[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]
I understand, I was referring to all ideas of meaning that reject a god. To call subjective values "meaning" adds an unnecessary layer that adds nothing to the concept. What is the difference between what is subjectively valued and what gives "meaning"? If there is no difference why have two concepts at all? To claim there is a difference is secular mysticism. I was talking specifically about western atheists. The so-called "New Atheist" movement is steeped in cultural Christianity.
RationalAtheist
It might add nothing to the concept to you, but religion tends to provide default meaning(s) for living faithfully. Without religion there is no objective religious meaning, only many personal and subjective ones that differ between people. It is the same "concept" of meaning to an atheist, but expressed in personal terms, rather than from religious dogma.
What is secular mysticism? What has secularism to do with this? Why confine yourself only to western atheists? Is it to suit your point of view?
What is this "New Atheist" movement? I've not heard of it personally, which I find surprising. How is this movement steeped in cultural Christianity and how do you seperate a culture from shared values with a particular religion?
You seem to be agreeing with me. Religion started the idea of life having "meaning". Without god, meaning becomes a subjective valuation. If you're going to reduce the concept of meaning to subjective values, then there is no more use for the concept of meaning. It's just values. The idea is superfluous and unnecessary.
Secular mysticism is clinging to religious concepts and ideas while adhering to a nonreligious or materialistic worldview.
My whole point was that western atheists are immersed and espouse cultural Christianity. I'm confining myself to western atheists because my point is about western atheists.
"New Atheism" refers to the recent resurgance of secular humanist and/or "anti-theist" authors and thinkers like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris the late Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett and many others.
Gamespot is not the place for an in-depth discussion about the influence of Christian culture on modern atheist movements. In brief, however, all one has to do is listen to their lectures or read their books to see the similarities. The "Four Horsemen of Atheism" (mentioned above) have very culturally Christian ideas about morality, duty, meaning, justice, equality amongst other things.
Hitchens and Harris have both tried to synthesize atheism and objective morality. Hitchens' view in particular sounds very reminiscent of the idea that "God's law is written on your heart".
Log in to comment