US to attack Iran on the 6th of April...?

Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor. a55assin

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!basersx

 Ethier way, Iran would attack the US soon after. And it greatly depends on what type of payload it's carrying. Such as the initial bombing of Baghdad. The city was crawling with anti-air units, and though they couldn't get a complete lock, they B2's were visible and low for a quite a while. I believe Iran has better anit-air defense/radar also.

If they have WOMD, and its confirmed they do than get in there and get rid of them id rather not have a nuclear warhead land on my house thank you very much, and either would you liberals.Montaya

[QUOTE="a55assin"] Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor. iforgotokie

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!basersx

 Ethier way, Iran would attack the US soon after. And it greatly depends on what type of payload it's carrying. Such as the initial bombing of Baghdad. The city was crawling with anti-air units, and though they couldn't get a complete lock, they B2's were visible and low for a quite a while. I believe Iran has better anit-air defense/radar also.

The first round of Iraq was all JDAMs which can and are dropped from high altitude.  I think you are confused.  The F-117A is the one that might be flying low.  The B2 NEVER fly's low for any reason.  It's not even designed for a low altitude attack of any kind.  The B2s were never seen in Iraq.  The F117A might have been slightly.  And that opening day we had everything in the air, the B2, F117A, F18s, cruse missiles, etc Even the B52s where in Iraq!  What ever they were getting locks on most certainly was not the B2!

Also we now have the bad ass F22's in service!!

[QUOTE="iforgotokie"]

[QUOTE="a55assin"] Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor. basersx

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!basersx

 Ethier way, Iran would attack the US soon after. And it greatly depends on what type of payload it's carrying. Such as the initial bombing of Baghdad. The city was crawling with anti-air units, and though they couldn't get a complete lock, they B2's were visible and low for a quite a while. I believe Iran has better anit-air defense/radar also.

The first round of Iraq was all JDAMs which can and are dropped from high altitude.  I think you are confused.  The F-117A is the one that might be flying low.  The B2 NEVER fly's low for any reason.  It's not even designed for a low altitude attack of any kind.  The B2s were never seen in Iraq.  The F117A might have been slightly.  And that opening day we had everything in the air, the B2, F117A, F18s, cruse missiles, etc Even the B52s where in Iraq!  What ever they were getting locks on most certainly was not the B2!

Also we now have the bad ass F22's in service!!

[QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="iforgotokie"]

[QUOTE="a55assin"] Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor. iforgotokie

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!basersx

 Ethier way, Iran would attack the US soon after. And it greatly depends on what type of payload it's carrying. Such as the initial bombing of Baghdad. The city was crawling with anti-air units, and though they couldn't get a complete lock, they B2's were visible and low for a quite a while. I believe Iran has better anit-air defense/radar also.

The first round of Iraq was all JDAMs which can and are dropped from high altitude.  I think you are confused.  The F-117A is the one that might be flying low.  The B2 NEVER fly's low for any reason.  It's not even designed for a low altitude attack of any kind.  The B2s were never seen in Iraq.  The F117A might have been slightly.  And that opening day we had everything in the air, the B2, F117A, F18s, cruse missiles, etc Even the B52s where in Iraq!  What ever they were getting locks on most certainly was not the B2!

Also we now have the bad ass F22's in service!!

Well not really.  The B2 is about 10 times larger and a completely differnt shape!  They are both black but thats about where there similarities end.  lol

The B2 are just amazing, each one cost 1.2 BILLION!

[QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="iforgotokie"]

[QUOTE="a55assin"] Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor. basersx

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!basersx

 Ethier way, Iran would attack the US soon after. And it greatly depends on what type of payload it's carrying. Such as the initial bombing of Baghdad. The city was crawling with anti-air units, and though they couldn't get a complete lock, they B2's were visible and low for a quite a while. I believe Iran has better anit-air defense/radar also.

The first round of Iraq was all JDAMs which can and are dropped from high altitude.  I think you are confused.  The F-117A is the one that might be flying low.  The B2 NEVER fly's low for any reason.  It's not even designed for a low altitude attack of any kind.  The B2s were never seen in Iraq.  The F117A might have been slightly.  And that opening day we had everything in the air, the B2, F117A, F18s, cruse missiles, etc Even the B52s where in Iraq!  What ever they were getting locks on most certainly was not the B2!

Also we now have the bad ass F22's in service!!

Well not really.  The B2 is about 6 times larger and a completely differnt shape!  They are both black but thats about where there similarities end.  lol

The B2 are just amazing, each one cost 1.2 BILLION!

The shape is kind of similiar. I remember the part about the cost though.

There won't be an attack on Iran, that would require a minimum of 300,000 troops and we can barely get 120,000 soldiers for Iraq. A war with Iran would require a draft and that will never happen, escpecially with Bush's past record with wars; the public and the rest of the government would never approve of a war, short of Iran nuking a major city. This_Is_Not

I agree it's not going to happen too and think this is a total hoax.  But if it ever did happen there would never be a ground invasion of Iran anyway.  We would just bomb them into a parking lot for like a month strait, and then maybe send some troops in after that but probably not.  It would most defiantly just be a massive air attack and then a build up of troops in Iraq and Pak to keep them from trying to come over the borders.

There won't be an attack on Iran, that would require a minimum of 300,000 troops and we can barely get 120,000 soldiers for Iraq. A war with Iran would require a draft and that will never happen, escpecially with Bush's past record with wars; the public and the rest of the government would never approve of a war, short of Iran nuking a major city. This_Is_Not

There won't be an attack on Iran, that would require a minimum of 300,000 troops and we can barely get 120,000 soldiers for Iraq. A war with Iran would require a draft and that will never happen, escpecially with Bush's past record with wars; the public and the rest of the government would never approve of a war, short of Iran nuking a major city. This_Is_Not

300,000 troops? You're crazy, history has shown that all we would need to defeat Iran is 300 soldiers.

Not really important at all, just a thought...

this would get the movie 300 pulled out of the theatres