When will Terrorist Era end?

  • 145 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mohan88
mohan88

4839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 mohan88
Member since 2006 • 4839 Posts
[QUOTE="mohan88"]How about this question......If Osama Bin Laden is dead, is that mean Terrorist are defeated?Silverbond
One man=/=all terrorists. Also, from that statement, I can infer that you have a prejudice against Muslims.

I have nothing aganist Muslims, but i do have something against Terrorists.....
Avatar image for stupid4
stupid4

3695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 80

User Lists: 0

#102 stupid4
Member since 2008 • 3695 Posts
The terroism era will never end.
Avatar image for deactivated-58188738395f3
deactivated-58188738395f3

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-58188738395f3
Member since 2008 • 1161 Posts

Wikipedia writes that the radical Sicarii offshoot of the Jewish Zealots and the Hashshashin (or Assassins), an offshoot of the Ismā'īlī sect of Shia Muslims, are one of the earliest forerunners of modern terrorism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_terrorism

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
Where there is organized civilization, there will be terrorism to undermine it.

Terrorism is the tool of the oppressed and weak in the face of adversity and suffering. I personally disagree with it entirely but it has no true beginning. Where there are bad governments, there are terrorist groups willing to take them down and establish new regimes.
foxhound_fox
I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.
Avatar image for Zerocrossings
Zerocrossings

7988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#105 Zerocrossings
Member since 2006 • 7988 Posts
When they finally get hold of nukes and bomb the world to hell.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#106 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Where there is organized civilization, there will be terrorism to undermine it.

Terrorism is the tool of the oppressed and weak in the face of adversity and suffering. I personally disagree with it entirely but it has no true beginning. Where there are bad governments, there are terrorist groups willing to take them down and establish new regimes.
MetalGear_Ninty
I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.

I'd say it's a combination of both, with oppression as the underlying factor. No matter how zealous, it's quite unlikely the unoppressed give their lives without some sort of mistreatment or adversity.
Avatar image for Trooperdx3117
Trooperdx3117

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#107 Trooperdx3117
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
[QUOTE="ElZilcho90"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Haha you know nothing of the IRARiseAgainst12
Care to enlighten us?

The IRA before 1969 fought a guerilla war, no terrorist acts were implemented by them. After 1969 and the split within the IRA The PIRA and OIRA fought a war against British rule which was started when britsh forces opened fire on unarmed Nationalist civilians. during the height of the troubles the PIRA luanched a Bombing campaign in England to force a settlement on the Norths politically unstable situation as British government had failed many times before. it was a war caused by the British and as propaganda it was deemed terrorist. the British were the terrorists, simple.

Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Where there is organized civilization, there will be terrorism to undermine it.

Terrorism is the tool of the oppressed and weak in the face of adversity and suffering. I personally disagree with it entirely but it has no true beginning. Where there are bad governments, there are terrorist groups willing to take them down and establish new regimes.
MetalGear_Ninty
I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.

Well... part of the reason for the surge in Islamic terrorism in the last five years is perceived oppression by the US, or 'The West' in general.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.

mainly because the oppressed are deemed "freedom fighters" when they act like terrorists.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Where there is organized civilization, there will be terrorism to undermine it.

Terrorism is the tool of the oppressed and weak in the face of adversity and suffering. I personally disagree with it entirely but it has no true beginning. Where there are bad governments, there are terrorist groups willing to take them down and establish new regimes.
Danm_999
I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.

I'd say it's a combination of both, with oppression as the underlying factor. No matter how zealous, it's quite unlikely the unoppressed give their lives without some sort of mistreatment or adversity.

Pull the other one. :roll: British terrorists have lived a very cosy lifestyle in Britain -- they have not been oppressed at all. Nor, do I imagine was Osama Bin Laden who was an extremely wealthy guy. This excuse of 'oppression' as the underlying factor absolutely holds no water, whatsoever.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Where there is organized civilization, there will be terrorism to undermine it.

Terrorism is the tool of the oppressed and weak in the face of adversity and suffering. I personally disagree with it entirely but it has no true beginning. Where there are bad governments, there are terrorist groups willing to take them down and establish new regimes.
Funky_Llama
I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part.

Well... part of the reason for the surge in Islamic terrorism in the last five years is perceived oppression by the US, or 'The West' in general.

Percieved oppression does not equate to actual oppression. This 'oppression' that is spoken of, is partly just propoganda by jihadists.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#112 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part. MetalGear_Ninty
I'd say it's a combination of both, with oppression as the underlying factor. No matter how zealous, it's quite unlikely the unoppressed give their lives without some sort of mistreatment or adversity.

Pull the other one. :roll: British terrorists have lived a very cosy lifestyle in Britain -- they have not been oppressed at all. Nor, do I imagine was Osama Bin Laden who was an extremely wealthy guy. This excuse of 'oppression' as the underlying factor absolutely holds no water, whatsoever.

Nobody is using it as an excuse except those who commit these crimes. I'm merely offering an explanation on what causes people to turn to zealotry. But you'd be crazy to deny that the injustices these people feel, even if they are completely perceived (which most of the time I feel they are) are motives in what they do. Some form of oppression motivated all these people, even if it didn't affect them personally. The injustices they perceive against their religion as a whole globally is a good example, plenty of Western born Muslims travel to Pakistan or Israel and get the first hand experiences they need to make that jump. Mix in some firebrand preachers and you've got a dangerous situation. I agree with you about Osama, but I don't see Osama as a true 'terrorist', more of an opportunist forcing other people to sacrifice themselves to advance his own agenda, whether they be political, religious or economic. I have no doubt he experienced a minimum of oppression in his life.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#113 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part. MetalGear_Ninty
Well... part of the reason for the surge in Islamic terrorism in the last five years is perceived oppression by the US, or 'The West' in general.

Percieved oppression does not equate to actual oppression. This 'oppression' that is spoken of, is partly just propoganda by jihadists.

Plenty of terrorists certainly believe it. That's all that really matters. The German people certainly weren't being oppressed by the Jewish people following WW1, but the belief that they were is certainly an explanation for the Holocaust.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] I'd say it's a combination of both, with oppression as the underlying factor. No matter how zealous, it's quite unlikely the unoppressed give their lives without some sort of mistreatment or adversity.Danm_999
Pull the other one. :roll: British terrorists have lived a very cosy lifestyle in Britain -- they have not been oppressed at all. Nor, do I imagine was Osama Bin Laden who was an extremely wealthy guy. This excuse of 'oppression' as the underlying factor absolutely holds no water, whatsoever.

Nobody is using it as an excuse except those who commit these crimes. I'm merely offering an explanation on what causes people to turn to zealotry. But you'd be crazy to deny that the injustices these people feel, even if they are completely perceived (which most of the time I feel they are) are motives in what they do. Some form of oppression motivated all these people, even if it didn't affect them personally. The injustices they perceive against their religion as a whole globally is a good example, plenty of Western born Muslims travel to Pakistan or Israel and get the first hand experiences they need to make that jump. Mix in some firebrand preachers and you've got a dangerous situation. I agree with you about Osama, but I don't see Osama as a true 'terrorist', more of an opportunist forcing other people to sacrifice themselves to advance his own agenda, whether they be political, religious or economic. I have no doubt he experienced a minimum of oppression in his life.

I see what you're saying. But like I was saying, perceived oppression simply does not equate to actual oppression.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#115 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] Pull the other one. :roll: British terrorists have lived a very cosy lifestyle in Britain -- they have not been oppressed at all. Nor, do I imagine was Osama Bin Laden who was an extremely wealthy guy. This excuse of 'oppression' as the underlying factor absolutely holds no water, whatsoever.MetalGear_Ninty
Nobody is using it as an excuse except those who commit these crimes. I'm merely offering an explanation on what causes people to turn to zealotry. But you'd be crazy to deny that the injustices these people feel, even if they are completely perceived (which most of the time I feel they are) are motives in what they do. Some form of oppression motivated all these people, even if it didn't affect them personally. The injustices they perceive against their religion as a whole globally is a good example, plenty of Western born Muslims travel to Pakistan or Israel and get the first hand experiences they need to make that jump. Mix in some firebrand preachers and you've got a dangerous situation. I agree with you about Osama, but I don't see Osama as a true 'terrorist', more of an opportunist forcing other people to sacrifice themselves to advance his own agenda, whether they be political, religious or economic. I have no doubt he experienced a minimum of oppression in his life.

I see what you're saying. But like I was saying, perceived oppression simply does not equate to actual oppression.

Doesn't matter, perceived oppression leads to actual terrorism.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"] I don't buy this concept that terrorism is the results of oppression and adversity; terroism is the results of ideological zealotry for the most part. MetalGear_Ninty
Well... part of the reason for the surge in Islamic terrorism in the last five years is perceived oppression by the US, or 'The West' in general.

Percieved oppression does not equate to actual oppression. This 'oppression' that is spoken of, is partly just propoganda by jihadists.

Mm, true, but if percieved oppression leads to terrorism, then actual oppression must lead to terrorism, because when they're actually oppressed, they percieve that oppression.
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] Nobody is using it as an excuse except those who commit these crimes. I'm merely offering an explanation on what causes people to turn to zealotry. But you'd be crazy to deny that the injustices these people feel, even if they are completely perceived (which most of the time I feel they are) are motives in what they do. Some form of oppression motivated all these people, even if it didn't affect them personally. The injustices they perceive against their religion as a whole globally is a good example, plenty of Western born Muslims travel to Pakistan or Israel and get the first hand experiences they need to make that jump. Mix in some firebrand preachers and you've got a dangerous situation. I agree with you about Osama, but I don't see Osama as a true 'terrorist', more of an opportunist forcing other people to sacrifice themselves to advance his own agenda, whether they be political, religious or economic. I have no doubt he experienced a minimum of oppression in his life.Danm_999
I see what you're saying. But like I was saying, perceived oppression simply does not equate to actual oppression.

Doesn't matter, perceived oppression leads to actual terrorism.

That wasn't the point you were making in your original post, and that's all I was saying.
Avatar image for redwolf22
redwolf22

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 redwolf22
Member since 2008 • 1192 Posts

The terrorisim ear will never end.

It is an act of desperation by the overly zealous followers of Islam as there somewhat isolated world is succombing to foriegn influences. I don't mean to be offensive, but that is what is happening.

Its happened before throughout history. An example would be the oppression of the Christians in moorish spain. Although they did not have bombs, several similaritys can be noticed.

So even if "Islamic" terrorisim ends, terrorisim itself will remain as an invaluble tool to groups unable to make direct conflict.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Well... part of the reason for the surge in Islamic terrorism in the last five years is perceived oppression by the US, or 'The West' in general.Funky_Llama
Percieved oppression does not equate to actual oppression. This 'oppression' that is spoken of, is partly just propoganda by jihadists.

Mm, true, but if percieved oppression leads to terrorism, then actual oppression must lead to terrorism, because when they're actually oppressed, they percieve that oppression.

I suppose so, but I don't think the actual oppression, like say perhaps in Israel, is as a major factor as some would have you believe in this thread.
Avatar image for Trelaf_TheWise
Trelaf_TheWise

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Trelaf_TheWise
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts

[QUOTE="mohan88"]First ever Terrorist attack happend on 1961.Hewkii
please.

What a Hero

Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#121 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="ElZilcho90"] Care to enlighten us?Trooperdx3117
The IRA before 1969 fought a guerilla war, no terrorist acts were implemented by them. After 1969 and the split within the IRA The PIRA and OIRA fought a war against British rule which was started when britsh forces opened fire on unarmed Nationalist civilians. during the height of the troubles the PIRA luanched a Bombing campaign in England to force a settlement on the Norths politically unstable situation as British government had failed many times before. it was a war caused by the British and as propaganda it was deemed terrorist. the British were the terrorists, simple.

Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids

Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?
Avatar image for redwolf22
redwolf22

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 redwolf22
Member since 2008 • 1192 Posts

[QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] The IRA before 1969 fought a guerilla war, no terrorist acts were implemented by them. After 1969 and the split within the IRA The PIRA and OIRA fought a war against British rule which was started when britsh forces opened fire on unarmed Nationalist civilians. during the height of the troubles the PIRA luanched a Bombing campaign in England to force a settlement on the Norths politically unstable situation as British government had failed many times before. it was a war caused by the British and as propaganda it was deemed terrorist. the British were the terrorists, simple.RiseAgainst12
Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids

Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?

I'd say they were. The cause they are fighting for shouldn't define whether or not they are terrorists; terrorism can be done in the name of a "good" or "bad" cause ;).

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"] The IRA before 1969 fought a guerilla war, no terrorist acts were implemented by them. After 1969 and the split within the IRA The PIRA and OIRA fought a war against British rule which was started when britsh forces opened fire on unarmed Nationalist civilians. during the height of the troubles the PIRA luanched a Bombing campaign in England to force a settlement on the Norths politically unstable situation as British government had failed many times before. it was a war caused by the British and as propaganda it was deemed terrorist. the British were the terrorists, simple.redwolf22

Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids

Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?

There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="redwolf22"]

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids
-Sun_Tzu-

Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?

There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

Terrorist involves targetting civiliansnot just any non-patriotic military action
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="redwolf22"] Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?markop2003
There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

 

Terrorist involves targetting civiliansnot just any non-patriotic military action

That is one form of terrorism, but that is by no means the only form of terrorism. All terrorism is at its heart is the use of fear, or "terror", to generate action; usually action of the political or ideological nature.
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
[QUOTE="mohan88"]First ever Terrorist attack happend on 1961.Hewkii
please.

Please.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

 

-Sun_Tzu-
Terrorist involves targetting civiliansnot just any non-patriotic military action

That is one form of terrorism, but that is by no means the only form of terrorism. All terrorism is at its heart is the use of fear, or "terror", to generate action; usually action of the political or ideological nature.

but doesnt that refer to alot of what governments do then? they use the fear of a possible war to make a point. an example is how the Americans used there Nuclear weapons to put them on a dominate spot in the world as countries were affriad of a nuclear war.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="markop2003"] Terrorist involves targetting civiliansnot just any non-patriotic military actionRiseAgainst12
That is one form of terrorism, but that is by no means the only form of terrorism. All terrorism is at its heart is the use of fear, or "terror", to generate action; usually action of the political or ideological nature.

but doesnt that refer to alot of what governments do then? they use the fear of a possible war to make a point. an example is how the Americans used there Nuclear weapons to put them on a dominate spot in the world as countries were affriad of a nuclear war.

Which goes back to my main point when I said that terrorism and patriotism are both subjective.
Avatar image for peeviness
peeviness

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 peeviness
Member since 2004 • 2023 Posts

Terrorism has existed as long as humanity.

 

Avatar image for taj7575
taj7575

12084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#130 taj7575
Member since 2008 • 12084 Posts

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="mohan88"]First ever Terrorist attack happend on 1961.CptJSparrow
please.

Please.

 

maybe even the french revolution.

Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts
terrorism is the means in which the oppressed achieve their ends. It will never end so long as malcontent minorities exist within the majority.
Avatar image for firo999
firo999

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#132 firo999
Member since 2005 • 167 Posts
HA ! it won't end because there are no terrorists they are just people funded by america :P
Avatar image for Trooperdx3117
Trooperdx3117

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#133 Trooperdx3117
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
[QUOTE="redwolf22"]

[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Ah yes but they also launched bombing campaign in England under Stephen Hayes and Sean Russell in the early 1940's and tried to make contact with Nazi Germany which meant the Nazis often dropped agents into Ireland to link up with the I.R.A. Also the I.R.A. can technically be linked back to being a terrorist organisation in 1935 when it was banned by the government. And just because they didn't do bombings at this time did'nt mean they didn't commit terrorist acts, they were involved in numerous murders and army ammunition dump raids
-Sun_Tzu-

Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?

There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

As far as im concerned a terrorist kills innocent civilians a revolutionist only tries to kill military targets
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="redwolf22"] Quick and easy question here, French resistance terrorist or not?Trooperdx3117
There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

 

As far as im concerned a terrorist kills innocent civilians a revolutionist only tries to kill military targets

Thank you, the IRA and later the PIRA had no intention to kill innocent civillians all targets were millitary or economic and precautions were taken to avoid civillian casualties.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

Trooperdx3117

As far as im concerned a terrorist kills innocent civilians a revolutionist only tries to kill military targets

Which proves my point of terrorism and patriotism being subjective. 

Avatar image for glenn2709
glenn2709

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 glenn2709
Member since 2005 • 1719 Posts
when the world ends, that's when.
Avatar image for Trooperdx3117
Trooperdx3117

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#137 Trooperdx3117
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] There is no clear cut line between the terrorist and the revolutionist. Terrorism and patriotism is all subjective. The founding fathers of the U.S, for example, could be considered radical terrorists.

 

As far as im concerned a terrorist kills innocent civilians a revolutionist only tries to kill military targets

Thank you, the IRA and later the PIRA had no intention to kill innocent civillians all targets were millitary or economic and precautions were taken to avoid civillian casualties.

And the Omagh bombings were just a mistake, after all its so easy to mix up an army base with a shopping center.
Avatar image for Jango-Bawls
Jango-Bawls

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Jango-Bawls
Member since 2008 • 360 Posts
[QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"][QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"] As far as im concerned a terrorist kills innocent civilians a revolutionist only tries to kill military targetsTrooperdx3117
Thank you, the IRA and later the PIRA had no intention to kill innocent civillians all targets were millitary or economic and precautions were taken to avoid civillian casualties.

And the Omagh bombings were just a mistake, after all its so easy to mix up an army base with a shopping center.

The IRA warned the police to get innocents out of there before the bomb went off, and they did'nt do it in time.It was'nt the IRA's intention to kill civilians that day. And on the topic, Terrorism will never end.Terrorism is the act of striking terror into people, its like fighting fear.You can't fight fear because it will always exist.
Avatar image for shyskillz
shyskillz

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 shyskillz
Member since 2006 • 4197 Posts
there is no way to stop terrorist acts and i believe most terrorism is trumped up by crooked governments. i don't buy it when it is said " We must fight for our freedom " wtf..freedom from what? why do terrorst want to hurt innocents? why don't the governmets give these terrorist a forum to speack so we can hear why we need to protect our freedom. pffft, sounds more like an excuse to pry into my business a little more. the Gov. always find clever ways to see whats in your suitcase, backpacks,car and house at any given time. they are the ones that are slowly taking your freedom away. sorry, but i'm just not that gullible.
Avatar image for RiseAgainst12
RiseAgainst12

6767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#140 RiseAgainst12
Member since 2007 • 6767 Posts
[QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Thank you, the IRA and later the PIRA had no intention to kill innocent civillians all targets were millitary or economic and precautions were taken to avoid civillian casualties.Jango-Bawls
And the Omagh bombings were just a mistake, after all its so easy to mix up an army base with a shopping center.

The IRA warned the police to get innocents out of there before the bomb went off, and they did'nt do it in time.It was'nt the IRA's intention to kill civilians that day. And on the topic, Terrorism will never end.Terrorism is the act of striking terror into people, its like fighting fear.You can't fight fear because it will always exist.

What he said.
Avatar image for 3aNkabot
3aNkabot

620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 3aNkabot
Member since 2008 • 620 Posts

Terrorism might end when a country that kills innocent ppl for their oil, land and natural resources stops doing so.

I belive america is a country of terrorists, no matter how righteous they are .

Imo, flame on.

Avatar image for mohan88
mohan88

4839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 mohan88
Member since 2006 • 4839 Posts
So, we can all conclude that Terrorism will never end............
Avatar image for Trooperdx3117
Trooperdx3117

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#143 Trooperdx3117
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
[QUOTE="Trooperdx3117"][QUOTE="RiseAgainst12"] Thank you, the IRA and later the PIRA had no intention to kill innocent civillians all targets were millitary or economic and precautions were taken to avoid civillian casualties.Jango-Bawls
And the Omagh bombings were just a mistake, after all its so easy to mix up an army base with a shopping center.

The IRA warned the police to get innocents out of there before the bomb went off, and they did'nt do it in time.It was'nt the IRA's intention to kill civilians that day. And on the topic, Terrorism will never end.Terrorism is the act of striking terror into people, its like fighting fear.You can't fight fear because it will always exist.

Okay what about the memorial day bombings or the Bessbrook murders where the I.R.A. killed 10 linen workers because they were protestant.
Avatar image for battousai188
battousai188

2075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#144 battousai188
Member since 2004 • 2075 Posts

Never because there will always be someone who hates someone and will do something to that other person/nation/whomever, Terrorism is just a term that describes what a group of people do to incite fear, to try and establish ideological change.

And as long as America remains a nation there will be groups who will do what they can do to prove a point to the world.

Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#145 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

Terrorism will never end.

That's why the "War on Terror" is a complete joke. People will always hate other people