World War 3: Poland vs. Russia

  • 186 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for edgewalker16
edgewalker16

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 edgewalker16
Member since 2005 • 2286 Posts

Conflict is "settling down" in Georgia since the treaty has been signed, but they aren't the ones we should be watching. I'll give you a short history lesson:

Poland was an ally of France in WWII. Poland gets invaded, France comes to the rescue...France gets steam-rolled and then the U.S. joins in to protect France, our ally. WWII.

Okay. Now, any of you remember that not-very-well publicized event where Poland accepted the U.S. deal of installing an anti-missile system in the region? Well, we're telling everyone that it's because of Iran. Russia is claiming that it's because of their own country. So, if Russia feels threatened by this they could invade Poland (which wouldn't be difficult). The main reason Poland signed this contract is because, as part of the contract, if Poland is ever attacked we MUST come to their aid/rescue/assitance whatever you want to call it. That would mean fighting Russia. That's a possible WWIII.

It sounds unlikely, but all Russia has to do is send troops into Poland. THAT'S IT. Then we're stuck fighting in Iraq, which is sucking up most of our military equipment and funds AND we'd be fighting Russia who is a much more formidable enemy than a few Iraqi's with bombs strapped to their chests. Don't put it past Russia...but I'll let you form your own conclusions.

Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts
All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations.
Avatar image for surferdude17
surferdude17

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 surferdude17
Member since 2003 • 599 Posts
While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. 11Marcel

but you yourself said Russia is only trying to defend themselves, but what are we and other countries doing putting up the missile defense systems? Its there for defense, and by Russia attacking they would be the ones who are make the aggressive move, the unnecessary move,not us or Poland.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.surferdude17

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#6 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts
Poland can beat Russia just like they beat the Swedes. Link
Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts
Yeah, I just wanted to add, foreign governments may seem to be extreme, but they aren't crazy. They'll always look at their own country first. When Russia has the choice between having a security risk and going to war with the whole western world, they'll remain peaceful, just like Iran won't fire any nukes if they know their country will turn to glass 24 hours after shooting those missiles.
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#8 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
I doubt WWIII will happen because of something like this
Avatar image for Bigg_Boi
Bigg_Boi

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Bigg_Boi
Member since 2004 • 1785 Posts
The Russian military would steamroll over the EU and the US if either the SCO or the CIS helps Russia. Russia has plenty of allies in the east and south that would love to attack Europe.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts
All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. 11Marcel
And Russia should give Poland the right to defend themselves. How does that hurt Russia unless Russia plans on attacking?
Avatar image for surferdude17
surferdude17

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 surferdude17
Member since 2003 • 599 Posts

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.argetlam00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

I just remebered that alliance which is why I took it out of my original post. I still believe that China would break that promise though. They are experiencing an economic boom while breaking ground in their political place in the world. Joining an aggresive Russia would destroy all the ground they achieved in the last 5 to 10 years.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. LJS9502_basic
And Russia should give Poland the right to defend themselves. How does that hurt Russia unless Russia plans on attacking?

Well the thing is, Russia is afraid that the US is surrounding it with missles and military bases. Just imagine what the US would feel like if the Russians put bases in Canada, Mexico and Cuba and said they are for "defense" even though that "defense" can be transformed into an offensive base within an hours time.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

I doubt WWIII will happen because of something like thisAndYOU

who knows, all it takes is one more move by Russia and you get many nations up in arms againest them, and then what better time for Iran to make a move, next thing you know its the world vs. Russia and Iran, we can only hope Russia doesnt do anything stupid because at this point they are the ones who will decided what happens.

Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. SaintLeonidas

but you yourself said Russia is only trying to defend themselves, but what are we and other countries doing putting up the missile defense systems? Its there for defense, and by Russia attacking they would be the ones who are make the aggressive move, the unnecessary move,not us or Poland.

Nukes are enough defense for nations. It's unrealistic for a nation to fire one of his nukes unless it's being fired upon. Iranians know they're going to get destroyed if they fire nukes, and so does Russia and any other still neutral nation. What the missile defense system will do is give the west such an advantage, that they can do anything they want with other nations, because there's no threat from them anymore. It gives them power over other nations.
Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts
i agree with tc he has a point
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.surferdude17

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

I just remebered that alliance which is why I took it out of my original post. I still believe that China would break that promise though. They are experiencing an economic boom while breaking ground in their political place in the world. Joining an aggresive Russia would destroy all the ground they achieved in the last 5 to 10 years.

China doesn't have much allies. Very few countries actually get along well with them. Russia and India are big allies to China and they do military training together.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

I don't think Russia would go to war over Poland, they are just talking big.

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.argetlam00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

If Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

I don't think Russia would go to war over Poland, they are just talking big.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.Chaos_HL21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

If Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

Agreed, but the Russian oil, Natural gas, lumber, etc are also important to the world economy and the west. Without them, the economy can go to hell as well.

Avatar image for Bigg_Boi
Bigg_Boi

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bigg_Boi
Member since 2004 • 1785 Posts
If China and India help Russia, then expect half the world's population to fall upon the US and Europe.
Avatar image for 11Marcel
11Marcel

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 11Marcel
Member since 2004 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. LJS9502_basic
And Russia should give Poland the right to defend themselves. How does that hurt Russia unless Russia plans on attacking?

If that installation is built, the west could theoratically nuke russia down, without russia being able to do anything back. Would you feel comfortable in that position? Russia would mean nothing internationally anymore, because if they would do anything that the west doesnt like, they have to retreat because of the threat from the west.

Just compare it to Russia building such a missile system on cuba. Suddenly, America can't attack its enemies with nukes anymore, but they can nuke America. Wouldn't that scare the crap out of people? Do you think it's realistic for the USA to NOT threaten Cuba?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

Chaos_HL21
Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.
Avatar image for surferdude17
surferdude17

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 surferdude17
Member since 2003 • 599 Posts

I don't think Russia would go to war over Poland, they are just talking big.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.Chaos_HL21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

If Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

Exactly correct. China is loving this economic boom and would not throw it away over Russian aggression.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

[If that installation is built, the west could theoratically nuke russia down, without russia being able to do anything back. Would you feel comfortable in that position? Russia would mean nothing internationally anymore, because if they would do anything that the west doesnt like, they have to retreat because of the threat from the west.

Just compare it to Russia building such a missile system on cuba. Suddenly, America can't attack its enemies with nukes anymore, but they can nuke America. Wouldn't that scare the crap out of people? Do you think it's realistic for the USA to NOT threaten Cuba?

11Marcel
The West isn't going to nuke Russia. And that is part of war...defense as well as offense. Perhaps if we make nukes obsolete they won't be such a problem.
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

LJS9502_basic

Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

Avatar image for Potato_Monster
Potato_Monster

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Potato_Monster
Member since 2006 • 475 Posts
Poland is a part of NATO, if Russia attacks Poland, pretty much all of Europe will come to Poland's aid
Avatar image for ElectronicMagic
ElectronicMagic

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ElectronicMagic
Member since 2005 • 5412 Posts
When people on this forum think about this, do they really think about what this could mean? I mean just stop and think about you, as an American, taking cover in storm shelters and what not, trying to take cover from Russian missiles. That's a scary thought. And even with the patriot missile system, we would still be hit pretty bad. A war like this would last a very long time, until one side or both could no longer fight anymore. Let's hope that this doesn't escalate. We shouldn't have even offered to put the system in Eastern Europe.
Avatar image for shinian
shinian

6871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 shinian
Member since 2005 • 6871 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. 11Marcel

but you yourself said Russia is only trying to defend themselves, but what are we and other countries doing putting up the missile defense systems? Its there for defense, and by Russia attacking they would be the ones who are make the aggressive move, the unnecessary move,not us or Poland.

Nukes are enough defense for nations. It's unrealistic for a nation to fire one of his nukes unless it's being fired upon. Iranians know they're going to get destroyed if they fire nukes, and so does Russia and any other still neutral nation. What the missile defense system will do is give the west such an advantage, that they can do anything they want with other nations, because there's no threat from them anymore. It gives them power over other nations.

You are overestimating the shield. There will be about 20 counter rockets placed in Poland. Russian Nuclear potential is far greater than 20 nukes.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="11Marcel"]

[If that installation is built, the west could theoratically nuke russia down, without russia being able to do anything back. Would you feel comfortable in that position? Russia would mean nothing internationally anymore, because if they would do anything that the west doesnt like, they have to retreat because of the threat from the west.

Just compare it to Russia building such a missile system on cuba. Suddenly, America can't attack its enemies with nukes anymore, but they can nuke America. Wouldn't that scare the crap out of people? Do you think it's realistic for the USA to NOT threaten Cuba?

LJS9502_basic

The West isn't going to nuke Russia. And that is part of war. Perhaps if we make nukes obsolete they won't be such a problem.

How can you be sure of that? If the west makes Russian nukes obselete, they can destroy China and Russia completely without any risk of retaliation. The balance of the world is that countries aren't encouraged to go to war because each one fears nucleur annhiliation.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

argetlam00
China isn't going to ruin their economy over a war Russia wants to start. Sorry...every country for themself. Depends on when it happens....there is oil in other parts of the world that hasn't been tapped yet. In the meantime alternate fuel sources should become a high priority.
Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts
[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

I don't think Russia would go to war over Poland, they are just talking big.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.argetlam00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

If Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

Agreed, but the Russian oil, Natural gas, lumber, etc are also important to the world economy and the west. Without them, the economy can go to hell as well.

There are other places for them. the US is a major place for Natural Gas for one (I also think it is for Lumber too). With the Trade deficit the US has with China, it wouldn't be in China's best interest in joining a war with Russia.

Avatar image for North-North
North-North

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 North-North
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts
If it were between these two countries Russia would easily win. Wouldn't be a WWIII.
Avatar image for surferdude17
surferdude17

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 surferdude17
Member since 2003 • 599 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

argetlam00

Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

China and Russia are in no way "friends". They were not during the Cold War and they are not now. They have always been extremely competitive and I don't see China rushing to help out Russia. Just think of it this way; if Russia is gone that only leaves two world powers left.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

11248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 joshrocks2245
Member since 2003 • 11248 Posts
I don't think it will be a world war. It will probably just be a war between Europe, USA vs. Russia.
I live in Canada so i'm safe, those cheap russian missiles can't reach me ^__^
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

How can you be sure of that? If the west makes Russian nukes obselete, they can destroy China and Russia completely without any risk of retaliation. The balance of the world is that countries aren't encouraged to go to war because each one fears nucleur annhiliation.

argetlam00
Not really......because if one launches a nuke....they'll be nuked even harsher. So that isn't a concern. And if Russia doesn't attack and invade other countries....why would they fear an attack? No one is going to arbitrarily nuke another country. Russia is safe....unless they do something rash.
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

How can you be sure of that? If the west makes Russian nukes obselete, they can destroy China and Russia completely without any risk of retaliation. The balance of the world is that countries aren't encouraged to go to war because each one fears nucleur annhiliation.

LJS9502_basic

Not really......because if one launches a nuke....they'll be nuked even harsher. So that isn't a concern. And if Russia doesn't attack and invade other countries....why would they fear an attack? No one is going to arbitrarily nuke another country. Russia is safe....unless they do something rash.

Yes, but Russia is completely at American mercy if this shield is made. The US pretty much rules the world. They can force Russia to sell everything to them for free or be destroyed if they wanted to. And it doesn't matter if they would be nuked harsher, Russia has 6 thousand nukes operational, thats enough to destroy this planet multiple times.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#37 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
If it were between these two countries Russia would easily win. Wouldn't be a WWIII.North-North
The point is that Poland wouldn't be alone though.
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

surferdude17

Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

China and Russia are in no way "friends". They were not during the Cold War and they are not now. They have always been extremely competitive and I don't see China rushing to help out Russia. Just think of it this way; if Russia is gone that only leaves two world powers left.

Their relations are quite strong..And how you described China feeling at Russia is exactly how China feels at the United States.

Avatar image for fillini
fillini

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 fillini
Member since 2004 • 857 Posts

Part of the agreement was for a US base to be established in Poland.

Russia is trying to gobble up thier old block countries again. The Wall Street journal has a fantastic story on the circumstances that brought about the conflict.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

Yes, but Russia is completely at American mercy if this shield is made. The US pretty much rules the world. They can force Russia to sell everything to them for free or be destroyed if they wanted to. And it doesn't matter if they would be nuked harsher, Russia has 6 thousand nukes operational, thats enough to destroy this planet multiple times.

argetlam00

I can't disagree with this decision when Russian generals threaten Poland. They make it necessary as does the last statement you made. Nukes do need to be neutralized.

Avatar image for surferdude17
surferdude17

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 surferdude17
Member since 2003 • 599 Posts
[QUOTE="surferdude17"][QUOTE="argetlam00"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

argetlam00

Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

China and Russia are in no way "friends". They were not during the Cold War and they are not now. They have always been extremely competitive and I don't see China rushing to help out Russia. Just think of it this way; if Russia is gone that only leaves two world powers left.

Their relations are quite strong..And how you described China feeling at Russia is exactly how China feels at the United States.

I agree that China sees the US the same way which is why I don't think they would get involved. I mean the Chinese can sit back and let the US and Russia destroy each other.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Yes, but Russia is completely at American mercy if this shield is made. The US pretty much rules the world. They can force Russia to sell everything to them for free or be destroyed if they wanted to. And it doesn't matter if they would be nuked harsher, Russia has 6 thousand nukes operational, thats enough to destroy this planet multiple times.

LJS9502_basic

I can't disagree with this decision when Russian generals threaten Poland. They make it necessary as does the last statement you made. Nukes do need to be neutralized.

Nukes save the world from WW3....Without them we would probably have saw 2 more World Wars since World War 2. The Cold War would ahve been World War 3 easily. Without nucleur weapons, it leaves countries completely without worry to engage in conventional warfare. Nukes are a huge peace keeping weapon IMO. The US would be nuts to try and attack RUssia when it has nukes, visa-verca. Without them, not so much.

Avatar image for ElectronicMagic
ElectronicMagic

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ElectronicMagic
Member since 2005 • 5412 Posts

Part of the agreement was for a US base to be established in Poland.

Russia is trying to gobble up thier old block countries again. The Wall Street journal has a fantastic story on the circumstances that brought about the conflict.

fillini

But if that were true, wouldn;tRussia have gone to Tbilisi days ago and taken over Georgia? Everyone knows that none of the old block countries want to be in a union with Russia again, most of them are extremely pro-western. This whole mess in Georgia is being overblown and Poland is just adding fuel to an unnecessary fire.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"][QUOTE="surferdude17"][QUOTE="argetlam00"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

IIf Russia started a war with Poland and the west China wouldn't join the war. China has too many trade agreements with the US and other western nations, and joining the Russian's war would be a major hit to their economy. That is suppose to be a defensive pact, it would only work if Russia was attacked.

surferdude17

Exactly. I was just talking to a coworker about that. China isn't going to ruin their economy over Russia...particularly when a strong Russia can become a threat to China.

Yes, but the world economy would also be in ruins without Russian oil, natural gas, etc. Also if Russia is destroyed (which it enver will be since it would nuke before its destroyed, China has absolutely NO allies). They get along very well with Russia and would probably join if Russia is attacked or needs help. Im just speculating though.

China and Russia are in no way "friends". They were not during the Cold War and they are not now. They have always been extremely competitive and I don't see China rushing to help out Russia. Just think of it this way; if Russia is gone that only leaves two world powers left.

Their relations are quite strong..And how you described China feeling at Russia is exactly how China feels at the United States.

I agree that China sees the US the same way which is why I don't think they would get involved. I mean the Chinese can sit back and let the US and Russia destroy each other.

You are just speculating. I can say the same thing about NATO. They wouldn't want to be destroyed by nukes, so they'll stay out.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

Nukes save the world from WW3....Without them we would probably have saw 2 more World Wars since World War 2. The Cold War would ahve been World War 3 easily. Without nucleur weapons, it leaves countries completely without worry to engage in conventional warfare. Nukes are a huge peace keeping weapon IMO. The US would be nuts to try and attack RUssia when it has nukes, visa-verca. Without them, not so much.

argetlam00
We've had conventional wars plenty. The reason we haven't had a world war is nothing major happened. Nukes are not the reason.
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts
[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Nukes save the world from WW3....Without them we would probably have saw 2 more World Wars since World War 2. The Cold War would ahve been World War 3 easily. Without nucleur weapons, it leaves countries completely without worry to engage in conventional warfare. Nukes are a huge peace keeping weapon IMO. The US would be nuts to try and attack RUssia when it has nukes, visa-verca. Without them, not so much.

LJS9502_basic

We've had conventional wars plenty. The reason we haven't had a world war is nothing major happened. Nukes are not the reason.

Yes they are...During the Cold War, only nukes kept the USSR and US from destroying each other. They came severely close to it, even with them.

Avatar image for gs_gear
gs_gear

3237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 gs_gear
Member since 2006 • 3237 Posts

[QUOTE="11Marcel"]All Russia is trying to do is defend themselves. It's up to the west if they really want that war. Russia is right now making clear it really doesn't want the missile system there, and that it'll go to great lengths to prevent it from being built. I personally don't think it should be built either. This will just mean a new arms race will begin. Next up china is going to build these installations. SaintLeonidas

but you yourself said Russia is only trying to defend themselves, but what are we and other countries doing putting up the missile defense systems? Its there for defense, and by Russia attacking they would be the ones who are make the aggressive move, the unnecessary move,not us or Poland.

Defending from who? There's no need for it in the first place. Probably they feel just like the Americans during the Cuban missile crisis. Fortunately Russia backed down then and I think it would be wise for the US to do the same.

Think about it, is it there for Iran? Iran can't do ****. All they are good at is at threatening Israel with photoshopped missiles. lol

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180076 Posts

Yes they are...During the Cold War, only nukes kept the USSR and US from destroying each other. They came severely close to it, even with them.

argetlam00
No. WW2 had ended and neither country trusted the other. But there wasn't much in the way of actual reasons to fight.:| Again...both countries know if they had nuked the other they would have been nuked in response. Thus, there was no win in this situation.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

[QUOTE="surferdude17"]While that is very possible, it is also very unlikely. An invasion of Poland would not only spark a war with the US, but the rest of Europe would also go against Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered.argetlam00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

What was that you were saying about "outnumbered"

The Chinese hate Russia.