COKE SECTION
it messes up at the coke can as i t is perfectly possible that one could apear as an object after the big bang just by chance but the chance is really low
BANANA SECTION
- Is shaped for human han, you could say that for most fruit the size of a banana
- Has non-slip surface, most fruit have thisas that is how the atoms fit together
- Has outward indicators of inward content: as it includes seeds it needs to be digested so the seeds comeout the otherend for this it needs to look apealing, Black is due to oxidisation, other endGreen-too early,
Yellow-just right,
Black-too late. - Has a tab for removal of wrappe, that's how it's connected to the tree so that's needed for it to grow
- Is perforated on wrappe, to hold the flesh and seeds together and to stop the flesh oxidising and turning to mush then falling off the tree before it's ready
- Bio-degradable wrapper, it's from a living organism so chances are it is biodegradeable
- Is shaped for human mouth
- Has a point at top for ease of entry, you might notice that monkeys open it the other way up by squeezing the base, anyway that's just a stalk connecting it to the tree with out it it wouldn't exist
- Is pleasing to taste bud, has to be so animals eat it and disperse the seeds over a wide area to prevent competition for nutrients
- Is curved towards the face to make eating process easy, depends which way you hold it actualy
As you can see some are an everlutionary advantage whilst other's could easily be coinsidence
THE ORANGES
I guess this is supposed to be about atoms and how they arrange themselves, it completely ignores charges which are what make atoms incorrect. A fruit way of saying it would be you have10 apples and 10 oranges, no apple may be next to another apple, how many possible combinations are there?
THE TESTS
TEST ONE
The person who thinks the Coca Cola can had no designer is:
___ A. Intelligent
___ B. A fool
___ C. Has an ulterior motive for denying the obvious
There is a chance it had no designer, a very small one but there is still a chance
TEST TWO
A. Do you know of any building that didn't have a builder?
___ YES___ NO
B. Do you know of any painting that didn't have a painter?
___ YES___ NO
C. Do you know of any car that didn't have a maker?
___ YES___ NO
These by definiton have to be no as a building has to be built, a painting has to be painted and it wouldn't be called a car if it had no maker, all of these would be seen as natural wonders instead and if you think about it the only difference between a basic stone buiilt house and a cave is one has been built the other was formed.
TEST THREE
A. From the atom to the universe, is there order?
___ YES___ NO
B. Did it happen by accident?
___ YES___ NO
C. Or, must there have been an intelligent mind?
___ YES___ NO
D. What are the chances of 50 oranges falling by chance
into ten rows of five oranges?
All of these questions seem to have double meanings, order could mean it happened by coincedence as they had too be like that like saying which way dual polarity magnets will face, no one made them attract that's just what happens, accident still seems to infer that some being did it and ignores the fact that it could be a series of events like the big bangs followed by big crushes this would mean you'ld answer no for both B and C. D ignores atomic nature completely, not all atoms will fit together.
TEST FOUR
It completely ignores the fact that you must prove something is before someone has to proof that it isn't
TEST FIVE
The man who sees a building and doesn't know if there was a builder is:
a building needs a builder by definition otherwise it's just an intresting grographical feature.
SUMMERY
The artical ignores evolution and atomic nature. It also ignores that ifa geographical feature was formed that looked just like your house it would not be a building as it had not been built even though it looked exactly the same it would still just be an intresting geographical feature.
:D
Log in to comment