Wkileaks' Diplomatic 9/11

If some rinky dink website can leak documents, chances are they weren't kept too "safe" to begin with. Maniacc1

[QUOTE="Maniacc1"]If some rinky dink website can leak documents, chances are they weren't kept too "safe" to begin with. LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Maniacc1"]If some rinky dink website can leak documents, chances are they weren't kept too "safe" to begin with. Maniacc1

One interesting thing is that both republicans and democrats are in agreement on this issue!

Maybe the CIA will be so ashamed they will disband :D I've about had it with the pointless wars and terrorism their meddling causes

People? It's only one undoubtedly and that doesn't mean the person was within the military either. LJS9502_basic

There is a chance that I am reading your posts wrong. Regardless the guy who gave Wikileaks the information is from the military.

Bradley Manning

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]People? It's only one undoubtedly and that doesn't mean the person was within the military either. testfactor888

There is a chance that I am reading your posts wrong. Regardless the guy who gave Wikileaks the information is from the military.

Bradley Manning

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]People? It's only one undoubtedly and that doesn't mean the person was within the military either. testfactor888

There is a chance that I am reading your posts wrong. Regardless the guy who gave Wikileaks the information is from the military.

Bradley Manning

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning

Hmmm looks like he was gay Possibly taking it out on the military and their recent efforts to stop the repeal process of DADT?

So I've now heard through the grape vine that wikileaks plans to release info regarding to scandals with bank executives.

Would the "ZOMG WIKILEAKS IS TEH DEBUL" people be okay with this? Banks arn't government agencies and leaking things from them is not a national security issue. Or should their corruption be protected?

So I've now heard through the grape vine that wikileaks plans to release info regarding to scandals with bank executives.

Would the "ZOMG WIKILEAKS IS TEH DEBUL" people be okay with this? Banks arn't government agencies and leaking things from them is not a national security issue. Or should their corruption be protected?

Pixel-Pirate

I cant wait to see that, hopefully the government wont do anything to hinder wikileaks anytime soon.

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

the "ZOMG WIKILEAKS IS TEH DEBUL" people

thegerg

To whom are you referring? No one has posted anything along those lines.

The people voting on places like fox and MSNBC that wikileaks are terrorists.

In other news, I heard the recent leak has basically confirmed that China is NOT on NK's side and is encouraging the US to lay a smack down on Chinas "bestest friend".

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="p2250"] Small group? Wishful thinking on your part....p2250

AQ is a small group, when you go to war you go against a actual nation.. The Iraq Army dwarfed anything close to what AQ has.. Furthermore our invasions along with the staggering collateral damage is increasing the terrorist group's recruitment rate..

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

The people voting on places like fox and MSNBC that wikileaks are terrorists.

thegerg

Haha. Why, then, are you asking us?

Because atleast a few people in this thread have called wikileaks terrorists.

I don't know what the fuss is.

Most of the information shown here is common knowledge to most people who read and watch the news: Yes, Afghanistan is corrupt, yes, pakistan is probably building nuclear weapons, and yes, of course Saudi Arabia is worried about Iran. All Wikileaks is doing is confirming all the information that most people should know about already.

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Because atleast a few people in this thread have called wikileaks terrorists.

thegerg

Like who? I just searched through this entire thread and no one has called them terrorists.

My apologies, I confused this thread with the other wikileaks thread from yesterday (You can find it a few pages back). Though the person who equated what wikileaks does to terrorism has posted here as well.

I'm still unsure why we are arguing semantics that have basically nothing to do with anything and not answering my valid question. Is it okay when Wikileaks leaks private-sector info?

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

Because atleast a few people in this thread have called wikileaks terrorists.

thegerg

Like who? I just searched through this entire thread and no one has called them terrorists.

[QUOTE="p2250"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

AQ is a small group, when you go to war you go against a actual nation.. The Iraq Army dwarfed anything close to what AQ has.. Furthermore our invasions along with the staggering collateral damage is increasing the terrorist group's recruitment rate..

m25105

so this is what irani president had to say about the leaks:

"We don't think this information was leaked," he said. "We think it was organised to be released on a regular basis and they are pursuing political goals."

this is pretty much what i said yesterday lol

Harisemo

[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]

My apologies, I confused this thread with the other wikileaks thread from yesterday (You can find it a few pages back). Though the person who equated what wikileaks does to terrorism has posted here as well.

I'm still unsure why we are arguing semantics that have basically nothing to do with anything and not answering my valid question. Is it okay when Wikileaks leaks private-sector info?

thegerg

I wasn't asking that question in an effort to argue semantics. It's just that you were making accusations without really supporting them.

As far as that question goes: It depends.

And then I supported it by pointing you in the direction.

Now we can focus on things that matter as oppossed to "who said wiki-leaks was bad?!"

people need to stop criticising wikileaks for putting people in danger, especially when the pentagon has admitted there is 'no threat' from any of the documents released.

Wikileaks is no doubt pro-war, that was the whole point in releasing the information.

Looks good on those that support them, because all along they probably thought they were smart for supporting Wikileaks.

funny how US is concerned about the safety of Pakistans nuclear material, do they even know where its kept? well if they did they would have already destroyed the storage facility :lol: seems to me US islooking forexcuses to somehow find the location of Pakistans nukes

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

so this is what irani president had to say about the leaks:

"We don't think this information was leaked," he said. "We think it was organised to be released on a regular basis and they are pursuing political goals."

this is pretty much what i said yesterday lol

Elraptor

and in reality

Wikileaks is no doubt pro-war, that was the whole point in releasing the information.

Looks good on those that support them, because all along they probably thought they were smart for supporting Wikileaks.

p2250

oh looky. its the 'EU is going to invade america with al-qaida' guy. are the communists still living under your floorboards, or?