This topic is locked from further discussion.
being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?IlivedI dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah
what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101you hold to the position that Jesus the man never existed?
[QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracyI dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracyyou hold to the position that Jesus the man never existed? And you hold to the position that he rose from the dead. I guess we're all crazy...
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Ilived
We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.
Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...
Although it is often considered absolute fact that Jesus existed and was real, there is still not that much evidence of him being real. Check wikipedia for more information. So if there is a chance that he wasn't even real, then there is a possibility that he was just a normal man who was able to rally disciples together by offering a good afterlife.
show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Premier1101
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
[QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101
We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.
Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...
There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...LJS9502_basic
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Religious heads explaining they've never touched little boys :lol: x5
[QUOTE="Proobie44"]What are the chances this will turn into a religious debate.Ilived
0 to none.
Did from the fist post...:|
[QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Lobster_Ear
We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.
Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...
There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
What about tomb robbing?
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
He raised the dead and cured the blind *Puts up shield*7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
notconspiracy
first, I don't really want to do this, so I'll just make this post and leave. regarding issue #7, if a leader converts to a specific religion or sect he usually carries the rest of the people with him (see: Henry VIII).
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...LJS9502_basic
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.
The 4 canonized Gospels
the heretical gospels
the Pauline epistles
The 1 Corinthians 15 creed
Tacitus
Josephus
Suetonius
Mara Bar Saropian
Pliny the Younger
Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian
Clement of Rome
Papias
Eusebius
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
Hewkii
first, I don't really want to do this, so I'll just make this post and leave. regarding issue #7, if a leader converts to a specific religion or sect he usually carries the rest of the people with him (see: Henry VIII).
it spread BEFORE constantine you know[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.Ah...no. They can't. Human knowledge is finite.
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.
*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracy
The 4 canonized Gospels
the heretical gospels
the Pauline epistles
The 1 Corinthians 15 creed
Tacitus
Josephus
Suetonius
Mara Bar Saropian
Pliny the Younger
Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian
Clement of Rome
Papias
Eusebius
Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.
*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101
The 4 canonized Gospels
the heretical gospels
the Pauline epistles
The 1 Corinthians 15 creed
Tacitus
Josephus
Suetonius
Mara Bar Saropian
Pliny the Younger
Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian
Clement of Rome
Papias
Eusebius
Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
so we have to throw out ALL, repeat ALL of ancient history?Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
Premier1101
Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.
*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:
do you even KNOW what the Gospels or the Epistles ARE?[QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracy
We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.
Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...
There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Lobster_Ear
We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.
Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...
There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.[QUOTE="Premier1101"]Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
LJS9502_basic
Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....
I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..
Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
sSubZerOo
Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....
I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..
Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?
asubzero, if you need ****ing DNA evidence of Jesus to believe in him, then we have to throw out all of ancient history.second, I just submitted evidence for the resurrection. If you wish to build a case for Greek mythology, then Im all ears
show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Premier1101
How do you propose we scientifically prove an individual is the Messiah?
[QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...notconspiracy
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.[QUOTE="Premier1101"]Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
LJS9502_basic
Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....
Is it me but isnt history what we can define as what has happened back then through proof? Since jesus is a sensitive subject, I'm requiring physical proof, that's it. Lots of history is defined by geological and historical finding and documentation(I am taking Western civ ancient to early modern) what history would you mean?
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.
oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained1: Jesus was crucified
2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty
3: Jesus appeared to the 12
4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic
5: Jesus appeared to Paul
6: The disciples believed the resurrection
7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire
These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?
All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.
*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:
do you even KNOW what the Gospels or the Epistles ARE?Early Christian literature.. The Gospels for instance are about the life of Jesus Christ... Yet again why are these books fact again? Oh thats right they arn't because its still a highly debated topic to this day.. If it were as fact as you claim it was.. There wouldn't be numerous religions other then christianity nor would there be a huge debate about it.. Yet again they are holy scriptures..
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail
sSubZerOo
Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....
I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..
Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?
I said history.....;)
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear
:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....
Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment