Smoking in the street can give other people 2nd hand smoke, drinking doesnt effect anyone else.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Beats me. Maybe something to do with intoxicating substances in particular? Incidentally, most European countries have banned smoking in many public places. In England, it's probably legal to drink in more public places than it is to smoke.
Then move to the other side of the street then.I think it should be the other way around personally. I get tired of people blowing smoke on me carelessly.
Jakesta7
there is no rhyme or reason why any of the laws are in place.. cannibus is illigal and liquor isnt, ciggs being the most detramental to your health are the easiest to aquire.. everything is bass akwards. the govt doesnt actually care about your health.. they just care about making money :-/.
that being said i dont see the need to drink in public anyway, but if you have too many drinks who knows what youll do.. if you have too many ciggs you will most likley just puke and get over it.
I don't want crazy drunk people on streets saying weird stuff.
I hope they ban public smoking too. That stuff is annoying as hell.
Most places they consider it public intoxication but I believe that if you have it in a paper bag they tend to not care. I know when I lived in Las Vegas you could be on the strip and drink and get drunk as hell on the strip and no one really cared. Hell you can smoke weed on the strip and not get stopped or at least I never was stoppedlol i didnt know you cant drink on the streets.
T_REX305
*lights up yeah those smokers are the evilz and I hates them *enjoys cigI don't want crazy drunk people on streets saying weird stuff.
I hope they ban public smoking too. That stuff is annoying as hell.
Gaming-Planet
cigs dont get you drunkweezyfbAlthough if your drunk and you have a cigarette it's the best thing ever... you go from kinda drunk to holy **** how did I end up on this side of the highway...
Because some people don't stand shouting at people walking past " Hey! You want some of this, I'll cut you!" after 7-9 smokes.TreflisIf they have 7-9 smokes in a row there not going to be shouting anything... unless they're way more pro then me
[QUOTE="Treflis"]Because some people don't stand shouting at people walking past " Hey! You want some of this, I'll cut you!" after 7-9 smokes.BranKetraI disagree. Only if you're trying to bum the last cig... Then you get cut no matter what...
[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Treflis"]Because some people don't stand shouting at people walking past " Hey! You want some of this, I'll cut you!" after 7-9 smokes.W1ckedGo0seI disagree. Only if you're trying to bum the last cig... Then you get cut no matter what... Much sooner than that...
I believe it's less to do with drunk and disorderly behaviour and more to do with charging someone with a crime. For instance, before the open container laws (I may be mistake, so correct me if I am wrong) it was actually legal to drink and drive. The catch was that you had to maintain a blood-alcohol level below 0.07.
Open container says that regardless or not if you're drunk, you're still drinking.
Bringing it out on the streets means that people who "may soon be drunk" but aren't yet can be charged with a crime; and that those who leave unattended containers (thereby giving minors access to alcohol) can also be charged for their negligence.
Eitherway, the point is to give the police the ability to charge you before you commit a crime due to the likelihood a crime will be committed.
Drinkers start fights and may do stupid stuff like jump in front of cars. Smokers shouldnt be able to pollute my clean pink lungs either though.hotfireeI can understand complaining about smokers in enclosed spaces but this idea that you are inhaling enough second hand smoke to harm yourself being outside in public is ludicrous. Smoke rises and typically unless you are standing right next to the person smoking you are in no danger of breathing in the dreaded second hand smoke *cowers in fear
I can understand complaining about smokers in enclosed spaces but this idea that you are inhaling enough second hand smoke to harm yourself being outside in public is ludicrous. Smoke rises and typically unless you are standing right next to the person smoking you are in no danger of breathing in the dreaded second hand smoke *cowers in fear I also hate the smell of it - they reek. Its hard to breathe when you walk around smokers - even outside, especially if there is a wind and its being blown near you.[QUOTE="hotfiree"]Drinkers start fights and may do stupid stuff like jump in front of cars. Smokers shouldnt be able to pollute my clean pink lungs either though.testfactor888
[QUOTE="testfactor888"]I can understand complaining about smokers in enclosed spaces but this idea that you are inhaling enough second hand smoke to harm yourself being outside in public is ludicrous. Smoke rises and typically unless you are standing right next to the person smoking you are in no danger of breathing in the dreaded second hand smoke *cowers in fear I also hate the smell of it - they reek. Its hard to breathe when you walk around smokers - even outside, especially if there is a wind and its being blown near you. I hate the smell of some perfumes but you don't see me trying to call for a ban on them. You learn to deal since people have free will. You are free to walk away from the smoker in most cases[QUOTE="hotfiree"]Drinkers start fights and may do stupid stuff like jump in front of cars. Smokers shouldnt be able to pollute my clean pink lungs either though.hotfiree
Lol, that's a funny concept, I think there should be a CGI movie with a scene like that! Just 'cause it's so absurd! Well, not a movie, but a bs PSA.Because smokers don't generally walk into oncoming traffic.
ChiSoxBombers
people who smoke a couple of cigarettes don't tend to start fights...people who have a couple of drinks tend to....
people who smoke a couple of cigarettes don't tend to start fights...people who have a couple of drinks tend to....
Making cigarettes illegal is ridiculous. Would you also like to ban some brands of perfume because you don't like the smell?
bloodling
Making them illegal isn't ridiculous at all. How they're even legal is what bothers me. They're just sticks packed with all kinds of disgusting chemicals that get you addicted to a habbit that does nothing but harm you and others around you. By all rights they should be illegal.
[QUOTE="bloodling"]
Making cigarettes illegal is ridiculous. Would you also like to ban some brands of perfume because you don't like the smell?
raynimrod
Making them illegal isn't ridiculous at all. How they're even legal is what bothers me. They're just sticks packed with all kinds of disgusting chemicals that get you addicted to a habbit that does nothing but harm you and others around you. By all rights they should be illegal.
That is far from the truth. Cigarettes have positives. Just because you don't think it's worth it doesn't mean nobody should smoke just because you don't. Cigarettes won't kill me. Even if they did, it's none of your business, really.
That is far from the truth. Cigarettes have positives. Just because you don't think it's worth it doesn't mean nobody should smoke just because you don't. Cigarettes won't kill me. Even if they did, it's none of your business, really.
bloodling
Really, cigarettes have positives? Please do tell, I'd be interested to hear your idea of "positive".
They're a dangerous concoction of chemicals, marketted in such a way to attract young and impressionable people in addition to keeping the older smokers hooked. I fail to see how breathing in all those potentially deadly toxins can produce beneficial, positive results. I also fail to see how they could possibly be legal...
Oh wait, the government taxes the industry and makes and absolute fortune - nevermind.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment