@joebones5000 said:
@hillelslovak said:
@joebones5000 said:
@hillelslovak: OMGLOL. An "answer my questions or your facts don't matter!!!!!" reply, really? LOL GTFO.
What are you talking about? You put forth an argument, no facts or citations. Are you aware it's quite easy for millionaires like Hilary and Trump to fudge their taxes? It's called repackaging, homes. You stated Christopher Hitchens was some right wing conspiracy theorist, and still have no addressed any of the other point I brought up originally. You remind me of the diehard Bush defenders during the 2004 election when I was in high school. I get it, you dont want a bargain basement psychotic like Trump in the white house. You do not have to debase yourself by supporting an inept pathological liar.....
I argued nothing. Stated only facts about Hillary. Posts #9, 20, 29, 52, and this one. All facts! Writing these facts is not an argument, they are an acknowledgement of truth.
Why should I address any of your right-wing fantasy when you aren't even representing what I write with honesty?
Post 9. Claim with no facts
Post 20. Nothing but a claim, with rhetoric. No facts.
Post 29. You brought up Republicans blocking funding for vets. This is nothing new. For all their bluster of loving and representing the troops, they do not. This is not news, and not a plus for Hilary. You then brought rhetoric on the Clinton foundation. Then you bring up a factcheck article which credited her with the implementation of the plan, which I critiqued as making little to no difference, like Common Core and No Child Left Behind.
Post 52, more rhetoric, with no facts to be had.
Lastly, I hate to break it to you, there is no such thing as a conservative, or liberal fantasy. One is either aligned with the available facts and arguments, or one is not.
You have steadfastly refused to address any of the other myriad issues I brought up as well. Once again:
Tell me, what do you think about her lying about dodging sniper fire in Bosnia, or her role in the war as a whole? What about her talking about women's rights, despite taking money from some of the most despotic and anti women countries on the planet, like Saudi Arabia? What about the extremely flippant way she discussed the murder of Gaddafi in Libya, instead of putting him on trial under the rule of international law? What about her repeated refusal to support the gay and lesbian community until 2013, when it was politically expedient? What about her large part in creating the 3 strikes rule in the legal system, something that screwed over minorities? What about the years she covered up her husband's serial whoring, turning the white house into a bordello, and simply stated it was a conservative conspiracy? Remember how she worked to silence the women who accused her husband of sexual misconduct?
Log in to comment