Whats the most successful libertarian/conservative government?

  • 120 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="BMD004"]That is completely false. Here is a list of 10 companies that have moved their headquarters overseas to avoid paying the U.S. taxes: http://www.focus.com/fyi/finance/10-big-businesses-that-have-moved-abroad/ and that is just 10 big companies. There are a LOT of other companies that much prefer the taxes they pay in other countries overseas. And the financial crisis was created by the incentive that the government provided by the extremely low interest rates. The risk-taking was encouraged by the incredibly low rates. Then, Fannie and Freddie (government-sponsored companies) were were encouraged to buy toxic securities. That isn't even up for debate. It's what happened. I don't even need a source for that because it is common knowledge. BMD004

Taxes do not and never have had an adverse impact on businesses and that is not why they leave the country. Businesses have to pay for workers and have to abide by government regulations on how much they can work and for what price. . .unless they get workers from a country without such regulations. Taxes on businesses in this country are ridiculously low--yet businesses continue to outsource, not because of taxes but because of cheap labor. During and after the crisis, the government implemented regulations that stopped the issue from escalating or repeating. The only reason why we're on a computer right now instead of begging for food in the streets is because of taxes and government regulation. They (OFHEO) tried investigating Fannie and Freddie years before the crisis and were dismissed "for trying to implement regulation."

First, I'll address the issue that you say that businesses don't leave because of taxes.

First, here is a 60 minutes report that was done about two months ago about how businesses go overseas to find a tax-haven so that they don't have to pay U.S. taxes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml

If you don't think that a LOT of businesses move to other countries, then I don't know what to tell you other than that you are ignorant about this particular issue.

Now, about the financial crisis. You are trying to treat symptoms instead of the root cause. The #1 main cause of the whole economic mess is Alan Greenspan and the Fed lowering the interest rates to almost nothing. This is what gave incentive for all of the BS that went on with the lending.

we cant sustain on economy based on tax evasion... we are too big. Thats why tiny ass states like delaware do that stuff. Or tiny ass countries like switzerland.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="BMD004"]That is completely false. Here is a list of 10 companies that have moved their headquarters overseas to avoid paying the U.S. taxes: http://www.focus.com/fyi/finance/10-big-businesses-that-have-moved-abroad/ and that is just 10 big companies. There are a LOT of other companies that much prefer the taxes they pay in other countries overseas. And the financial crisis was created by the incentive that the government provided by the extremely low interest rates. The risk-taking was encouraged by the incredibly low rates. Then, Fannie and Freddie (government-sponsored companies) were were encouraged to buy toxic securities. That isn't even up for debate. It's what happened. I don't even need a source for that because it is common knowledge. BMD004

Taxes do not and never have had an adverse impact on businesses and that is not why they leave the country. Businesses have to pay for workers and have to abide by government regulations on how much they can work and for what price. . .unless they get workers from a country without such regulations. Taxes on businesses in this country are ridiculously low--yet businesses continue to outsource, not because of taxes but because of cheap labor. During and after the crisis, the government implemented regulations that stopped the issue from escalating or repeating. The only reason why we're on a computer right now instead of begging for food in the streets is because of taxes and government regulation. They (OFHEO) tried investigating Fannie and Freddie years before the crisis and were dismissed "for trying to implement regulation."

First, I'll address the issue that you say that businesses don't leave because of taxes.

First, here is a 60 minutes report that was done about two months ago about how businesses go overseas to find a tax-haven so that they don't have to pay U.S. taxes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml

If you don't think that a LOT of businesses move to other countries, then I don't know what to tell you other than that you are ignorant about this particular issue.

Now, about the financial crisis. You are trying to treat symptoms instead of the root cause. The #1 main cause of the whole economic mess is Alan Greenspan and the Fed lowering the interest rates to almost nothing. This is what gave incentive for all of the BS that went on with the lending.

Businesses go to other countries for profits; taxes do not hinder profits. Businesses weren't collapsing left and right when the tax rate was twice as high as it is now and businesses aren't collapsing in countries with a higher corporate tax rate than us. Businesses in certain other countries do not have to adhere to regulations; they do not need to give their employees insurance, they do not have to pay a set minimum wage, they do not need to worry about lawsuits (because workers can't sue), they don't have to worry about strikes or health regulations or any other matter of the sort that does cost them money. So they go to other countries. What we should be doing, rather than encouraging their behavior, is imposing penalties (yes, of the legal kind; regulation) for mass outsourcing; tax them MORE if they send their workers overseas. It gives them less incentive to do so and keeps more jobs in the US. I never said a lot of businesses do not move to other countries; I said they do not move to other countries because of teh taxes. Some businesses in this country just avoid taxes altogether (GE, anyone?). Alan Greenspan and the fed would not have been able to lower the interest rates (or their actions would not have had the consequences they had) if our regulation wasn't so lax at the time. They tried to treat the cause AND symptoms and the Bush Administration dismissed them.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
(Sweden is hardly socialist, read The Communist Manifesto).Saturos3091
Socialism and Communism are very different things. This is laid out in the Manifesto along with a long and vehement criticism of socialism. Marx and Engles hated socialism. Read the Communist Manifesto.
Avatar image for SoBaus
SoBaus

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 SoBaus
Member since 2011 • 546 Posts

[QUOTE="SoBaus"]

so you think we should model ourselves after china? this is the problem we all come back to... is there is no functional libertarian model, its a pipe dream. But china has WAAAAY more government regulation than the US.

and you honestly might be right, but you also have no proof... and no examples to backup that theory. Its like watching 5 guys try to jump the grand canyon and they all meet a fiery death... but its gonnna work when we try... just cause we are feeling totally stoked. Such bad reasoning.

Saturos3091



There is no functional model for any single form of government. Socialism too is a pipe dream. In fact there are no truly socialist nations out there that are successful either (Sweden is hardly socialist, read The Communist Manifesto). A well-designed government always teeters between policies geared towards more than one ideology.

China does have more regulations but not in regards to industry. They don't even have legitimate copyright laws. What I'm saying is not that we should model ourselves after anybody, but look into easing regulation of industry when extra regulation isn't needed, and regulating it when it is needed. That's the whole purpose of our government, but it's bogged down by ideological nutcases in Congress and the Supreme Court who think "I'm a liberal/conservative, so we HAVE to regulate/deregulate this." They don't think about what is good for the country, but whatever fits their half-wit ideologies.

not regulations like safety or environmental stuff.... but they are sure more than happy to force companies like GE to hand over patents to their government in order to do business there.... or insisting their government owns part of the business.

If people thought the financial and auto bailouts were bad, their heads would explode when they heard what china demands for the right to do business in their country.

but the thing is, all china's poor worker salaries are constantly going up, the average american worker salary is going down. And eliminating things like minimum wage isnt going to bring that salary up.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Taxes do not and never have had an adverse impact on businesses and that is not why they leave the country. Businesses have to pay for workers and have to abide by government regulations on how much they can work and for what price. . .unless they get workers from a country without such regulations. Taxes on businesses in this country are ridiculously low--yet businesses continue to outsource, not because of taxes but because of cheap labor. During and after the crisis, the government implemented regulations that stopped the issue from escalating or repeating. The only reason why we're on a computer right now instead of begging for food in the streets is because of taxes and government regulation. They (OFHEO) tried investigating Fannie and Freddie years before the crisis and were dismissed "for trying to implement regulation."Theokhoth

First, I'll address the issue that you say that businesses don't leave because of taxes.

First, here is a 60 minutes report that was done about two months ago about how businesses go overseas to find a tax-haven so that they don't have to pay U.S. taxes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml

If you don't think that a LOT of businesses move to other countries, then I don't know what to tell you other than that you are ignorant about this particular issue.

Now, about the financial crisis. You are trying to treat symptoms instead of the root cause. The #1 main cause of the whole economic mess is Alan Greenspan and the Fed lowering the interest rates to almost nothing. This is what gave incentive for all of the BS that went on with the lending.

Businesses go to other countries for profits; taxes do not hinder profits. Businesses weren't collapsing left and right when the tax rate was twice as high as it is now and businesses aren't collapsing in countries with a higher corporate tax rate than us. Businesses in certain other countries do not have to adhere to regulations; they do not need to give their employees insurance, they do not have to pay a set minimum wage, they do not need to worry about lawsuits (because workers can't sue), they don't have to worry about strikes or health regulations or any other matter of the sort that does cost them money. So they go to other countries. What we should be doing, rather than encouraging their behavior, is imposing penalties (yes, of the legal kind; regulation) for mass outsourcing; tax them MORE if they send their workers overseas. It gives them less incentive to do so and keeps more jobs in the US. I never said a lot of businesses do not move to other countries; I said they do not move to other countries because of teh taxes. Some businesses in this country just avoid taxes altogether (GE, anyone?). Alan Greenspan and the fed would not have been able to lower the interest rates (or their actions would not have had the consequences they had) if our regulation wasn't so lax at the time. They tried to treat the cause AND symptoms and the Bush Administration dismissed them.

Businesses have been going overseas for a long time... this is nothing new. And you are exactly right about regulation. Taxes aren't the only thing they are trying to escape. All of the regulation costs businesses a lot of money. They are trying to get away from all of that BS so that they can just do business. Businesses aren't just sending workers overseas... they are packing up and moving their entire headquarters to other countries. And to the second answer, the federal reserve supplied all the cheap money. That is how all this happened.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

The best government of all is a dictatorship where the dictator only has the best of interests for his people.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

The best government of all is a dictatorship where the dictator only has the best of interests for his people.

GOGOGOGURT
if only an omniscient benevolent dictator were possible, if only we had a god on earth to tell us what to do.
Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"](Sweden is hardly socialist, read The Communist Manifesto).Theokhoth
Socialism and Communism are very different things. This is laid out in the Manifesto along with a long and vehement criticism of socialism. Marx and Engles hated socialism. Read the Communist Manifesto.

May I ask what you are refering to? I'm familiar with Marx & Engels criticism of what would be a welfare state/social democracy, as well as theory on socialism being but a necessary stepping stone (but not the end itself) towards a stateless Communist society, but not so much a direct criticism of the socialist theory. Or was it those that you were refering?

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

First, I'll address the issue that you say that businesses don't leave because of taxes.

First, here is a 60 minutes report that was done about two months ago about how businesses go overseas to find a tax-haven so that they don't have to pay U.S. taxes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml

If you don't think that a LOT of businesses move to other countries, then I don't know what to tell you other than that you are ignorant about this particular issue.

Now, about the financial crisis. You are trying to treat symptoms instead of the root cause. The #1 main cause of the whole economic mess is Alan Greenspan and the Fed lowering the interest rates to almost nothing. This is what gave incentive for all of the BS that went on with the lending.

BMD004

Businesses go to other countries for profits; taxes do not hinder profits. Businesses weren't collapsing left and right when the tax rate was twice as high as it is now and businesses aren't collapsing in countries with a higher corporate tax rate than us. Businesses in certain other countries do not have to adhere to regulations; they do not need to give their employees insurance, they do not have to pay a set minimum wage, they do not need to worry about lawsuits (because workers can't sue), they don't have to worry about strikes or health regulations or any other matter of the sort that does cost them money. So they go to other countries. What we should be doing, rather than encouraging their behavior, is imposing penalties (yes, of the legal kind; regulation) for mass outsourcing; tax them MORE if they send their workers overseas. It gives them less incentive to do so and keeps more jobs in the US. I never said a lot of businesses do not move to other countries; I said they do not move to other countries because of teh taxes. Some businesses in this country just avoid taxes altogether (GE, anyone?). Alan Greenspan and the fed would not have been able to lower the interest rates (or their actions would not have had the consequences they had) if our regulation wasn't so lax at the time. They tried to treat the cause AND symptoms and the Bush Administration dismissed them.

Businesses have been going overseas for a long time... this is nothing new. And you are exactly right about regulation. Taxes aren't the only thing they are trying to escape. All of the regulation costs businesses a lot of money. They are trying to get away from all of that BS so that they can just do business. Businesses aren't just sending workers overseas... they are packing up and moving their entire headquarters to other countries. And to the second answer, the federal reserve supplied all the cheap money. That is how all this happened.

Businesses have been trying to escape human rights regulations for a long time. Regulations are not BS. Regulations are what keep us from dying of botulism when we go out to eat, what keep us from falling unconscious at work, and what make sure we are paid enough to survive at least at the bare minimum level. And yes, these regulations do cost a good bit of money; the alternative, however, is absolute hell for workers and the common person. Chinese sweat shops are the prime example of this. Regulations are 100% absolutely necessary, and we are too light on them as it is.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Saturos3091"](Sweden is hardly socialist, read The Communist Manifesto)._BlueDuck_

Socialism and Communism are very different things. This is laid out in the Manifesto along with a long and vehement criticism of socialism. Marx and Engles hated socialism. Read the Communist Manifesto.

May I ask what you are refering to? I'm familiar with Marx & Engels criticism of what would be a welfare state/social democracy, as well as theory on socialism being but a necessary stepping stone (but not the end itself) towards a stateless Communist society, but not so much a direct criticism of the socialist theory. Or was it those that you were refering?

Yes; Marx hated "idealist" socialism.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

The best government of all is a dictatorship where the dictator only has the best of interests for his people.

surrealnumber5

if only an omniscient benevolent dictator were possible, if only we had a god on earth to tell us what to do.

It's actually true. But only if the dictator made all the right decisions, and he wasn't crazy like stalin or lenin or hitler or saddam or kim jung or qadaffi or...

Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Socialism and Communism are very different things. This is laid out in the Manifesto along with a long and vehement criticism of socialism. Marx and Engles hated socialism. Read the Communist Manifesto.Theokhoth

May I ask what you are refering to? I'm familiar with Marx & Engels criticism of what would be a welfare state/social democracy, as well as theory on socialism being but a necessary stepping stone (but not the end itself) towards a stateless Communist society, but not so much a direct criticism of the socialist theory. Or was it those that you were refering?

Yes; Marx hated "idealist" socialism.

Ah yes. There is a good amount of irony there that the welfare state is probably one of the best ways to prevent a communist/socialist revolution. Of course those most scared of that oppose the welfare state just as much.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

The best government of all is a dictatorship where the dictator only has the best of interests for his people.

GOGOGOGURT

if only an omniscient benevolent dictator were possible, if only we had a god on earth to tell us what to do.

It's actually true. But only if the dictator made all the right decisions, and he wasn't crazy like stalin or lenin or hitler or saddam or kim jung or qadaffi or...

i agree, if there COULD BE someone like that he/she would be ideal, but unless he/she were immortal it would still end with all of the ills of prior dictators.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#114 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]

Uhm, pretty sure you can't imitate. Most successful governments (if there's any) with libertarian socialist ideals are small and cannot be compared to the US. Especially in terms of demographic. Wasn't America built on free market?

SoBaus

think your wrong, us libertarians know we are right and want to have a libertarian US government... we would not willy dilly inflict a completely unproven form of government on the most powerful country in the world... that would be completely illogical and make us mad men.

Finally, someone gets it!

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

nazi germany

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23354 Posts
I find it incredible that the extreme views of libertarians and the Tea Party have become so openly adopted in this country. The Republican party is going to come crashing down hard if that keeps up. The questions are when will that be and how much damage will they do before then?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
I find it incredible that the extreme views of libertarians and the Tea Party have become so openly adopted in this country. The Republican party is going to come crashing down hard if that keeps up. The questions are when will that be and how much damage will they do before then?mattbbpl
i would not mix the tea party with libertarians
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23354 Posts
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"]I find it incredible that the extreme views of libertarians and the Tea Party have become so openly adopted in this country. The Republican party is going to come crashing down hard if that keeps up. The questions are when will that be and how much damage will they do before then?surrealnumber5
i would not mix the tea party with libertarians

Their fiscal views often coincide, although their social views usually clash. And both take their views to destructive extremes.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#119 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] Businesses go to other countries for profits; taxes do not hinder profits. Businesses weren't collapsing left and right when the tax rate was twice as high as it is now and businesses aren't collapsing in countries with a higher corporate tax rate than us. Businesses in certain other countries do not have to adhere to regulations; they do not need to give their employees insurance, they do not have to pay a set minimum wage, they do not need to worry about lawsuits (because workers can't sue), they don't have to worry about strikes or health regulations or any other matter of the sort that does cost them money. So they go to other countries. What we should be doing, rather than encouraging their behavior, is imposing penalties (yes, of the legal kind; regulation) for mass outsourcing; tax them MORE if they send their workers overseas. It gives them less incentive to do so and keeps more jobs in the US. I never said a lot of businesses do not move to other countries; I said they do not move to other countries because of teh taxes. Some businesses in this country just avoid taxes altogether (GE, anyone?). Alan Greenspan and the fed would not have been able to lower the interest rates (or their actions would not have had the consequences they had) if our regulation wasn't so lax at the time. They tried to treat the cause AND symptoms and the Bush Administration dismissed them.Theokhoth

Businesses have been going overseas for a long time... this is nothing new. And you are exactly right about regulation. Taxes aren't the only thing they are trying to escape. All of the regulation costs businesses a lot of money. They are trying to get away from all of that BS so that they can just do business. Businesses aren't just sending workers overseas... they are packing up and moving their entire headquarters to other countries. And to the second answer, the federal reserve supplied all the cheap money. That is how all this happened.

Businesses have been trying to escape human rights regulations for a long time. Regulations are not BS. Regulations are what keep us from dying of botulism when we go out to eat, what keep us from falling unconscious at work, and what make sure we are paid enough to survive at least at the bare minimum level. And yes, these regulations do cost a good bit of money; the alternative, however, is absolute hell for workers and the common person. Chinese sweat shops are the prime example of this. Regulations are 100% absolutely necessary, and we are too light on them as it is.

Agreed.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#120 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

The best government of all is a dictatorship where the dictator only has the best of interests for his people.

surrealnumber5
if only an omniscient benevolent dictator were possible, if only we had a god on earth to tell us what to do.

why hello there.