US to attack Iran on the 6th of April...?

  • 117 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="KrayzieJ"]day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:DaveGamer_05
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012

Oh, you believe that crap?

actually its supposed to be teh SINGULARITY.... when all of humanity becomes one and creates our own universe :roll: yeah right!
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#52 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="KrayzieJ"]day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:DaveGamer_05
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012

Oh, you believe that crap?

Sure...why not...the world will end in the year 2012! Don't underestimate the...Mayans(or something)
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#53 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?cjek
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"
Avatar image for cjek
cjek

14327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 cjek
Member since 2003 • 14327 Posts
[QUOTE="DaveGamer_05"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="KrayzieJ"]day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:KrayzieJ
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012

Oh, you believe that crap?

actually its supposed to be teh SINGULARITY.... when all of humanity becomes one and creates our own universe :roll: yeah right!

Whatever happens, I'll be celebrating New Year's Day on 1st January 2013.
Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#55 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

i doubt it,just because russian intellegence says it im not going to believe it.

Avatar image for Pittfan666
Pittfan666

8638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#56 Pittfan666
Member since 2003 • 8638 Posts

I hope we do, but then again the way that Iran is running its way with the British troops makes me somewhat nervous as to why they are resorting to making the troops state false statements.

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#57 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

We should do it on April 1st.

"We will NOT go to war with Iran.....April fools!"

fidosim
Watch...just watch I tell ya! I would laugh so hard if that happens.
Avatar image for AmericanSk8land
AmericanSk8land

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#58 AmericanSk8land
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
[QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?a55assin
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you America!  I have freedom of speech!"
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#59 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?AmericanSk8land
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you, America, I have freedom of speech!"

...I think you misundersood something here. Why don't people read the whole thread before actually posting...
Avatar image for AmericanSk8land
AmericanSk8land

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#60 AmericanSk8land
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
[QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?a55assin
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you, America, I have freedom of speech!"

...I think you misundersood something here. Why don't people read the whole thread before actually posting...

because im lazy. also i know the government isnt even that stupid to release that type of info publically.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#61 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?AmericanSk8land
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you, America, I have freedom of speech!"

...I think you misundersood something here. Why don't people read the whole thread before actually posting...

because im lazy. also i know the government isnt even that stupid to release that type of info publically.

They didn't...Russia did.
Avatar image for iforgotokie
iforgotokie

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 iforgotokie
Member since 2005 • 5226 Posts
God he better not. I swear, another war would be the fall of this country. Especially if powers such as Russia are involved.
Avatar image for cjek
cjek

14327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 cjek
Member since 2003 • 14327 Posts
[QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?a55assin
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.
Avatar image for AmericanSk8land
AmericanSk8land

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 AmericanSk8land
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts
[QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?a55assin
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you, America, I have freedom of speech!"

...I think you misundersood something here. Why don't people read the whole thread before actually posting...

because im lazy. also i know the government isnt even that stupid to release that type of info publically.

They didn't...Russia did.

I guess I should have read the rest of the thread. but still, im just too lazy and am sick of hearing about politics.
Avatar image for mjf249
mjf249

3000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#65 mjf249
Member since 2004 • 3000 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mjf249"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mjf249"]I seriously hope not the US attacks Iran, not at the moment anyways. Our military is stretched thin, our only best military option would be airstrikes. While our military is stretched thin, those B-2 Spirit stealth bombers pack quite a wallop-- I don't know if those SDB(small-diameter bombs) are in service yet but they can unload 250lbs which has an explosive yield equivalent to a 1,000lb bomb I read on Globalsecurity.org. The B-2 carries 80 of SDBs depending on configuration. Either way I don't think the US will do it right now, but you can make a sure bet that the US and Israel will knock out those nuclear facilities if Iran doesn't imply to demands. Russians are idiots, their supplying Iran dozens of weapons. I'd say Russia themselves support terrorism considering Iran funds Hezbollah. I think countries need to be very careful on who they give out military weapons to.

There's too much "your either with us or against us" in your post. Just because the russians are dealing with Iran, doesn't make them criminals or terrorists.

It should be that way. Your either on our side or with them. You'd think Russia would have learned those problems as their fighting a war with radical Chechen rebels, well no sympathy from me. Your men are being killed by terrorist and your country is in grief, while your contributing to the killings of people off all ethnic backgrounds. People just don't understand the ramifications and dangers toying and neglecting terrorism-- your still calling Iraq "The War in Iraq"? These politicians, and the media need to stop saying this war is still going on-- we wiped the Iraqi Army four years ago. Iraq is now the War on Terrorism.

Haha, so what do you think about your country being involved in the Iran-Contra affair in the 80's? The US was selling arms to Iran. Or dealing with the Saudi's, and the same orginaztions tied to 9/11? Sleeping with the enemy, hey? That would be with them, AND against them! Maybe you should read up on your history a bit before speaking up...

Believe me I am quite informed. I know my history well. That was over twenty years ago, and the US sadly to an extent still involved in it, using Saudi bases. In fact I believe the only reliable ally in the Middle East is Israel. The US has been dealing with Saudi Arabia for many years, yet many terrorist organizations still live within and operate in Saudi Arabia. The Middle East practically hates the US nearly all of them-- what I was saying is Russia is a bit too straightforward in their approach-- grieving over Chechnya yet they only contribute. Their country has many flaws and shady dealings that far exceed what they want to be looked upon as major player in the world. Russia does not have the resources to fully combat terrorism outside their small area of operations. The US has the manpower, and capabilities to wage it on all fronts, and is actually doing something to try and rid them. But then again every Government is corrupt and has it's fair share of problems. But in a sense, it's logical to believe nearly every body contributes to terrorism. You buy drugs, your funding terrorism. You operate a bank your pretty much aiding the financial aspects of terrorism. The foundation terrorists organizations is nearly too complex to ever stop. So please don't tell me I need to 'look up my history'-- I am actually very well educated in terms of world events.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#66 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?cjek
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.

Oh...sorry, I actually haven't heard of any other dates. This is the first time this kind of detailed information about Iran was released. Of course it doesn't have to be the truth...and considering that Bush publicly announced that he isn't going to attack Iran....this info is probably false.
Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts

I swear it is all linked. China, Islamo-terrorists (hate to use that term) Russia, Iran, Venezuela North Korea, they are all working together to bring down the west. Have you seen the president of Russia? that guy is like a fricken mob boss! They all want the same thing, and that is too knock U.S.A off the top spot. that leads me to believe that they would form some kind of secretive alliance to bring down my country.

 
Look at OPEC, they are already noticing day in and day out that China is growing to be a much better customer for oil than America! I think all these wars today, is just Bush scrambling to keep America as the sole super power, and i give him kudos for that at least.

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#68 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="formaldehyde27"]IF this were true, you think that the US government would advertise it like that?AmericanSk8land
It's called "Freedom of Speech"

so you just randomly picked a date and said "**** you, America, I have freedom of speech!"

...I think you misundersood something here. Why don't people read the whole thread before actually posting...

because im lazy. also i know the government isnt even that stupid to release that type of info publically.

They didn't...Russia did.

I guess I should have read the rest of the thread. but still, im just too lazy and am sick of hearing about politics.

Lol, I understand.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#69 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

I swear it is all linked. China, Islamo-terrorists (hate to use that term) Russia, Iran, Venezuela North Korea, they are all working together to bring down the west. Have you seen the president of Russia? that guy is like a fricken mob boss! They all want the same thing, and that is too knock U.S.A off the top spot. that leads me to believe that they would form some kind of secretive alliance to bring down my country.


Look at OPEC, they are already noticing day in and day out that China is growing to be a much better customer for oil than America! I think all these wars today, is just Bush scrambling to keep America as the sole super power, and i give him kudos for that at least.

KrayzieJ
That piece about the Russian President...that's common knowledge in Europe...I'm serious.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

 
Look at OPEC, they are already noticing day in and day out that China is growing to be a much better customer for oil than America! I think all these wars today, is just Bush scrambling to keep America as the sole super power, and i give him kudos for that at least.

KrayzieJ
Capitalism...
Avatar image for Hexum-311
Hexum-311

1158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Hexum-311
Member since 2007 • 1158 Posts
[QUOTE="AmericanSk8land"] I guess I should have read the rest of the thread. but still, im just too lazy and am sick of hearing about politics.

Then don't read the thread and leave a meaningless comment. Discussion should be emphasized.
Avatar image for DaveGamer_05
DaveGamer_05

18823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#72 DaveGamer_05
Member since 2005 • 18823 Posts
[QUOTE="KrayzieJ"][QUOTE="DaveGamer_05"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="KrayzieJ"]day after my birthday, on good Friday. what is the world coming to? :lol:cjek
The END...obviously. Actually..not until 2012

Oh, you believe that crap?

actually its supposed to be teh SINGULARITY.... when all of humanity becomes one and creates our own universe :roll: yeah right!

Whatever happens, I'll be celebrating New Year's Day on 1st January 2013.

...and laughing at those who were sucked into the mayans theory.
Avatar image for cjek
cjek

14327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 cjek
Member since 2003 • 14327 Posts
[QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?a55assin
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.

Oh...sorry, I actually haven't heard of any other dates. This is the first time this kind of detailed information about Iran was released. Of course it doesn't have to be the truth...and considering that Bush publicly announced that he isn't going to attack Iran....this info is probably false.

To be honest I wouldn't trust Bush either. I just don't think an attack would just happen spontaneously is all. The US needs some hard evidence to prove its case that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, and so far the support from other nations and evidence is fairly good, but not good enough to warrant attack. Now if Iran were to say something like "we have a right to nuclear defence", I think that would be a big enough spark. Anything that puts Israel at risk.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#75 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?cjek
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.

Oh...sorry, I actually haven't heard of any other dates. This is the first time this kind of detailed information about Iran was released. Of course it doesn't have to be the truth...and considering that Bush publicly announced that he isn't going to attack Iran....this info is probably false.

To be honest I wouldn't trust Bush either. I just don't think an attack would just happen spontaneously is all. The US needs some hard evidence to prove its case that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, and so far the support from other nations and evidence is fairly good, but not good enough to warrant attack. Now if Iran were to say something like "we have a right to nuclear defence", I think that would be a big enough spark. Anything that puts Israel at risk.

I understand what you're saying...but look back a little. What did US have on Iraq? Two pictures of factories labeled "Nuke Plant"
Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts
I don't know, I hate to sound so cliché, but i earnestly believe that when oil runs out sometime in the next several decades, the world is going to see some real drastic changes, and probably allot of serious economic depression, and what follows economic depression? thats right you guessed it! fascism and world war.
Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts
Bush isn't that stupid... at least I hope he isn't. :| Maybe he thinks he's playing Pokemon, except with Middle Eastern civil wars instead of pokemon.
Avatar image for cjek
cjek

14327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 cjek
Member since 2003 • 14327 Posts
[QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?a55assin
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.

Oh...sorry, I actually haven't heard of any other dates. This is the first time this kind of detailed information about Iran was released. Of course it doesn't have to be the truth...and considering that Bush publicly announced that he isn't going to attack Iran....this info is probably false.

To be honest I wouldn't trust Bush either. I just don't think an attack would just happen spontaneously is all. The US needs some hard evidence to prove its case that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, and so far the support from other nations and evidence is fairly good, but not good enough to warrant attack. Now if Iran were to say something like "we have a right to nuclear defence", I think that would be a big enough spark. Anything that puts Israel at risk.

I understand what you're saying...but look back a little. What did US have on Iraq? Two pictures of factories labeled "Nuke Plant"

Indeed they/we did.. and that's why this time they'll need more evidence. This time they already have the advantage of a much wider band of support internationally already, Iran repeatedly defying the UN, and now Iran illegally capturing British sailors. It won't take an awful lot more for the US to escalate things. Not something anyone really wants, but I can see it happening possibly in the next few years.
Avatar image for ct1257860
ct1257860

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#79 ct1257860
Member since 2006 • 4441 Posts
why doesnt he just say WORLD WAR 3 !
Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts
"I understand what you're saying...but look back a little. What did US have on Iraq? Two pictures of factories labeled "Nuke Plant"" clearly photoshoped. :lol:
Avatar image for Doomlike_Mitc
Doomlike_Mitc

4912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 Doomlike_Mitc
Member since 2006 • 4912 Posts

Wow, that would be really bad, IF US keeps being this easy in attacking countries there could come consequenses soon. And when the first weapon of mass destruct is used, this will lead in countries all over the world arming themselfs... ah well, I dont think it will happen... :( 

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
why doesnt he just say WORLD WAR 3 !ct1257860
because you usually need more then one country on each side for it to be a world war.
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
Like I have stated before, as long as Gates is in the Pentagon, I don't foresee any US aggression against Iran.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#84 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="cjek"]Is advertising upcoming wars a new tactic? Or have I been missing something?cjek
Another one that doesn't get it... Russia leaked the info...not the US. And the reason you see these on here...is because of a little something called "The freedom of speech"

I said that because I keep seeing dates on this forum of supposed American attacks on Iran. Someone said the other day that they would attack on the 28th, and throughout this year and last year various dates were predicted. They all link to articles which refer to similar sources, claiming to be 'close to the Russian military'. And for some reason, they never materialise as actual attacks :roll:. Admittedly this was one of the more convincing ones.

Oh...sorry, I actually haven't heard of any other dates. This is the first time this kind of detailed information about Iran was released. Of course it doesn't have to be the truth...and considering that Bush publicly announced that he isn't going to attack Iran....this info is probably false.

To be honest I wouldn't trust Bush either. I just don't think an attack would just happen spontaneously is all. The US needs some hard evidence to prove its case that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, and so far the support from other nations and evidence is fairly good, but not good enough to warrant attack. Now if Iran were to say something like "we have a right to nuclear defence", I think that would be a big enough spark. Anything that puts Israel at risk.

I understand what you're saying...but look back a little. What did US have on Iraq? Two pictures of factories labeled "Nuke Plant"

Indeed they/we did.. and that's why this time they'll need more evidence. This time they already have the advantage of a much wider band of support internationally already, Iran repeatedly defying the UN, and now Iran illegally capturing British sailors. It won't take an awful lot more for the US to escalate things. Not something anyone really wants, but I can see it happening possibly in the next few years.

Well, of course...the tension between US and Iran is uncomfortable. But now think about this a little. Every single country in Europe(for th exception of England and maybe one other) is against war with Iran. Iraq also had 9-11...that did a lot. A possible cold war with Russia...and another "hot" war with Iran is like a nightmare.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#85 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
Like I have stated before, as long as Gates is in the Pentagon, I don't foresee any US aggression against Iran.LukeAF24
Gates? Kidding right?
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
[QUOTE="LukeAF24"]Like I have stated before, as long as Gates is in the Pentagon, I don't foresee any US aggression against Iran.a55assin
Gates? Kidding right?

Can't say I am, as he has publicly addressed that there is "no good military options in Iran.", but I'm sure you knew that already.
Avatar image for wiidominance
wiidominance

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 wiidominance
Member since 2006 • 1499 Posts
[QUOTE="bluezy"][QUOTE="enormousaxie"]

If they really attack Iran... the Russians should attack them...

enormousaxie
And the Arab countries come to the aid of Iran. Yay for WW3?

yay... >__>

It seems your not in the image of the situation of the middle east, Iran is considered a threat to the Arab, so no ... arabs won't give a hand (officially), but people will react.
Avatar image for KrayzieJ
KrayzieJ

3283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 KrayzieJ
Member since 2003 • 3283 Posts
Why would they remove the number one check to Iran's power, Saddam Hussein. They obviously knew that Iran is more of a threat than Iraq.
Avatar image for wiidominance
wiidominance

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 wiidominance
Member since 2006 • 1499 Posts
Well,,, I'll put it bluntly, USA Vs. Iran = USA doomed..... Iran will be destroyed as well, but so will the US, the US doesn't have the means to get involved in another military struggle, Sorry, but these Rumors are simply BS. Just check the national American Debt.... If say, Japan asks the US to return all the money Japan gave to the US at this point of time, The entire US economy will collapse, the american economy is highly Dependant on other Countires (Japan, China and UK) to name few. US shall not attack Iran.... not in the near future ...... anyone who is in the full picture of the war on Iraq will realize that Iran and the US are in good relations behind the scenes. whats on the surface is all BS.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#90 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="LukeAF24"]Like I have stated before, as long as Gates is in the Pentagon, I don't foresee any US aggression against Iran.LukeAF24
Gates? Kidding right?

Can't say I am, as he has publicly addressed that there is "no good military options in Iran.", but I'm sure you knew that already.

I don't think you understand..one man cannot do anything. This is a matter of so much fundings....it's out of this world
Avatar image for deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e

8419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-583e5f64e0a7e
Member since 2003 • 8419 Posts
I don't think you understand..one man cannot do anything. This is a matter of so much fundings....it's out of this world a55assin
He holds plenty of clout. Besides, do you really believe that Congress would vote on an Iran Resolution that included force? Do you even think the vote would be close?
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#92 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts
[QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

a55assin

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites.  If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back home without ever landing or been seen!  There are no soldiers or troops to see!!  And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!!  LOL

Avatar image for camreeno360
camreeno360

6850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#93 camreeno360
Member since 2005 • 6850 Posts
Bush needs the House and Senate to confirm that. If he just went out and attacked, he's get impeached, no duh.
Avatar image for iforgotokie
iforgotokie

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#94 iforgotokie
Member since 2005 • 5226 Posts
[QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

basersx

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites.  If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen!  There are no soldiers or troops to see!!  And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!!  LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.
Avatar image for mark4091
mark4091

3780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 mark4091
Member since 2007 • 3780 Posts
[QUOTE="wiidominance"]Well,,, I'll put it bluntly, USA Vs. Iran = USA doomed..... Iran will be destroyed as well, but so will the US, the US doesn't have the means to get involved in another military struggle, Sorry, but these Rumors are simply BS. Just check the national American Debt.... If say, Japan asks the US to return all the money Japan gave to the US at this point of time, The entire US economy will collapse, the american economy is highly Dependant on other Countires (Japan, China and UK) to name few. US shall not attack Iran.... not in the near future ...... anyone who is in the full picture of the war on Iraq will realize that Iran and the US are in good relations behind the scenes. whats on the surface is all BS.

the arabians are the ones that own 800 billion dollars worth of the US economy, I believe, it's somewhere around that amount
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#96 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts
[QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

iforgotokie

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites.  If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen!  There are no soldiers or troops to see!!  And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!!  LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Well I live in MO and see the B2's all the time.  Here is a pic I took last fall, sorry its not soo great I took it through my sunroof. 


(click twice for full size)

Of course it would not be flying that low over Iran, and it would be at night.  And you are a still making me laugh by believing an internet Hoax!  LOLOLOLOL!!!

Avatar image for iforgotokie
iforgotokie

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 iforgotokie
Member since 2005 • 5226 Posts
[QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

basersx

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites.  If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen!  There are no soldiers or troops to see!!  And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!!  LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Well I live in MO and see the B2's all the time.  Here is a pic I took last fall, sorry its not soo great I took it through my sunroof. 

Of course it would not be flying that low over Iran, and it would be at night.  And you are a still making me laugh by believing an internet Hoax!  LOLOLOLOL!!!

Bombers have to drop their altitude to accurately deliver their payload, idiot. Ethier way, once the bomb doors open on a B2, it's just as detecable as any other aircraft. And not once did I say I believe in this scenario. Whether you see them all the time or not, you evidently don't see them in target practice.
Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#98 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts
[QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

iforgotokie

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites. If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen! There are no soldiers or troops to see!! And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!! LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Well I live in MO and see the B2's all the time. Here is a pic I took last fall, sorry its not soo great I took it through my sunroof.

Of course it would not be flying that low over Iran, and it would be at night. And you are a still making me laugh by believing an internet Hoax! LOLOLOLOL!!!

Bombers have to drop their altitude to accuratly deliver their payload, idiot. Ethier way, once the bomb doors open on a B2, it's just as detecable as any other aircraft. And not once did I say I believe in this scenario. Whether you see them all the time or not, you evidently don't see them in target practice.

Getting feisty! I like that! Also...I must comment on something, when you say that the B2 are completely un-camouflaged after the door opens...you are only telling half the truth. It would take great luck for any kind of radar(even US made ones) to detect such a small opening 10k feet in the air. It only lasts for a few seconds and then closes. Iran doesn't have half the technology we do, therefore unable to detect even the less stealthy fighter jets. Such as the FF-22 Raptor.
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#99 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts
[QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

iforgotokie

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites.  If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen!  There are no soldiers or troops to see!!  And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!!  LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Well I live in MO and see the B2's all the time.  Here is a pic I took last fall, sorry its not soo great I took it through my sunroof. 

Of course it would not be flying that low over Iran, and it would be at night.  And you are a still making me laugh by believing an internet Hoax!  LOLOLOLOL!!!

Bombers have to drop their altitude to accurately deliver their payload, idiot. Ethier way, once the bomb doors open on a B2, it's just as detecable as any other aircraft. And not once did I say I believe in this scenario. Whether you see them all the time or not, you evidently don't see them in target practice.

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet.  And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later.  Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets.  Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all! 

 

Avatar image for wiidominance
wiidominance

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 wiidominance
Member since 2006 • 1499 Posts
[QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="iforgotokie"][QUOTE="basersx"][QUOTE="a55assin"][QUOTE="basersx"]

Yeah most countries schedule an attack like a hair cut and then leak it to the whole world! LOL Sounds real legit to me.:roll:

basersx

Here is a little history lesson. About two years ago, the highest security level in the FBI has been breeched by Russia. Russia had a spy in the FBI...giving away vital information that was a threat to National Security. I don't see why a whole force of US soldiers and such..couldn't be seen by Russia. It seems logical to me.

Force of US soldiers?!?! LMAO Even the hoax stats it would be a small air strike on the nuke sites. If the USA ever were to do this the B2s would quietly fly out of Missouri to Iran, drop the bombs and fly back how with out ever landing or been seen! There are no soldiers or troops to see!! And you are making everyone laugh at you by believing an internet hoax!! LOL

It's just as believalbe as your story. Honestly, stealth bombers are not invisible, especially while releasing their payload. Even if that did happen, Iran wouldn't take an airstrike idolly. It would end up being a ground invasion, most likely beginning with an Iranian attack on Iraq. You might as well keep your obnoxious laugh for yourself, especially when you're the one who has no ****ing idea what you're talking about.

Well I live in MO and see the B2's all the time. Here is a pic I took last fall, sorry its not soo great I took it through my sunroof.

Of course it would not be flying that low over Iran, and it would be at night. And you are a still making me laugh by believing an internet Hoax! LOLOLOLOL!!!

Bombers have to drop their altitude to accurately deliver their payload, idiot. Ethier way, once the bomb doors open on a B2, it's just as detecable as any other aircraft. And not once did I say I believe in this scenario. Whether you see them all the time or not, you evidently don't see them in target practice.

Uh no, the B2 can drop bombs jike the JDAMs from 40,000 feet. And even if it is seen for a split second it is gone a second later. Plus with bombs like the JDAMs, they can drop them from 40 miles away from the target and the bombs guide themselves to the targets. Iran would have no chance to see it until it was too late and no way to retaliate against the B2 at all!

don't be so sure ... I believe many said the same thing for the B-52, until it was knocked down in Vietnam ..... so yeah ... don't be so sure .....\