90% of them have no idea what it meansweezyfbNot knowing what something is doesnt mean you cant hate it.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe. And your thing about "reducing the gap" just brings the upper and upper-middle down. It doesn't bring the lower and middle up.
Pirate700
Yepp.
=O That's really offensive to an entire continent. I doubt you reallt mean that.It's true. There's a reason why the US is the economic center of the world.Truth to be told, I'd rather live in a country where everybody get the same essential benefits inorder to survive regardless of wether you're in lower, middle or upper class, Then a country where there are a couple of economically strong groups who gets full benefits but with hundreds of thousands that live in what is basically poverty.[QUOTE="Cpt-Obvious"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe. And your thing about "reducing the gap" just brings the upper and upper-middle down. It doesn't bring the lower and middle up.
Yepp.
Mediocrity lol , If by that you mean lower crime rates, lower infant mortality , social justice, better education standards etc etc etc not to mention the historical and cultural significance, yeah who needs all that right when the us has economic and military strength.[QUOTE="Sagem28"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
mrbojangles25
I'm sorry, what ? I couldn't hear you behind all my cheap health care benefits.
he does have a point
I watch films set in Europeand I cant help but think "Wow...is that how/where they live?"
I watch films set in the US and I think "Wow, that is a nice house"
I mean I just watched Let the Right One In and, forgive me for jumping to conclusions, but are those living conditions standard for Norwegians? I look at Tokyo apartments versus San Francisco apartments and think "Damn...Tokyo sucks"
Erm, so you're comparing lower budget films to Hollywood films?Wait, sorry I misunderstood your post and didn't read the other ones :P
But yeah, Western Europe does have high standard of living. An economically developed country (UK, Germany, etc etc) are like any other place though, you get your good areas and your bad areas.
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
I'm sorry, what ? I couldn't hear you behind all my cheap health care benefits.
Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
I'm sorry, what ? I couldn't hear you behind all my cheap health care benefits.
Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms. What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"][QUOTE="Sagem28"]Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms. What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:I'm sorry, what ? I couldn't hear you behind all my cheap health care benefits.
Ravensmash
Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms.YellowOneKinobi
Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
Yet for the vast majority of people services like the NHS work perfectly. You honestly telling me there aren't issues like this in the US? Weren't 60ish % of bankruptcies related to unpaid medical costs? That's right, in a developed country in 2011 there are people losing everything because they get ill/couldn't be covered by insurance? Look I shouldn't criticise it either because I haven't experienced it, but it just annoys me when people rely on horror stories to push an agenda whilst ignoring any positives. (And yes I'm being hypocritical slightly, but meh)What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms.YellowOneKinobi
Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
that is not a good case but it does fall in line with nearly all of the arguments you see here, the number of stories there is not enough to come to a conclusion but cherry picking and creating arguments with the constitution of jello on a hot summers day seems to be the way things are done.What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] Probably the reason you couldn't hear behind your cheap healthcare benefits is because you have people moaning in agony in all of your hospitals, literally dying int he hallways while mothers give birth in waiting rooms.YellowOneKinobi
Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
This is about as representative of Government Health Care as Michael Moore's "Sicko" is of private health care. It's isolating the bad stories. There's a little something called triage. Sure, if you come to the emergency room with an annoying cough, they're going to make you wait, because they'll be more focused on people with the broken arms or arriving in ambulances. It's no worse then people seeking home remedies or ignoring what could be a major illness because they can't or don't want to pay for the medical bills. Oh, wait. Being told that you can only afford to re-attach two, of three fingers... yeah, that's a lot worse. I've seen dramas about people taking hostages trying to get treatment for their (insert relation here) that they can't afford. Never seen a drama about a waiting room.[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] What? I'm guessing you've never experienced it then :lol:Tylendal
Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
This is about as representative of Government Health Care as Michael Moore's "Sicko" is of private health care. It's isolating the bad stories. There's a little something called triage. Sure, if you come to the emergency room with an annoying cough, they're going to make you wait, because they'll be more focused on people with the broken arms or arriving in ambulances. It's no worse then people seeking home remedies or ignoring what could be a major illness because they can't or don't want to pay for the medical bills. Oh, wait. Being told that you can only afford to re-attach two, of three fingers... yeah, that's a lot worse. I've seen dramas about people taking hostages trying to get treatment for their (insert relation here) that they can't afford. Never seen a drama about a waiting room. This. There's a reason why cases in that link are highlighted and reported in the media, because they don't occur often. To judge a healthcare system which supports 70million people on a few horrific stories is unfair.[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]This is about as representative of Government Health Care as Michael Moore's "Sicko" is of private health care. It's isolating the bad stories. There's a little something called triage. Sure, if you come to the emergency room with an annoying cough, they're going to make you wait, because they'll be more focused on people with the broken arms or arriving in ambulances. It's no worse then people seeking home remedies or ignoring what could be a major illness because they can't or don't want to pay for the medical bills. Oh, wait. Being told that you can only afford to re-attach two, of three fingers... yeah, that's a lot worse. I've seen dramas about people taking hostages trying to get treatment for their (insert relation here) that they can't afford. Never seen a drama about a waiting room. This. There's a reason why cases in that link are highlighted and reported in the media, because they don't occur often. To judge a healthcare system which supports 70million people on a few horrific stories is unfair. kinda like a system that supports 300 million? oh wait it is not state run so it is ok to jump to conclusion with only conjecture and statistical outliers.Here is the first batch......... http://biggovhealth.org/stories
Ravensmash
It's not thet people are paranoid to every instance of socialism. We have many social programs in this country that are widely accepted and are the norm. It's just that this country was founded on the idea that the individual is king. We don't like a small group of people trying to pass off their idea of what is "right and just" on everyone else. We prefer people to make those decisions, themselves. We don't believe that all the fruits of someone's labors are the property of everyone else. We believe that if you work hard, are innovative, or are successful, that is a good thing, not a crime. Most people are for a closing of the income gap between classes, but we are not for government mandated income redistribution. It's not the governments place to decide who should make what.
We believe the government should serve the needs of the people, not the people serving the needs of the government. It's supposed to be a mutually beneficial organization. Something that is useful to everyone and not something that acts to punish its members.
I have no problem with a lot of social systems. What I do have a problem with is this blind and uneducated belief that socialism is the cure to all that ails the world. That despite its past failures, it's the only way to go. Most people I've seen on this forum that are pushing for it, do so only because it will benefit their specific situation. In my opinion, they're just as selfish and greedy as those they rail against.
This. There's a reason why cases in that link are highlighted and reported in the media, because they don't occur often. To judge a healthcare system which supports 70million people on a few horrific stories is unfair. kinda like a system that supports 300 million? oh wait it is not state run so it is ok to jump to conclusion with only conjecture and statistical outliers. Private health care is putting a price on human life. It doesn't work when people go bankrupt as a result of not dying.[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="Tylendal"] This is about as representative of Government Health Care as Michael Moore's "Sicko" is of private health care. It's isolating the bad stories. There's a little something called triage. Sure, if you come to the emergency room with an annoying cough, they're going to make you wait, because they'll be more focused on people with the broken arms or arriving in ambulances. It's no worse then people seeking home remedies or ignoring what could be a major illness because they can't or don't want to pay for the medical bills. Oh, wait. Being told that you can only afford to re-attach two, of three fingers... yeah, that's a lot worse. I've seen dramas about people taking hostages trying to get treatment for their (insert relation here) that they can't afford. Never seen a drama about a waiting room.surrealnumber5
This. There's a reason why cases in that link are highlighted and reported in the media, because they don't occur often. To judge a healthcare system which supports 70million people on a few horrific stories is unfair. Ravensmashkinda like a system that supports 300 million? oh wait it is not state run so it is ok to jump to conclusion with only conjecture and statistical outliers. Private health care is putting a price on human life. It doesn't work when people go bankrupt as a result of not dying. thank you for making my point
[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] kinda like a system that supports 300 million? oh wait it is not state run so it is ok to jump to conclusion with only conjecture and statistical outliers.Private health care is putting a price on human life. It doesn't work when people go bankrupt as a result of not dying. thank you for making my point Okay, lets put it this way. When a group of people sit down, and talk about how to make money by taking advantage of the ill and wounded, THAT is a problem.surrealnumber5
thank you for making my point Okay, lets put it this way. When a group of people sit down, and talk about how to make money by taking advantage of the ill and wounded, THAT is a problem. do you have a proof that has ever happened let alone on a large tin foil scale?[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Tylendal"] Private health care is putting a price on human life. It doesn't work when people go bankrupt as a result of not dying.Tylendal
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]Okay, lets put it this way. When a group of people sit down, and talk about how to make money by taking advantage of the ill and wounded, THAT is a problem. do you have a proof that has ever happened let alone on a large tin foil scale? What? That's how private sector hospitals work. They're not charity organizations, they're businesses, which means people at the top started them for the sole sake of making a profit. If you see someone get injured, you go help them. The American system is you go help them, and steal their wallet. That's a problem.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] thank you for making my pointsurrealnumber5
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Tylendal"] Okay, lets put it this way. When a group of people sit down, and talk about how to make money by taking advantage of the ill and wounded, THAT is a problem.do you have a proof that has ever happened let alone on a large tin foil scale? What? That's how private sector hospitals work. They're not charity organizations, they're businesses, which means people at the top started them for the sole sake of making a profit. If you see someone get injured, you go help them. The American system is you go help them, and steal their wallet. That's a problem. it would be if that were the system. i dont think i would go to a hospital if the did not fix me, stole my wallet, and told me to F*** off. i have no clew where you got this theory from.Tylendal
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Tylendal"] Okay, lets put it this way. When a group of people sit down, and talk about how to make money by taking advantage of the ill and wounded, THAT is a problem.do you have a proof that has ever happened let alone on a large tin foil scale? What? That's how private sector hospitals work. They're not charity organizations, they're businesses, which means people at the top started them for the sole sake of making a profit. If you see someone get injured, you go help them. The American system is you go help them, and steal their wallet. That's a problem. That's your view of the system. Most hospitals aren't out to "steal your wallet". That's a pretty naive view. In fact, most hospitals provide tons of charity care where they just write off the costs of treating people who can't pay. Hospitals are expensive because they have to hire and maintain large staffs of skilled workers such as nurses, techs, aides, doctors, etc. They also have to buy the latest and greatest equipment to ensure that their patients have access to the best quality. Simply assuming that hospitals only want to steal your money is not correct.Tylendal
What? That's how private sector hospitals work. They're not charity organizations, they're businesses, which means people at the top started them for the sole sake of making a profit. If you see someone get injured, you go help them. The American system is you go help them, and steal their wallet. That's a problem. That's your view of the system. Most hospitals aren't out to "steal your wallet". That's a pretty naive view. In fact, most hospitals provide tons of charity care where they just write off the costs of treating people who can't pay. Hospitals are expensive because they have to hire and maintain large staffs of skilled workers such as nurses, techs, aides, doctors, etc. They also have to buy the latest and greatest equipment to ensure that their patients have access to the best quality. Simply assuming that hospitals only want to steal your money is not correct. At the bottom line though, they're still 'for profit', and ethically, that just doesn't sit well with me.[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] do you have a proof that has ever happened let alone on a large tin foil scale? sonicare
=O That's really offensive to an entire continent. I doubt you reallt mean that.It's true. There's a reason why the US is the economic center of the world. Well, Since China is quickly becoming the largest economic power, maybe we should all be Communist, to avoid "mediocrity". Communist Capitalism obviously > Democratic Capitalism[QUOTE="Cpt-Obvious"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
Pirate700
What? That's how private sector hospitals work. They're not charity organizations, they're businesses, which means people at the top started them for the sole sake of making a profit. If you see someone get injured, you go help them. The American system is you go help them, and steal their wallet. That's a problem.TylendalThat's your view of the system. Most hospitals aren't out to "steal your wallet". That's a pretty naive view. In fact, most hospitals provide tons of charity care where they just write off the costs of treating people who can't pay. Hospitals are expensive because they have to hire and maintain large staffs of skilled workers such as nurses, techs, aides, doctors, etc. They also have to buy the latest and greatest equipment to ensure that their patients have access to the best quality. Simply assuming that hospitals only want to steal your money is not correct. At the bottom line though, they're still 'for profit', and ethically, that just doesn't sit well with me.doctors in every system do their job for pay...
[QUOTE="With-Hatred"][QUOTE="BMD004"] Missed my point. He can say Finland and Sweden have the highest levels of happiness (a stat that is completely idiotic), and I can back up that they have higher levels of suicide than "less happy" countries. It's just a stupid statistic to throw out there.
BMD004
http://www.financialjesus.com/how-to-get-rich/top-10-happiest-countries/ High rates of happiness http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy norwegian countries haveHigh life expectancies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Indexnorway has the highest standard of living
So the USA has a life expectancy of 78, whereas the nordic countries have a life expectancy of about 80. Those extra 2 years I'm sure has to do with eating a better diet than Americans, and in no way reflects the health care of the countries. lulz, denial, forgot to mention the increased happiness and higher standards of living to huh?=O That's really offensive to an entire continent. I doubt you reallt mean that.It's true. There's a reason why the US is the economic center of the world.[QUOTE="Cpt-Obvious"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
Because capitalism is what keeps us from the mediocrity of Europe.
Pirate700
I would have to agree. Capitalism is one of the reasons why we're so great.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="BMD004"] Missed my point. He can say Finland and Sweden have the highest levels of happiness (a stat that is completely idiotic), and I can back up that they have higher levels of suicide than "less happy" countries. It's just a stupid statistic to throw out there.Suicide doesn't really correspond directly to unhappiness. The US is a much more religious country and a religious person is much less likely to kill them self since it means their eternal damnation. A Swedish guy down on his luck is probably just going to shoot himself without a second thought since why the hell not. Also the numbers are not very different between Sweden and the US so it's kind of silly to say "HA! Their suicide rate is .8 higher than ours! Socialism is dumb!" Most Americans believe in God and classify themselves as "Christian", but not many of them are actual practicing Christians. If somebody was so far-gone that they were actually thinking of ending their own life, nothing will stop them. P.S... Finland has a suicide rate of 18.3, and the USA has a rate of 11.1. A 7 point difference is a huge amount.. especially when the highest in the world is about 30.Maybe u should account for higher succeptability to seasonal depression which has been show to increase suidicide rates by 50% +, if u take that into account it's actually lower....durrBMD004
Well, Since China is quickly becoming the largest economic power, maybe we should all be Communist, to avoid "mediocrity". Communist Capitalism obviously > Democratic CapitalismII_Seraphim_II
Perhaps you shouldn't listen to the alarmists quite so much. China has a huge housing bubble that is ready to collapse. And it will. When it does, China will be in no position to be an economic power.
I don't like any government meddling, or rather, as little as possible... Government is full of politicians(surprise surprise?) They tend to like being corrupt, making things have a ton of red tape and trying to be nannies, too obsessed with not hurting, or offending people. It's not paranoia, it's that I don't trust them.InconsistancyWhilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money?
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]I don't like any government meddling, or rather, as little as possible... Government is full of politicians(surprise surprise?) They tend to like being corrupt, making things have a ton of red tape and trying to be nannies, too obsessed with not hurting, or offending people. It's not paranoia, it's that I don't trust them.RavensmashWhilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money? What the hell else do companies exist for? Pretty sure they all are in it for money. Anyway, they don't make laws, w/o government assistance they can fail, and have to be more careful about consequences... I'm tired.
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]I don't like any government meddling, or rather, as little as possible... Government is full of politicians(surprise surprise?) They tend to like being corrupt, making things have a ton of red tape and trying to be nannies, too obsessed with not hurting, or offending people. It's not paranoia, it's that I don't trust them.RavensmashWhilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money? companies have a bottom line and competition, they need to become more efficient and if they do mess up there is legal recourse against them. for the fedies if they do a good job they get their budget cut, if they do a bad job they get more money, it pays to be inefficient in the public sector.
[QUOTE="Sagem28"]
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]
oh I have been to Europe about ten times in my life (one of the perks of havign a flight attendent mom :D ).
I was playing Devil's Advocate, btw. I know Europe has many things that I personally envy, and as far as living standards go in Western Europe they easily match the US's for the most part, if not exceed, but are likely less in some respects too.
Its just in California I can drive through any number of neighborhoods and see nice houses and everything is spread out and to get one of those houses is realistic provided you work hard.
I just havent seen neighborhoods like that in Europe that a middle ****person could afford or even pursue. Im likely incorrect though.
We also have a structural problem over here, everything is build so tightly together. There hardly is any building ground anymore, so people often buy old houses which they renovate instead of breaking it down and building a new modern one.
yeah but personally I sort of like that.
in my current town, the oldest house is like 120 years old. Its even been given "historical status" lol.
In Europe, I saw many restored houses that were 150+ years old, usually a lot more due to stone/brick construction. Theyre so beautiful and just ooze **** but that also makes them very expensive.
Also, a lot of European cities were designed before the car and mass transit lol. Hard to navigate for us foreigners :P
As far as close together, that goes both ways; I enjoyed being able to get from Barcelona, Spain to Paris, France in a matter of 3 or so hours...in CA, it takes me close to four hours to get to LA to visit my sister, and four hours to go to San Francisco to visit my folks. Conversely, I can drive that distance and not come across a large town for quite some time, everything is so spread out.
I guess what I am trying to say is that nothing is better, just different, and the least we can do is learn from eachother. Lord knows I want some stuff you "get' from your government; I work my ass off, I deserve healthcare dammit
have u been to scandinavia? u gotta remember our saleries are way higher then urs and we have tons of benefits like social care, free school (yes uni too), more or less free medical system (both care and any medication) and so on, so if our houses are more expensive its not strange and i cant say i know what u mean by ugly small houses here?? i seen some really bad places in usa - dad drove wrong... and we lived at 5 star hotels and ur beds just suck... also u should never put all of europe in the same sentence cause we're very different- we usually have the same high prices even the more poor countries - which sucks for them!!! and its not fair, there is no way u can compare and clump up the nordic countries with the poor countries in europe - houses streets , saleries - everything is different and yeah i been to usa and canada - u have huge roads cause ure big countries , i personally prefer smaller since i dont even bother to have a car nor license - why? i dont need any - im close to everything!!! and we have excellent transportation system i do give u some things i love about north america: ur stuff is so cheap!!!!! and u get games wayyy before us (if we even get them), so i love to import stuff from canada or usa - love any regionfree console! when anyone complain here about console or game prices i just wanna cry since u got it so cheap compared to the rest of the world - ure lucky! ok so i realize i live in one of the high salery countries - BUT all of europe get same prices even though some countries dont even have one forth of our saleries and that is just unfair another good thing is groceryshops - its something i like in all countries - i love trying new food, candy whatever people are in general more open and friendly in north america then the colder more shy nordic countries, and i like canada especially since they got a lil bit more calm laid back attitude also - gotta love ur amusmentparks! especially universal studios but its not a country i ever wanna live in (and i think most people feel that about their own country - love to travel but then realize how good their own country is - that said my bf moved to sweden a year ago and love it and he lived in 2 countries before, my dad lived in 3 different countries too - starting with usa the first 14 years - he will never ever live there again) all countries got good and bad stuff[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]I don't like any government meddling, or rather, as little as possible... Government is full of politicians(surprise surprise?) They tend to like being corrupt, making things have a ton of red tape and trying to be nannies, too obsessed with not hurting, or offending people. It's not paranoia, it's that I don't trust them.RavensmashWhilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money?Companies usually can't force you to buy their product. Government forces you to participate.
metalkitten
You salaries are in the same ballpark. By purchasing power parity, the U.S. median household income scores above some Scandinavian countries, (generally we don't top Norway though) and that is before taxes. (whereby income is taken to fund government services) All things considered, real purchasing power is relatively close.
Whilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money?Companies usually can't force you to buy their product. Government forces you to participate. Well in the case of medical insurance you surely have to have it? And you spend more on insurance than other countries.[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]I don't like any government meddling, or rather, as little as possible... Government is full of politicians(surprise surprise?) They tend to like being corrupt, making things have a ton of red tape and trying to be nannies, too obsessed with not hurting, or offending people. It's not paranoia, it's that I don't trust them.aransom
[QUOTE="aransom"]Companies usually can't force you to buy their product. Government forces you to participate. Well in the case of medical insurance you surely have to have it? And you spend more on insurance than other countries. Not really any competition in medical insurance, can't buy across state lines for a better deal... quite stupid imo.[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] Whilst that may be true, how is that any worse than for profit companies who exist solely to make money?Ravensmash
I don't like big govnerment. So if the government controls everything, isn't that a tyranny? What happened to limited government run by the people.mohfrontlineSo there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people.
[QUOTE="mohfrontline"]I don't like big govnerment. So if the government controls everything, isn't that a tyranny? What happened to limited government run by the people.curonoSo there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people. the the expense of? what is just is subjective and what is unjust is tyrannical, if he does not feel he should be forced to pay for others things and is, the entity forcing is imposing tyranny on him.
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="mohfrontline"]I don't like big govnerment. So if the government controls everything, isn't that a tyranny? What happened to limited government run by the people.surrealnumber5So there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people. the the expense of? what is just is subjective and what is unjust is tyrannical, if he does not feel he should be forced to pay for others things and is, the entity forcing is imposing tyranny on him.
If we go to both ends we can get tyranny in two different ways.. The best way has always been striking a fine balance between the two.. That is why if we look through out the world the most prosperous nations strike up this balance of grey.
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="mohfrontline"]I don't like big govnerment. So if the government controls everything, isn't that a tyranny? What happened to limited government run by the people.surrealnumber5So there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people. the the expense of? what is just is subjective and what is unjust is tyrannical, if he does not feel he should be forced to pay for others things and is, the entity forcing is imposing tyranny on him. No. In that sense every government is by default tyrannical, since you can't choose exactly what your tax will be used for, decisions are made by politics and which laws you want to be enforced to you. Part of the social contract (base of almost every social group), is allowing a group to enforce decisions and laws. And by going to your crazy standards, every social group is by nature tyrannical. Tyranny goes to other lines, dont try to slap it like a sticker.
the the expense of? what is just is subjective and what is unjust is tyrannical, if he does not feel he should be forced to pay for others things and is, the entity forcing is imposing tyranny on him.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="curono"] So there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people.sSubZerOo
If we go to both ends we can get tyranny in two different ways.. The best way has always been striking a fine balance between the two.. That is why if we look through out the world the most prosperous nations strike up this balance of grey.
only force and abuse of power can be called tyrannical, you can come up with another name for the other end unless you believe a dictatorship of the proletariat could form, but unless there is power and force there is no tyrannyHyper-conservative, anti-Soviet propaganda still lingering in the public mindset. It doesn't help that the anti-Soviet ideology was brought in connected to Christianity ("God" being added to the dollar and anthem to counter the "Soviet atheists") which the majority of the nation adheres to. So socialism still is believed to be anti-Christianity.
I've read part of the Communist Manifesto, and read a bit about socialism... and think either side of the political spectrum is detrimental to a society. One has to balance between capitalism and socialism, with the power being solely in the hands of the people.
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="curono"] So there can't be a big democratic government? Seriously, you are going to tyranny really fast without thinking that programs could be made to help people.curonothe the expense of? what is just is subjective and what is unjust is tyrannical, if he does not feel he should be forced to pay for others things and is, the entity forcing is imposing tyranny on him. No. In that sense every government is by default tyrannical, since you can't choose exactly what your tax will be used for, decisions are made by politics and which laws you want to be enforced to you. Part of the social contract (base of almost every social group), is allowing a group to enforce decisions and laws. And by going to your crazy standards, every social group is by nature tyrannical. Tyranny goes to other lines, dont try to slap it like a sticker. i am using the word as it is defined, as it is to be used, i do not want to get into an argument about diction. your thoughts on that word are wrong, you may find another word that fits your argument. tyranny is subject to the will of the individuals being imposed on.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment