What are the chances of Jesus...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ilived
Ilived

5516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Ilived
Member since 2007 • 5516 Posts
being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?
Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts
what are the chances we find out he was real?
Avatar image for Ilived
Ilived

5516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Ilived
Member since 2007 • 5516 Posts

what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?Ilived
I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah
Avatar image for forgetwatyahear
forgetwatyahear

6260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 forgetwatyahear
Member since 2005 • 6260 Posts

what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101

1/10

to teh first post

3/10

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101
you hold to the position that Jesus the man never existed?
Avatar image for Video_Game_King
Video_Game_King

27545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#7 Video_Game_King
Member since 2003 • 27545 Posts
Don't know. He'd have to moonwalk on water a la Michael Jackson to prove that he was Crazy Jesus :P.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy
I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts
show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...
Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracy
you hold to the position that Jesus the man never existed?

And you hold to the position that he rose from the dead. I guess we're all crazy...
Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Ilived

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...

Avatar image for Proobie44
Proobie44

5663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Proobie44
Member since 2006 • 5663 Posts
What are the chances this will turn into a religious debate.
Avatar image for cgi15
cgi15

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 cgi15
Member since 2008 • 492 Posts

Although it is often considered absolute fact that Jesus existed and was real, there is still not that much evidence of him being real. Check wikipedia for more information. So if there is a chance that he wasn't even real, then there is a possibility that he was just a normal man who was able to rally disciples together by offering a good afterlife.

Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
Here we go again...He put up a better argument (miracles, etc) than anyone else.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180055 Posts

show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Premier1101

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Avatar image for forgetwatyahear
forgetwatyahear

6260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 forgetwatyahear
Member since 2005 • 6260 Posts

What are the chances this will turn into a religious debate.Proobie44

10/10

Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
[QUOTE="Ilived"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...

There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.
Avatar image for Ilived
Ilived

5516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Ilived
Member since 2007 • 5516 Posts

What are the chances this will turn into a religious debate.Proobie44

0 to none.

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...LJS9502_basic

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Religious heads explaining they've never touched little boys :lol: x5

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180055 Posts

[QUOTE="Proobie44"]What are the chances this will turn into a religious debate.Ilived

0 to none.

Did from the fist post...:|

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Lobster_Ear

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...

There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.

typical fundy atheist retort:roll:
Avatar image for makaveli2344
makaveli2344

3106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 makaveli2344
Member since 2007 • 3106 Posts
I dunno, what are the chances of me waking up tomorrow, going on GameSpot, and NOT seeing a Religion thread?
Avatar image for Ilived
Ilived

5516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Ilived
Member since 2007 • 5516 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

What about tomb robbing?

Avatar image for Proobie44
Proobie44

5663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Proobie44
Member since 2006 • 5663 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

He raised the dead and cured the blind *Puts up shield*
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

notconspiracy

first, I don't really want to do this, so I'll just make this post and leave. regarding issue #7, if a leader converts to a specific religion or sect he usually carries the rest of the people with him (see: Henry VIII).

Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...LJS9502_basic

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts

what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101
by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.

The 4 canonized Gospels

the heretical gospels

the Pauline epistles

The 1 Corinthians 15 creed

Tacitus

Josephus

Suetonius

Mara Bar Saropian

Pliny the Younger

Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian

Clement of Rome

Papias

Eusebius

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

Hewkii

first, I don't really want to do this, so I'll just make this post and leave. regarding issue #7, if a leader converts to a specific religion or sect he usually carries the rest of the people with him (see: Henry VIII).

it spread BEFORE constantine you know
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.

I just put some forth.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180055 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.

Ah...no. They can't. Human knowledge is finite.

Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#33 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts
Jesus obviously exsisted. He was a level 10 lich with the usless abulity to manipulate water.
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.

*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?
Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracy

by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.

The 4 canonized Gospels

the heretical gospels

the Pauline epistles

The 1 Corinthians 15 creed

Tacitus

Josephus

Suetonius

Mara Bar Saropian

Pliny the Younger

Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian

Clement of Rome

Papias

Eusebius

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.

*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?

No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Premier1101

by the way, we have pretty damned good evidence of his existence.

The 4 canonized Gospels

the heretical gospels

the Pauline epistles

The 1 Corinthians 15 creed

Tacitus

Josephus

Suetonius

Mara Bar Saropian

Pliny the Younger

Early church fathers including (that I can name off the top of my head) Tertullian

Clement of Rome

Papias

Eusebius

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

so we have to throw out ALL, repeat ALL of ancient history?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180055 Posts

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

Premier1101

Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?sSubZerOo

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.

*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?

No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:

do you even KNOW what the Gospels or the Epistles ARE?
Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
[QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?notconspiracy

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...

There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.

typical fundy atheist retort:roll:

Ouch. You called me an atheist...who replied in a typical manner...
Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="Ilived"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]what are the chances we find out he was real?Lobster_Ear

We already found out he existed, but the other thing...uhhhh not so much.

Wheres the proof, Ive never seen it...

There is no proof. They just like to believe there is...Let them have their fun. It helps them sleep better at night.

typical fundy atheist retort:roll:

Ouch. You called me an atheist...who replied in a typical manner...

yes, yes you did. you most certainly did reply in the typical FUNDY atheist manner.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

LJS9502_basic

Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....

I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..

Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

sSubZerOo

Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....

I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..

Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?

asubzero, if you need ****ing DNA evidence of Jesus to believe in him, then we have to throw out all of ancient history.

second, I just submitted evidence for the resurrection. If you wish to build a case for Greek mythology, then Im all ears

Avatar image for ElZilcho90
ElZilcho90

6157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 ElZilcho90
Member since 2006 • 6157 Posts

show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Premier1101

How do you propose we scientifically prove an individual is the Messiah?

Avatar image for Lobster_Ear
Lobster_Ear

5428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Lobster_Ear
Member since 2005 • 5428 Posts
[QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...notconspiracy

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.

I just put some forth.

You put absolutely no evidence forth. It would be like me saying you murdered someone and then calling it evidence.
Avatar image for Premier1101
Premier1101

13515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Premier1101
Member since 2008 • 13515 Posts
[QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

LJS9502_basic

Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....

Is it me but isnt history what we can define as what has happened back then through proof? Since jesus is a sensitive subject, I'm requiring physical proof, that's it. Lots of history is defined by geological and historical finding and documentation(I am taking Western civ ancient to early modern) what history would you mean?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Ilived"]being another one of those crazy paranoid people who claimed to be the messiah?notconspiracy

I dont know. you tell me. he rose from the dead, so he probably was THE messiah

This is only shown through testimony of blind followers.. There were alot of messiahs then, some believers claimed they can heal wounds and diease as well.. Penn and Teller go into depth with this.. This is not to say Jesus may or may not be the messiah.. I just find the reasoning behind why you think so to be flawed. You make it sound like you saw it your self.

oh. you wish to engage in a debate. well, there are 7 facts regarding Jesus, each of which need to be explained

1: Jesus was crucified

2: Jesus was entombed. This tomb was later found to be empty

3: Jesus appeared to the 12

4: Jesus appeared to James, who was a skeptic

5: Jesus appeared to Paul

6: The disciples believed the resurrection

7: Christianity rapidly spread throughout the Roman empire

These 7 facts, well 6 facts the 1st is just a necessary prerequisite, need to be explained. I submit the resurrection as an explanation. do you have any other?

All of this except the last point you got direclty from the bible.. There is no historical evidence what so ever.. Thus why FAITH TAKES in and why your points are FLAWED. Because you think there is some fact or evidence to prove Jesus's divinity when there is not.. THUS why FAITH is in place, and why the SCIENTIFIC community and many people other then that do not agree with this conclusion. I am by no means saying you are wrong.. I personally couldn't care either way.. My point is the way your going about it is your trying to state belief and faith based writings as garenteed fact and actuallity when they are certainly not.

*sigh* did you ****ing ignore my post?

No I am pointing out that you are basically saying that Jesus's divinity was proven fact (even though it defies physics, something we can actually repeat over and over agan and have evidence on), through the writings of holy scripture.. :roll:

do you even KNOW what the Gospels or the Epistles ARE?

Early Christian literature.. The Gospels for instance are about the life of Jesus Christ... Yet again why are these books fact again? Oh thats right they arn't because its still a highly debated topic to this day.. If it were as fact as you claim it was.. There wouldn't be numerous religions other then christianity nor would there be a huge debate about it.. Yet again they are holy scriptures..

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180055 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Those are people, not DNA, clothes, hard evidence, anything concrete, sorry bud, word of mouth=fail

sSubZerOo

Then I guess we have a lot of history to throw out....

I take it we are suppose to believe Greek mythology then? It has just as much evidence or lack of to things such as the divinity of Jesus. I am by no means argueing that Jesus was a messiah then.. Just that there is no hardcore evidence that he was devine.. And yes you can't take all anicent history seriouslly..

Are we suppose to take the battle of thermoplae (spelling) seriouslly when the writer who saw it said the Persians number in the millions? When every researcher believes that was not true because there was not enough water sources near by to support such a army?

I said history.....;)

Avatar image for notconspiracy
notconspiracy

2225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 notconspiracy
Member since 2007 • 2225 Posts
[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="Lobster_Ear"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Premier1101"]show me proof other than word of mouth..... then yeah definetly.. has to approved by scientists as well as religious heads as well...Lobster_Ear

:lol: Human scientists to explain the supernatural.....

Well, science is basically the study of anything that can be studied with true evidence. Supernatural or not. There is always a science to it. If there is a god, there is a science to him/her/it...As long as there is evidence.

I just put some forth.

You put absolutely no evidence forth. It would be like me saying you murdered someone and then calling it evidence.

for ancient history, accounts are all we have
Avatar image for nintendorocks
nintendorocks

5996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#50 nintendorocks
Member since 2004 • 5996 Posts
100 percent chance.