Methinks that the TC overestimates the power of a billionaire.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
a man with 100 billion in cash could take care of .7% of the federal debtMethinks that the TC overestimates the power of a billionaire.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"]A billion $'s wouldnt even put a dent in the debt our Country is in.TechTrek
Keep in mind that I also considered just the debt of a single state. I'm pretty sure a billionaire could afford that.
Still.. It would barely make a dent. Depending on the state. *cough* cali *cough*[QUOTE="Danm_999"]Philanthropists are always going to donate the majority of their money outside the USA, where problems can be a little more severe than your state government being in defecit.TechTrekWell, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs. People would 1. Instantly run up more debt on their cards 3. Everyone would buy a bigger house, probably cause a crisis in the local housing market 4. You better live in a small state! 5. Alot of homeless people have severe problems that make many of them unemployable without alot of help (see ted williams) You sentiment is in the right place though!
Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget3. Raising taxes Any plan that isn't 95% or more built around those three things is a very unserious plan. Here's a visual representation of what we spend our money on to drive the point home.
So when you here some bozo on the news talking about wasteful government spending, he or she is spending all of their time in the "everything else" category. If you declare 2/3rds of our federal budget completely untouchable and then take tax increases off the table, you're not going to ever be able to fix the deficit long term.nocoolnamejim
This guy gets it. It will require much more than a few wealthy angels and reduction in waste to significantly alleviate, let alone eliminate, the current deficit.
It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. -Sun_Tzu-I'm not at all knowledgeable in that area, but isn't because JP Morgan was the equivalent of a central bank and it was in their interest?
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. MochycI'm not at all knowledgeable in that area, but isn't because JP Morgan was the equivalent of a central bank and it was in their interest? Yeah, shortly after the Panic of 1907, congress passed the Federal Reserve Act as a means to combat future bank runs in a similar fashion as JP Morgan had done.
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="TechTrek"] Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs. TechTrekYou'd be breaking the mould. People like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates have given billions (Buffett gave $37bn) to causes like vaccinating and immunising the poorest places in the world, HIV and AIDS research, financial services for the poor globally, disaster relief, agricultural research, and improvements to educational facilities within the USA. Most of that is done through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. To be honest, if i were a billionaire, I'd be more interested in doing those things than paying people's credit card debt. Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible.
Agreed we need to take care of our country first, before we go out helping others.
Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state... 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. ... TechTrekAs soon as you paid off everyone's credit cards and mortgages, they'd all go on spending sprees, and buy bigger houses, and before long, they'd all be back where they started because rewarding poor choices just encourages people to make more poor choices. Besides, if you had a million people in your state, and each owed $10,000 on their credit cards, and each owed $90,000 on their mortgage, you'd need to give away 100 billion dollars.
It has happened before. Not exactly in the way described in the OP, but JP Morgan played a very large role in ending the Panic of 1907 by using his enormous wealth to sure up the banking system. -Sun_Tzu-funny.. this time around we had to use the taxpayer's enormous wealth to sure up jp morgan....
the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?
TechTrek
Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet? TechTrekBecause, while the United States owes them money, the other countries want to stay on the U.S.'s good side.
[QUOTE="TechTrek"]the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?
lloveLamp
So, the U.S. owes the most money to itself? The Federal Reserve is a U.S. organization.
[QUOTE="TechTrek"] Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible. Danm_999Are you going to be helping in the long term though? What's to stop the pattern from repeating itself? I realize not everyone is in debt by choice, or by foolishness, but isn't hitting the reset button on a lot of people's debts simply going to allow them to reacquire more debt in the future?
That's what I was thinking giving a few billion dollars to pay off people's debts is essentially just wasting money, kind of like propping up a business and having the money go nowhere. You would help a relatively small percentage of people, even if you bailed an entire state out, which would take more than a few billion in most cases, it wouldn't make much of a meaningful impact on the overall economy, and finally you'd be better served investing in cancer research, or aiding in stopping world poverty.
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]Philanthropists are always going to donate the majority of their money outside the USA, where problems can be a little more severe than your state government being in defecit.Radiatedrich91
So we should neglect ourselves until everyone else's problems are solved?
When our problems are relatively small, and mostly our own fault like debt, yes. If someone wants to help a family who lost their home, or a person who has the disease and resides in the U.S. then go ahead, but debt is a small problem compared to situations described.
The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. mucgoo
I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.
[QUOTE="mucgoo"]The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. TacticalDesire
I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.
That would be enough for the debt of a single state, which was an option I mentioned in the OP.
[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]
[QUOTE="mucgoo"]The USA has a GDP of 14 trillion dollars. Even gates at his peak with $80 billion is a small component of that with less than 1% of a single year GDP. Sure someone very rich could regenerate a small city, or maybe even one of the small states with half a million people in. Their actual effect on the national economy would be minuscule. TechTrek
I'm pretty sure Gates had around 90m at his peak, but yes I completely agree with the point you're making.
That would be enough for the debt of a single state, which was an option I mentioned in the OP.
The general consensus is it wouldn't help. If you only helped one state, most of them would take it for granted and end up in debt again. It would require trillions to bailout the whole country, and even more to prevent it from happening again.I don't know hoy much money is owed to China, but I think it is the bulk of the US's debt.Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?
TechTrek
The reason China hasn't called it in is because the US can't pay it. The only way they could would be to start printing so much money that the US dollar would be worthless, and essentially, both the american and chinese economies would go under.
It's in China's best interest not to demand the money.
They haven't asked for it back yet because the only way the US would be able to pay it back is through printing money. This would devalue the dollar and reduce the "real" amount of money they are receiving. The whole reason countries are willing to hold US debt is because it is expected to retain its value and be a stable asset.What do you think would happen if a billionaire decided to use his money to pay the taxes or debt of everyone in his state? Do you think the consequences would be good or bad? Also, would such an action even be legal?
EDIT:
Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?
TechTrek
Something about the TC reminds me of someone....
deathtarget04
Blu...???? No that cant be! Pm me if you are! Well, lets not assume it can just be a new user to gamespot OT.
I can't disagree with this...id rather help a kid with a weird disease than some guy who maxed his credit.
Krelian-co
Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget
3. Raising taxes Any plan that isn't 95% or more built around those three things is a very unserious plan. Here's a visual representation of what we spend our money on to drive the point home.So when you here some bozo on the news talking about wasteful government spending, he or she is spending all of their time in the "everything else" category. If you declare 2/3rds of our federal budget completely untouchable and then take tax increases off the table, you're not going to ever be able to fix the deficit long term.nocoolnamejim
Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget
.daqua_99
Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).
we could spend ZERO on defense and still be running a trillion defisit a year[QUOTE="daqua_99"]
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]Our single year federal deficit is over $1 TRILLION dollars. This is a structural problem that cannot be materially impacted by even the most generous of rich billionaires. The way to fix the federal deficit involves exactly three things. 1. Cutting entitlements. (Social Security, Medicare) 2. Cutting the defense budget
.surrealnumber5
Dang that graph is bad. I cannot believe a federal government would spend more on defence then what they would on health and education. Our total budget goes Social Security (32.4%), General Government Services (26.2%), Health (16%), Education (9.3%), and then Defence (5.9%). Heck, Defence is only just above Industry and Workforce (4.1%), Transport and Infrustructure (3.5%), and Culture (2.4%).
we could spend ZERO on defense and still be running a trillion defisit a yearI do like, though, that only 21% of US Federal money goes to Social Security. If we reduced ours to even 25%, that's an extra 7.4% that could be spent on improving infrustructure. I hate it how it takes me longer, by train, to get from my local train station to the airport than it does to fly from the airport interstate ...
the us biggest creditor i think is actually the federal reserve. ever since china starting slowing down the purchashing of us treasury bonds the federal reserve has had to pick up the slack.[QUOTE="lloveLamp"][QUOTE="TechTrek"]
Just being curious, what countries does the U.S. owe money and how much money does it owe China? Also, why haven't these countries demanded their money back, yet?
TechTrek
So, the U.S. owes the most money to itself? The Federal Reserve is a U.S. organization.
the problem here is the federal reserve isnt a normal government agency and doesnt really report back to anyone in the normal sense. i forget exactly how it works but it doesnt operate under the usual rules of report back to congress or president and your job is on the line each time and can be fired with relative ease. its in a special category all on its own. also the federal reserve prints money all on its own without any congress or presidental oversight on the matter. its really like some unelected 4th branch of power. but ya back to print money on its own causes inflation which in a sinking economy is bad. never mind as you noticed b orrowing money from yourself will make your scratch your head.even bill gates cant take care of http://www.usdebtclock.org if i pay off my share, can my taxes be lowered accordingly to represent the fact that i don't need to pay off the interest or principal on my part of the debt anymore?[QUOTE="kayoticdreamz"][QUOTE="TechTrek"] Well, if I were a billionaire, I'd do one of the following: 1. Pay off the credit card debt of everyone in my state. 2. Pay off the student loans of everyone in my state. 3. Pay off the mortgage of everyone in my state. 4. Pay off the taxes of everyone in my state. 5. Feed all of the homeless and create a business to give them jobs. comp_atkins
EDIT: lol in 2000 it was running backwards... aah the good ol' days...
no it doesnt work that way. you still get medicare and social security. and you could still claim unemployment among other things so you can never really pay off your share by just paying taxes. as our spending is > our taxes by a very large margin.[QUOTE="TechTrek"] Debt is a huge problem in this country and is one of the biggest aspects of this country's economic crisis. I'd want to help in any way possible. Danm_999Are you going to be helping in the long term though? What's to stop the pattern from repeating itself? I realize not everyone is in debt by choice, or by foolishness, but isn't hitting the reset button on a lot of people's debts simply going to allow them to reacquire more debt in the future?
I completely agree. The worst thing you can do for people who spend irresponsibly is clear their slates. Without consequences, some people will spend absolutely every dollar - borrowed or otherwise - that someone will give them.
Helping people who are stricken with a medical catastrophe or helping successful students (who couldn't win scholarships because they aren't elite students) with loans I could get on board with, but I'd never spend my money helping other people buy wants. As for mortgages... people need to be reasonable about their financial circumstances and buy a property they can afford. If you buy a home with mortgage payments you can't afford or don't plan ahead for potential rising interest rates, it's your own fault, and it's frankly no different than carrying any other sort of want-related debt. You need shelter... but you don't need a dream home.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment