Why is it morally objectionable to allow illegal immigrants to get healthcare?

  • 124 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#102 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"] No matter if you like it or not...we are a Christian based country (this is not debatable, it is even on our money). Those original beliefs (right or wrong) permeate everything. Part of that is to help those in need. This will not change. If hospital workers see someone about to die, they will help them...end of story. It is part of the very fabric of our country...which you are free to disagree with (another great thing about this country) Not every other country is like this. I have read about others where you must show proof of insurance NO MATTER WHAT before they will do anything for you. I for one prefer our way...others on here feel differently I would rather live in a place that helps first and asks questions later, rather than the opposite

All you explained to me is why, as the country we are now, we probably will not remove the ER. You did not rule out the possibility that, some time down the road, our moral values will change, and subsequently the ER will go away. Thus, it could bet he case that the ER may dissapear, thus it is premature to say it will always be here.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Why can't we get rid of the ER?Vandalvideo
because we try to be a civil society ? ;)

That speaks more to why we probably won't, not why we can't.

Anything is possible...but not probable. We could go to a "show insurance first country" But you better hope you have proof on you if you get into a bad accident or you are screwed... To answer your question: This could happen, but never will We will always help people about to die on a hospital's doorstep
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#104 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"] Anything is possible...but not probable. We could go to a "show insurance first country" But you better hope you have proof on you if you get into a bad accident or you are screwed... To answer your question: This could happen, but never will We will always help people about to die on a hospital's doorstep

You're using a fallacy. You cannot rule out, merely from the improbability of something, that it will not happen. It may not be likely to happen, but that doesn't mean it won't happen. Your statements that the ER will always be here is unfounded thus far.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"] No matter if you like it or not...we are a Christian based country (this is not debatable, it is even on our money). Those original beliefs (right or wrong) permeate everything. Part of that is to help those in need. This will not change. If hospital workers see someone about to die, they will help them...end of story. It is part of the very fabric of our country...which you are free to disagree with (another great thing about this country) Not every other country is like this. I have read about others where you must show proof of insurance NO MATTER WHAT before they will do anything for you. I for one prefer our way...others on here feel differently I would rather live in a place that helps first and asks questions later, rather than the oppositeVandalvideo
All you explained to me is why, as the country we are now, we probably will not remove the ER. You did not rule out the possibility that, some time down the road, our moral values will change, and subsequently the ER will go away. Thus, it could bet he case that the ER may dissapear, thus it is premature to say it will always be here.

The ER would never go away...people with insurance need care at 3 am, just like those without. I think you mean treating uninsured in the ER. Which I handled in the post above.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#106 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"] The ER would never go away...people with insurance need care at 3 am, just like those without. I think you mean treating uninsured in the ER. Which I handled in the post above.

Sorry, but merely repeating yourself does not prove it. Once again, mere improbability does not translate to certainty. Down the road, our country may decide that helping someone who walks in the door at 3AM is not in society's best interest. Such a hypothetical could happen. Until you prove that it can't happen, you cannot say that the ER will never go away.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts

[QUOTE="rawsavon"] Anything is possible...but not probable. We could go to a "show insurance first country" But you better hope you have proof on you if you get into a bad accident or you are screwed... To answer your question: This could happen, but never will We will always help people about to die on a hospital's doorstepVandalvideo
You're using a fallacy. You cannot rule out, merely from the improbability of something, that it will not happen. It may not be likely to happen, but that doesn't mean it won't happen. Your statements that the ER will always be here is unfounded thus far.

You are right, using your extreme logic anything is possible.
So the answer to anything you ask is "yes", there is always some possibility...
even if it is
.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%
...there is still a chance.

I found a clip that best represents your line of thinking
LINK

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts

The government option won't be free. it will cost slightly less than a private insurance policy, or slightly more yet give you more coverage for the dollar.

If illegals are denied than we pay for their healthcare through our emergency room bills. we DO pay for illegals RIGHT NOW... thats what those clowns don't tell you, giving anyone foreign or domestic the option to BUY our healthcare plan will put MORE money into the program itself.

This depends on if Obamas plan for a SELF SUSTAINED program works out. in a program that cost ZERO what is the harm in covering illegals? nothing, if the plan works then we would actually save money by covering them because we wouldn't pay for their rediculous emergency room bills like we do right now.

But, who knows how it will all work out, its a chance we may need to take.

Fear of change is the easiest fear to spread. even if the status quo is 100% guaranteed to kill you people are afraid of change. Republicans base their entire ideology off of fear in a changing world. There is plenty to fear, lets market that fear and run for office!

Meejoe27
Or we could just not incentivize illegal immigration and refuse them care.
Avatar image for cs45F
cs45F

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 cs45F
Member since 2008 • 1147 Posts
There not even supposed to be here in the first place why should they be allowed to get health care.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Because they're not US citizens. Because they don't pay taxes and don't pay into the system that would provide healthcare. Because the US can't afford to subsidize the healthcare of non us citizens. If you feel that people from third world nations should have better healthcare, by all means pay for it with your own money.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#111 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Why can't we get rid of the ER?

because we try to be a civil society ? ;)

That speaks more to why we probably won't, not why we can't.

well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ontain"] because we try to be a civil society ? ;) Ontain
That speaks more to why we probably won't, not why we can't.

well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.

Don't bother with him... Read the above posts. He just goes on and on about how anything is possible...can't say it won't change.
Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#113 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts

I would presume the obvious answer would be that they do not pay taxes that they would were they a lawful resident; therefore they are taking out without giving in what others are expected to give in.

GabuEx
Gabu delivers my opinions once again.
Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ontain"] because we try to be a civil society ? ;)

That speaks more to why we probably won't, not why we can't.

well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.

You don't carry ID or an insurance card on you?
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] That speaks more to why we probably won't, not why we can't.FragStains
well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.

You don't carry ID or an insurance card on you?

There have been lots of times people have gone into an ER with no id (yes legal citizens with insurance). Example: heart attack while in bed = rushed to hospital, most likely no one thinks to get id's
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#116 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"] well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.

For some odd reason I doubt policy makers fall into this category.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#117 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

You don't carry ID or an insurance card on you?FragStains
some ppl don't bring them when they go jogging.

or if you're at your gym and pass out (stuff in locker but no one's going to get it)

someone beat you up and stole them fire in your house and you ran out but didn't get your id, etc.

plenty of cases where you wouldn't have the info but even if you did would you want them to waste time verifying the info (which could be fakes) rather than doing the expensive procedures to save your life and worrying about the bill later? also drivers ID doesn't mean your legal in some states.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#118 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ontain"] well a self serving reason would be that if i'm unconscious and need the ER I don't want them having to check if i'm legal before giving me care.

For some odd reason I doubt policy makers fall into this category.

I don't know who most congress men are do you?
Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts

[QUOTE="FragStains"]You don't carry ID or an insurance card on you?Ontain

some ppl don't bring them when they go jogging.

or if you're at your gym and pass out (stuff in locker but no one's going to get it)

someone beat you up and stole them fire in your house and you ran out but didn't get your id, etc.

plenty of cases where you wouldn't have the info but even if you did would you want them to waste time verifying the info (which could be fakes) rather than doing the expensive procedures to save your life and worrying about the bill later? also drivers ID doesn't mean your legal in some states.

So we should allow illegals to abuse the ER because in a small amount of cases, a legal citizen may not have any ID on them?
Avatar image for Meejoe27
Meejoe27

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#120 Meejoe27
Member since 2009 • 786 Posts

[QUOTE="Meejoe27"]

The government option won't be free. it will cost slightly less than a private insurance policy, or slightly more yet give you more coverage for the dollar.

If illegals are denied than we pay for their healthcare through our emergency room bills. we DO pay for illegals RIGHT NOW... thats what those clowns don't tell you, giving anyone foreign or domestic the option to BUY our healthcare plan will put MORE money into the program itself.

This depends on if Obamas plan for a SELF SUSTAINED program works out. in a program that cost ZERO what is the harm in covering illegals? nothing, if the plan works then we would actually save money by covering them because we wouldn't pay for their rediculous emergency room bills like we do right now.

But, who knows how it will all work out, its a chance we may need to take.

Fear of change is the easiest fear to spread. even if the status quo is 100% guaranteed to kill you people are afraid of change. Republicans base their entire ideology off of fear in a changing world. There is plenty to fear, lets market that fear and run for office!

FragStains

Or we could just not incentivize illegal immigration and refuse them care.

Or we could just keep paying their hospital bills like we do now and never ask for a dime.

you sir are brilliant, just give them 100% free coverage, that will teach them to break into our country.

Hey Illegals, Want to pay for your hospital bill? Well too bad, we won't let you, this one is on the tax payer, take that illegals!

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts

[QUOTE="FragStains"][QUOTE="Meejoe27"]

The government option won't be free. it will cost slightly less than a private insurance policy, or slightly more yet give you more coverage for the dollar.

If illegals are denied than we pay for their healthcare through our emergency room bills. we DO pay for illegals RIGHT NOW... thats what those clowns don't tell you, giving anyone foreign or domestic the option to BUY our healthcare plan will put MORE money into the program itself.

This depends on if Obamas plan for a SELF SUSTAINED program works out. in a program that cost ZERO what is the harm in covering illegals? nothing, if the plan works then we would actually save money by covering them because we wouldn't pay for their rediculous emergency room bills like we do right now.

But, who knows how it will all work out, its a chance we may need to take.

Fear of change is the easiest fear to spread. even if the status quo is 100% guaranteed to kill you people are afraid of change. Republicans base their entire ideology off of fear in a changing world. There is plenty to fear, lets market that fear and run for office!

Meejoe27

Or we could just not incentivize illegal immigration and refuse them care.

Or we could just keep paying their hospital bills like we do now and never ask for a dime.

you sir are brilliant, just give them 100% free coverage, that will teach them to break into our country.

Hey Illegals, Want to pay for your hospital bill? Well too bad, we won't let you, this one is on the tax payer, take that illegals!

Um....huh?
Avatar image for Xeros606
Xeros606

11126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Xeros606
Member since 2007 • 11126 Posts
They don't pay taxes.
Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="danwallacefan"]

The sort of responses to my point are quite disturbing. You seem to treat the welfare state as some kind of exchange between poor people (the recipients of said welfare) and the Government. I disagree entirely. The welfare state exists IN ORDER TO provide welfare, healthcare, and other basic services to people *who cannot afford* to pay for said services on their own

Not that I agree one iota with the welfare state, but I think there is a gross misunderstanding of the moral principle that founds the welfare state.

avatar_genius

The problem is, while welfare etc serves a good intention, it causes dependancy and abuse of the system and takes away incentive.

...lol, this coming from a poster who has a milton friedman quote in his sig, no less, supporting government welfare, oh well ....

I can see that you ignored the bolded text :roll:

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

I think it is common sense right? I mean they do not deserve to have free healthcare. Why? Well because they are not contributing to the country. In order to support this so called public healthcare system it comes out of our paychecks. Illegal immigrants are either not working or aren't getting paid by check because they don't have a social.

xscrapzx

what on earth are you talking about? Illegal immigrants most certainly contribute to the country! They take jobs and sell their labor. They spend their earned wages in America. They most certainly do contribute to the country.

Avatar image for danwallacefan
danwallacefan

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 danwallacefan
Member since 2008 • 2413 Posts

Some people really seem to be misunderstanding my sentiment.

First, I DO NOT AGREE with any sort of government welfare. I dont agree with Government in the first place, hence why I am an anarchist.

My post was to clarify one certain problem I have with the people promoting Government healthcare, and that is that they do not want to extend this coverage to "illegal aliens".

Now there was one point that I could sympathize with, and that was that if we gave welfare to illegal immigrants, lots of immigrants would come to America BECAUSE of the free healthcare and other benefits, and that would be simply unsustainable (Hence why Paul Krugman supports cracking down on illegal aliens).

But I am simply taken aback by the replies which argue along the lines that illegal immigrants "Dont deserve" free healthcare because they "didn't contribute" to it. This is absolutely absurd. The purpose of the welfare state is to give housing, food, and healthcare to *people who CANNOT pay for it*. The illegal immigrants would be very people who are in most need of these services because they could never afford it on their own.

That was the moral contradiction i was pointing out. I think welfare statists need to stop abdigating to the xenophobes on the "right"