What if a billionaire decided to use his money to help the economy?

  • 103 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Methinks that the TC overestimates the power of a billionaire.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Methinks that the TC overestimates the power of a billionaire.

coolbeans90
a man with 100 billion in cash could take care of .7% of the federal debt
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system.
Avatar image for TechTrek
TechTrek

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 TechTrek
Member since 2011 • 88 Posts

A billion $'s wouldnt even put a dent in the debt our Country is in.00-Riddick-00

Keep in mind that I also considered just the debt of a single state. I'm pretty sure a billionaire could afford that.

Avatar image for deathtarget04
deathtarget04

2266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#55 deathtarget04
Member since 2009 • 2266 Posts

Something about the TC reminds me of someone....

Avatar image for 00-Riddick-00
00-Riddick-00

18884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#56 00-Riddick-00
Member since 2009 • 18884 Posts

[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"]A billion $'s wouldnt even put a dent in the debt our Country is in.TechTrek

Keep in mind that I also considered just the debt of a single state. I'm pretty sure a billionaire could afford that.

Still.. It would barely make a dent. Depending on the state. *cough* cali *cough*
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]Philanthropists are always going to donate the majority of their money outside the USA, where problems can be a little more severe than your state government being in defecit.TechTrek
Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs.

People would 1. Instantly run up more debt on their cards 3. Everyone would buy a bigger house, probably cause a crisis in the local housing market 4. You better live in a small state! 5. Alot of homeless people have severe problems that make many of them unemployable without alot of help (see ted williams) You sentiment is in the right place though!
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#58 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget

3. Raising taxes Any plan that isn't 95% or more built around those three things is a very unserious plan. Here's a visual representation of what we spend our money on to drive the point home.  So when you here some bozo on the news talking about wasteful government spending, he or she is spending all of their time in the "everything else" category. If you declare 2/3rds of our federal budget completely untouchable and then take tax increases off the table, you're not going to ever be able to fix the deficit long term.
Avatar image for Baconbits2004
Baconbits2004

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Baconbits2004
Member since 2009 • 12602 Posts
I suggest removing that 9 percent on interest. Seems pretty wasteful to me.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget

3. Raising taxes Any plan that isn't 95% or more built around those three things is a very unserious plan. Here's a visual representation of what we spend our money on to drive the point home.  So when you here some bozo on the news talking about wasteful government spending, he or she is spending all of their time in the "everything else" category. If you declare 2/3rds of our federal budget completely untouchable and then take tax increases off the table, you're not going to ever be able to fix the deficit long term.nocoolnamejim

This guy gets it. It will require much more than a few wealthy angels and reduction in waste to significantly alleviate, let alone eliminate, the current deficit.

Avatar image for Mochyc
Mochyc

4421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Mochyc
Member since 2007 • 4421 Posts
It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. -Sun_Tzu-
I'm not at all knowledgeable in that area, but isn't because JP Morgan was the equivalent of a central bank and it was in their interest?
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. Mochyc
I'm not at all knowledgeable in that area, but isn't because JP Morgan was the equivalent of a central bank and it was in their interest?

Yeah, shortly after the Panic of 1907, congress passed the Federal Reserve Act as a means to combat future bank runs in a similar fashion as JP Morgan had done.
Avatar image for whet40
whet40

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 whet40
Member since 2006 • 318 Posts

I suggest removing that 9 percent on interest. Seems pretty wasteful to me. Baconbits2004

I like the cut of your jib.

Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
there are more needy people out there weezyfb
agreed. look at what bill gates is doing. much better than feeding the sinking ship that is the current us economy
Avatar image for TF626
TF626

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 TF626
Member since 2010 • 593 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="TechTrek"] Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs. TechTrek
You'd be breaking the mould. People like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates have given billions (Buffett gave $37bn) to causes like vaccinating and immunising the poorest places in the world, HIV and AIDS research, financial services for the poor globally, disaster relief, agricultural research, and improvements to educational facilities within the USA. Most of that is done through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. To be honest, if i were a billionaire, I'd be more interested in doing those things than paying people's credit card debt.

Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible.

Agreed we need to take care of our country first, before we go out helping others.

Avatar image for aransom
aransom

7408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 aransom
Member since 2002 • 7408 Posts

Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state... 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. ... TechTrek
As soon as you paid off everyone's credit cards and mortgages, they'd all go on spending sprees, and buy bigger houses, and before long, they'd all be back where they started because rewarding poor choices just encourages people to make more poor choices. Besides, if you had a million people in your state, and each owed $10,000 on their credit cards, and each owed $90,000 on their mortgage, you'd need to give away 100 billion dollars.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

Why not just use that money to increase consumer spending...oh wait

Avatar image for l0ve
l0ve

3178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -1

#68 l0ve
Member since 2005 • 3178 Posts
By paying off everyones debt today, etc what would prevent them from going back into debt the very next day. The effort is futile, the money can be used for much better things.
Avatar image for TechTrek
TechTrek

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 TechTrek
Member since 2011 • 88 Posts

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts
It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. -Sun_Tzu-
funny.. this time around we had to use the taxpayer's enormous wealth to sure up jp morgan....
Avatar image for MetallicaKings
MetallicaKings

4781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 MetallicaKings
Member since 2004 • 4781 Posts
America makes 14 trillion a year. A few billion won't do squat.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
America makes 14 trillion a year. A few billion won't do squat.MetallicaKings
And yet they're 14 trillion in debt, and it increases.
Avatar image for Papadrach
Papadrach

1965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Papadrach
Member since 2008 • 1965 Posts

Im pretty sure a billionaire would not help our economy, not enough money. Could help local area's and such. But not the US as a whole

Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

TechTrek
the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.
Avatar image for Lotus-Edge
Lotus-Edge

50513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Lotus-Edge
Member since 2008 • 50513 Posts

Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet? TechTrek
Because, while the United States owes them money, the other countries want to stay on the U.S.'s good side.

Avatar image for TechTrek
TechTrek

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 TechTrek
Member since 2011 • 88 Posts

[QUOTE="TechTrek"]

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

lloveLamp

the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.

So, the U.S. owes the most money to itself? The Federal Reserve is a U.S. organization.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts

That's a silly idea, trickle-down economics doesn't work!

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

[QUOTE="TechTrek"] Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible. Danm_999
Are you going to be helping in the long term though? What's to stop the pattern from repeating itself? I realize not everyone is in debt by choice, or by foolishness, but isn't hitting the reset button on a lot of people's debts simply going to allow them to reacquire more debt in the future?

That's what I was thinking giving a few billion dollars to pay off people's debts is essentially just wasting money, kind of like propping up a business and having the money go nowhere. You would help a relatively small percentage of people, even if you bailed an entire state out, which would take more than a few billion in most cases, it wouldn't make much of a meaningful impact on the overall economy, and finally you'd be better served investing in cancer research, or aiding in stopping world poverty.

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

[QUOTE="Danm_999"]Philanthropists are always going to donate the majority of their money outside the USA, where problems can be a little more severe than your state government being in defecit.Radiatedrich91

So we should neglect ourselves until everyone else's problems are solved?

When our problems are relatively small, and mostly our own fault like debt, yes. If someone wants to help a family who lost their home, or a person who has the disease and resides in the U.S. then go ahead, but debt is a small problem compared to situations described.

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. mucgoo

I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.

Avatar image for TechTrek
TechTrek

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 TechTrek
Member since 2011 • 88 Posts

[QUOTE="mucgoo"]The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. TacticalDesire

I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.

That would be enough for the debt of a single state, which was an option I mentioned in the OP.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="mucgoo"]The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. TechTrek

I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.

That would be enough for the debt of a single state, which was an option I mentioned in the OP.

The general consensus is it wouldn't help. If you only helped one state, most of them would take it for granted and end up in debt again. It would require trillions to bailout the whole country, and even more to prevent it from happening again.
Avatar image for Colin1192
Colin1192

6221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 Colin1192
Member since 2008 • 6221 Posts
investing in tech would be a much smarter use of his money
Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#85 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

TechTrek

I don't know hoy much money is owed to China, but I think it is the bulk of the US's debt.

The reason China hasn't called it in is because the US can't pay it. The only way they could would be to start printing so much money that the US dollar would be worthless, and essentially, both the american and chinese economies would go under.

It's in China's best interest not to demand the money.

Avatar image for Mafiree
Mafiree

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Mafiree
Member since 2008 • 3704 Posts

What do you think would happen if a billionaire decided to use his money to pay the taxes or debt of everyone in his state? Do you think the consequences would be good or bad? Also, would such an action even be legal?

EDIT:

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

TechTrek
They haven't asked for it back yet because the only way the US would be able to pay it back is through printing money. This would devalue the dollar and reduce the "real" amount of money they are receiving. The whole reason countries are willing to hold US debt is because it is expected to retain its value and be a stable asset.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

It may sound great, but people will just reoccur the debts again.

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
If only you could "pay off" taxes... unfortunately they keep coming back every paycheque.
Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

Something about the TC reminds me of someone....

deathtarget04

Blu...???? No that cant be! Pm me if you are! Well, lets not assume it can just be a new user to gamespot OT.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#90 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
The United States is in debt by the trillions, not millions. A single billionaire couldn't bail us out of the overall picture. He can, however, perform certain tasks such as be charitable and grant more jobs...and I think we can all be charitable.
Avatar image for angrules23
angrules23

854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 angrules23
Member since 2007 • 854 Posts
Tc you don't understand economics and also your average billionaire would not have nearly enough money to bail out an entire state.
Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts

id rather help a kid with a weird disease than some guy who maxed his credit.

Krelian-co
I can't disagree with this...
Avatar image for daqua_99
daqua_99

11170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#93 daqua_99
Member since 2005 • 11170 Posts

Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget

3. Raising taxes Any plan that isn't 95% or more built around those three things is a very unserious plan. Here's a visual representation of what we spend our money on to drive the point home.  So when you here some bozo on the news talking about wasteful government spending, he or she is spending all of their time in the "everything else" category. If you declare 2/3rds of our federal budget completely untouchable and then take tax increases off the table, you're not going to ever be able to fix the deficit long term.nocoolnamejim

Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget

.daqua_99

Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).

we could spend ZERO on defense and still be running a trillion defisit a year

Avatar image for daqua_99
daqua_99

11170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#95 daqua_99
Member since 2005 • 11170 Posts

[QUOTE="daqua_99"]

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget

.surrealnumber5

Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).

we could spend ZERO on defense and still be running a trillion defisit a year

I do like, though, that only 21% of US Federal money goes to Social Security. If we reduced ours to even 25%, that's an extra 7.4% that could be spent on improving infrustructure. I hate it how it takes me longer, by train, to get from my local train station to the airport than it does to fly from the airport interstate ...

Avatar image for gamergotgame90
gamergotgame90

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 gamergotgame90
Member since 2011 • 100 Posts
Most billonaires are too selfish to do something like that. But even if one did it still wouldn't be enough to make a huge impact the debt is just too huge.
Avatar image for kayoticdreamz
kayoticdreamz

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 kayoticdreamz
Member since 2010 • 3347 Posts

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"][QUOTE="TechTrek"]

Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?

TechTrek

the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.

So, the U.S. owes the most money to itself? The Federal Reserve is a U.S. organization.

the problem here is the federal reserve isnt a normal government agency and doesnt really report back to anyone in the normal sense. i forget exactly how it works but it doesnt operate under the usual rules of report back to congress or president and your job is on the line each time and can be fired with relative ease. its in a special category all on its own. also the federal reserve prints money all on its own without any congress or presidental oversight on the matter. its really like some unelected 4th branch of power. but ya back to print money on its own causes inflation which in a sinking economy is bad. never mind as you noticed b orrowing money from yourself will make your scratch your head.
Avatar image for kayoticdreamz
kayoticdreamz

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 kayoticdreamz
Member since 2010 • 3347 Posts

[QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"][QUOTE="TechTrek"] Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs. comp_atkins

even bill gates cant take care of http://www.usdebtclock.org

if i pay off my share, can my taxes be lowered accordingly to represent the fact that i don't need to pay off the interest or principal on my part of the debt anymore?

EDIT: lol in 2000 it was running backwards... aah the good ol' days...

no it doesnt work that way. you still get medicare and social security. and you could still claim unemployment among other things so you can never really pay off your share by just paying taxes. as our spending is > our taxes by a very large margin.
Avatar image for pianist
pianist

18900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 pianist
Member since 2003 • 18900 Posts

[QUOTE="TechTrek"] Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible. Danm_999
Are you going to be helping in the long term though? What's to stop the pattern from repeating itself? I realize not everyone is in debt by choice, or by foolishness, but isn't hitting the reset button on a lot of people's debts simply going to allow them to reacquire more debt in the future?

I completely agree. The worst thing you can do for people who spend irresponsibly is clear their slates. Without consequences, some people will spend absolutely every dollar - borrowed or otherwise - that someone will give them.

Helping people who are stricken with a medical catastrophe or helping successful students (who couldn't win scholarships because they aren't elite students) with loans I could get on board with, but I'd never spend my money helping other people buy wants. As for mortgages... people need to be reasonable about their financial circumstances and buy a property they can afford. If you buy a home with mortgage payments you can't afford or don't plan ahead for potential rising interest rates, it's your own fault, and it's frankly no different than carrying any other sort of want-related debt. You need shelter... but you don't need a dream home.

Avatar image for Desulated
Desulated

30952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#100 Desulated
Member since 2005 • 30952 Posts

The US's debt is in the trillions. A couple billion won't even make much of a difference.