[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"] uh, not really (again) :|BiancaDK
Yes really again.....War crimes are "violations of the laws or customs of war"; including "murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps", "the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war", the killing of hostages, "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity"
None of which fits...
I'm assuming you agree that whatever took place here is "justified by military, or civilian necessity", redeeming the action from any of the mentioned criterias or definitions thereof, correct? :)
Well, that's where we disagree, the justification of the action that took place. I'm assuming the U.S military had poor justification behind the action, and I guess you're assuming the U.S military have solid justification behind the action.
We don't even know the circumstances of the video. For all we knowthe plane's navigation might have failed or the information was mixed up. Why would you assume we had poor justification without knowing anything about what happened.
Log in to comment