like the russians are supplying the other countries with arms like they did with the vietcong.....the vietcong was a guerilla group not a nations army....

your analogy is broken

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#29 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="enormousaxie"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="bluezy"][QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

jointed

And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

What other countries exactly? All other middle eastern countries is insignificant....military wise

weren't the Vietcong also insignificant... >__>

no.....what's your point?

It's not like the russians are supplying the other countries with arms like they did with the vietcong.....the vietcong was a guerilla group not a nations army....

your analogy is broken

You don't need much to stir confusion throughout a country. They don't need to send footmen force, things could be done other ways. (I'm talking about the 'other' countries)
Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts
i guess america wants more oil, imperialist ********
Avatar image for Hexum-311
Hexum-311

1158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Hexum-311
Member since 2007 • 1158 Posts
i guess america wants more oil, imperialist ********Artosa
It's much more complex than that.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#32 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
i guess america wants more oil, imperialist ********Artosa
I doubt US cares about the oil anymore. If I were them, I'd want to end the war...not start another one.
Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#33 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts
[QUOTE="jrhawk42"]

it's funny when people mistake

"the US can attack Iran by April 6th"

for

"the US will attack Iran on April 6th"

 

a55assin

What kind of a title would that make? It IS the second one, there is a (...?) after it. That means it's more of a question about what you think. Russia said the US WILL, WILL attack on the 6th of April. WILL!

First you're trusting something that has been translated from english to russian back to english (at least).

Second military documents don't work like that.  They either have dates, or plans not a both (unless somebody has really, really screwed up).

My guess is the plans mentioned they could be implimented as soon as april 6, and somebody misread it or translated it wrong.

Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
I think the more likely scenario is the Brit's will attack Iran, and the US will support them. The american public will not accept another war. There would be chaos in the states. But if the Brits attack, and the US helps, it would seem more noble, and the people would more likely accept that.
Avatar image for DaveGamer_05
DaveGamer_05

18823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 DaveGamer_05
Member since 2005 • 18823 Posts
Not on April 6th. It will happen eventually though. We were already out in their ocean flexing our muscles showing off fighter jets.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="jrhawk42"]

it's funny when people mistake

"the US can attack Iran by April 6th"

for

"the US will attack Iran on April 6th"

jrhawk42

What kind of a title would that make? It IS the second one, there is a (...?) after it. That means it's more of a question about what you think. Russia said the US WILL, WILL attack on the 6th of April. WILL!

First you're trusting something that has been translated from english to russian back to english (at least).

Second military documents don't work like that. They either have dates, or plans not a both (unless somebody has really, really screwed up).

My guess is the plans mentioned they could be implimented as soon as april 6, and somebody misread it or translated it wrong.

First of all, I am trusting my Polish channels more than any of the US ones. They have a real "freedom of speech" there. Second, Russians didn't release any documents, they simply said that they have gotten their hands on leaked information...might be that they actually saw something. There was no translator problems...I almost understood the whole Russian conversation...I'm pretty sure that's not the problem. Also...I never said that I trust anything.
Avatar image for mjf249
mjf249

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#37 mjf249
Member since 2004 • 3000 Posts
I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#38 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

Well, I think that US has no problem bombing anyone in the world. They've got enough stealth bombers to give a scare to Sparta.
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
[QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

There's too much "your either with us or against us" in your post. Just because the russians are dealing with Iran, doesn't make them criminals or terrorists.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

There's too much "your either with us or against us" in your post. Just because the russians are dealing with Iran, doesn't make them criminals or terrorists.

But there is a better chance of Russia supporting those who purchase weapons from them. There is no reason why Russia would have a positive reaction to what US is doing. But really, if is US attacks, I think Russia wouldn't do anything...but loose some money(or gain...I'm confused).
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

Avatar image for mjf249
mjf249

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#42 mjf249
Member since 2004 • 3000 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

There's too much "your either with us or against us" in your post. Just because the russians are dealing with Iran, doesn't make them criminals or terrorists.

It should be that way. Your either on our side or with them. You'd think Russia would have learned those problems as their fighting a war with radical Chechen rebels, well no sympathy from me. Their men, woman, and children are being killed by terrorist and their country is in grief, while their contributing to the killings of people off all ethnic backgrounds. People just don't understand the ramifications and dangers toying and neglecting terrorism-- your still calling Iraq "The War in Iraq"? These politicians, and the media need to stop saying this war is still going on-- we wiped the Iraqi Army four years ago. Iraq is now the War on Terrorism.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

basersx
Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.
Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts

day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:

 

If we do go to war with Iran then im not joining the military (voluntarily). I was considering NROTC but three wars at the same time is pure suicide 

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:KrayzieJ
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012
Avatar image for DaveGamer_05
DaveGamer_05

18823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 DaveGamer_05
Member since 2005 • 18823 Posts
[QUOTE="KrayzieJ"]day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:a55assin
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012

Oh, you believe that crap?
Avatar image for funnymario
funnymario

9122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 funnymario
Member since 2005 • 9122 Posts
So organized :o
Avatar image for fidosim
fidosim

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#48 fidosim
Member since 2003 • 12901 Posts

We should do it on April 1st.

"We will NOT go to war with Iran.....April fools!"

Avatar image for cjek
cjek

14327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 cjek
Member since 2003 • 14327 Posts
Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
[QUOTE="mjf249"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

There's too much "your either with us or against us" in your post. Just because the russians are dealing with Iran, doesn't make them criminals or terrorists.

It should be that way. Your either on our side or with them. You'd think Russia would have learned those problems as their fighting a war with radical Chechen rebels, well no sympathy from me. Your men are being killed by terrorist and your country is in grief, while your contributing to the killings of people off all ethnic backgrounds. People just don't understand the ramifications and dangers toying and neglecting terrorism-- your still calling Iraq "The War in Iraq"? These politicians, and the media need to stop saying this war is still going on-- we wiped the Iraqi Army four years ago. Iraq is now the War on Terrorism.

Haha, so what do you think about your country being involved in the Iran-Contra affair in the 80's? The US was selling arms to Iran. Or dealing with the Saudi's, and the same orginaztions tied to 9/11? Sleeping with the enemy, hey? That would be with them, AND against them! Maybe you should read up on your history a bit before speaking up...