Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?iginlawasupI do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?iginlawasupI do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?
You have to take into account that this movie is a sequel. It's meant to be watched after Batman Begins, just like Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is meant to be watched after Fellowship of the Ring.
Lieutenant Gordon's character was pretty well explained in Batman Begins.
Harvey Dent is an attorney who has been dating Bruce Wayne's ex-girlfriend...I'm not entirely sure how you didn't really "get" his character.
Sal Maroni wasn't that important in the grand scheme of things. He was just there to show you basically how crazy the Joker was.
Exactly. I don't understand the disconnect. Did you just fall asleep or day dream (or perhaps not think enough about the movie at all because you expect everytyhing to just b e handed to you) during the movie? Everything was well explained and the story was easy to follow.Did you perchance have your volume turned to 0? I also don't understand what you mean about no characters being explained :?[QUOTE="Dylan_11"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
No characters were explained. Also, the guy with half his face burnt off, how is he talking perfectly normal? This movie just didn't make sense. It was just to long and complicated. They were talking so quiet, I didn't understand what they were saying. Explaining a complicated story by whispering is hard to understand.
iginlawasup
Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?
To all people who are attacking me. Its MY OPINION! I could say the same thing about people not liking Avatar. I thought this movie was boring. I have seen and liked movies with good stories and no action.
The movie 2012 didn't have much of a story and lots of action but I hated it.
Lieutenant James Gordan: Beginning of the movie Batman and Gordan are introduced together. By his name alone you know he is a cop and his association with Batman shows you why he is in the film so much.Harvey Dent: He is introduced as the new District Attorney of Gotham City, one who is cleaning up the streets. Turns into Two-Face, the transformation which is shown slowly throughout the movie.
Sal Maroni: Shown as a mob boss. Obviously a bad guy.
Are you sure you watched the movie? Did you forget to equip any hearing or visual aides you may need?
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"][QUOTE="spazzx625"] Either you kept falling asleep for 20 minute time spans or you're just being hyperbolic for the sake of trying to make a point.bobdood99
No characters were explained. Also, the guy with half his face burnt off, how is he talking perfectly normal? This movie just didn't make sense. It was just to long and complicated. They were talking so quiet, I didn't understand what they were saying. Explaining a complicated story by whispering is hard to understand.
There's a thing called subtitles for the hearing impaired.... I could hear just fine. And for the talking with a burned off face, it's a movie.... Just role with the punches. I see what you're doing here. You're just giving stupid excuses trying to make the Dark Knight a horrible movie.This is my opinion. The dark knight was an awful movie in my opinion. I liked to kill a mocking bird that had a good story. People on ferrys? What was that thing with the phones in the end? I may have gotten the gist of the story. But really you don't have to go on trying to offend me to prove your point. If you read a book were no characters were introduced, would you understand and like the book?
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"]Didn't have enough action scenes. :lol:iginlawasup
Well Ya, its batman, I expected something more exciting than 60 minutes.
You said earlier that you're not a Batman fan, so why would you have had any expectations? How would you know if it needed a lot of action? It had tons of action, but not so much as to make it distasteful.[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?dave123321I do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
If you read a book were no characters were introduced, would you understand and like the book?
iginlawasup
If I was reading a sequel to a book and the author decided that he had to explain who the characters were again, I'd be bored as hell.
Besides, Harvey Dent was introduced pretty well.
Sal Maroni is like the 10th most important character in the movie, so he's not going to get that much of a backstory.
There's a thing called subtitles for the hearing impaired.... I could hear just fine. And for the talking with a burned off face, it's a movie.... Just role with the punches. I see what you're doing here. You're just giving stupid excuses trying to make the Dark Knight a horrible movie.[QUOTE="bobdood99"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
No characters were explained. Also, the guy with half his face burnt off, how is he talking perfectly normal? This movie just didn't make sense. It was just to long and complicated. They were talking so quiet, I didn't understand what they were saying. Explaining a complicated story by whispering is hard to understand.
iginlawasup
This is my opinion. The dark knight was an awful movie in my opinion. I liked to kill a mocking bird that had a good story. People on ferrys? What was that thing with the phones in the end? I may have gotten the gist of the story. But really you don't have to go on trying to offend me to prove your point. If you read a book were no characters were introduced, would you understand and like the book?
The phones thing was indicated early in the movie when Batman went after the Chinese money manager. The people on the boats were people trying to escape from the city after they got scared by the Joker. It isn't hard to understand.[QUOTE="bobdood99"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
No characters were explained. Also, the guy with half his face burnt off, how is he talking perfectly normal? This movie just didn't make sense. It was just to long and complicated. They were talking so quiet, I didn't understand what they were saying. Explaining a complicated story by whispering is hard to understand.
There's a thing called subtitles for the hearing impaired.... I could hear just fine. And for the talking with a burned off face, it's a movie.... Just role with the punches. I see what you're doing here. You're just giving stupid excuses trying to make the Dark Knight a horrible movie.This is my opinion. The dark knight was an awful movie in my opinion. I liked to kill a mocking bird that had a good story. People on ferrys? What was that thing with the phones in the end? I may have gotten the gist of the story. But really you don't have to go on trying to offend me to prove your point. If you read a book were no characters were introduced, would you understand and like the book?
Characters are never introduced in any books I've read. And if you're reading books that plainly say "Jeff is a supermarket manager and he is not married. He has blue eyes..." then you should stop reading 2nd grade books. Ever read "Catcher in the Rye", or "The Natural," or "Black Hawk Down?" No characters are introduced "formally", you just learn about them by reading and progressing through the story. That's the entire point of the book. To learn about the story and characters. Character development is a literaly technique for a reason...I do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?iginlawasup
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
I think it would be best to watch that one to get a better understanding of what is going on in Gotham as a result of Batman and perhaps it would be more clear what is going on.I do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?iginlawasup
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
Well..it is called Batman Begins...
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"]Didn't have enough action scenes. :lol:HybridPhoenix
Well Ya, its batman, I expected something more exciting than 60 minutes.
You said earlier that you're not a Batman fan, so why would you have had any expectations? How would you know if it needed a lot of action? It had tons of action, but not so much as to make it distasteful.I thought batman was going to be cool. I saw two of the older one when I was a kid and liked them.
There's a thing called subtitles for the hearing impaired.... I could hear just fine. And for the talking with a burned off face, it's a movie.... Just role with the punches. I see what you're doing here. You're just giving stupid excuses trying to make the Dark Knight a horrible movie.[QUOTE="bobdood99"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
No characters were explained. Also, the guy with half his face burnt off, how is he talking perfectly normal? This movie just didn't make sense. It was just to long and complicated. They were talking so quiet, I didn't understand what they were saying. Explaining a complicated story by whispering is hard to understand.
iginlawasup
This is my opinion. The dark knight was an awful movie in my opinion. I liked to kill a mocking bird that had a good story. People on ferrys? What was that thing with the phones in the end? I may have gotten the gist of the story. But really you don't have to go on trying to offend me to prove your point. If you read a book were no characters were introduced, would you understand and like the book?
People on the ferrys were leaving gotham, they explained it twice right before that part. And if you live in Chicago (like I do) where it was filmed, you would understand why they had water/ferrys in the movie in the first place. But they still explained it anyway.
I dont know what you mean by the "phones" part. Explain please.
I do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Who is Lieutenant James Gordon? Harvey Dent? Sal Maroni?iginlawasup
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
Yes..Dark Knight is the Sequel to Batman Begins..that's why they're current;y working on a third installment... At least do your research before you complain..Okay TC, were you only looking for something to blow up in the movie or were you actually paying attention. The movie was pretty straight forward. Despite many users thinking it is overatted I actually love the movie and it is one of my top super hero movie. What I think the movie did well in compared to other superhero movies is the protrayal of realism and how it felt more like a thriller despite it being a Batman movie.
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"][QUOTE="dave123321"] I do not really get how you would not understand who these people are. Did you see the first movie by the way?HybridPhoenix
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
Yes..Dark Knight is the Sequel to Batman Begins..that's why they're current;y working on a third installment... At least do your research before you complain..They did not make it clear that it was a sequel. Like in Star Wars they had the yellow writing in the start. Star Wars had a good balance of story and action.
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Coming from the guy with Austin Powers as an avatar....In my opinion it was awful. Just another Batman movie. It had a story that was hard to follow, didn't have enough action scenes, and Christian Bale was awful as batman.
I didn't get what was going on through the movie. I admit Heath Ledger was good as the Joker, but Heath Ledgers death was the reason why this movie did so well at the box office. I think it was just "sympathy."
People complain about Avatar but I thought Avatar was good. People were saying this movie was "amazing". But I just wanted it to be over. Is it because Im not a Batman fan? Its just the same as any other super hero movie. Why does everyone make a fuss about this movie. Did you like it or dislike it?
This is in my opinion.
bobdood99
Austin Powers was funny and creative. I enjoyed Austin Powers, The Dark Knight I just wanted to be over.
It is a brilliant film, and Christopher Nolan is a brilliant director. Calling both Batman Begins and The Dark Knight "just another Batman film" just goes to show you either haven't seen the older Batman films (Batman & Robin especially), or you don't care to remember how awfully bad they are. It also shows you really haven't been exposed to many quality films, and don't have a necessarily broad palate when it comes to having a good background to form a respectable opinion.
I would mention Heath Ledger's amazing performance as The Joker... but that is irrelevant to the quality of the film and is merely one amazing aspect among many.
They did not make it clear that it was a sequel. Like in Star Wars they had the yellow writing in the start. Star Wars had a good balance of story and action.iginlawasupI think this movie does too. It seems like you knew next to nothing about this movie or BB when you saw it. You are to blame for not knowing it was a sequel.
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]They did not make it clear that it was a sequel. Like in Star Wars they had the yellow writing in the start. Star Wars had a good balance of story and action.dave123321I think this movie does too. It seems like you knew next to nothing about this movie or BB when you saw it. You are to blame for not knowing it was a sequel. Exactly, this is one of the reasons it was such a good movie. It's clear that it's a sequel, but it definitely made it so that someone who had never seen Batman Begins would be able to follow it...you just seem to be in the minority...I'm curious, how old are you?
Yes..Dark Knight is the Sequel to Batman Begins..that's why they're current;y working on a third installment... At least do your research before you complain..[QUOTE="HybridPhoenix"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
You mean Batman begins? I didn't know that was the sequel! :?
iginlawasup
They did not make it clear that it was a sequel. Like in Star Wars they had the yellow writing in the start. Star Wars had a good balance of story and action.
Didn't make it clear? It has the same characters as the first movie, had the same actors as the first movie, is by the same director as the first movie, and that movie had a blatant sequel hook that led to this movie.Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
Because Batman doesn't kill people.Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
iginlawasup
Austin Powers was funny and creative. I enjoyed Austin Powers, The Dark Knight I just wanted to be over.iginlawasup
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"][QUOTE="HybridPhoenix"] Yes..Dark Knight is the Sequel to Batman Begins..that's why they're current;y working on a third installment... At least do your research before you complain..PannicAtack
They did not make it clear that it was a sequel. Like in Star Wars they had the yellow writing in the start. Star Wars had a good balance of story and action.
Didn't make it clear? It has the same characters as the first movie, had the same actors as the first movie, is by the same director as the first movie, and that movie had a blatant sequel hook that led to this movie.I did not see the first one, and I did not know who the director was. They didn't make it clear it was a sequel. I thought they were two seperate movies.
Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
iginlawasup
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]Because Batman doesn't kill people.Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
PannicAtack
Ok, so he is just going to let the joker continue to kill people? And I was saying the cop should have shot him right there.
I did not see the first one, and I did not know who the director was. They didn't make it clear it was a sequel. I thought they were two seperate movies.iginlawasupYou should have looked it up then.
[QUOTE="bobdood99"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
In my opinion it was awful. Just another Batman movie. It had a story that was hard to follow, didn't have enough action scenes, and Christian Bale was awful as batman.
I didn't get what was going on through the movie. I admit Heath Ledger was good as the Joker, but Heath Ledgers death was the reason why this movie did so well at the box office. I think it was just "sympathy."
People complain about Avatar but I thought Avatar was good. People were saying this movie was "amazing". But I just wanted it to be over. Is it because Im not a Batman fan? Its just the same as any other super hero movie. Why does everyone make a fuss about this movie. Did you like it or dislike it?
This is in my opinion.
Coming from the guy with Austin Powers as an avatar....Austin Powers was funny and creative. I enjoyed Austin Powers, The Dark Knight I just wanted to be over.
you have horrid taste in movies.[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
foxhound_fox
He's a mass murderer. People don't have sympathy for him. Its just a hole in the plot. Batman does more harm than good by not killing him. "You can not just kill someone who is mentally ill"
You can not just let a mentally ill person kill innocent people.
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"][QUOTE="bobdood99"]Coming from the guy with Austin Powers as an avatar....Trollsters
Austin Powers was funny and creative. I enjoyed Austin Powers, The Dark Knight I just wanted to be over.
you have horrid taste in movies.Austin Powers was an adult comedy movie which I did like. The Dark Knight was an action adventure which I did not like. I can't even call it action, because it was just talking!
He's a mass murderer. People don't have sympathy for him. Its just a hole in the plot. Batman does more harm than good by not killing him. "You can not just kill someone who is mentally ill"
You can not just let a mentally ill person kill innocent people.
iginlawasup
Have you heard of the DC Snipers? 7-8 years ago, they were people who went around Washington DC with a Sniper Rifle and killed people at random...serial killers. They were arrested.
That's just one example. It happens a lot.
Because Batman doesn't kill people.[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
iginlawasup
Ok, so he is just going to let the joker continue to kill people? And I was saying the cop should have shot him right there.
First of all cops don't kill perps unless they absolutely have to and asking "why doesn't batman kill joker" means you completely missed the point of the whole movie. Batman is supposed to be the symbol of change and hope in Gotham City. He transformed himself from Bruce Wayne, a man, to Batman, a symbol, because symbols are immortal and can be incorruptible. Throughout the whole movie, Joker plays little ploys in an attempt to destroy the symbol Batman stands for. Even at the very end of the movie, joker says "You truly are incorruptible". Batman doesn't kill people because Batman is not a villain. He may be rough, and use unorthodox methods, but he doesn't kill people. If he killed people, Gotham would never accept him, and he would just be another thug.you have horrid taste in movies.[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Austin Powers was funny and creative. I enjoyed Austin Powers, The Dark Knight I just wanted to be over.
iginlawasup
Austin Powers was an adult comedy movie which I did like. The Dark Knight was an action adventure which I did not like. I can't even call it action, because it was just talking!
That's just off the top of my head. No action?
If you didn't like the movie, fine...but saying that it had little action is flat-out wrong.
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
[QUOTE="Trollsters"] you have horrid taste in movies.JML897
Austin Powers was an adult comedy movie which I did like. The Dark Knight was an action adventure which I did not like. I can't even call it action, because it was just talking!
That's just off the top of my head. No action?
If you didn't like the movie, fine...but saying that it had little action is flat-out wrong.
Ok, I say I don't like a movie, and everyone on gamespot who likes the dark knight attacks me. Ill take the one line from this movie to all the people bashing me. Why so serious?
Jeez people, chill out, people aren't always going to agree with you.
[QUOTE="JML897"]
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Austin Powers was an adult comedy movie which I did like. The Dark Knight was an action adventure which I did not like. I can't even call it action, because it was just talking!
iginlawasup
That's just off the top of my head. No action?
If you didn't like the movie, fine...but saying that it had little action is flat-out wrong.
Ok, I say I don't like a movie, and everyone on gamespot who likes the dark knight attacks me. Ill take the one line from this movie to all the people bashing me. Why so serious?
Jeez people, chill out, people aren't always going to agree with you.
We're just trying to help you remember as it seems you don't remember or didn't understand chunks of the movie.
Because it is one of the greatest films caught on screen.
Heath arguably becomes the greatest villain of all time (behind maybe Vader) and captivates you every moment he's on screen.
The music was astounding.
The pace was electrifying.
The acting was terrific.
And the batpod was awesome.
Overall, it's my favorite movie, and I'd say it's one of the best ever made...
what are you kidding me
when our civilization dies and aliens visit our planet this is the movie aliens will worship
religions will be started from this movie and it will be said
He who is with Justice kick the first ass
It was a good movie. The monologue ending felt cheap, Bale was worthless throughout, and there were some pacing/editing problems, but overall the film is very good, both a major triumph for the genre, and for the Batman mythology in general, of which I am an enormous fan.
Personally, I prefer Batman Begins, but I wouldn't argue with anyone who liked TDK better.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="iginlawasup"]
Why didn't they just kill they joker when they caught him? If he is such a villain, the cop should have just shot him when they caught him.
Why did Batman take the fall at the end?
Look up "The Dark Knight is Confused" on youtube.
iginlawasup
He's a mass murderer. People don't have sympathy for him. Its just a hole in the plot. Batman does more harm than good by not killing him. "You can not just kill someone who is mentally ill"
You can not just let a mentally ill person kill innocent people.
Kingdom Come. Read it.He's a mass murderer. People don't have sympathy for him. Its just a hole in the plot. Batman does more harm than good by not killing him. "You can not just kill someone who is mentally ill"You can not just let a mentally ill person kill innocent people.
iginlawasup
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment