Who else is optimistic that marijuana prohibition could end by 2011?

  • 191 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pis3rch
pis3rch

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 pis3rch
Member since 2006 • 1695 Posts

Marijuana is a deteriorating drug andhas been scientifically proven to destroy the brain at a shocking rate.

Marijuana has actually been the reason for murder and theft and more immoral activities that I cannot mention here.

calvinsora

1.Really?

2. Don't you think that the murder and theft would stop once people could get marijuana from legal, legitimate sources than from violent drug dealers from Mexico and South America?

Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#102 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

I just want to say we shouldn't need a valid reason to make it legal. You should need a valid reason to keep it illegal. Why should you have the right to tell me what I can smoke or drink in my own home? If I'm not harming anyone other than myself then why should you have the right to ban me from using it?

It's a simple matter of personal freedom. Nothing more, nothing less. If I want to smoke pot I should have the right to do that. Your opinion on whether it's good or bad for me or anyone doesn't matter at all. It all goes back to personal freedom. It should be my right to what I want to with my life as long as I'm not harming anyone else. If someone ends up killing another person in a car accident because they were high, then they should go to prison. We already have those laws for a good reason and I'm all for them. But there is NO reason why I shouldn't be legally allowed to sit in my own house and smoke some pot whenever the hell I want to.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="pis3rch"]

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Marijuana is a deteriorating drug andhas been scientifically proven to destroy the brain at a shocking rate.

Marijuana has actually been the reason for murder and theft and more immoral activities that I cannot mention here.

1.Really?

2. Don't you think that the murder and theft would stop once people could get marijuana from legal, legitimate sources than from violent drug dealers from Mexico and South America?

That article is from 2003. Update your info.
Avatar image for pis3rch
pis3rch

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 pis3rch
Member since 2006 • 1695 Posts
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="pis3rch"]

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Marijuana is a deteriorating drug andhas been scientifically proven to destroy the brain at a shocking rate.

Marijuana has actually been the reason for murder and theft and more immoral activities that I cannot mention here.

1.Really?

2. Don't you think that the murder and theft would stop once people could get marijuana from legal, legitimate sources than from violent drug dealers from Mexico and South America?

That article is from 2003. Update your info.

Is a source completely useless if its from more than a year ago? Show me a study that reveals that marijuana "destroys the brain at a shocking rate," as the guy I quoted claimed.
Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

Legalizing marijuana is a stupid idea. Marijuana is a deteriorating drug andhas been scientifically proven to destroy the brain at a shocking rate. It alsohas many substitutes in the medical field, so even as a pain reliever it can be done without. Why don't we legalizeheroinwhile we're at it? Personally, I want tobacco illegalized, but the reason smoking is allowed is that it's mostly harmful to the user. Marijuana has actually been the reason for murder and theft and more immoral activities that I cannot mention here. What's even more ridiculous is that people want it legallized. It's just irrational.

calvinsora
be careful most people on the internet cannot detect sarcasm.
Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#106 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Marijuana is a deteriorating drug andhas been scientifically proven to destroy the brain at a shocking rate.

Marijuana has actually been the reason for murder and theft and more immoral activities that I cannot mention here.

pis3rch

1.Really?

2. Don't you think that the murder and theft would stop once people could get marijuana from legal, legitimate sources than from violent drug dealers from Mexico and South America?

1. As my dad is a doctor, he should know pretty well the effects of marijuana. It DOES destroy the brain. This isn't a theory, it's fact.

2. The violent drug dealers are another story entirely. I'm talking about everything that happens when some unstable people are under influence of marijuana, hallucinations and paranoia for example. DUI's ending in tragedy, irrational suicides and more have all happened under the influence of marijuana.

Avatar image for Immortalica
Immortalica

6309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Immortalica
Member since 2008 • 6309 Posts
I fully support it. I can't wait to be honest.
Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#108 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

1. As my dad is a doctor, he should know pretty well the effects of marijuana. It DOES destroy the brain. This isn't a theory, it's fact.

2. The violent drug dealers are another story entirely. I'm talking about everything that happens when some unstable people are under influence of marijuana, hallucinations and paranoia for example. DUI's ending in tragedy, irrational suicides and more have all happened under the influence of marijuana.

calvinsora

No offense, but a doctor does not equal a scientist. I'll take the scientists word over a medical doctors. The scientists are the ones who do the research that the doctors can benefit from. As for your #2, you don't hallucinate on marijuana. Irrational suicides and stupid accidents happen all the time even when drugs are not being used. Did you know that tired drivers kill more people than high or drunk drivers? How many people have died because someone was messing with their radio or talking on the phone while driving? It's all besides the point anyway since it's not an issue of health or safety. We already have laws in regards to the safety and making it legal or keeping it illegal won't change that. As for the health aspect, as I said before, it's a matter of personal freedom. If I want to destroy my brain that should be my right.

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#109 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

Just in time for the end of the world. At least we won't have to suffer through the downfall of America. --Because that's what most likely going to occur after everyone starts using marijuana on a daily basis. We might as well just nuke ourselves.

The status quo of USA's illegal drug regulations shouldn't be destroyed. As it is right now, a very limited portion of the population bothers to find drug sources--but that's because it's not as easy as it look. Once we could legally buy it at drug stores--without prescriptions--the American populace is ******.

Unless, of course, any one of you can honestly say that alcohol and tobacco (and maybe even McDonald) is "good." (Apart from the monetary compensation the big businesses are rewarded--which help run this country.)

Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#110 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

Just in time for the end of the world. At least we won't have to suffer through the downfall of America. --Because that's what most likely going to occur after everyone starts using marijuana on a daily basis. We might as well just nuke ourselves.

The status quo of USA's illegal drug regulations shouldn't be destroyed. As it is right now, a very limited portion of the population bothers to find drug sources--but that's because it's not as easy as it look. Once we could legally buy it at drug stores--without prescriptions--the American populace is ******.

Unless, of course, any one of you can honestly say that alcohol and tobacco (and maybe even McDonald) is "good." (Apart from the monetary compensation the big businesses are rewarded--which help run this country.)

a55assin
Do you have any data to backup your ridiculous claims? Has Amsterdam been destroyed by the legalization of drugs?
Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#111 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]1. As my dad is a doctor, he should know pretty well the effects of marijuana. It DOES destroy the brain. This isn't a theory, it's fact.

2. The violent drug dealers are another story entirely. I'm talking about everything that happens when some unstable people are under influence of marijuana, hallucinations and paranoia for example. DUI's ending in tragedy, irrational suicides and more have all happened under the influence of marijuana.

bdever32

No offense, but a doctor does not equal a scientist. I'll take the scientists word over a medical doctors. The scientists are the ones who do the research that the doctors can benefit from. As for your #2, you don't hallucinate on marijuana. Irrational suicides and stupid accidents happen all the time even when drugs are not being used. Did you know that tired drivers kill more people than high or drunk drivers? How many people have died because someone was messing with their radio or talking on the phone while driving? It's all besides the point anyway since it's not an issue of health or safety. We already have laws in regards to the safety and making it legal or keeping it illegal won't change that. As for the health aspect, as I said before, it's a matter of personal freedom. If I want to destroy my brain that should be my right.

Well, for every article about how marijuana isn't harmful, you'll find one that says it is. Test subjects vary wildly in capability and stability. One guy can be completely nonplussed, while others fare much worse. As for the hallucination part, that may be a mistake on my part but I'm mainly happy I don't know the effects of marijuana. If people need drugs to feel good or be in "ecstasy", than I don't know wether to pity them or be mad at them, though the former is more likely. If we allow people to destroy their brains, like you say, then should we just let people fall into drug abuse, or commit suicide, or become an alcoholic? Rehab centers are there for a reason, you know. Anyway, on murders and such, you say they happen all the time, without drugs or not. Then wouldn't it be nice to reduce the number slightly? I would think so.

Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#112 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts
Well, for every article about how marijuana isn't harmful, you'll find one that says it is. Test subjects vary wildly in capability and stability. One guy can be completely nonplussed, while others fare much worse. As for the hallucination part, that may be a mistake on my part but I'm mainly happy I don't know the effects of marijuana. If people need drugs to feel good or be in "ecstasy", than I don't know wether to pity them or be mad at them, though the former is more likely. If we allow people to destroy their brains, like you say, then should we just let people fall into drug abuse, or commit suicide, or become an alcoholic? Rehab centers are there for a reason, you know. Anyway, on murders and such, you say they happen all the time, without drugs or not. Then wouldn't it be nice to reduce the number slightly? I would think so.calvinsora
I just don't believe the legalization of marijuana would have any negative effects on the crime rate. I believe it would have a large positive effect. Drug dealers would be put out of business by large corporations. So where would the crime come from if it were legal?
Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#113 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="a55assin"]

Just in time for the end of the world. At least we won't have to suffer through the downfall of America. --Because that's what most likely going to occur after everyone starts using marijuana on a daily basis. We might as well just nuke ourselves.

The status quo of USA's illegal drug regulations shouldn't be destroyed. As it is right now, a very limited portion of the population bothers to find drug sources--but that's because it's not as easy as it look. Once we could legally buy it at drug stores--without prescriptions--the American populace is ******.

Unless, of course, any one of you can honestly say that alcohol and tobacco (and maybe even McDonald) is "good." (Apart from the monetary compensation the big businesses are rewarded--which help run this country.)

bdever32

Do you have any data to backup your ridiculous claims? Has Amsterdam been destroyed by the legalization of drugs?

Amsterdam is very close to being destroyed. It's on the top 10 least attractive places for me, personally. I agree, is anyone willing to say alcohol and tobacco is good? Answer that first, don't go pointing other stuff out first. Where's your proof that marijuana HASN'T been a negative impact on the community?

Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#114 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

Amsterdam is very close to being destroyed. It's on the top 10 least attractive places for me, personally. I agree, is anyone willing to say alcohol and tobacco is good? Answer that first, don't go pointing other stuff out first. Where's your proof that marijuana HASN'T been a negative impact on the community?calvinsora
Amsterdam is doing quite well. It's one of the major commercial centers of Europe.

Edit: To answer your question. No, alcohol and tobacco are not good for you(aside from having a glass of wine every day). But it's not your place to tell people what they should or shouldn't be consuming.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#115 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]Well, for every article about how marijuana isn't harmful, you'll find one that says it is. Test subjects vary wildly in capability and stability. One guy can be completely nonplussed, while others fare much worse. As for the hallucination part, that may be a mistake on my part but I'm mainly happy I don't know the effects of marijuana. If people need drugs to feel good or be in "ecstasy", than I don't know wether to pity them or be mad at them, though the former is more likely. If we allow people to destroy their brains, like you say, then should we just let people fall into drug abuse, or commit suicide, or become an alcoholic? Rehab centers are there for a reason, you know. Anyway, on murders and such, you say they happen all the time, without drugs or not. Then wouldn't it be nice to reduce the number slightly? I would think so.bdever32
I just don't believe the legalization of marijuana would have any negative effects on the crime rate. I believe it would have a large positive effect. Drug dealers would be put out of business by large corporations. So where would the crime come from if it were legal?

Only marijuana would be legalized, not heroin, meth, angel dust etc. Drug dealers would still be there, selling other stuff. It's just one less drug to deal with.

Avatar image for the_kidisblack
the_kidisblack

1184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 the_kidisblack
Member since 2008 • 1184 Posts

I for one am with California and a few other state considering legalization.

rob1101
Dont cry to your family and expect taxpayers to pay for your healthcare when you get schizophrenia and other disorders.
Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#117 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

Only marijuana would be legalized, not heroin, meth, angel dust etc. Drug dealers would still be there, selling other stuff. It's just one less drug to deal with.

calvinsora
Exactly. All the crime related to the sale or distribution of marijuana would be gone.
Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#118 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Only marijuana would be legalized, not heroin, meth, angel dust etc. Drug dealers would still be there, selling other stuff. It's just one less drug to deal with.

bdever32

Exactly. All the crime related to the sale or distribution of marijuana would be gone.

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

[QUOTE="bdever32"][QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Only marijuana would be legalized, not heroin, meth, angel dust etc. Drug dealers would still be there, selling other stuff. It's just one less drug to deal with.

calvinsora
guess what the number one cash crop is? There are more than twice as many marijuana users as there are of all the other illicit drugs combine. The cartels would surely be hurt.
[QUOTE="rob1101"]

I for one am with California and a few other state considering legalization.

the_kidisblack
Dont cry to your family and expect taxpayers to pay for your healthcare when you get schizophrenia and other disorders.

Well first of all this is one reason why socialized health care is a bad idea, because of alcohol abuse and tobacco use. And please show me some evidence that any of those disorders are caused from marijuana.
Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#120 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

calvinsora

I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#121 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

bdever32

I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

When I say that, of course I mean those who are blatantly "high" but nonetheless, I'm a guy who actually cares for the welfare of others. Maybe that's a bad thing.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="pis3rch"]

1.Really?

2. Don't you think that the murder and theft would stop once people could get marijuana from legal, legitimate sources than from violent drug dealers from Mexico and South America?

pis3rch

That article is from 2003. Update your info.

Is a source completely useless if its from more than a year ago? Show me a study that reveals that marijuana "destroys the brain at a shocking rate," as the guy I quoted claimed.

Yes it does make it useless, science does not stop for you or anybody and new studies come out all the time. And where did i say what he did? Name one time I agreed with what he said? Thats right, I didn't. I was just telling you that you should update your info to something more current.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#123 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="bdever32"] guess what the number one cash crop is? There are more than twice as many marijuana users as there are of all the other illicit drugs combine. The cartels would surely be hurt. [QUOTE="the_kidisblack"][QUOTE="rob1101"]

I for one am with California and a few other state considering legalization.

rob1101

Dont cry to your family and expect taxpayers to pay for your healthcare when you get schizophrenia and other disorders.

Well first of all this is one reason why socialized health care is a bad idea, because of alcohol abuse and tobacco use. And please show me some evidence that any of those disorders are caused from marijuana.

For evidence, see people in rehab. Read the news once in a while, you'll see people that have really been affected by marijuana. As for the drug dealers, sure, it will hurt their business (too bad for them) but they will still be there.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="bdever32"]

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

When I say that, of course I mean those who are blatantly "high" but nonetheless, I'm a guy who actually cares for the welfare of others. Maybe that's a bad thing.

I know, sometimes I feel like some think people who actually care about the welfare of others are worse than Hitler
Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

bdever32

I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

that is how the propaganda is they push marijuana into the 'hard core' drug group and make it seem as though there are only 'clean' stragit edge people and hardcore drug addict pot heads. There is a difference between drug use, drug abuse, drug addiction. You wouldn't classify someone that a drink after work on Fridays as an alcoholic would you?
Avatar image for -xPANICx-
-xPANICx-

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 -xPANICx-
Member since 2008 • 482 Posts

[QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] Ummmm....You do know Tabacco was seen as harmless not that long ago right? So you might not want to use that one.MoonMarvel

marijuana doesnt have harmful man made chemicals in it :roll:

Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer. :roll:

ok? considering how the harmful man made chemicals in the tobacco is what makes cigarettes so harmful, i would say marijuana is close to not being harmful at all.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#127 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="bdever32"]

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

Most drug dealers sell multiple "brands". The same guys with the same employees would still be in business. One drug addiction often leads to another. As for Amsterdam, not all people smoke marijuana there, it's just the people who do that bother me.

rob1101

I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

that is how the propaganda is they push marijuana into the 'hard core' drug group and make it seem as though there are only 'clean' stragit edge people and hardcore drug addict pot heads. There is a difference between drug use, drug abuse, drug addiction. You wouldn't classify someone that a drink after work on Fridays as an alcoholic would you?

Check my response first.

Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="bdever32"] I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

When I say that, of course I mean those who are blatantly "high" but nonetheless, I'm a guy who actually cares for the welfare of others. Maybe that's a bad thing.

I know, sometimes I feel like some think people who actually care about the welfare of others are worse than Hitler

there is a difference between caring for the welfare of others and telling people what they can and cannot due because of what you believe.
Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]marijuana doesnt have harmful man made chemicals in it :roll:

Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer. :roll:

ok? considering how the harmful man made chemicals in the tobacco is what makes cigarettes so harmful, i would say marijuana is close to not being harmful at all.

You went back how many pages to respond to that? And got it wrong? Again, Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer, it does that on its own. So with or without those chemicals cigarettes would STILL be harmful. They didn't know that a long time ago, which is why tobacco should not be used in an argument FOR weed. Maybe it would be better for you to keep those 2 plants seperate.
Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#130 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="calvinsora"]

When I say that, of course I mean those who are blatantly "high" but nonetheless, I'm a guy who actually cares for the welfare of others. Maybe that's a bad thing.

rob1101

I know, sometimes I feel like some think people who actually care about the welfare of others are worse than Hitler

there is a difference between caring for the welfare of others and telling people what they can and cannot due because of what you believe.

You can't deny that marijuana has a negative impact on the body, at least on par with cigarettes?

Avatar image for bdever32
bdever32

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#131 bdever32
Member since 2005 • 757 Posts
there is a difference between caring for the welfare of others and telling people what they can and cannot due because of what you believe.rob1101
Spot on. That's exactly what I've been trying to say. I'm glad you care about people, Calvinsora, but in the end shouldn't it be my choice?
Avatar image for jimbojones_sw
jimbojones_sw

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 jimbojones_sw
Member since 2009 • 586 Posts

we had this exact conversation a week ago.

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

we had this exact conversation a week ago.

jimbojones_sw
More like 3 days ago, pro pot threads pop up here every other day.
Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

[QUOTE="rob1101"][QUOTE="bdever32"] I respect that you're against using marijuana, but you're painting with a wide brush here. You seem to believe there are addicted potheads and then "normal" people who would never use drugs ever. This is simply not the case. There are many people who use marijuana only occasionally, enjoy it when they use it and then go about their normal lives the rest of the time. Are you saying you would have a problem with someone like that?

calvinsora

that is how the propaganda is they push marijuana into the 'hard core' drug group and make it seem as though there are only 'clean' stragit edge people and hardcore drug addict pot heads. There is a difference between drug use, drug abuse, drug addiction. You wouldn't classify someone that a drink after work on Fridays as an alcoholic would you?

Check my response first.

yea the post are coming kind of fast. But you know why people are in rehab for marijuana? some just have that addictive personality which they can be addicted to anything illegal or not. And the majority of people that are in rehab for marijuana are only there because they got busted and it will reduce their sentence/fine, taxdollars at work.... Marijuana is not physically addictive.
Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

[QUOTE="rob1101"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] I know, sometimes I feel like some think people who actually care about the welfare of others are worse than Hitlercalvinsora

there is a difference between caring for the welfare of others and telling people what they can and cannot due because of what you believe.

You can't deny that marijuana has a negative impact on the body, at least on par with cigarettes?

Sure it has to have some negative effect, can stimulate appetite causing weight gain for some depending on how you smoke it you may be more prone to a cough or mild bronchitis in some. But it is definitely below par with cigarettes, cigarettes are addictive and will cause harm to your body and lungs and will eventually kill you.
Avatar image for jimbojones_sw
jimbojones_sw

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 jimbojones_sw
Member since 2009 • 586 Posts

[QUOTE="jimbojones_sw"]

we had this exact conversation a week ago.

MoonMarvel

More like 3 days ago, pro pot threads pop up here every other day.

it's hard with a community as big as this because new members come and then you have to explain the whole situation again. i don't even wanna bother with this.

i posted earlier and i'll say it again. weed should be legalized and taxed

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="jimbojones_sw"]

we had this exact conversation a week ago.

jimbojones_sw

More like 3 days ago, pro pot threads pop up here every other day.

it's hard with a community as big as this because new members come and then you have to explain the whole situation again. i don't even wanna bother with this.

i posted earlier and i'll say it again. weed should be legalized and taxed

The TC isn't new. I am getting bored with this, we need a new topic to talk about. One that isn't Obama, Recession, Weed, George Bush or Sex related. Maybe a thread about a nice ham sandwich? Or Sobe, nobody is offended by Sobe.

Avatar image for Smoke89
Smoke89

3575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#138 Smoke89
Member since 2003 • 3575 Posts

1. As my dad is a doctor, he should know pretty well the effects of marijuana. It DOES destroy the brain. This isn't a theory, it's fact.

2. The violent drug dealers are another story entirely. I'm talking about everything that happens when some unstable people are under influence of marijuana, hallucinations and paranoia for example. DUI's ending in tragedy, irrational suicides and more have all happened under the influence of marijuana.

calvinsora

Claiming the title of M.D. makes one an authority on drugs is a bit extreme. Second, congrats that your father is educated, but unfortunately you and your dad don't have the same brain! Research has proven that marijuana plays with the nurochemicals in the brain and extended use can affect the production of certain ones. Actual brain "destruction" is not usually the case.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#139 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="rob1101"] that is how the propaganda is they push marijuana into the 'hard core' drug group and make it seem as though there are only 'clean' stragit edge people and hardcore drug addict pot heads. There is a difference between drug use, drug abuse, drug addiction. You wouldn't classify someone that a drink after work on Fridays as an alcoholic would you?rob1101

Check my response first.

yea the post are coming kind of fast. But you know why people are in rehab for marijuana? some just have that addictive personality which they can be addicted to anything illegal or not. And the majority of people that are in rehab for marijuana are only there because they got busted and it will reduce their sentence/fine, taxdollars at work.... Marijuana is not physically addictive.

It is mentally addictive, however, and that is equally as bad. Also, if you want to read about the bad effects of marijuana, please go to this link:

http://www.addict-help.com/marijuana.asp

These people work with addicts and prevention of drugs, so I think they can be trusted in this matter. What the question really boils down to is WHY legalize marijuana? Why introduce another drug into the world, because some people want it? With that disposition, legalizing meth and angel dust and heroin and cocaine falls into the same category. Tobaccois bad enough.

Avatar image for -xPANICx-
-xPANICx-

482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 -xPANICx-
Member since 2008 • 482 Posts

[QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer. :roll:MoonMarvel

ok? considering how the harmful man made chemicals in the tobacco is what makes cigarettes so harmful, i would say marijuana is close to not being harmful at all.

You went back how many pages to respond to that? And got it wrong? Again, Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer, it does that on its own. So with or without those chemicals cigarettes would STILL be harmful. They didn't know that a long time ago, which is why tobacco should not be used in an argument FOR weed. Maybe it would be better for you to keep those 2 plants seperate.

your response is totally irrelevant to my original post. i am keeping the plants separate (one isharmful) (other isbeneficial). YOU got it wrong, im not defending the statement that tobacco isnt harmful your just assuming it.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#141 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

1. As my dad is a doctor, he should know pretty well the effects of marijuana. It DOES destroy the brain. This isn't a theory, it's fact.

2. The violent drug dealers are another story entirely. I'm talking about everything that happens when some unstable people are under influence of marijuana, hallucinations and paranoia for example. DUI's ending in tragedy, irrational suicides and more have all happened under the influence of marijuana.

Smoke89

Claiming the title of M.D. makes one an authority on drugs is a bit extreme. Second, congrats that your father is educated, but unfortunately you and your dad don't have the same brain! Research has proven that marijuana plays with the nurochemicals in the brain and extended use can affect the production of certain ones. Actual brain "destruction" is not usually the case.

I didn't literally mean destroyed. That would be silly. I did it more for dramatic effect. What I'm stating is that he's seen the effects of marijuana. One case is enough to show that it can happen.

Avatar image for a55assin
a55assin

7603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#142 a55assin
Member since 2005 • 7603 Posts

Amsterdam is one city--and although soft drugs are technically legal across the whole of the Netherlands--the capital has an overwhelming advantage over all the other cities. And when I say "technically," I'm speaking of the limits that shadow the sales of marijuana--and the like. Dealing in the streets is still quite illegal. Just as is advertising the availability and sale of such drugs. That means that you won't be seeing any signs on stores that sell drugs--none at all. You have to be a local, know a local, or visit shop, after shop, after shop. There are many more limitations, of course, and the small size of the country makes them easy to enforce.

You simply cannot compare the Netherlands to the US. The former has a population of approximately 16 million. New York State has 19--and that's just one state.

Do you know where people would turn to in the time of crisis? And a crisis is approaching. Out economy isn't getting any better--not really. Our government is once again--unsurprisingly--breaking promises and making things worse. --They would turn to the next best thing after alcohol and tobacco--soft drugs. And some of those would go even higher up the ladder--to harder drugs; like cocaine. And inebriated people aren't great for the economy. The working class of Americans is the only thing holding the US together--so I do care what others use. Remember the depression? They had the same attitude as you do now--"Oh, hey, let them max out their credit cards, I don't care." Only a bit more refined.

I hate anything that proposes the chance of drawing you in and turning you into an addict--but I'd probably still have myself some legal marijuana if access was easy enough. And so would many, many others. I could picture it now . . .

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
[QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="-xPANICx-"]ok? considering how the harmful man made chemicals in the tobacco is what makes cigarettes so harmful, i would say marijuana is close to not being harmful at all.

You went back how many pages to respond to that? And got it wrong? Again, Tobacco doesn't need chemicals to cause cancer, it does that on its own. So with or without those chemicals cigarettes would STILL be harmful. They didn't know that a long time ago, which is why tobacco should not be used in an argument FOR weed. Maybe it would be better for you to keep those 2 plants seperate.

your response is totally irrelevant to my original post. i am keeping the plants separate (one isharmful) (other isbeneficial). YOU got it wrong, im not defending the statement that tobacco isnt harmful your just assuming it.

No you got it wrong and are trying to talk your way around it. Lets start here, why did I make the original comment about tobacco in the first place? Start there and see where you went wrong with this.
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#144 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
'Optimistic' isn't the word I'd use.
Avatar image for dimebagblues
dimebagblues

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 dimebagblues
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Even if it does become legal, you dont have to smoke it. Its your choice.
Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts
Even if it does become legal, you dont have to smoke it. Its your choice.dimebagblues
Not if some crazy pothead holds you up at gunpoint and makes you smoke it. :P
Avatar image for jimbojones_sw
jimbojones_sw

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 jimbojones_sw
Member since 2009 • 586 Posts

[QUOTE="dimebagblues"]Even if it does become legal, you dont have to smoke it. Its your choice.MoonMarvel
Not if some crazy pothead holds you up at gunpoint and makes you smoke it. :P

No such thing as a crazy pot head

Avatar image for MoonMarvel
MoonMarvel

8249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 MoonMarvel
Member since 2008 • 8249 Posts

[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="dimebagblues"]Even if it does become legal, you dont have to smoke it. Its your choice.jimbojones_sw

Not if some crazy pothead holds you up at gunpoint and makes you smoke it. :P

No such thing as a crazy pot head

Hello....Humor knocking. It was a joke.
Avatar image for pis3rch
pis3rch

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 pis3rch
Member since 2006 • 1695 Posts

[QUOTE="pis3rch"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"] That article is from 2003. Update your info.MoonMarvel

Is a source completely useless if its from more than a year ago? Show me a study that reveals that marijuana "destroys the brain at a shocking rate," as the guy I quoted claimed.

Yes it does make it useless, science does not stop for you or anybody and new studies come out all the time. And where did i say what he did? Name one time I agreed with what he said? Thats right, I didn't. I was just telling you that you should update your info to something more current.


Sorry, i took "update your info" way out of context and thought you were agreeing with him/arguing with me. My bad. Here's a more recent article that specifically quotes the previos study when discussing effects of marijuana on the brain for adults. Article

Avatar image for Mr_Manikin52
Mr_Manikin52

12300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 Mr_Manikin52
Member since 2004 • 12300 Posts

Personally I think marijuana should be legal and regulated like alcohol and tobacco.

I'm a little Libertarian on this issue.