Wikileaks founder has classified footage of a US airstrike killing 140 Afghans.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#101 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

Yeah, I'm sure people will believed the biased content released by Wikileaks again...

SgtKevali

I can guarantee they will. Not everyone, mainly Anti War People will use it as a stepping stone.

Dead civilians are dead civilians, irrelevant of the circumstances under which they were killed. It's important that people see that war causes the death of many civilians.

That doesn't seem to count until its your own who are getting killed..... literally watch all the folks here get up in arms all the sudden...
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#102 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

I'm assuming you agree that whatever took place here is "justified by military, or civilian necessity", redeeming the action from any of the mentioned criterias or definitions thereof, correct? :)

Well, that's where we disagree, the justification of the action that took place. I'm assuming the U.S military had poor justification behind the action, and I guess you're assuming the U.S military have solid justification behind the action.

LJS9502_basic

Because civilians die does NOT inherently make it a war crime...which is your assumption and which is contradicted...by yet again, your link....you have to prove it was unjustified...and you have not done so. In war civilians WILL always die. But with no evidence to the contrary...and you have none....it's not fair, logical, or correct to call it a war crime. That's a conviction without a trial. And civilized countries...hold trials. :)

the death... of civilians.. does not inherently NOT make... it a war crime... i also like how you want me to prove it was unjustified... by a video that has not been released yet... that's not fair or logical to demand... when everything in this thread is based on assumptions as to what really went on... if you supported the action, no demand for evidence is stated... but if you're against the action, here you are asking for evidence... it's beautiful really..

k? ;)

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts
[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] I can guarantee they will. Not everyone, mainly Anti War People will use it as a stepping stone. SaudiFury

Dead civilians are dead civilians, irrelevant of the circumstances under which they were killed. It's important that people see that war causes the death of many civilians.

That doesn't seem to count until its your own who are getting killed..... literally watch all the folks here get up in arms all the sudden...

i think everyone KNOWS war causes civilian deaths. Is it really a revelation?
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

YOUR telling me how MY units MOUT training is conducted? Are you kidding me? Please tell me your just trolling...

BiancaDK

What is MOUT training?

Wait, don't tell me, I really don't care tbh. :)

Military Operations on Urban Terrain. If you don't care, then don't post. And you didn't address the rest of my post. Nice try.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

[

the death... of civilians.. does not inherently NOT make... it a war crime... i also like how you want me to prove it was unjustified... by a video that has not been released yet... that's not fair or logical to demand... when everything in this thread is based on assumptions as to what really went on... if you supported the action, no demand for evidence is stated... but if you're against the action, here you are asking for evidence... it's beautiful really..

k? ;)

BiancaDK

Then in the absence of proof....the prudent thing is not to call it a war crime. You know what they say about assumptions.;)

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#107 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
Aw you guys.. :oops:
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#108 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

Then in the absence of proof....the prudent thing is not to call it a war crime. You know what they say about assumptions.;)

LJS9502_basic
Indeed, assuming the operation was justified, good stuff. ;)
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

Great news in it's own sad way, but looking forward to seeing more evidence of war crimes committed by the U.S military. =) Hopefully international public support will take a dive after this.

UnknownSniper65

You must be looking forward to the Taliban releasing footage that shows their suicide bombers or IEDs killing civilians. Of course such videos don't even make it out into the public because the Taliban know it would discredit their war effort. Odd how people seem so willing to bash NATO for accidentally killing civilians,but are willing to completely ignore when the Taliban does it accidentally ,or in many cases purposely. I am completely sickened by this.

Let's not forget how the Taliban fire rockets and mortars into girls schools ON PURPOSE. But they're freedom fighters! Amiright!!!

Avatar image for Jaybird36
Jaybird36

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Jaybird36
Member since 2008 • 65 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"] uh, not really (again) :|BiancaDK

Yes really again.....

War crimes are "violations of the laws or customs of war"; including "murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps", "the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war", the killing of hostages, "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity"

None of which fits...

I'm assuming you agree that whatever took place here is "justified by military, or civilian necessity", redeeming the action from any of the mentioned criterias or definitions thereof, correct? :)

Well, that's where we disagree, the justification of the action that took place. I'm assuming the U.S military had poor justification behind the action, and I guess you're assuming the U.S military have solid justification behind the action.

We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#111 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

Military Operations on Urban Terrain. If you don't care, then don't post. And you didn't address the rest of my post. Nice try.

SpartanMSU

I can post as much as I want to, and care as little as I choose to. :) *thumbs up*

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

Then in the absence of proof....the prudent thing is not to call it a war crime. You know what they say about assumptions.;)

BiancaDK
Indeed, assuming the operation was justified, good stuff. ;)

Not an assumption......the operations are justified...but since you wish to damn the US military...it's rather pointless to discuss this.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#113 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.

Jaybird36

Why would I assume the U.S had good justification without knowing anything about what happened?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51588 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]I can guarantee they will. Not everyone, mainly Anti War People will use it as a stepping stone. airshocker

And it'll be defended just as vehemently as the other WikiLeaks video was,

What was biased about the past video/
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.

Jaybird36

It's not worth it...she has her mind made up BEFORE the evidence is in.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#117 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
Not an assumption......the operations are justified...but since you wish to damn the US military...it's rather pointless to discuss this. LJS9502_basic
The operations are justified in your opinion, yes. :)
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

Military Operations on Urban Terrain. If you don't care, then don't post. And you didn't address the rest of my post. Nice try.

BiancaDK

I can post as much as I want to, and care as little as I choose to. :) *thumbs up*

You asked me a question and then said wait don't answer because I don't care. Do you realize how idiotic that sounds?

And again, you're avoiding addressing the rest of my post. You're making a fool out of yourself.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Not an assumption......the operations are justified...but since you wish to damn the US military...it's rather pointless to discuss this. BiancaDK
The operations are justified in your opinion, yes. :)

I haven't predisposed myself as you have....but the US operates as cleanly as is possible in war.
Avatar image for mattisgod01
mattisgod01

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#120 mattisgod01
Member since 2005 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaybird36"]

We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.

BiancaDK

Why would I assume the U.S had good justification without knowing anything about what happened?

I choose to assume people are innocent until proven guilty. I do not believe the US Military would intentionally kill civilians. Why are you so adamant they did?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

You asked me a question and then said wait don't answer because I don't care.

And again, you're avoiding addressing the rest of my post.

SpartanMSU

I think the link answered the question here. But I daresay...she won't admit it.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"] You must be looking forward to the Taliban releasing footage that shows their suicide bombers or IEDs killing civilians. Of course such videos don't even make it out into the public because the Taliban know it would discredit their war effort. Odd how people seem so willing to bash NATO for accidentally killing civilians,but are willing to completely ignore when the Taliban does it accidentally ,or in many cases purposely. I am completely sickened by this.UnknownSniper65

Let's not forget how the Taliban fire rockets and mortars into girls schools ON PURPOSE. But they're freedom fighters! Amiright!!!

Within the last month the Taliban have suicide bombed a wedding killing 40 people and hanged a 7 year old boy for treason. Both were done intentionally.

It's disgusting. And you comes and helps with the wounded innocents? The U.S./UK and other militaries there. BiancaDK obviously shuts her eyes and yells to ignore this kind of news though.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#123 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

You asked me a question and then said wait don't answer because I don't care. Do you realize how idiotic that sounds?

And again, you're avoiding addressing the rest of my post. You're making a fool out of yourself.

SpartanMSU

lol ok. :)

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

&

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

gt;

You asked me a question and then said wait don't answer because I don't care. Do you realize how idiotic that sounds?

And again, you're avoiding addressing the rest of my post. You're making a fool out of yourself.

BiancaDK

lol ok. :)

How oh so mature of you.

Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

I'm still waiting for this video wikileaks suppose to have. how many days has it been?

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
People die in war boo hoo deal with it. :| MrLions
That's easy for you to say when the wars your country fights in (I'm asumming you're a US citizen) are never in your territory. There's a reason why countries in Europe and Japan are very careful to glorify and justify war atrocities. That's because they have lived the war personlly. Since americans can "live" their wars sitting on their confortable couches watching on their big screens lcds no wonder ridiculous statements such as this are made constantly.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#128 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

I haven't predisposed myself as you have....but the US operates as cleanly as is possible in war. LJS9502_basic
Oh yeah, totally. =D And no, you totally haven't. *nods*

I choose to assume people are innocent until proven guilty. I do not believe the US Military would intentionally kill civilians. Why are you so adamant they did?

mattisgod01

If the video contains even half of what the decription says it does, I'm going to be hard pressed assuming the U.S military innocent on this one.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I haven't predisposed myself as you have....but the US operates as cleanly as is possible in war. BiancaDK

Oh yeah, totally. =D And no, you totally haven't. *nods*

Well unlike you apparently....I need to see evidence of wrongdoing BEFORE I assume it. In the US....innocent until proven guilty does mean something. ;)

Avatar image for Jaybird36
Jaybird36

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Jaybird36
Member since 2008 • 65 Posts

[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

[QUOTE="Jaybird36"]

We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.

mattisgod01

Why would I assume the U.S had good justification without knowing anything about what happened?

I choose to assume people are innocent until proven guilty. I do not believe the US Military would intentionally kill civilians. Why are you so adamant they did?

Exactly. The military is not horrible like you think they are.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I haven't predisposed myself as you have....but the US operates as cleanly as is possible in war. BiancaDK

Oh yeah, totally. =D And no, you totally haven't. *nods*

I choose to assume people are innocent until proven guilty. I do not believe the US Military would intentionally kill civilians. Why are you so adamant they did?

mattisgod01

If the video contains even half of what the decription says it does, I'm going to be hard pressed assuming the U.S military innocent on this one.

What would the U.S. have to gain from intentionally killing civilians?

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

Great news in it's own sad way, but looking forward to seeing more evidence of war crimes committed by the U.S military. =) Hopefully international public support will take a dive after this.

BiancaDK
I hope you can see the different between intentional and accidental civilian deaths.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#133 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

Well unlike you apparently....I need to see evidence of wrongdoing BEFORE I assume it. In the US....innocent until proven guilty does mean something. ;)

LJS9502_basic
Oh but you guys are always making a proper cluster**** outta' things, I think my assumption is reasonable, until evidence lands proving the contrary if so. :)
Avatar image for mattisgod01
mattisgod01

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#134 mattisgod01
Member since 2005 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I haven't predisposed myself as you have....but the US operates as cleanly as is possible in war. BiancaDK

Oh yeah, totally. =D And no, you totally haven't. *nods*

I choose to assume people are innocent until proven guilty. I do not believe the US Military would intentionally kill civilians. Why are you so adamant they did?

mattisgod01

If the video contains even half of what the decription says it does, I'm going to be hard pressed assuming the U.S military innocent on this one.

Even if it does show the US killing civilians it is not likely to show the intent. It all comes down to the intent, Was is a deliberate attack on civilians or was it an accident. From what i've read from your posts so far its almost as if you hope they did it intentionally.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

Well unlike you apparently....I need to see evidence of wrongdoing BEFORE I assume it. In the US....innocent until proven guilty does mean something. ;)

BiancaDK

Oh but you guys are always making a proper cluster**** outta' things, I think my assumption is reasonable, until evidence lands proving the contrary if so. :)

Always? Way to exaggerate. Accidents do happen...they happen in EVERY military. And no...your assumption is not in the least reasonable since there is currently ZERO evidence.

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#137 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

Exactly. The military is not horrible like you think they are.

Jaybird36

Yes they are.

What would the U.S. have to gain from intentionally killing civilians?

SpartanMSU

Good question, It'll be interesting finding out when the video is released. :)

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaybird36"]

Exactly. The military is not horrible like you think they are.

BiancaDK

Yes they are.

What would the U.S. have to gain from intentionally killing civilians?

SpartanMSU

Good question, It'll be interesting finding out when the video is released. :)

It's a good thing you don't run this country. We would be a third world country with the rest of them.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

Good question, It'll be interesting finding out when the video is released. :)

BiancaDK

Heavily edited I'm sure.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaybird36"]

Exactly. The military is not horrible like you think they are.

BiancaDK

Yes they are.

What would the U.S. have to gain from intentionally killing civilians?

SpartanMSU

Good question, It'll be interesting finding out when the video is released. :)

Wow.

And it was a general question. The video isn't needed to answer it.

Do you not know the definition of intentional and accidental?

Avatar image for stanley_baldwin
stanley_baldwin

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 stanley_baldwin
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

It's a good thing you don't run this country. We would be a third world country with the rest of them.Mystic-G

Wait, what?

Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#143 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
I hope you can see the different between intentional and accidental civilian deaths. Mystic-G
I hope so too. :)

Even if it does show the US killing civilians it is not likely to show the intent. It all comes down to the intent, Was is a deliberate attack on civilians or was it an accident. From what i've read from your posts so far its almost as if you hope they did it intentionally.

mattisgod01
Oh no, I would never hope the U.S military did it intentionally. Is that the issue here? My incentives?
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51588 Posts

You guys realize you're arguing with a person who is essentially only saying, "Nu uh, you're wrong!"

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"]

Good question, It'll be interesting finding out when the video is released. :)

stanley_baldwin

It's a good thing you don't run this country. We would be a third world country with the rest of them.

Wait, what?

Wow... I didn't think I'd have to break that down for someone.

A person who thinks the military is bad would most likely back down from a lot of conflicts. You have two preliminary choices in war, bring the war to them or let them bring it to you. If we back down because our military is evil then they will bring the war to us. If they do that then this country won't last too much longer without having to fear of frequent terrorist attacks.

Avatar image for mattisgod01
mattisgod01

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#146 mattisgod01
Member since 2005 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaybird36"]

Exactly. The military is not horrible like you think they are.

BiancaDK

Yes they are.

Do you picture the military being some kind of massive machine that is fueled by the blood of small children and gains power through the deaths of others?

I'm sure you're just trolling but i happen to know alot of people in the military who would be sick to the stomach if they found out their actions led to the deaths of innocent people. Believe it or not they are very human.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="MrLions"]People die in war boo hoo deal with it. :| UnknownSniper65
That's easy for you to say when the wars your country fights in (I'm asumming you're a US citizen) are never in your territory. There's a reason why countries in Europe and Japan are very careful to glorify and justify war atrocities. That's because they have lived the war personlly. Since americans can "live" their wars sitting on their confortable couches watching on their big screens lcds no wonder ridiculous statements such as this are made constantly.

Ridiculous argument . You're acting as if Europeans are dodging sniper fire on the way to work.

Wut? I'm saying europeans are not so quickly to justify war and say thngs like the above because they have lived war in all its glory in their territories recently. They know the excesses and injusties war brings to civilian populations and that's why they know better. When was the last time the US had a war in their territory? it was several generations ago. No wonder you see war as a kind of game.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

You guys realize you're arguing with a person who is essentially only saying, "Nu uh, you're wrong!"

Chutebox
Yes they are. I just find it ironic what with the link posted.:lol:
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#149 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts
It's a good thing you don't run this country. We would be a third world country with the rest of them. Mystic-G
It's a good thing you don't run your country. Polka-dotted zebras would roam wild in the streets like the rest of them.

Heavily edited I'm sure.

LJS9502_basic
Sure, sure... ;) Whatever presumption serves your argument, let's go with that. Whatever presumption doesn't, let's argue against it. You're such a beautiful snowflake, LJ. :)
Avatar image for Jaybird36
Jaybird36

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Jaybird36
Member since 2008 • 65 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]I hope you can see the different between intentional and accidental civilian deaths. BiancaDK
I hope so too. :)

Even if it does show the US killing civilians it is not likely to show the intent. It all comes down to the intent, Was is a deliberate attack on civilians or was it an accident. From what i've read from your posts so far its almost as if you hope they did it intentionally.

mattisgod01

Oh no, I would never hope the U.S military did it intentionally. Is that the issue here? My incentives?

Why exactly do you think our military is evil?