Why do you hate it ? ( please be open minded )

  • 177 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for YourChaosIsntMe
YourChaosIsntMe

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 YourChaosIsntMe
Member since 2007 • 1228 Posts

Well, I'm sorry, what else do you need? Besides you called me a dolt. Totally uncalled for to begin with. WhiteSnake5000
I thought you were responding to me with criticism. I was also trying to explain that there are or can be harmful side effects from smoking marijuana. Also, the common defense for any drug use that "anything can be harmful" agitates me because it undermines the legitimate and abundant arguments that marijuana legislation reform has.

Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"][QUOTE="YourChaosIsntMe"]There are a lot of negative aspects of marijuana use, especially habitual marijuana use. Notably, the vast majority of information widely used against and for marijuana use today is usually propaganda (at worst), or scientific research being misrepresented or grossly exaggerated. Much of this research, likewise, is roughly inversely analogous to the research commissioned by companies such as R.J. Reynolds to prove that tobacco use has no detrimental medical effects. Rather than being privately funded, it is often commissioned through the DEA. On the other hand, there is legitimate research that exists, and much of it finds, in the various aspects of the studies, that marijuana use is and/or can be harmful, depending on various factors (though less so than alcohol consumption or playing football).YourChaosIsntMe
Anything can be considered "harmful", even water, especially tap water. If anti-marijuana activists want to truly persuade us that marijuana is bad and should stay illegal for health/moral reasons (Their common argument)... I want to see real evidence that it is significantly damaging to both the body and mind.

I smoke pot, you dolt. Yes, anything can be harmful, even water! What the hell is your point? Marijuana smoke contains carcinogens, ergo it is harmful. Are you really stoned enough to believe that marijuana smoke isn't harmful to your health? The only reason this doesn't generally result in lung cancer, COPD, Emphysema, or other possible disorders is the average rate of use. Futhermore, some of the increased risks connected to smoking tobacco do not exist due to the lack of certain additives found in tobacco and the inevitable differences between the compounds produced through burning the two difference substances.

I think you should watch your tone a bit, all this hostility out of nothing, especially when I agree with most of your points... Anyway, smoke of any kind is harmful, period. Hence, why I actually do not smoke weed. I vaporize it, just look back into the thread I could swear I mentioned something about smoke being harmful. AndI used water as an example... Here check it out. http://environment.about.com/od/healthenvironment/a/tap_water_safe.htm Now, most people that drink tap water or bottled water, do not get sick from it and don't expect to have any serious affects from it. Same goes with Marijuana... Despite that there is some research and evidence behind them both being harmful in some way. I just think people over state how harmful it really is, without knowing how harmful it actually is. There are varying degrees of harm. We have to draw the line somewhere.
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#153 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts

Its not inherently bad, its just that unless your friends with people who smoke every day or every other day and you're sober (no drugs or alcohol) for quite some time you realize how much it changes people and you realize some of the lengths they go to just to get high. I've been ditched and excluded from things so many times because I didn't want to get high. Its pretty ridiculous.

Don't ever let anyone tell you weed is not addictive. You can't become physically dependent on it but when the area goes dry you can see who is a real big stoner, they get shakey and buy cigarettes by the boat load.

Avatar image for YourChaosIsntMe
YourChaosIsntMe

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 YourChaosIsntMe
Member since 2007 • 1228 Posts

I think you should watch your tone a bit, all this hostility out of nothing, especially when I agree with most of your points... Anyway, smoke of any kind is harmful, period. Hence, why I actually do not smoke weed. I vaporize it, just look back into the thread I could swear I mentioned something about smoke being harmful. AndI used water as an example... Here check it out. http://environment.about.com/od/healthenvironment/a/tap_water_safe.htm Now, most people that drink tap water or bottled water, do not get sick from it and don't expect to have any serious affects from it. Same goes with Marijuana... Despite that there is some research and evidence behind them both being harmful in some way. I just think people over state how harmful it really is, without knowing how harmful it actually is. There are varying degrees of harm. We have to draw the line somewhere. WhiteSnake5000
Don't take hostility too seriously online. That should be a rule of thumb. I know about the various issues concerning tap water (I live in Florida, I would know). There is no real correlation between the two. Importantly, the issue of tap water purity is one that concerns governance and the lack of a federal body governing the process (in contrast to the municipality-based system that exists today). Hyper-hydration is the more common defense used in the "everything is harmful" argument.

The statement "If Most people who drink tap water do not get sick, and most people who smoke pot suffer no major negative effects, then the possibility and nature of negative consequences are relative to one another" is invalid, it is a fallacy. "If P is R and Q is R ----> P and R are U " is not valid. Such statements concern the most simplistic rules of logic in mathematics. Marijuana, with long-term use, has inevitable consequences, though often marginal. This is regardless of external circumstances, like mismanagement of the water supply and purification system (and in some cases the public sector at large).

It's not about the severity of side effects, but the existence of them. again, the correlation between drinking water and marijuana simply doesn't exist, and no aspect of the argument is cogent, sorry.

Holy crap, I just hit 1000.

Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
[QUOTE="YourChaosIsntMe"][QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"]I think you should watch your tone a bit, all this hostility out of nothing, especially when I agree with most of your points... Anyway, smoke of any kind is harmful, period. Hence, why I actually do not smoke weed. I vaporize it, just look back into the thread I could swear I mentioned something about smoke being harmful. AndI used water as an example... Here check it out. http://environment.about.com/od/healthenvironment/a/tap_water_safe.htm Now, most people that drink tap water or bottled water, do not get sick from it and don't expect to have any serious affects from it. Same goes with Marijuana... Despite that there is some research and evidence behind them both being harmful in some way. I just think people over state how harmful it really is, without knowing how harmful it actually is. There are varying degrees of harm. We have to draw the line somewhere.

Don't take hostility too seriously online. That should be a rule of thumb. I know about the various issues concerning tap water (I live in Florida, I would know). There is no real correlation between the two Importantly, the issue of tap water purity is one that concerns governance and the lack of a federal body governing the process (in contrast to the municipality-based system that exists today). Hyper-hydration is the more common defense used in the "everything is harmful" argument. The statement "If Most people who drink tap water do not get sick, and most people who smoke pot suffer no major negative effects, then the possibility and nature of negative consequences are relative to one another" is invalid, it is a fallacy. "If P is R and Q is R ----> P and R are U " is not valid. Such statements concern the most simplistic rules of logic in mathematics. Marijuana, with long-term use, has inevitable consequences, though often marginal. This is regardless of external circumstances, like mismanagement of the water supply and purification system (and in some cases the public sector at large). It's not about the severity of side effects, but the existence of them. again, the correlation between drinking water and marijuana simply doesn't exist, and no aspect of the argument is cogent.

I understand what you are saying and agree, but that's not what I had in my mind. When you claim to have evidence that marijuana is harmful, yet you cannot prove it 100%. Is a lot like saying that "this contaminated water is harmful, yet there is not enough evidence to say that it is absolutely harmful". It's a loose study and the long term effects greatly vary from person to person, and marginal effects shouldn't be used as basis for an argument, as they come from pretty much overdoing anything. Marijuana isn't proven to be harmful in the same way as alcohol is. Which is what a lot of people like to compare it to, and it just kinda, well pisses me off.
Avatar image for GTALoco
GTALoco

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 GTALoco
Member since 2004 • 2945 Posts

I don't hate marijuana, but a documentary called 'Totally Baked' doesn't sound like the most definitive source for unbiased information.DJ_Lae

Yeah, I checked some of it out on Youtube and, to say the least, it's definitely not the place you want to look for good, unbiased and well presented information. Anyone looking for a good documentary on the subject should check out The Union: The Business Behind Getting High.

Avatar image for YourChaosIsntMe
YourChaosIsntMe

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 YourChaosIsntMe
Member since 2007 • 1228 Posts

WhiteSnake5000
Well that certainly annoys me too, though there is (nearly) 100% proof that marijuana contains carcinogens, and there is (nearly) 100% proof that carcinogens are conducive to the development of cancer. Ergo, marijuana is harmful to some degree. A degree that does not validate it's illegality, certainly. Marginal effects are tremendously important, because even if they're marginal, they provide an underlying basis for assumptions about marijuana's general effect upon casual/habitual and short-term/long-term users. The issue of over-consumption of a substance is generally the concern of medical research and treatment first and foremost. The long-term effect of habitual use, as far as current research goes, is at least somewhat negative physiologically; this is generally inarguable. The psychological effects are highly contested, and all research in this area is inconclusive. More legitimate data will gradually become available while independent firms and research institutes do their own work outside of government contracts.

I know that arguing against anti-legislation reform can influence a drive to develop a convenient argument, but convenient arguments often become illogical. The issue goes far beyond physical and psychological health into the realm of economics and business, law, sociology, and even U.S. history (specifically during industrialization). The argument concerning health is simply the convenient one.

The War on Drugs is a red herring, hahaha.

Also, Totally Baked is the antithesis of objectivity, haha. I forgot to mention that to begin with...

Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens.
Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#159 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts
Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. WhiteSnake5000
But has it been proven that all carcinogens release at a higher temperature than the THC does?
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#160 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. WhiteSnake5000
Well I doubt you'd be able to smoke a joint while you're walking down the street.
Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"]Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. warbmxjohn
But has it been proven that all carcinogens release at a higher temperature than the THC does?

Yes, basically. It's not 100% effective, but pretty close. Rest assured that most of what you are putting in your lungs is in fact THC, and rest assured the harmful toxins will not be a problem. I can speak from experience, it's a much cleaner high and a lot easier on the lugs.
Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"]Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. Tiefster
Well I doubt you'd be able to smoke a joint while you're walking down the street.

Don't like joints, I have a pipe though, I'd never think about walking down a street with that though lol.
Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#163 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts
[QUOTE="warbmxjohn"][QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"]Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. WhiteSnake5000
But has it been proven that all carcinogens release at a higher temperature than the THC does?

Yes, basically. It's not 100% effective, but pretty close. Rest assured that most of what you are putting in your lungs is in fact THC, and rest assured the harmful toxins will not be a problem. I can speak from experience, it's a much cleaner high and a lot easier on the lugs.

Cool. Just curious.
Avatar image for YourChaosIsntMe
YourChaosIsntMe

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 YourChaosIsntMe
Member since 2007 • 1228 Posts
[QUOTE="Tiefster"][QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"]Well if it's ever legalized, I hope people decide to use vaporizers. So we can all avoid the carcinogens. WhiteSnake5000
Well I doubt you'd be able to smoke a joint while you're walking down the street.

Don't like joints, I have a pipe though, I'd never think about walking down a street with that though lol.

I never got into vaporizers. My friend just got one though, and the primary benefit that I see is the double smokeability of what you vaporize. Efficiency is key.
Avatar image for BohemianAndy
BohemianAndy

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 BohemianAndy
Member since 2007 • 1413 Posts
[QUOTE="BobSacamento"]

ooo look at me im hayley wiliams

i have orange hair

would you like a crumpet

i would because im hayley williams

Lmao! You win for having the most random post in this topic :P /thread.
Avatar image for WhiteSnake5000
WhiteSnake5000

12454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 WhiteSnake5000
Member since 2005 • 12454 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteSnake5000"][QUOTE="Tiefster"]Well I doubt you'd be able to smoke a joint while you're walking down the street.YourChaosIsntMe
Don't like joints, I have a pipe though, I'd never think about walking down a street with that though lol.

I never got into vaporizers. My friend just got one though, and the primary benefit that I see is the double smokeability of what you vaporize. Efficiency is key.

It's quite a different feeling too, like more clear, more awake, especially vapo in the mornings, truly incredible compared to smoking. And smoking can give you a headache and what not and yeah a waste too, efficiency is key as you said. I recommend you look into one somewhere down the line if you choose to continue with mj.
Avatar image for OOG-ICANO
OOG-ICANO

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 OOG-ICANO
Member since 2009 • 55 Posts
Well that certainly annoys me too, though there is (nearly) 100% proof that marijuana contains carcinogens, and there is (nearly) 100% proof that carcinogens are conducive to the development of cancer. Ergo, marijuana is harmful to some degree. YourChaosIsntMe
Yeah, but doesn't pretty much everything cause Cancer nowadays? From talking on a cell phone to using the wrong kind of dish towels, you will risk getting Cancer it seems. But yes that is a negative (possible) side-effect of long term usage. Also, there are contradicting studies that say weed is more, lees, or as harmful as cigarettes. Yes I am biased but after reading a few books, articles and various studies on it I've found that it's apparently less harmful than smoking tobacco. Also I have heard that it can soften brain tissue and slow motor skills down after many years of use, but I have come across no proof to say for certain either way.
Avatar image for Ceraby
Ceraby

3306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#168 Ceraby
Member since 2009 • 3306 Posts

Anyways, I want opinions... that is if this thread doesn't get shot down right away :)
But, look at the questions. and post what you believe the answers are.

Virus214

My opinion... don't personally hate marijuana. Don't even mind indulging myself, every now and again, in fact. But at the same time, I don't think it should be legalized. I would elaborate, but all I can really say is some vague idea that alcohol and cigarettes already have been legalzied and I wouldn't want to add another " probable addicting vice " that the government would be blamed for legalizing.

Avatar image for Sharvie
Sharvie

8895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#169 Sharvie
Member since 2006 • 8895 Posts
I don't hate it. People can do what they want with their money and time. I only have a problem with it if it is impending my life which is unlikely.
Avatar image for spotter11
spotter11

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 spotter11
Member since 2009 • 31 Posts
i dont hate anything or anyone. hatiin takes to much energy. it will be legal sooner or later so im not stressin
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#171 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
I don't hate it, I hate the pedestal it sits upon.
Avatar image for ShotGunBunny
ShotGunBunny

2184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 ShotGunBunny
Member since 2004 • 2184 Posts
Okay walk into a room full of pot smokers sober and you'll see why. A bunch of idiots sitting on a sofa laughing at a tv thats not on and eating everything isnt my definition of coolsoulfood4
Your problem lies more in not knowing any actually cool people.
Avatar image for Dr_Brocoli
Dr_Brocoli

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 Dr_Brocoli
Member since 2007 • 3724 Posts
People DO get addicted to marijuana. Like alcohol its a mental addictive which is just almost as bad as physical. And i dont hate it.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#175 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
Easy. It's a drug -- I hate drugs.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#177 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
I love it.
Avatar image for Paladin_King
Paladin_King

11832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#178 Paladin_King
Member since 2008 • 11832 Posts
People like TC really need to stop using the "tobacco and alcohol are worse, but they're legal...so why not marijuana" argument. There are many solid arguments for the legalization of marijuana and this just flat-out isn't one of them. It's rather shocking to me how many people just absolutely fail to see the logic problem here. How one bad thing is treated should not have an effect on how another bad thing is treated. They are independent of each other and should be treated accordingly. Basically, one really bad thing's being legal does not mean that other, less bad things SHOULD be legal. That would ultimately just mean having two bad things in total as opposed to one. You can argue about marijuana's lack of negative effect. That's valid. Comparative arguments really aren't. People could very well say "yes, alcohol is legal these days, but that's because our society's already messed up and we flubbed it there....why should we make things worse by making another substance legal?"
Avatar image for YourChaosIsntMe
YourChaosIsntMe

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 YourChaosIsntMe
Member since 2007 • 1228 Posts
[QUOTE="Paladin_King"]People like TC really need to stop using the "tobacco and alcohol are worse, but they're legal...so why not marijuana" argument. There are many solid arguments for the legalization of marijuana and this just flat-out isn't one of them. It's rather shocking to me how many people just absolutely fail to see the logic problem here. How one bad thing is treated should not have an effect on how another bad thing is treated. They are independent of each other and should be treated accordingly. Basically, one really bad thing's being legal does not mean that other, less bad things SHOULD be legal. That would ultimately just mean having two bad things in total as opposed to one. You can argue about marijuana's lack of negative effect. That's valid. Comparative arguments really aren't. People could very well say "yes, alcohol is legal these days, but that's because our society's already messed up and we flubbed it there....why should we make things worse by making another substance legal?"

Thanks for coming in here and backing up my sentiments perfectly. :)
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#180 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Plenty of people smoke weed who you wouldn't normally classify as a stoner.
Avatar image for nereik94
nereik94

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 nereik94
Member since 2008 • 205 Posts

Haven't tried either weed or tobacco (Only 15)

I think their is a small chance of me trying weed... but I will never smoke tobacco... that stuff kills you... theres is totally solid evidence of that