Who is the greatest NFL Quarterback of all time?

  • 164 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]Joe Montana -QB today is MUCH easier to play: 1. rules on hits to QB 2. rules on WR's 3. plays called for them (except for Manning) = can't compare stats b/w eras The position is about winning Favre is good...but not an all-time great IMO (he has longevity). But I can think of at least 5 QB's I would take over him (not in top 5 = not an all-time great IMO) Montana, Manning, Brady, Elway, and Staubach...maybe even Youngwstfld

Finally someone recognized Manning for his playcalling abilities. I mean audibles almost every damn play because he can read the defense.

Don't they call like three plays and he just picks one?

No he calls the play at the line I believe.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

Also no mention of Jim Kelly is very disappointing.

quetzalcoatI
Why? The AFC was garbage at that time (lost like 12 Super Bowls in a row to the NFC). So he got out of a crappy conference 4 straight years...not a great accomplishment IMO Has no stats (even when compared to people in his own era) and no wins...what does he bring...he was good...but not great
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I don't think Bret Favre belongs on that list. He has longevity, but he was never the type of quarterback that I knew would beat my time. Put Elway on their instead.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

No, I say he isn't THE best, not that he isn't one of the best. You think I don't know it takes a team? I've always believed it starts at the top, from ownership, GM, coaching, and both the o-line and d-line before I start worrying about the QB. The reason the niners have 5 Super Bowls is because of Eddie D, Carmen Policy, and Bill Walsh and their superb eyes for talent and coaching.

Renegade_Fury

Let's look at the record books: Most seasons leading league in Yards gained: 1st: Dan Marino - 5 seasons Joe Montana - Not on list Most Consecutive seasons leading league in yards gained: 1st Dan Fouts - 4 seasons 2nd Dan Marino - 3 seasons Joe Montana - Not on list Most yards gained in Career: 1st Brett Favre - 69,329 2nd Dan Marino - 61,361 3rd John Elway Most seasons 3,000 or more yards passing: 1st Brett Favre - 18 seasons 2nd Dan Marino - 13 seasons Joe Montana - not on list Most yards gained in a single season: 1st Dan Marino - 5,084 Most games 400 or more yards passing in career: 1st Dan Marino - 13 games 2nd Joe Montana - 7 games Most games 400 or more yards passing in a season: 1st Dan Marino - 4 in '84 2nd Dan Marino - 3 in '86 Most games 300 or more yards passing in career: 1st Dan Marino - 63 games 2nd Brett Favre 3rd Peyton Manning Most games 300 or more yards passing in a season: 2nd Dan Marino Joe Montana not on list Most consecutive season leading league in passing: 2nd Dan Marino Montana not on list Most Touchdown passes in career: 1st Favre 2nd Marino 3rd Manning Most touchdown passes in season: 1st Brady 2nd Manning 3rd Marino Most games 4 or more touchdown passes in career: 1st Favre 2nd Marino Most games 4 or more touchdown passes in season: 1st Dan Marino 2nd Dan Marino In the record books, Dan Marino is near the top, if not in the top spot on most quarterback stats. Joe Montana is hardly ever in the top 3 of any stats. Just throwing that out there.

Hmm... oh yes, let's take out the number book. That is basically what all Marino supporters have isn't it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here, I'll take out the ones that matter. You know the ones in the postseason:

Most TDs (45)

Games with a passing rating over 100 (12)

Second in passing yards and games with 300+ passing yards (5,772)

1,1142 yards, 11 TD, 0 INTs, passer rating of 127.8, 3 MVPs, and 4-0 record in SB's

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can list Montana's regular season numbers too, but what's the point? He has them, difference is, he didn't have to do everything. He had more weapons, a D, and the greatest coach that ever lived. Marino and Elway didn't, which is why they had to those things. What Montana did have that made him stand above the rest, was his ability to come in the clutch. Be it MNF, playoffs, or the SB, Montana came to play. That is why he won all 4 SBs, and had both the biggest blowout SB win, and arguably the greatest comeback drive ever as well. Take into account he did this in a non salalry cap and tougher era for passers, and just further boosts his legend. Even in KC, he proved it when he toppled Elway's Broncos on national telivision and took the Chiefs to the AFC championship game.

I'm not going to waste my time any further. I'm not trying to convince you. You can believe whoever you want is the greatest, but for me, if my life was on the line, there is no QB I'd take over Joe Cool.

lol at you trying to discredit marino's statistics like stats don't matter..
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

lol at you trying to discredit marino's statistics like stats don't matter..BMD004

Part of being a GREAT QB is being a leader.
Word on the street is that Marino's teammates hated him and did not want to play for him...explains why they reached the SB his rookie year and never again (before the ego).

Only made the Playoffs 10/17 years.
...that is throwing a lot of meaningless yards

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

I'm just still shocked that I'm the ONLY person to mention Dan Marino. The only reason that he is considered by many not to be the all-time greatest is because he didn't win a super-bowl. If he won just one superbowl, he would probably be considered the greatest by many. Pure-passer wise... quarterback skills wise, he is the greatest.

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
John Elway!!!!1!11!!1one
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

I'm just still shocked that I'm the ONLY person to mention Dan Marino. The only reason that he is considered by many not to be the all-time greatest is because he didn't win a super-bowl. If he won just one superbowl, he would probably be considered the greatest by many. Pure-passer wise... quarterback skills wise, he is the greatest.

BMD004
Stats are stats and nothing more. Before this year (new coach), Texas Tech QB's always put up the best stats in college (or very near the top)...does that make them the best...of course not. Marino has empty stats and nothing more. He got far his rookie year (when it was less about him...same with any rookie QB) and never did anything else of note besides stats. Only making the playoffs 10/17 years is the utlmate stat...where most GREAT QB's make is almost every year (usually at least 75% of the time)
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

lol at you trying to discredit marino's statistics like stats don't matter..rawsavon

Part of being a GREAT QB is being a leader.
Word on the street is that Marino's teammates hated him and did not want to play for him...explains why they reached the SB his rookie year and never again (before the ego).

Only made the Playoffs 10/17 years.
...that is throwing a lot of meaningless yards

That is true... but look at the difference in teams between the 49ers and the Miami Dolphins. Marino didn't have much to work with.

Avatar image for MountainManQ
MountainManQ

130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 MountainManQ
Member since 2010 • 130 Posts

johnny unitas?

Bart Starr?

John Elway?

Steve Young?

How are these not even options?

BMD004

my thoughts exactly. but anyways i have lost a great deal of respect for favre in the past few years...i used to not mind him but now i cant stand him

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"]

I'm just still shocked that I'm the ONLY person to mention Dan Marino. The only reason that he is considered by many not to be the all-time greatest is because he didn't win a super-bowl. If he won just one superbowl, he would probably be considered the greatest by many. Pure-passer wise... quarterback skills wise, he is the greatest.

rawsavon
Stats are stats and nothing more. Before this year (new coach), Texas Tech QB's always put up the best stats in college (or very near the top)...does that make them the best...of course not. Marino has empty stats and nothing more. He got far his rookie year (when it was less about him...same with any rookie QB) and never did anything else of note besides stats. Only making the playoffs 10/17 years is the utlmate stat...where most GREAT QB's make is almost every year (usually at least 75% of the time)

College is so much different from the NFL. Not everybody plays the same teams, there are many different offensive styles that not everybody is used to, etc. Football is a team game. The reason that the Dolphins didn't win any super-bowls is because they were the Miami Dolphins. Not because Dan Marino wasn't good enough to get to a super-bowl besides that one time.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

lol at you trying to discredit marino's statistics like stats don't matter..BMD004

Part of being a GREAT QB is being a leader.
Word on the street is that Marino's teammates hated him and did not want to play for him...explains why they reached the SB his rookie year and never again (before the ego).

Only made the Playoffs 10/17 years.
...that is throwing a lot of meaningless yards

That is true... but look at the difference in teams between the 49ers and the Miami Dolphins. Marino didn't have much to work with.

The AFC was garbage in those years (see my OP).
The NFC won 12 or 13 straight SB's...I am not talking about getting to or winning the whole thing. I am talking about even making the playoffs.
How often do you think Manning or Brady will miss the playoffs in their careers?
-Marino only made the playoffs 58% of the time...PATHETIC for a supposed 'all-time great'

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

I'm just still shocked that I'm the ONLY person to mention Dan Marino. The only reason that he is considered by many not to be the all-time greatest is because he didn't win a super-bowl. If he won just one superbowl, he would probably be considered the greatest by many. Pure-passer wise... quarterback skills wise, he is the greatest.

Stats are stats and nothing more. Before this year (new coach), Texas Tech QB's always put up the best stats in college (or very near the top)...does that make them the best...of course not. Marino has empty stats and nothing more. He got far his rookie year (when it was less about him...same with any rookie QB) and never did anything else of note besides stats. Only making the playoffs 10/17 years is the utlmate stat...where most GREAT QB's make is almost every year (usually at least 75% of the time)

College is so much different from the NFL. Not everybody plays the same teams, there are many different offensive styles that not everybody is used to, etc. Football is a team game. The reason that the Dolphins didn't win any super-bowls is because they were the Miami Dolphins. Not because Dan Marino wasn't good enough to get to a super-bowl besides that one time.

My point was that stats are stats and nothing more. Aikman has terrible stats, but he is the Hall of Fame...why? b/c football is not baseball (an individual sport based on stats)
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

Part of being a GREAT QB is being a leader.
Word on the street is that Marino's teammates hated him and did not want to play for him...explains why they reached the SB his rookie year and never again (before the ego).

Only made the Playoffs 10/17 years.
...that is throwing a lot of meaningless yards

rawsavon

That is true... but look at the difference in teams between the 49ers and the Miami Dolphins. Marino didn't have much to work with.

The AFC was garbage in those years (see my OP).
The NFC won 12 or 13 straight SB's...I am not talking about getting to or winning the whole thing. I am talking about even making the playoffs.
How often do you think Manning or Brady will miss the playoffs in their careers?
-Marino only made the playoffs 58% of the time...PATHETIC for a supposed 'all-time great'

If Marino had the caliber of players of the Colts or the Patriots, you don't think he'd do just as well?

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Stats are stats and nothing more. Before this year (new coach), Texas Tech QB's always put up the best stats in college (or very near the top)...does that make them the best...of course not. Marino has empty stats and nothing more. He got far his rookie year (when it was less about him...same with any rookie QB) and never did anything else of note besides stats. Only making the playoffs 10/17 years is the utlmate stat...where most GREAT QB's make is almost every year (usually at least 75% of the time)rawsavon
College is so much different from the NFL. Not everybody plays the same teams, there are many different offensive styles that not everybody is used to, etc. Football is a team game. The reason that the Dolphins didn't win any super-bowls is because they were the Miami Dolphins. Not because Dan Marino wasn't good enough to get to a super-bowl besides that one time.

My point was that stats are stats and nothing more. Aikman has terrible stats, but he is the Hall of Fame...why? b/c football is not baseball (an individual sport based on stats)

But stats do matter. You can't be leading almost every single passing category and be a bad quarterback like you are implying.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"] That is true... but look at the difference in teams between the 49ers and the Miami Dolphins. Marino didn't have much to work with.

BMD004

The AFC was garbage in those years (see my OP).
The NFC won 12 or 13 straight SB's...I am not talking about getting to or winning the whole thing. I am talking about even making the playoffs.
How often do you think Manning or Brady will miss the playoffs in their careers?
-Marino only made the playoffs 58% of the time...PATHETIC for a supposed 'all-time great'

If Marino had the caliber of players of the Colts or the Patriots, you don't think he'd do just as well?

The Colts don't have that great of players though...no running game since E. James left, Manning makes the WR's, Dallas Clark is All-World...but who else do they have that is not great b/c of Manning.

Same with Brady...they won with nobody's at WR and RB

List me All-time great QB's with worse records (making the playoffs)

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

Look at the Patriots when Brady broke the touchdown record. They were unstoppable... more so than any other season.

Marino had a year when he broke nearly every single-season passing record. And what did the Dolphins do? I don't know how they finished without looking it up, but they didn't make the Super Bowl. Why? Because he played on the Dolphins.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] College is so much different from the NFL. Not everybody plays the same teams, there are many different offensive styles that not everybody is used to, etc. Football is a team game. The reason that the Dolphins didn't win any super-bowls is because they were the Miami Dolphins. Not because Dan Marino wasn't good enough to get to a super-bowl besides that one time.BMD004
My point was that stats are stats and nothing more. Aikman has terrible stats, but he is the Hall of Fame...why? b/c football is not baseball (an individual sport based on stats)

But stats do matter. You can't be leading almost every single passing category and be a bad quarterback like you are implying.

Where did I EVER say bad? Not an All-time great =/= bad He is good...but not an all-time great
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"]

Look at the Patriots when Brady broke the touchdown record. They were unstoppable... more so than any other season.

Marino had a year when he broke nearly every single-season passing record. And what did the Dolphins do? I don't know how they finished without looking it up, but they didn't make the Super Bowl. Why? Because he played on the Dolphins.

Brady won SB's with no names (they did not win the year you are talking about). All-Time Greats make those around them better...like Manning
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

The AFC was garbage in those years (see my OP).
The NFC won 12 or 13 straight SB's...I am not talking about getting to or winning the whole thing. I am talking about even making the playoffs.
How often do you think Manning or Brady will miss the playoffs in their careers?
-Marino only made the playoffs 58% of the time...PATHETIC for a supposed 'all-time great'

rawsavon

If Marino had the caliber of players of the Colts or the Patriots, you don't think he'd do just as well?

The Colts don't have that great of players though...no running game since E. James left, Manning makes the WR's, Dallas Clark is All-World...but who else do they have that is not great b/c of Manning.

Same with Brady...they won with nobody's at WR and RB

List me All-time great QB's with worse records (making the playoffs)

Manning has had great players around him throughout his career. He DID have Edgerin James on his team. (we're talking about all-time between quarterbacks), he has had Marvin Harrison. He has Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Joseph Addai, Dwight Freeney, Pierre Garcon, Adam Vinitari, and more. These are all good players. And I'm sure he's had more good players in the past that I'm missing..

Avatar image for quetzalcoatI
quetzalcoatI

627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 quetzalcoatI
Member since 2010 • 627 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] My point was that stats are stats and nothing more. Aikman has terrible stats, but he is the Hall of Fame...why? b/c football is not baseball (an individual sport based on stats)rawsavon
But stats do matter. You can't be leading almost every single passing category and be a bad quarterback like you are implying.

Where did I EVER say bad? Not an All-time great =/= bad He is good...but not an all-time great

hahahaha. According to your logic, I suppose that Philip Rivers had a bad game against the seahawks too? He threw for 455 yards and 2 touchdowns, but lost still, due to two kick offs returned for touchdowns...

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

Look at the Patriots when Brady broke the touchdown record. They were unstoppable... more so than any other season.

Marino had a year when he broke nearly every single-season passing record. And what did the Dolphins do? I don't know how they finished without looking it up, but they didn't make the Super Bowl. Why? Because he played on the Dolphins.

Brady won SB's with no names (they did not win the year you are talking about). All-Time Greats make those around them better...like Manning

I know they didn't win the superbowl that year. They won 19 straight games though. And BS that Brady won with no-names. Seriously? His very first super bowl win, he had these guys oh his team: Dieon Branch, Tedy Bruschi, Kevin Faulk, Jarvis Green, Ty Law, Adam Vinateri, Mike Vrabel, Rodney Harrison, Richard Seymour, Tyrone Poole, and more players who play well as a team.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"] If Marino had the caliber of players of the Colts or the Patriots, you don't think he'd do just as well?

The Colts don't have that great of players though...no running game since E. James left, Manning makes the WR's, Dallas Clark is All-World...but who else do they have that is not great b/c of Manning.

Same with Brady...they won with nobody's at WR and RB

List me All-time great QB's with worse records (making the playoffs)

Manning has had great players around him throughout his career. He DID have Edgerin James on his team. (we're talking about all-time between quarterbacks), he has had Marvin Harrison. He has Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Joseph Addai, Dwight Freeney, Pierre Garcon, Adam Vinitari, and more. These are all good players. And I'm sure he's had more good players in the past that I'm missing..

Manning DID NOT have have James when he won. Harrison is not an all-time great, good though. Wayne is good b/c of manning...same with Garcon. Addai is garbage...a bust. Clark is all world. I will give you that. Their D sucks. You named a kicker...really? Do you not think it is weird that the Colts always have good wr's (now Collie and Garcon and Gonzales)...me thinks that is Peyton and not the WR's Marino had just as good of WR's and a better D
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] But stats do matter. You can't be leading almost every single passing category and be a bad quarterback like you are implying.quetzalcoatI

Where did I EVER say bad? Not an All-time great =/= bad He is good...but not an all-time great

hahahaha. According to your logic, I suppose that Philip Rivers had a bad game against the seahawks too? He threw for 455 yards and 2 touchdowns, but lost still, due to two kick offs returned for touchdowns...

Where did I say Marino was bad? Rivers makes the playoffs...Marino made it 58% of the time...not an All-Time great
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

Look at the Patriots when Brady broke the touchdown record. They were unstoppable... more so than any other season.

Marino had a year when he broke nearly every single-season passing record. And what did the Dolphins do? I don't know how they finished without looking it up, but they didn't make the Super Bowl. Why? Because he played on the Dolphins.

Brady won SB's with no names (they did not win the year you are talking about). All-Time Greats make those around them better...like Manning

I know they didn't win the superbowl that year. They won 19 straight games though. And BS that Brady won with no-names. Seriously? His very first super bowl win, he had these guys oh his team: Dieon Branch, Tedy Bruschi, Kevin Faulk, Jarvis Green, Ty Law, Adam Vinateri, Mike Vrabel, Rodney Harrison, Richard Seymour, Tyrone Poole, and more players who play well as a team.

What other HOF player did Brady have on offense -Branch sucked when he left (wonder why) -Faulk is nothing...just a 3rd down back...really? -then you named all Defensive players...but their offense was good
Avatar image for quetzalcoatI
quetzalcoatI

627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 quetzalcoatI
Member since 2010 • 627 Posts
[QUOTE="quetzalcoatI"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"] Where did I EVER say bad? Not an All-time great =/= bad He is good...but not an all-time great rawsavon

hahahaha. According to your logic, I suppose that Philip Rivers had a bad game against the seahawks too? He threw for 455 yards and 2 touchdowns, but lost still, due to two kick offs returned for touchdowns...

Where did I say Marino was bad? Rivers makes the playoffs...Marino made it 58% of the time...not an All-Time great

And Kelly goes to four super bowls in a row ( a feat no one else has accomplished)and it is not because he is one of the all time greats, and Buffalo had one of the scariest offenses in the league, but because the AFC sucked?
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

The Colts don't have that great of players though...no running game since E. James left, Manning makes the WR's, Dallas Clark is All-World...but who else do they have that is not great b/c of Manning.

Same with Brady...they won with nobody's at WR and RB

List me All-time great QB's with worse records (making the playoffs)

Manning has had great players around him throughout his career. He DID have Edgerin James on his team. (we're talking about all-time between quarterbacks), he has had Marvin Harrison. He has Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Joseph Addai, Dwight Freeney, Pierre Garcon, Adam Vinitari, and more. These are all good players. And I'm sure he's had more good players in the past that I'm missing..

Manning DID NOT have have James when he won. Harrison is not an all-time great, good though. Wayne is good b/c of manning...same with Garcon. Addai is garbage...a bust. Clark is all world. I will give you that. Their D sucks. You named a kicker...really? Do you not think it is weird that the Colts always have good wr's (now Collie and Garcon and Gonzales)...me thinks that is Peyton and not the WR's Marino had just as good of WR's and a better D

My brother was teammates with Reggie Wayne in high school... he has always been a BEAST. Everybody knew he was going to the NFL. He was great at Miami. This is hilarious that you downplay other people's talents and say they are ONLY good because of some other guy. Harrison was an amazing player. He's been to the pro-bowl several times, holds records, etc. He was THE man in Indy. Yes, I named a kicker. Kickers can win you games. Vinateri is one of the best.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Brady won SB's with no names (they did not win the year you are talking about). All-Time Greats make those around them better...like Manningrawsavon
I know they didn't win the superbowl that year. They won 19 straight games though. And BS that Brady won with no-names. Seriously? His very first super bowl win, he had these guys oh his team: Dieon Branch, Tedy Bruschi, Kevin Faulk, Jarvis Green, Ty Law, Adam Vinateri, Mike Vrabel, Rodney Harrison, Richard Seymour, Tyrone Poole, and more players who play well as a team.

What other HOF player did Brady have on offense -Branch sucked when he left (wonder why) -Faulk is nothing...just a 3rd down back...really? -then you named all Defensive players...but their offense was good

A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="quetzalcoatI"] hahahaha. According to your logic, I suppose that Philip Rivers had a bad game against the seahawks too? He threw for 455 yards and 2 touchdowns, but lost still, due to two kick offs returned for touchdowns...

quetzalcoatI

Where did I say Marino was bad? Rivers makes the playoffs...Marino made it 58% of the time...not an All-Time great

And Kelly goes to four super bowls in a row ( a feat no one else has accomplished)and it is not because he is one of the all time greats, and Buffalo had one of the scariest offenses in the league, but because the AFC sucked?

K-gun was good...but not great
-to me, an All-time great = top 5

The AFC was garbage. If a QB won this years NFC West 4 times in a row, would that make them good...the whole AFC was like that (especially before the cap was put in '93)

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] Manning has had great players around him throughout his career. He DID have Edgerin James on his team. (we're talking about all-time between quarterbacks), he has had Marvin Harrison. He has Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Joseph Addai, Dwight Freeney, Pierre Garcon, Adam Vinitari, and more. These are all good players. And I'm sure he's had more good players in the past that I'm missing..

BMD004

Manning DID NOT have have James when he won. Harrison is not an all-time great, good though. Wayne is good b/c of manning...same with Garcon. Addai is garbage...a bust. Clark is all world. I will give you that. Their D sucks. You named a kicker...really? Do you not think it is weird that the Colts always have good wr's (now Collie and Garcon and Gonzales)...me thinks that is Peyton and not the WR's Marino had just as good of WR's and a better D

My brother was teammates with Reggie Wayne in high school... he has always been a BEAST. Everybody knew he was going to the NFL. He was great at Miami. This is hilarious that you downplay other people's talents and say they are ONLY good because of some other guy. Harrison was an amazing player. He's been to the pro-bowl several times, holds records, etc. He was THE man in Indy. Yes, I named a kicker. Kickers can win you games. Vinateri is one of the best.

So your brother playing with someone in HS makes someone a GREAT player now :?
...most every NFL player dominated their HS

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] I know they didn't win the superbowl that year. They won 19 straight games though. And BS that Brady won with no-names. Seriously? His very first super bowl win, he had these guys oh his team: Dieon Branch, Tedy Bruschi, Kevin Faulk, Jarvis Green, Ty Law, Adam Vinateri, Mike Vrabel, Rodney Harrison, Richard Seymour, Tyrone Poole, and more players who play well as a team. BMD004
What other HOF player did Brady have on offense -Branch sucked when he left (wonder why) -Faulk is nothing...just a 3rd down back...really? -then you named all Defensive players...but their offense was good

A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes.

O-line is important. Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Manning DID NOT have have James when he won. Harrison is not an all-time great, good though. Wayne is good b/c of manning...same with Garcon. Addai is garbage...a bust. Clark is all world. I will give you that. Their D sucks. You named a kicker...really? Do you not think it is weird that the Colts always have good wr's (now Collie and Garcon and Gonzales)...me thinks that is Peyton and not the WR's Marino had just as good of WR's and a better Drawsavon

My brother was teammates with Reggie Wayne in high school... he has always been a BEAST. Everybody knew he was going to the NFL. He was great at Miami. This is hilarious that you downplay other people's talents and say they are ONLY good because of some other guy. Harrison was an amazing player. He's been to the pro-bowl several times, holds records, etc. He was THE man in Indy. Yes, I named a kicker. Kickers can win you games. Vinateri is one of the best.

So your brother playing with someone in HS makes someone a GREAT player now :?
...most every NFL player dominated their HS

No, I'm saying that we've seen him play since his high school years. It's not like Manning all of a sudden made him great. He was always great whether it was at John Ehret high shcool or University of Miami or the Indianapolis Colts. He's always been a beast.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"] My brother was teammates with Reggie Wayne in high school... he has always been a BEAST. Everybody knew he was going to the NFL. He was great at Miami. This is hilarious that you downplay other people's talents and say they are ONLY good because of some other guy. Harrison was an amazing player. He's been to the pro-bowl several times, holds records, etc. He was THE man in Indy. Yes, I named a kicker. Kickers can win you games. Vinateri is one of the best.BMD004

So your brother playing with someone in HS makes someone a GREAT player now :?
...most every NFL player dominated their HS

No, I'm saying that we've seen him play since his high school years. It's not like Manning all of a sudden made him great. He was always great whether it was at John Ehret high shcool or University of Miami or the Indianapolis Colts. He's always been a beast.

Great in HS and College =/= great in the NFL.
This is adding nothing to the debate (that you think he was great in college or HS)

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
I think the answer is Peyton Manning...it doesn't matter who you throw up there to catch the ball...all of a sudden they turn into pro-bowl recievers when he's there....the only detractor is that he only has 1 superbowl ring...without PM...the colts are a 3 win team...
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
I think the answer is Peyton Manning...it doesn't matter who you throw up there to catch the ball...all of a sudden they turn into pro-bowl recievers when he's there....the only detractor is that he only has 1 superbowl ring...without PM...the colts are a 3 win team...Omni-Slash
That is why he is not my #1 (the one ring thing). -if he can get a couple more, he will #1 IMO
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"] So your brother playing with someone in HS makes someone a GREAT player now :?
...most every NFL player dominated their HS

rawsavon

No, I'm saying that we've seen him play since his high school years. It's not like Manning all of a sudden made him great. He was always great whether it was at John Ehret high shcool or University of Miami or the Indianapolis Colts. He's always been a beast.

Great in HS and College =/= great in the NFL.
This is adding nothing to the debate (that you think he was great in college or HS)

But your logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, not because he is great, but because Peyton Manning makes him great. My logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, because he is just a great player.

Avatar image for Omni-Slash
Omni-Slash

54450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#87 Omni-Slash
Member since 2003 • 54450 Posts
That is why he is not my #1 (the one ring thing). -if he can get a couple more, he will #1 IMOrawsavon
they thing is that's not a a big enough detractor for me.....one man a team doesn't make...even if he is the quaterback.....QB play can only get you so far in the playoffs....look at tom brady last year.....or any great QB with a subpar team (Marino)....you can only do so much without the complete team around you.....it's a testiment to manning that they have managed just to make the playoffs as it is...
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"] No, I'm saying that we've seen him play since his high school years. It's not like Manning all of a sudden made him great. He was always great whether it was at John Ehret high shcool or University of Miami or the Indianapolis Colts. He's always been a beast.

BMD004

Great in HS and College =/= great in the NFL.
This is adding nothing to the debate (that you think he was great in college or HS)

But your logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, not because he is great, but because Peyton Manning makes him great. My logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, because he is just a great player.

Okay...
I assume what you are saying makes sense to you, but it does not to me. My point is that 90% of the players in the NFL fit your description (great in HS and college)...so it means nothing to me to say that.

Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] What other HOF player did Brady have on offense -Branch sucked when he left (wonder why) -Faulk is nothing...just a 3rd down back...really? -then you named all Defensive players...but their offense was goodrawsavon
A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes.

Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.

O-line is the most important thing besides the QB. Miami was looking for a running game the entire time Marino was with them, and they never found one. How many seasons did they have a 1000 yard rusher? 2 or 3? How many Super Bowl winners didn't have 1000 yard rushers on their team? Hell, how many playoff teams don't have 1000 yard rushers on their team?
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]That is why he is not my #1 (the one ring thing). -if he can get a couple more, he will #1 IMOOmni-Slash
they thing is that's not a a big enough detractor for me.....one man a team doesn't make...even if he is the quaterback.....QB play can only get you so far in the playoffs....look at tom brady last year.....or any great QB with a subpar team (Marino)....you can only do so much without the complete team around you.....it's a testiment to manning that they have managed just to make the playoffs as it is...

I think Manning is an All-Time great (that means top 5 to me) -he is just not my #1 (Montana)
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] What other HOF player did Brady have on offense -Branch sucked when he left (wonder why) -Faulk is nothing...just a 3rd down back...really? -then you named all Defensive players...but their offense was goodrawsavon
A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes.

O-line is important. Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.

And that is bull about Manning not having a good team. I just looked it up, and in 2007 the Colts were 2nd in offense and 2nd in Defense in the AFC. They were good on both sides of the ball. They have always been a solid overall team.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes. wstfld
Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.

O-line is the most important thing besides the QB. Miami was looking for a running game the entire time Marino was with them, and they never found one. How many seasons did they have a 1000 yard rusher? 2 or 3? How many Super Bowl winners didn't have 1000 yard rushers on their team? Hell, how many playoff teams don't have 1000 yard rushers on their team?

You can't compare stats b/w eras though. -a 1,000 yard rusher meant something back in the day...means nothing now Mannind (post E. James) and Brady both lack running games for most of their careers. -J. Addai was a bust for Indy and L. Marony was bust for NE
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"] Great in HS and College =/= great in the NFL.
This is adding nothing to the debate (that you think he was great in college or HS)

rawsavon

But your logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, not because he is great, but because Peyton Manning makes him great. My logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, because he is just a great player.

Okay...
I assume what you are saying makes sense to you, but it does not to me. My point is that 90% of the players in the NFL fit your description (great in HS and college)...so it means nothing to me to say that.

No, you're wrong. If he was like the 250th pick in the draft and then becomes amazing, then you may have a point. But he was the Colts first round draft pick.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="BMD004"] A lot of times, offenses work not because of the stars, but because of the O-line. The Patriots are known for their increible O-line. This gives Brady all the time in the world to make good passes. BMD004
O-line is important. Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.

And that is bull about Manning not having a good team. I just looked it up, and in 2007 the Colts were 2nd in offense and 2nd in Defense in the AFC. They were good on both sides of the ball. They have always been a solid overall team.

O is b/c of Manning D had a couple good years...what about all the other years they make the playoffs with a terrible D? I am not not placing Marino as an all-time great b/c of not having a SB win (I understand it is a team game) I am not placing Marino as an all-time great b/c of the making the playoffs record
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"] But your logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, not because he is great, but because Peyton Manning makes him great. My logic is this: He was great in high school, he was great in college, and he is now great in the NFL, because he is just a great player.

BMD004

Okay...
I assume what you are saying makes sense to you, but it does not to me. My point is that 90% of the players in the NFL fit your description (great in HS and college)...so it means nothing to me to say that.

No, you're wrong. If he was like the 250th pick in the draft and then becomes amazing, then you may have a point. But he was the Colts first round draft pick.

Lots of first round busts...that does not mean anything.
Domainate college and HS =/= anything in the NFL
(look at bust after bust at WR 's drafted in the 1st rounds...it is almost as bad as QB)

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="wstfld"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.rawsavon
O-line is the most important thing besides the QB. Miami was looking for a running game the entire time Marino was with them, and they never found one. How many seasons did they have a 1000 yard rusher? 2 or 3? How many Super Bowl winners didn't have 1000 yard rushers on their team? Hell, how many playoff teams don't have 1000 yard rushers on their team?

You can't compare stats b/w eras though. -a 1,000 yard rusher meant something back in the day...means nothing now Mannind (post E. James) and Brady both lack running games for most of their careers. -J. Addai was a bust for Indy and L. Marony was bust for NE

That is not true. The Colts are right smack in the middle of the rushing stats in the NFL. They are average. And actually, they have the least amount of rushing fumbles in the NFL. And the Patriots are even better. They are in the top half of the NFL in rushing. If you go back to 1986, the Dolphins were #25 out of 28 teams in rushing.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
Compare Manning's and Brady's last 5-8 years in rushing to an 8 year span for Marino. -you can't just pick 2 random years and say that is how it was for a career. -if that was the case, Derek Anderson wold be in the HOF after that one good year for the Browns
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="rawsavon"]

Okay...
I assume what you are saying makes sense to you, but it does not to me. My point is that 90% of the players in the NFL fit your description (great in HS and college)...so it means nothing to me to say that.

rawsavon

No, you're wrong. If he was like the 250th pick in the draft and then becomes amazing, then you may have a point. But he was the Colts first round draft pick.

Lots of first round busts...that does not mean anything.
Domainate college and HS =/= anything in the NFL
(look at bust after bust at WR 's drafted in the 1st rounds...it is almost as bad as QB)

But my point is that you completely discredit that he has been amazing at football his whole life. He was even the Colts first pick in the draft. He was always great, and was expected to be great, and you say the only reason is because of Manning. It's like saying Jerry Rice was only great because of his quarterback. Not that he was always an amazing receiver, but because Joe and Steve got him the ball.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

@BMD

The colts were last in the league in rushing last year
...so...
looks like Manning can make up for a terrible run game

D was 18
...so looks like Manning can make up for a below average D as well

Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
[QUOTE="wstfld"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] Do you have in-depth analysis from watching Marino's O-line...I sure don't. But i do know that an all-time great QB would do better than making the playoffs 58% of the time. -even with only 'okay' parts...to not even make it as a wild card team.rawsavon
O-line is the most important thing besides the QB. Miami was looking for a running game the entire time Marino was with them, and they never found one. How many seasons did they have a 1000 yard rusher? 2 or 3? How many Super Bowl winners didn't have 1000 yard rushers on their team? Hell, how many playoff teams don't have 1000 yard rushers on their team?

You can't compare stats b/w eras though. -a 1,000 yard rusher meant something back in the day...means nothing now Mannind (post E. James) and Brady both lack running games for most of their careers. -J. Addai was a bust for Indy and L. Marony was bust for NE

J. Addai had 1,000 yards when they won the SB. Maroney wasn't on their Super Bowl teams.