Wikileaks founder has classified footage of a US airstrike killing 140 Afghans.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts
Question. If these videos are posted and such will they really do much damage? It is an airstrike right? Usually the footage is pretty far away from the scene so we won't be seeing close up gritty footage just general damage from afar. Doesn't seem as personal.Nifty_Shark
Well I doubt someone had a close camera view of it.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#202 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Question. If these videos are posted and such will they really do much damage? It is an airstrike right? Usually the footage is pretty far away from the scene so we won't be seeing close up gritty footage just general damage from afar. Doesn't seem as personal.Nifty_Shark
And you can't see if there are any "Civilians" in the area either.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#203 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

Dude, It finally Happened. I have my own little group of followers(People that don't like me and make it known)! Yay! :P

(Look at "Liberal...Thread")

Snipes_2


Welcome to hell....then. Enjoy your stay.:P

Lol, Doesn't bother me really. I must be doing something right. :lol:

Not necessarily.

Avatar image for Vadislav
Vadislav

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 Vadislav
Member since 2009 • 199 Posts

A lot of butthurt in this thread.

Avatar image for GmasterRED
GmasterRED

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#205 GmasterRED
Member since 2006 • 1051 Posts
You didn't have to past the whole article, first of all. Second, civilians die in war. What are we supposed to do about it? It's not like a video game, where there are magically no civillians, or if there are, very few.
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts
[QUOTE="GmasterRED"]You didn't have to past the whole article, first of all. Second, civilians die in war. What are we supposed to do about it? It's not like a video game, where there are magically no civillians, or if there are, very few.

I dunno about you but I took out the enemy very successfully with no civilian casualties in CoD4.
Avatar image for Fire_Ants
Fire_Ants

4256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#207 Fire_Ants
Member since 2005 • 4256 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="GmasterRED"]You didn't have to past the whole article, first of all. Second, civilians die in war. What are we supposed to do about it? It's not like a video game, where there are magically no civillians, or if there are, very few.

I dunno about you but I took out the enemy very successfully with no civilian casualties in CoD4.

I agree, plus Bad Company 2 is very realistic, and there's no civilians. So there must be no civilians in real life war!
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#208 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts

Its crazy, but lets just say the US has a bit of a history in hitting the wrong target. Like the weapons depo they went to hit that time, it turned out to be making medicine for people

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#209 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="Nifty_Shark"]Question. If these videos are posted and such will they really do much damage? It is an airstrike right? Usually the footage is pretty far away from the scene so we won't be seeing close up gritty footage just general damage from afar. Doesn't seem as personal.Snipes_2

And you can't see if there are any "Civilians" in the area either.

The argument isn't about whether there are civilians in these videos or not. There almost always are.

The argument is generally about what the circumstances under which these people were killed were, and whether those circumstances justify the act or not.

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#210 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts
War has high costs on many aspects. Not just financially. Of course its sad when innocent people lose their lives. Thats what happens when they live in a war zone though. Innocent civilians should be moved for the time being. ... but thats unrealistic, because we cant tell who our enemy is, and who innocent civilians are. Children will shoot guns at soldiers, and throw rocks at them. Women will also shoot at soldiers. Both will strap up and blow up - but not ALL of them will. Its hard to tell who will and who wont. They create IED's out of donkeys and dogs for crying out loud. Am I saying its justified? No. Am I saying its ok? No. Why? Cause we as civilians do not know all the information to go along with the video. We dont know if they were in fact innocent, if they had reason to open fire on them, and we dont know the mental state of the soldiers that opened fire. Have you ever been in a warzone? Do you know what its like to have to kill people? Do you know what its like to get shot at? Do you know what its like to have mortars exploding around you, and you sitting there, then looking over to see if your buddy is ok, and come to find out that hes.. half the man he used to be (to put it in non gruesome terms). If soldiers did do this on purpose... the soldiers may have done it because of PTSD - which is real, and it is terrible. And more of our soldiers are developing it because of the Iraq and Afghanistan war - several tours of hell... Some men cant take it.
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts
War has high costs on many aspects. Not just financially. Of course its sad when innocent people lose their lives. Thats what happens when they live in a war zone though. Innocent civilians should be moved for the time being. ... but thats unrealistic, because we cant tell who our enemy is, and who innocent civilians are. Children will shoot guns at soldiers, and throw rocks at them. Women will also shoot at soldiers. Both will strap up and blow up - but not ALL of them will. Its hard to tell who will and who wont. They create IED's out of donkeys and dogs for crying out loud. Am I saying its justified? No. Am I saying its ok? No. Why? Cause we as civilians do not know all the information to go along with the video. We dont know if they were in fact innocent, if they had reason to open fire on them, and we dont know the mental state of the soldiers that opened fire. Have you ever been in a warzone? Do you know what its like to have to kill people? Do you know what its like to get shot at? Do you know what its like to have mortars exploding around you, and you sitting there, then looking over to see if your buddy is ok, and come to find out that hes.. half the man he used to be (to put it in non gruesome terms). If soldiers did do this on purpose... the soldiers may have done it because of PTSD - which is real, and it is terrible. And more of our soldiers are developing it because of the Iraq and Afghanistan war - several tours of hell... Some men cant take it.xhellcatx
Add that to the fact that the enemy hide amongst civilians...and look like civilians...
Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#213 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts
[QUOTE="xhellcatx"]****hellcat rant****.Xx_Hopeless_xX
Add that to the fact that the enemy hide amongst civilians...and look like civilians...

lol i think i tried to say it but rushed to some other point i was gonna make but yes, we dont HAVE enemy lines anymore.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"]War has high costs on many aspects. Not just financially. Of course its sad when innocent people lose their lives. Thats what happens when they live in a war zone though. Innocent civilians should be moved for the time being. ... but thats unrealistic, because we cant tell who our enemy is, and who innocent civilians are. Children will shoot guns at soldiers, and throw rocks at them. Women will also shoot at soldiers. Both will strap up and blow up - but not ALL of them will. Its hard to tell who will and who wont. They create IED's out of donkeys and dogs for crying out loud. Am I saying its justified? No. Am I saying its ok? No. Why? Cause we as civilians do not know all the information to go along with the video. We dont know if they were in fact innocent, if they had reason to open fire on them, and we dont know the mental state of the soldiers that opened fire. Have you ever been in a warzone? Do you know what its like to have to kill people? Do you know what its like to get shot at? Do you know what its like to have mortars exploding around you, and you sitting there, then looking over to see if your buddy is ok, and come to find out that hes.. half the man he used to be (to put it in non gruesome terms). If soldiers did do this on purpose... the soldiers may have done it because of PTSD - which is real, and it is terrible. And more of our soldiers are developing it because of the Iraq and Afghanistan war - several tours of hell... Some men cant take it.SEANMCAD

I cant speak for the orginal poster but for me my question is not 'why did a predictable war event take place' but rather why is the event hidden from public review?

THAT is the larger question I think

Do you really think we have to see every action that occurs? Why?:|
Avatar image for jubino
jubino

6265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#215 jubino
Member since 2005 • 6265 Posts

God only knows why they did it, or how inflated the numbers are. The fact is we'll never know all the facts. For all we know, it could have been a terrorist summer training camp. You don't have to be that old to operate an RPG, so it might even be possible these "kids" were terrorists already. No one knows.

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"]***hellcat rant***.SEANMCAD

I cant speak for the orginal poster but for me my question is not 'why did a predictable war event take place' but rather why is the event hidden from public review?

THAT is the larger question I think

which is simple to answer, so I will :) The government does not release the video because automatically the soldiers will be targeted. Investigation needs to take place. If the soldiers are found guilty of murder, the video MAY NOT be released, (there is a possibility it wont be, but a possibility it will), but the public will be informed of what happened. Firstly though, investigation must take place. "innocent until proven guilty" sort of is the key here.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180169 Posts

There is a difference between a persons perception of 'needing' to see every event and events being off-limits for review.

The question is NOT should we see every event, the issue is why are some events explicitly (look up the word if you don't know it) set for non view.

Two entirely different subjects

SEANMCAD

Yeah......trying to insult my intelligence because we don't agree. :roll:

You assume that what is not shown does not endanger national security....and as with all assumptions dude....

Avatar image for xhellcatx
xhellcatx

9015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#220 xhellcatx
Member since 2006 • 9015 Posts

[QUOTE="xhellcatx"][QUOTE="SEANMCAD"]

I cant speak for the orginal poster but for me my question is not 'why did a predictable war event take place' but rather why is the event hidden from public review?

THAT is the larger question I think

SEANMCAD

which is simple to answer, so I will :) The government does not release the video because automatically the soldiers will be targeted. Investigation needs to take place. If the soldiers are found guilty of murder, the video MAY NOT be released, (there is a possibility it wont be, but a possibility it will), but the public will be informed of what happened. Firstly though, investigation must take place. "innocent until proven guilty" sort of is the key here.

itsyears past and as hard as I look and listen to those videos for the life of me I still cant idenify the name of the soliders would you mind telling me their names now that its releasesd as you suggest

Investigations CAN take years. And when a video like that gets released - properly - names sometimes are accompanied with it. When videos are released unproperly (leaked) then names almost always go with with it. Look. The government makes certain things Classified for a reason. If there wasnt a good reason to make it Classified, then it wouldnt be. And again, Investigations... especially with the Military.. take a long... LONG time. If you have ever been involved in the Military, you should be familiar with the term "Hurry up and Wait"