You know, between this and your little "time is energy" blurb, I have this to say to you... you might want to brush up on your basic science a good bit. :|
I should've phrased it better sorry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efMZQaiII-4This video will give you a better understanding of the theory I was talking about when it comes to Light. I may be mistaken, but I've been doing a lot of looking into the principles of Quantum mechanics and much of it is simply mindboggling.
I believe in god and I choose to have Jesus as my savior. However, I do not believe a lot of the bible, and do not follow it. There is a lot morally wrong with it.
From a scientific point of view, not 1 atheist or non believer has provided a shred of evidence that God does not exist. Atheists claim to not want to believe in super magical things, yet if you are an atheist you must believe that the very first appearance of life was essentially superman in a single cell form. It was indestructable and unkillable, immune to everything from the get go. It was immune to immense radiation, extreme heat or cold, acid rain and a was likely born in a soup of solvent or acid or some type. So ya, you don't believe in a supernatural god, but you believe in a super powered single celled organism that was totally immune to everything from the very start.
kryptonianpride
A single-celled life form that's immune to practically anything is not supernatural though. It does not violate scientific laws. Science only studies that which conforms to scientific laws, because if you bring in the supernatural, you bring in another dimension that can't be studied. It's not that scientists choose to study the natural world. It's just that that's the only reality that they can study, probably because reality is limited to just nature. Abiogenesis is the leading hypothesis right now. It's not a theory. I believe in it because there's no logical alternative.
you also believe that evolution is random and not preset by a god like being, that suddenly and at the same time all over the world, a species evolved into something else or a new trait. Sorry, but if you seperate bacteria one from another in seperate dishes or places, only one of them is going to mutate, and the odds of it finding a way to survive and spread to everything is so remote, it really cant happen. Cave man after cave man slept with his mom and sister and had mutated offspring, one of them evolved slightly and he cannot procreate to a large enough degree to repopulate the entire earth. You all seem to believe this. Why? I am not sure. Because your text books say this is what happened, maybe.
kryptonianpride
First of all, evolution is not random. Genetic drift is. Secondly, evolution occurs at conception. We are all conceived with our genetic material. I don't see how cave men sleeping with his mom and sister could change it. Besides, changes in species have been documented in the fossil record. If you think that because a textbook teaches about evolution is the only reason why evolutionists believe in evolution, you would be mistaken. A textbook is just a gateway between the student and the evidence.
Log in to comment