LOT MORE WHITEYS IN NFL
i kid i kid
This topic is locked from further discussion.
there'd be fewer black people for starters, and whatever blacks there would be here would be immigrants and treated as second class people like they are in France.
Seriously...only homeless people I saw were black in France, I didnt see one walking to work or anything
mrbojangles25
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
there'd be fewer black people for starters, and whatever blacks there would be here would be immigrants and treated as second class people like they are in France.
Seriously...only homeless people I saw were black in France, I didnt see one walking to work or anything
shutdown_202
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
think like mexicans in america now
[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
there'd be fewer black people for starters, and whatever blacks there would be here would be immigrants and treated as second class people like they are in France.
Seriously...only homeless people I saw were black in France, I didnt see one walking to work or anything
links136
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
think like mexicans in america now
Are you saying that all Americans hate Mexicans? Or is it just me?[QUOTE="links136"][QUOTE="shutdown_202"]
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
gamerguru100
think like mexicans in america now
Are you saying that all Americans hate Mexicans? Or is it just me?No, Many americans probably dislike the illegal immigrant Mexicans...
To be perfectly honest, and as ironic as it sounds, if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today. Our economy was pretty much dependent on slavery for the first century of our existence. Without it, I would tend to think that we would have probably been overrun by one of the other imperial powers of the day. Probaby England.
Are you saying that all Americans hate Mexicans? Or is it just me?[QUOTE="gamerguru100"][QUOTE="links136"]
think like mexicans in america now
Xx_Hopeless_xX
No, Many americans probably dislike the illegal immigrant Mexicans...
Oh. good point. :PI just think they would have used a substitute method of forced labor...To be perfectly honest, and as ironic as it sounds, if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today. Our economy was pretty much dependent on slavery for the first century of our existence. Without it, I would tend to think that we would have probably been overrun by one of the other imperial powers of the day. Probaby England.
tycoonmike
[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]I just think they would have used a substitute method of forced labor...To be perfectly honest, and as ironic as it sounds, if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today. Our economy was pretty much dependent on slavery for the first century of our existence. Without it, I would tend to think that we would have probably been overrun by one of the other imperial powers of the day. Probaby England.
rawsavon
Which in and of itself would be slavery. I fail to see your point.
Agreed...the North was not all about helping black people...they were just about screwing the South...that served as a convenient excuseEven if slavery happened, if the Government did a better job protecting blacks in the post-slavery period, and didn't pass laws making it very rough to live as a colored person(especially in the south), there would be much less problems now.
taj7575
I just think they would have used a substitute method of forced labor...[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="tycoonmike"]
To be perfectly honest, and as ironic as it sounds, if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today. Our economy was pretty much dependent on slavery for the first century of our existence. Without it, I would tend to think that we would have probably been overrun by one of the other imperial powers of the day. Probaby England.
tycoonmike
Which in and of itself would be slavery. I fail to see your point.
Not 'slavery'...not black people...the poor would have been forced to work for wealthy land owners -see feudal times part two- The TC proposed "Like if black people were never enslaved and brought to America" -you said "if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today" -this is false...we would have had 'forced' labor...not slaves, just people left with little other choice. Class tension would replace the racial tensions we are experiencing todayNot sure if America would be too different, as we get tons of immirants already. However, Western Africa would probably be a much better place. We utterly destroyed communities there for centuries.Engrish_MajorBy we I assume you mean Europe. They started the trade and invaded those countries and stole their people.
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]However, Western Africa would probably be a much better place. We utterly destroyed communities there for centuries.collegeboy64
How do you figure this? The vast majority of slaves taken from Africa by Europeans were already slaves of the tribe they were bought from.
I'm not justifying slavery or trying to diminish the evil of what was done, but all the colonial powers have been out of Africa for over 40 years. Shouldn't Africans take some responsibility for their condition now?
1. The tribal slavery system and the American one were two entirely different things from what I have read. 2. Apartheid just ended like, yesterday, basically. 3. Can't take responsibility until they take back their resources. Everything of value there (the mines, the most valuable land) are all owned by foreign entities. The field isn't even just because the oppressor said "OK, you are free now. See you later.", after stripping the continent of all it's worth.LOL if you think blacks use drugs as much as white people. Stereotypes for the loss... Drugs cost money. Many don't have enough of that. Most do not want to rob for it. Blacks only really care about weed, in truth. All the rest is white territory. My state is the number one Meth state. Took me years (as a black man) to even learn what the heck Meth was... Crime, I think would be about the same too. Someone else would live in horrid conditions and do whatever to make ends meet. I agree though, the sports world would never recover...less crime less black people not as good football players and less drugs
thedootmaster
still less crime if they were never slaves in the first place and just a normal worker. then they would live in the same kind of conditions as white people.
I'd get moderated if I stated my opinion.
I think America would be very different now though.
Everyone knows it was the Africans selling eachother (Into Slavery) to the Portugese right? The Portugese didn't rip them out of their homes like many think.
HEre's a Map:
http://www.maps.com/ref_map.aspx?pid=11318
[QUOTE="tycoonmike"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] I just think they would have used a substitute method of forced labor...rawsavon
Which in and of itself would be slavery. I fail to see your point.
Not 'slavery'...not black people...the poor would have been forced to work for wealthy land owners -see feudal times part two- The TC proposed "Like if black people were never enslaved and brought to America" -you said "if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today" -this is false...we would have had 'forced' labor...not slaves, just people left with little other choice. Class tension would replace the racial tensions we are experiencing todayBy that logic, everyone who doesn't own a company is a slave. The TC also gave the question, in the title, "What would America be like if there never was slavery?" so don't try to hide behind what they said. Forced labor is still slave labor because there is no other choice. Whether the slaves are conveniently all the same race or not, it is still slavery.
What would Eygt be like without slavey? Or Athens? Or Rome? Slavery is as old as civilzation. The entire world would be different if the practice never got started. I love how selective some people are with their history...
What would Eygt be like without slavey? Or Athens? Or Rome? Slavery is as old as civilzation. The entire world would be different if the practice never got started. I love how selective some people are with their history...
heysharpshooter
Yeah, Don't forgot the Whole Middle East. Slavery was very big in the Ottoman Empire, which was primarily Muslim.
Not 'slavery'...not black people...the poor would have been forced to work for wealthy land owners -see feudal times part two- The TC proposed "Like if black people were never enslaved and brought to America" -you said "if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today" -this is false...we would have had 'forced' labor...not slaves, just people left with little other choice. Class tension would replace the racial tensions we are experiencing today[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="tycoonmike"]
Which in and of itself would be slavery. I fail to see your point.
tycoonmike
By that logic, everyone who doesn't own a company is a slave. The TC also gave the question, in the title, "What would America be like if there never was slavery?" so don't try to hide behind what they said. Forced labor is still slave labor because there is no other choice. Whether the slaves are conveniently all the same race or not, it is still slavery.
It is not the same. -if there is only one job available in town that does not make you a slave. -it is just what would have happened in the South w/out slave labor...similar to what many immigrants go through in the south right now (agricultural, construction, and oil field work)...they are not slaves, they just have VERY limited options...not much in the way of construction or oil company jobs back then...that leaves agriculture You are making wild judgments "By that logic, everyone who doesn't own a company is a slave" -all I said is that wealthy land owners would have found substitute labor -this was to refute your wildly inaccurate assertion that we would have taken over by England w/out slaves...which is wrong on so many levels it is not even funny -England losing the first time had nothing to do with economies or resources...you can't win a war like that unless you kill every person there...see Vietnam or the current war on terror[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
there'd be fewer black people for starters, and whatever blacks there would be here would be immigrants and treated as second class people like they are in France.
Seriously...only homeless people I saw were black in France, I didnt see one walking to work or anything
shutdown_202
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
now, or two years ago when i was there
[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
there'd be fewer black people for starters, and whatever blacks there would be here would be immigrants and treated as second class people like they are in France.
Seriously...only homeless people I saw were black in France, I didnt see one walking to work or anything
links136
When you say treated like second class people in France, do you mean back then or now?
think like mexicans in america now
no, from what I saw the blacks in France dont have it that good.
Hispanic immigrants have the same opportunities as born Americans provided they have citizenship.
In France, I did not see that same opportunity extended to blacks. Granted I was only there for two weeks, but I couldnt help but notice that every homeless person was black, ever person selling trinkets and crap was black, and I didnt see one black person working a legitimate job.
They would not have had the Civil War.optiowMost likely it would still have occurred...slavery was but a small drop in the ocean of differences -it was basically two completely different nations with vastly disparate views under one flag. The northerners were not pro black...they were just anti south...slavery served as nice rallying cry. (see the treatment of blacks after the war for proof) There was an excellent post earlier in thread that hypothesized The south would have won because the North would not have had the same public support w/out the slavery issue -the South would have been seen as poor farmers protecting their interests and perhaps received aid form abroad
[QUOTE="optiow"]They would not have had the Civil War.rawsavonMost likely it would still have occurred...slavery was but a small drop in the ocean of differences -it was basically two completely different nations with vastly disparate views under one flag. The northerners were not pro black...they were just anti south...slavery served as nice rallying cry. (see the treatment of blacks after the war for proof) There was an excellent post earlier in thread that hypothesized The south would have won because the North would not have had the same public support w/out the slavery issue -the South would have been seen as poor farmers protecting their interests and perhaps received aid form abroad
If not for the slavery angle, they would have received internationl support... Britain wanted the cotton and tobacco from the South, and for a while feared that if the South lost, that trade in those crops would have declined sharply.
Most likely it would still have occurred...slavery was but a small drop in the ocean of differences -it was basically two completely different nations with vastly disparate views under one flag. The northerners were not pro black...they were just anti south...slavery served as nice rallying cry. (see the treatment of blacks after the war for proof) There was an excellent post earlier in thread that hypothesized The south would have won because the North would not have had the same public support w/out the slavery issue -the South would have been seen as poor farmers protecting their interests and perhaps received aid form abroad[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="optiow"]They would not have had the Civil War.heysharpshooter
If not for the slavery angle, they would have received internationl support... Britain wanted the cotton and tobacco from the South, and for a while feared that if the South lost, that trade in those crops would have declined sharply.
That was my thought as well. -even if England had not helped, France would have been just as eager for a piece of the pie (better trade relations, maybe some of the north's territory) It is crazy to think how different things could have been...That word existed before slaveryNo "N" word. God it annoys me when people use the "N word" in every sentence.
Gaming-Planet
Like if black people were never enslaved and brought to America... What do you think?CHOASXIII
They were originally indentured servants not slaves. If slavery had never come to be, America would have been a very different place. Without slavery, Lincoln could not have prevented Britain from entering the Civil War and the South may have won. Also the new country may have sided with Germany in WW1 and WW2 may not have happened.
[QUOTE="tycoonmike"]I just think they would have used a substitute method of forced labor...To be perfectly honest, and as ironic as it sounds, if slavery never existed in America, we probably wouldn't be a free country today. Our economy was pretty much dependent on slavery for the first century of our existence. Without it, I would tend to think that we would have probably been overrun by one of the other imperial powers of the day. Probaby England.
rawsavon
yes they may have, it would have probably just been indentured servants, but sadly slavery was one of the best things to happen to the world economy. Without it the world may be a very different place today. Lets not forget that has it not been for slavery that most of the world back then would have been extremely poor. The problem is that the us had more of an agricultural slavery as apposed to the african house servants (slaves).
No Blues would exist, and if no Blues would exist, then no Rock & Roll would exist, and if no Rock & Roll would exist, then none of the music that I listen to today would exist, which is just sad.....:(
No Klu Klux Klan, less prejudice people, and more positive black communities would most likely be some of it's side effects. But then again, I'd would probably be born in the most remote areas of Africa since the white man wouldn't have came and took my ancestors to america.....tocool340If you want to be more technical about it, you would never have been born at all since ancestors post-slavery would never have met.
....
I obsess about alternate timelines.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment