Which movies do you HATE

  • 134 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for streak000
streak000

6802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 streak000
Member since 2007 • 6802 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.Film-Guy

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

I disagree. I think that, if anything, the original trilogy legitimised Sci-Fi as a serious genre, and increased the general population's interest in it. And I happen to think that it had a very good plot. In fact, it was its plot, not special effects, that made it so popular.

Then again, if you are talking about the second trilogy, I completely agree with you. Recent Star Wars were absolute trash, and almost undermined the magic of the originals for me........

Avatar image for SaintBlaze
SaintBlaze

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 SaintBlaze
Member since 2007 • 7736 Posts

Clovefield

Fantastic Four

super Mario Bros.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#103 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.Film-Guy

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

Avatar image for Helloiseeu
Helloiseeu

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#104 Helloiseeu
Member since 2007 • 786 Posts
All those Lara Croft wannabe movies.
Avatar image for arab_prince
arab_prince

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#105 arab_prince
Member since 2005 • 4089 Posts
Napoleon Dynamite is the only title that comes to mind
Avatar image for 123625
123625

9035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#106 123625
Member since 2006 • 9035 Posts
Son of the mask, could it be any more pointless?
Avatar image for muthsera666
muthsera666

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#107 muthsera666
Member since 2005 • 13271 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola2"]

[QUOTE="maximusmmii"]

(not seen)

equillibrium

donnie darko

maximusmmii

now your just listing good movies to annoy ;) cheeky you

no. those are all really bad movies.

I love Donnie Darko. A great movie to watch with friends in the middle of the night and then discuss the metaphysical rammifications.

And Equillibrium had some great ideas.

Avatar image for Film-Guy
Film-Guy

26778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Film-Guy
Member since 2007 • 26778 Posts
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.battlefront23

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

So what if put a bunch of mythological references in star wars, doesnt make it better.

Avatar image for muthsera666
muthsera666

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#109 muthsera666
Member since 2005 • 13271 Posts

All those Lara Croft wannabe movies.Helloiseeu

I liked the first one, and the second had some good aspects.

Avatar image for A_Tarkovsky
A_Tarkovsky

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 A_Tarkovsky
Member since 2008 • 2929 Posts

300 (ok.. i don't hate it. but with all the hype. I expected more)

athgeek
It's one of your least favorite movies because it wasn't all that great? That's bullcrap.
Avatar image for A_Tarkovsky
A_Tarkovsky

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 A_Tarkovsky
Member since 2008 • 2929 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.Film-Guy

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

So what if put a bunch of mythological references in star wars, doesnt make it better.

Star Wars ruined science-fiction? I'm pretty sure science-fiction was ruined in the fifties.
Avatar image for Film-Guy
Film-Guy

26778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Film-Guy
Member since 2007 • 26778 Posts
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.A_Tarkovsky

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

So what if put a bunch of mythological references in star wars, doesnt make it better.

Star Wars ruined science-fiction? I'm pretty sure science-fiction was ruined in the fifties.

The fifties had some gems, Star Wars made Sci Fi moe generic and popularized for a more mainstream but less intelligent crowd. Thats why Films like John Caprenters the thing didnt make much money while E.T did. Also kinda explains some of Terry Gilliam's failures in the past. People were too easily satisfied with good effects that they ignore the whole picture. i still think Blade Runner is one of the best Sci FI Movies ever and that George Lucas is a hack that makes way too much money, while a great directors like Andrei Tarkovsky get ignored. Also films like The Signal, which may not be a pure sci fi film, also gets ignored.

Avatar image for linkinSOXecho
linkinSOXecho

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 linkinSOXecho
Member since 2007 • 594 Posts
napolean dynomite.....i hate that movie so much. what makes it worse is that everyone say it was hilarious. i didnt laugh once.
Avatar image for martialbullet
martialbullet

10948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#114 martialbullet
Member since 2006 • 10948 Posts
New Fist of Fury was horrible!! A bad way for Jackie Chan to have started his career
Avatar image for A_Tarkovsky
A_Tarkovsky

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 A_Tarkovsky
Member since 2008 • 2929 Posts
I'm gonna list Dogville, because I hate that ugly handheld camera work and the ludicrous assertion that it's a comment on America.
Avatar image for A_Tarkovsky
A_Tarkovsky

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 A_Tarkovsky
Member since 2008 • 2929 Posts
[QUOTE="A_Tarkovsky"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.Film-Guy

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

So what if put a bunch of mythological references in star wars, doesnt make it better.

Star Wars ruined science-fiction? I'm pretty sure science-fiction was ruined in the fifties.

The fifties had some gems, Star Wars made Sci Fi moe generic and popularized for a more mainstream but less intelligent crowd. Thats why Films like John Caprenters the thing didnt make much money while E.T did. Also kinda explains some of Terry Gilliam's failures in the past. People were too easily satisfied with good effects that they ignore the whole picture. i still think Blade Runner is one of the best Sci FI Movies ever and that George Lucas is a hack that makes way too much money, while a great directors like Andrei Tarkovsky get ignored. Also films like The Signal, which may not be a pure sci fi film, also gets ignored.

I'm sorry, but this had nothing to do with Star Wars. Terry Gilliam's films failed because Terry Gilliam is a ****ing wacko (and I mean that in the best possible way) and they could never be marketed to a mainstream crowd. Tarkovsky's films are ignored because his movies are three-hours long and in Russian. Those guys aren't the most palatable to a mainstream audience. Star Wars didn't ruin their chances of success, Star Wars simply persuaded studios to pour more money into these "blockbusters" that were kickstarted with Jaws. There you go, blame Jaws for your problems. Actually, blame King Kong. Seriously, blame marketing and the American public.
Avatar image for martialbullet
martialbullet

10948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#117 martialbullet
Member since 2006 • 10948 Posts
I also hated the Protector (1984). No, just nooo.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
AI, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon and Napolian Dynamite all hold a special level of hatred with me
Avatar image for Film-Guy
Film-Guy

26778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Film-Guy
Member since 2007 • 26778 Posts
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="A_Tarkovsky"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Any Star Wars movie, overrated trash that ruined the sci fi genre.A_Tarkovsky

Blasphemy!

Star Wars turned the public against interesting sci fi. After Star wars it became more acceptable for a sci fi film to have a crappy plot as long as it had good effects. Intellectual Sci Fi went downill after Star wars, sure there were some gems like Twelve Monkeys, but they never had the success they used to.

So having your model of plot design on ancient Greek mythology bad?

So what if put a bunch of mythological references in star wars, doesnt make it better.

Star Wars ruined science-fiction? I'm pretty sure science-fiction was ruined in the fifties.

The fifties had some gems, Star Wars made Sci Fi moe generic and popularized for a more mainstream but less intelligent crowd. Thats why Films like John Caprenters the thing didnt make much money while E.T did. Also kinda explains some of Terry Gilliam's failures in the past. People were too easily satisfied with good effects that they ignore the whole picture. i still think Blade Runner is one of the best Sci FI Movies ever and that George Lucas is a hack that makes way too much money, while a great directors like Andrei Tarkovsky get ignored. Also films like The Signal, which may not be a pure sci fi film, also gets ignored.

I'm sorry, but this had nothing to do with Star Wars. Terry Gilliam's films failed because Terry Gilliam is a ****ing wacko (and I mean that in the best possible way) and they could never be marketed to a mainstream crowd. Tarkovsky's films are ignored because his movies are three-hours long and in Russian. Those guys aren't the most palatable to a mainstream audience. Star Wars didn't ruin their chances of success, Star Wars simply persuaded studios to pour more money into these "blockbusters" that were kickstarted with Jaws. There you go, blame Jaws for your problems. Actually, blame King Kong. Seriously, blame marketing and the American public.

I've been blaming the public for years:P Lowest common denominater I tell you.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
oh and the movie Sunshine
Avatar image for Film-Guy
Film-Guy

26778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Film-Guy
Member since 2007 • 26778 Posts

oh and the movie SunshineSerraph105

Which one? The one with Ralph Fiennes or the sci fi one? I quite liked both, the twist near the end of sunshine was a bit strange at first, but not enough to make it a bad movie.

Avatar image for Link256
Link256

29195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Link256
Member since 2005 • 29195 Posts

Just about the entire spoof genre in the last several years. Same goes video game movies.

Also...

  • Big Momma's House 2
  • Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo
  • Supergirl
  • 3 Ninjas: High Noon at Mega Mountain
  • Class of Nuke 'Em High Part II: Subhumanoid Meltdown

Avatar image for A_Tarkovsky
A_Tarkovsky

2929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 A_Tarkovsky
Member since 2008 • 2929 Posts

Just about the entire spoof genre in the last several years. Same goes video game movies.

Also...

  • Big Momma's House 2
  • Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo
  • Supergirl
  • 3 Ninjas: High Noon at Mega Mountain
  • Class of Nuke 'Em High Part II: Subhumanoid Meltdown

Link256
Roger Ebert isn't my favorite critic, but I've got to admit his review of Deuce Bigelow is utter genius.
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola2
hip-hop-cola2

2454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 hip-hop-cola2
Member since 2007 • 2454 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]oh and the movie SunshineFilm-Guy

Which one? The one with Ralph Fiennes or the sci fi one? I quite liked both, the twist near the end of sunshine was a bit strange at first, but not enough to make it a bad movie.

he cant be talking about the danny boyle film....he cant :|

Avatar image for swizz-the-gamer
swizz-the-gamer

8801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#125 swizz-the-gamer
Member since 2005 • 8801 Posts
[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]

No Country For Old Men

whos_next000
I literally facepalmed.

Yeah thats easily one of the best movies of the last few years.
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20081 Posts

Casino Royale was not a james bond movie, it was something else.

Frattracide

After the godawfully terrible Die Another Day (not the worst Bond film, but only because it didn't have Roger Moore in it), Casino Royale was a very welcome change to the series.
In fact, it's how Bond films should be - they were getting far too carried away with stupid gadgets and ridiculous villains.

Anyway, uh...
Any annoying family movies that my friends drag me to (like Happy Feet - they're not bad movies, but I hate going to them, and don't enjoy them)
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Star Wars: Episode 1: The Phantom Menace
Napoleon Dynamite

Oh, and The Usual Suspects.
It tried hard to be clever, and failed miserably. It would have been better without a plot twist.

Avatar image for Chitzu
Chitzu

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Chitzu
Member since 2007 • 419 Posts

Any movie with Orlando Bloom in it. Every time he says his line or just stands in the background I become REALLY sleepy and just have to go away and stop watching the movie...

Avatar image for Buffalo_Soulja
Buffalo_Soulja

13151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Buffalo_Soulja
Member since 2004 • 13151 Posts
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]oh and the movie Sunshinehip-hop-cola2

Which one? The one with Ralph Fiennes or the sci fi one? I quite liked both, the twist near the end of sunshine was a bit strange at first, but not enough to make it a bad movie.

he cant be talking about the danny boyle film....he cant :|

I didn't hate that one, but was really dissapointed by it.

Avatar image for johnchan3
johnchan3

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 johnchan3
Member since 2007 • 281 Posts
No Country For Old Men
Avatar image for maccer101
maccer101

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#130 maccer101
Member since 2005 • 4257 Posts
[QUOTE="athgeek"]

300 (ok.. i don't hate it. but with all the hype. I expected more)

A_Tarkovsky

It's one of your least favorite movies because it wasn't all that great? That's bullcrap.

well, it does really suck

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola2
hip-hop-cola2

2454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 hip-hop-cola2
Member since 2007 • 2454 Posts
[QUOTE="A_Tarkovsky"][QUOTE="athgeek"]

300 (ok.. i don't hate it. but with all the hype. I expected more)

maccer101

It's one of your least favorite movies because it wasn't all that great? That's bullcrap.

well, it does really suck

300 is a film which needs a cinema experience, iv watched the blu-ray and it simply wasn't the same without loud surround sound and a huge screen lol... but in the cinema.... brilliant

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#132 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Fight Club. Don't know why, but I just didn't buy the hype. So many guys rave about it, but it was blah to me.
Avatar image for muthsera666
muthsera666

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#133 muthsera666
Member since 2005 • 13271 Posts

Fight Club. Don't know why, but I just didn't buy the hype. So many guys rave about it, but it was blah to me.sonicare

I thought the movie was great. Very good commentary on the culture of materialism and alternative interpretations of how to live with it. Also opens for discussion on what the world would be like if the ending were to happen in real life.

Avatar image for Quadrifoglio
Quadrifoglio

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#134 Quadrifoglio
Member since 2006 • 5451 Posts
Titanic..
Avatar image for muthsera666
muthsera666

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#135 muthsera666
Member since 2005 • 13271 Posts

Titanic..Quadrifoglio

I've still never seen it, and I don't plan to see it.

Avatar image for courtneyygee
courtneyygee

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 courtneyygee
Member since 2006 • 785 Posts

Dreamcatcher!!! WASTE OF MY TIME.

Penny Dreadful (one of the eight movies to die for...more like to kill you)

No Country For Old Men...=/