This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"]Examples would be great. The Exorcist, The Shining, Halloween and Psycho are all leagues ahead of Saw, Hostel, Quarantine and The Strangers...correction : horror movies were never scary before, horror movies today are.
super_mario_128
no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"]Examples would be great. The Exorcist, The Shining, Halloween and Psycho are all leagues ahead of Saw, Hostel, Quarantine and The Strangers...correction : horror movies were never scary before, horror movies today are.
x_Martyr_x
no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
What horror film today do you think nails the horror genre?I don't know what to say about the horror movies from the 50's to 60's. I never found them scary. I just find the music laughable. They were better in their time. The 70's sprung out a few great horrors which still stand up today, and the 80's... Heh.
Back in the 80's, when I was a little boy I used to watch certificate 18 horrors. Back then it was mega gore and monster films such as Hellraiser, Nightmare of Elm Street and many, many more. The horror style back then was very viseral. Kind of, here is a scary monster made up in a creature shop coming at you, wanting to eat your intestines. It'll show people being skinned and stuff, a lot of make up, raspberry juice and screaming. It scared the hell out of me when I was that age. But now it's just silly fun and I doubt it will have any effect on the average person over the age of 12.
One more point "why" horror movies aren't scary anymore. I think it's because the filmmakers focus more on gore and bloodiness rather than trying to genuinely scare you. They think having more violence is scary. But that's not true. It's gross, but not scary, two different things, just like disturbing is not the same thing as being scary.ASK_Story
That's pretty much how I feel about this subject.
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Examples would be great. The Exorcist, The Shining, Halloween and Psycho are all leagues ahead of Saw, Hostel, Quarantine and The Strangers...sammyjenkis898
no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
What horror film today do you think nails the horror genre?a few films come to mind; wolf creek, the hills have eyes (remake), the strangers, open water, hostel. if were talking about supernatural horror i enjoyed 1408, the mist, ginger snaps.
[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"]What horror film today do you think nails the horror genre?no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
x_Martyr_x
a few films come to mind; wolf creek, the hills have eyes (remake), the strangers, open water, hostel. if were talking about supernatural horror i enjoyed 1408, the mist, ginger snaps.
You consider those films better then Halloween or The Shining? The only film that I mildly enjoyed out of those were The Hills Have Eyes and The Mist.no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
What horror film today do you think nails the horror genre?a few films come to mind; wolf creek, the hills have eyes (remake), the strangers, open water, hostel. if were talking about supernatural horror i enjoyed 1408, the mist, ginger snaps.
Good horror movies don't need to rely on visuals. Great camera-work and an eerie score can do a far better job than any amount of special effects or gloss. You could also make an argument for that the grittiness of the old horror movies adds to the terror. Still though, the only recent horror movies I've seen that I tihnk are good are The Descent, Creep, The Ring and Ju-On: The Grudge (Japanese). Wolf Creek was a good movie aswell, but Hostel was awful in every aspect for me. I wouldn't even classify it as 'horror'...Most horror movies (if you want to call them that) are mainly torture porn. Most studios see the success from Saw and Hostel and realize that this is what the public wants. It really is sad. sammyjenkis898
the only people who call horror movies "torture porn" are soccer moms and people who like watered down "safe" horror. horror movies aren't supposed to hold your hand while you watch them, they are meant to disgust and to frighten you. as wes craven puts it, "its not art until you have offended someone." i dont want horror movies to distract me from true evil, and thats why monsters are not scary. the real monsters are people. horror movies bring us to our primal instincts, and in a way we get to experience the real human condition, because its in facing death that we truly live.
no, they aren't.
i dont need examples, old horror movies speak for themselves, i dont care how strong the writing or plot is, they look terrible. horror is very visual as well, (and im not talking about gore necessarily.)
What horror film today do you think nails the horror genre?a few films come to mind; wolf creek, the hills have eyes (remake), the strangers, open water, hostel. if were talking about supernatural horror i enjoyed 1408, the mist, ginger snaps.
I enjoyed all those films you mentioned and I somewhat agree on the past things you said in this thread. I'm also very tired of people who think that Phycho is the be all and end all of horror movies. It's like saying Charlie Chaplin is the funniest comedian.[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Most horror movies (if you want to call them that) are mainly torture porn. Most studios see the success from Saw and Hostel and realize that this is what the public wants. It really is sad. x_Martyr_x
the only people who call horror movies "torture porn" are soccer moms and people who like watered down "safe" horror. horror movies aren't supposed to hold your hand while you watch them, they are meant to disgust and to frighten you. as wes craven puts it, "its not art until you have offended someone." i dont want horror movies to distract me from true evil, and thats why monsters are not scary. the real monsters are people. horror movies bring us to our primal instincts, and in a way we get to experience the real human condition, because its in facing death that we truly live.
I have no idea how anyone can consider Hostel a horror movie. It's nothing but gore. There is no substance. It doesn't really take any talent to make a film like that.Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
excellent list, i like slither and the decent the most out of theseHorror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
Film-Guy
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"] the only people who call horror movies "torture porn" are soccer moms and people who like watered down "safe" horror. super_mario_128Er no. People who call BAD horror movies 'torture porn' are people who appreciate the subtlety and suspense of GOOD horror movies. Though if you enjoy watching women bath in the blood of other women more than a movie with ACTUAL suspense then we'll all just have to sit back and watch the genre slowly turn to crap.
Reminds me of that bit in the film Hostel 2. That part made me think to myself, there must be two type of people in this world: Those who look at that as discuisting obscenity, and those who wanted to join in. I know which one I am :twisted:
I think Hostel 1 and 2 are indeed torture porn movies like you said. But what's wrong with a bit of torture porn from time to time? We gotta have some movies like that or we won't have anything to call torture porn! I believe in Russia there's a theatre act which is something like Hostel, it's been running for over a hundred years, don't make me dig it up. But anyway, I don't think every modern horror movie they make these days is torture porn.
Reminds me of that bit in the film Hostel 2.Evil_SalukiYeh, I was referring to that. :P I don't mind the fact that people enjoy watching these movies, but they just AREN'T horror movies. They're a part of some sub-genre of horror, and I personally wouldn't regard them as horror in the slightest...
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"]Most horror movies (if you want to call them that) are mainly torture porn. Most studios see the success from Saw and Hostel and realize that this is what the public wants. It really is sad. sammyjenkis898
the only people who call horror movies "torture porn" are soccer moms and people who like watered down "safe" horror. horror movies aren't supposed to hold your hand while you watch them, they are meant to disgust and to frighten you. as wes craven puts it, "its not art until you have offended someone." i dont want horror movies to distract me from true evil, and thats why monsters are not scary. the real monsters are people. horror movies bring us to our primal instincts, and in a way we get to experience the real human condition, because its in facing death that we truly live.
I have no idea how anyone can consider Hostel a horror movie. It's nothing but gore. There is no substance. It doesn't really take any talent to make a film like that.im sorry that you did not understand the film. but since you seem to think that it takes no talent to make it, im eagerly awaiting your own horror movie which will be better.
Inside is really good.Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
Film-Guy
Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
From the movies I've seen, that's an excellent list...I might add the French film Them. It's basically The Strangers, but came out first and I thought it was a little scarier. I still need to see Slither, and I do have Stuck very high up on my Netflix queve.Some of those films are good, but they didn't scare me. i admit 28 days later was intense but it wasn't "horrifying". And sorry I just didn't get Bubba Ho Tep. I got the joke about the guy who was JFK but ... meh, really, its all I can say. "Let the right one in" is that a foreign film? I read good things about it, is it genuinely scary or just a cool horror film like 28 days later?Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
Film-Guy
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/26/arts/horror.php
Think this will help make horror movies scary again?
Gore movies CAN be "horrifying". Movies that combine good character development with insane gore effects tend to be awesome.jointedSeeing those two together in a movie is as rare as finding a bad Kubrick movie. >_>
What? Can't a person not like a movie and not be experts in making movies now?im sorry that you did not understand the film. but since you seem to think that it takes no talent to make it, im eagerly awaiting your own horror movie which will be better.
x_Martyr_x
[QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"][QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"]I have no idea how anyone can consider Hostel a horror movie. It's nothing but gore. There is no substance. It doesn't really take any talent to make a film like that.the only people who call horror movies "torture porn" are soccer moms and people who like watered down "safe" horror. horror movies aren't supposed to hold your hand while you watch them, they are meant to disgust and to frighten you. as wes craven puts it, "its not art until you have offended someone." i dont want horror movies to distract me from true evil, and thats why monsters are not scary. the real monsters are people. horror movies bring us to our primal instincts, and in a way we get to experience the real human condition, because its in facing death that we truly live.
x_Martyr_x
im sorry that you did not understand the film. but since you seem to think that it takes no talent to make it, im eagerly awaiting your own horror movie which will be better.
I didn't understand the film? Please, tell me what I didn't understand..[QUOTE="jointed"]Gore movies CAN be "horrifying". Movies that combine good character development with insane gore effects tend to be awesome.super_mario_128Seeing those two together in a movie is as rare as finding a bad Kubrick movie. >_> Ichi the Killer is pretty awesome, teehee.
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="jointed"]Gore movies CAN be "horrifying". Movies that combine good character development with insane gore effects tend to be awesome.jointedSeeing those two together in a movie is as rare as finding a bad Kubrick movie. >_> Ichi the Killer is pretty awesome, teehee. :lol: The trailer is more violent than most movies, let alone the entire film!
The reasons are simple:
1. You can see the monsters.
Take "The Thing" (the original black-and-white film, not Carpenter's remake): that movie was super-creepy... until the last 5 minutes, when you see what has caused all the damage. "Oh... is that all..."
The remake, however, keeps you guessing. You can't see the monster... it could be anybody. Even when the mutant is "outed," it has a different form every time... but it's still not the "real" monster.
Watch any horror by John Carpenter: he doesn't really show the monster that often, only glimpses (even in "Halloween," you only see the Shape, not what's driving it).
2. Sequelitis.
As soon as I see a "2," "3," etc. on a film title, I know what to expect: the same things as 1, only multiplied. The body count for "Halloween" was 4; the body count was several times that number in "Halloween 2," and the deaths a lot bloodier... but was it really any better?
3. Remake-itis
Other than Rob Zombie's "Halloween" (which I felt was amazing), I have yet to see a remake of an older horror movie that comes close to recapturing the scares of the original. "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" was paranoia-inducing; the remake with Donald Sutherland was just gross... and not at all scary (unless you're 9, when I first saw it).
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Seeing those two together in a movie is as rare as finding a bad Kubrick movie. >_>super_mario_128Ichi the Killer is pretty awesome, teehee. :lol: The trailer is more violent than most movies, let alone the entire film! Yeah, although there is one, I wouldn't call it bad but at least mediocre, Kubrick movie: Full Metal Jacket :o
I think it is because we live in a more cynical age where we can judge films harshly. That and Hollywood just churns out bad film after bad film where most of the actors have a much more appealing body then actual acting abilities.
The 'Slasher' genre pretty much killed any sense of horror from films anyway, the same idea is used over and over with the masked madman going on a killing spree of sexually driven teens is the same horror film I have seen many times before. The short lived love of the Japanese Horror films was good at the time but again has sadly fallen through the cracks of "lets milk this for all its worth" and now we see more films of the pale, scary, wide eyed woman that crawls after you in a strangely freaky way.
Occasionally you find gem of a horror film but that is a in a rare circumstance where the director actually WANTS to make a decent horror flick and not one that is just trashy.
1. more focus on gore porn
2. not enough focus on story and characters
3. moar sex!
4. the unneeded over use of cgi, we need more guys like stan winston, tom savini and rick baker TRUE artist of their craft
but you can still find some goodies, you have to try forigne and independent
[QUOTE="musicaz70"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Oh God, what an awesome movie. I was terrified by it, but at times I tried to nullify the horror by screaming at the heroines, "Yeh, you beat that bastard! ... You go girl!" Which made me less scaid. D:super_mario_128Is that movie like super good? I constantly hear that it is really scary, but I don't know anyone in real life who has seen it... It's one of the best horror movies of this decade, and it can certainly rival the likes of the classics from the 70's and 80's. It takes place in a cave, and the camera-work makes it all the more creepy. The 'things' are kind of lame though imo.
[QUOTE="x_Martyr_x"][QUOTE="sammyjenkis898"] I have no idea how anyone can consider Hostel a horror movie. It's nothing but gore. There is no substance. It doesn't really take any talent to make a film like that. sammyjenkis898
im sorry that you did not understand the film. but since you seem to think that it takes no talent to make it, im eagerly awaiting your own horror movie which will be better.
I didn't understand the film? Please, tell me what I didn't understand..if you think that Hostel was "nothing but gore", apparently a whole lot.
[QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Some of those films are good, but they didn't scare me. i admit 28 days later was intense but it wasn't "horrifying". And sorry I just didn't get Bubba Ho Tep. I got the joke about the guy who was JFK but ... meh, really, its all I can say. "Let the right one in" is that a foreign film? I read good things about it, is it genuinely scary or just a cool horror film like 28 days later?Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
clembo1990
To be honest I would not really call Let the right one in a horror film, there are some creepy parts and it is about vampires. But it is more of a romance story really, but not in a crappy Twilight way.
[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="Film-Guy"]Some of those films are good, but they didn't scare me. i admit 28 days later was intense but it wasn't "horrifying". And sorry I just didn't get Bubba Ho Tep. I got the joke about the guy who was JFK but ... meh, really, its all I can say. "Let the right one in" is that a foreign film? I read good things about it, is it genuinely scary or just a cool horror film like 28 days later?Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
Film-Guy
To be honest I would not really call Let the right one in a horror film, there are some creepy parts and it is about vampires. But it is more of a romance story really, but not in a crappy Twilight way.
It's definitely a horror film, a different horror film, but it is a horror film.To be honest I would not really call Let the right one in a horror film, there are some creepy parts and it is about vampires. But it is more of a romance story really, but not in a crappy Twilight way.
It's definitely a horror film, a different horror film, but it is a horror film.I guess you are right, but it doesn't exactly focus on the horror element. Its more about the relationship between the two kids, heck the horror parts are not even that scary. By definition though I think it still counts as horror.
Horror films are still good, you just have to look harder for them. Some of the films I am about to list are not really scary, but they are still great horror films that any horror fan should watch.
Session 9
The Devil's Backbone
Eden Lake
High Tension
Inside
Frontiers
Kairo
Shutter
A tale of two sisters
Midnight Meat train
Rogue
The Signal
The Cottage
Stuck
The Strangers
Let The Right One In
Teeth
The Descent
The Others
A stir of echoes
6 films to keep you awake
Identity
Behind the mask: The rise of Leslie Vernon
Bubba Ho Tep
Slither
Feast
Cigarette Burns
Audition
28 days later
Film-Guy
A lot of those I really want to see. I must say though that High Tension left me saying..."Holy crap...that was the dumbest thing I have ever seen!" and Shutter is complete garbage in my opinon.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment