yes? no? thoughts?
RPGAddict4Ever
I think women who want kids are selfish.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
Not if they go through life not wanting kids
I think this is greatly overstated in psychology... What says it has to be kids/marriage that makes you happy? We all have different personalities. Some people will regret, and some people will realize it was the best decisions of their life. In fact, I bet there's just as many people who aren't happy because they decided to have kids and are really regretting it later in life.. I know one of my cousins is.Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]I think this is greatly overstated in psychology... What says it has to be kids/marriage that makes you happy? We all have different personalities. Some people will regret, and some people will realize it was the best decisions of their life. In fact, I bet there's just as many people who aren't happy because they decided to have kids and are really regretting it later in life.. I know one of my cousins is.that's pretty awful, hope the kids never find out.Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
The_Lipscomb
Nothing worse than knowing you're unwanted
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
Nope, but I do think that people who have kids without thinking things through to be selfish.tagyhag
Nope, but I do think that people who have kids without thinking things through to be selfish.tagyhag
[
I mean, I would think both men and women who are married, but don't want kids to be somewhat selfish. I'm all for birth control and whatnot, but I've always viewed that marriage eventually results in raising a child, at least one. I could understand if one person of the marriage already had kids from a previous marriage, so in the current marriage they opt to have no kids. Or if the couple can't feasibly take care of a child or raise one for financial reasons.
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
worlock77
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
somebody hasn't studied psychology....I think this is greatly overstated in psychology... What says it has to be kids/marriage that makes you happy? We all have different personalities. Some people will regret, and some people will realize it was the best decisions of their life. In fact, I bet there's just as many people who aren't happy because they decided to have kids and are really regretting it later in life.. I know one of my cousins is.that's pretty awful, hope the kids never find out.[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"] Well, he loves the kids regardless. [QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
Nothing worse than knowing you're unwanted
It's awful, but the truth. I would make a guess and say at least half of those with kids, should have never have had them.. Many people simply rush into having kids, because it's the normal society standard to eventually have kids.. Thus, many of these people are having kids for the wrong reason.. Then once they realize the huge mistake they made, it's too late.Â[QUOTE="worlock77"]
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
somebody hasn't studied psychology....I have and frankly, for as valid as much of it can be, a lot that's been said in the name of psychology is hogwash. It is, unfortunately, a field that attracts far too much quackery. Regardless, having children is not requisite to have a sense of accomplishment.
somebody hasn't studied psychology....[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
[QUOTE="worlock77"]
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
worlock77
I have and frankly, for as valid as much of it can be, a lot that's been said in the name of psychology is hogwash. It is, unfortunately, a field that attracts far too much quackery. Regardless, having children is not requisite to have a sense of accomplishment.
i'd only modify your statement (Warlock) to say "children is not the ONLY requisite to have a sense of accomplishment, but one of many". but i agree with you though.[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]somebody hasn't studied psychology....
SaudiFury
I have and frankly, for as valid as much of it can be, a lot that's been said in the name of psychology is hogwash. It is, unfortunately, a field that attracts far too much quackery. Regardless, having children is not requisite to have a sense of accomplishment.
i'd only modify your statement (Warlock) to say "children is not the ONLY requisite to have a sense of accomplishment, but one of many". but i agree with you though.Not to nitpick, but that's a rather clumsy way of agreeing, as your modified statement pretty much says the opposite of what I said.
i'd only modify your statement (Warlock) to say "children is not the ONLY requisite to have a sense of accomplishment, but one of many". but i agree with you though.[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
I have and frankly, for as valid as much of it can be, a lot that's been said in the name of psychology is hogwash. It is, unfortunately, a field that attracts far too much quackery. Regardless, having children is not requisite to have a sense of accomplishment.
worlock77
Not to nitpick, but that's a rather clumsy way of agreeing, as your modified statement pretty much says the opposite of what I said.
Then it seems i misread your intent then. what i got from the conversation going on was people saying not having kids led to a feeling of not being accomplished later in life. from what i got that was argument of an absolute of sorts. and to me it's not the only way for people to feel accomplished or satisfied at the twilight life. I can see why old parents could feel a sense of accomplishment or satisfaction in the knowledge that they raised their kids well and got them off and going in life on the best footing possible. I just don't think it's the only way for people to feel that though. I did agree with your statement that a lot of what gets passed off as psychology is just quackry nonsense.[QUOTE="worlock77"]
[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]
Anybody else think that in the long term people are going to regret not having kids and be really depressed by it. In psycholgogy happiness in late life is determined by whether you feel like you've accomplished something. Let's be honest, outside of family the vast majority of people do not.
I guess it could be argued that they're selfish because they're giving up happiness later on for what they perceive as making them more happy in the present.
MakeMeaSammitch
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
somebody hasn't studied psychology.... I have a degree in psychology and yeah, the argument would be pretty moronic, should you make it. If you'd study psychology, you'd know that the meaning a person finds in their life is determined by that person alone; if they decided long ago that they don't want a family, they aren't going to regret not having a family (except perhaps along the lines of "I wonder what life would have been like if. . .").[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]somebody hasn't studied psychology.... I have a degree in psychology and yeah, the argument would be pretty moronic, should you make it. If you'd study psychology, you'd know that the meaning a person finds in their life is determined by that person alone; if they decided long ago that they don't want a family, they aren't going to regret not having a family (except perhaps along the lines of "I wonder what life would have been like if. . ."). This. The meaning of life is whatever the individual thinks it is.. which varies among each person.. I don't want kids, but I wonder what it would be like to have them.. but after thinking about that for a while, I always come to the same conclusion.. Shit, still feel same way about kids lol.. don't want them.[QUOTE="worlock77"]
Sure, you could argue that. It would be a moronic argument, but you could make it.
Makhaidos
No, I consider it selfish if you bring a child into this world that you will not care for, bringing it up in proverty ect. So the child will grow up being a horrible person or have a shitty life. We need to reduce birth rates, not guilt tripping women into boosting the birth rate! There are too many people as it is!
No, but I think women over 40 who have kids are. By the time the kid is 20, the woman will be in her 60s, which is the age group of many peoples' grandparents. And if their grandparents are even alive by the time the kid is 20, they'll be in their 80's or 90s. That child will be experiencing a lot of loss in their 20s and 30s. Just doesn't seem right to me.Â
People in Asia, Africa, and Latin America should really start having less kids. Having kids while you're in deep poverty also comes off as selfish to me because the kids will be entering a world of suffering. We really have more than enough people on the planet right now. There's really no reason why two countries on the planet need to have a billion people each, having 40% of the human population put together.Â
Bangladesh is the size of Iowa but has a population of about 150-160 million, which is more than Russia (140 million), the largest country on Earth by land area. It is also half the population of the US. That is beyond ridiculous. The country lies on a flood plain, which could put at least half the country underwater. I know it's a part of their culture to have lots of kids, but given the fact that their country is low-lying and poor, having a lot of kids will only exacerbate their problems.Â
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.Â
It depends on her reason for not wanting to have kids. If the reason is selfish then she would be acting selfishly, but if the reason isn't selfish (say she wants to be a nun or maybe a soldier or some similar kind of service to the common good) then it wouldn't be selfish.
That being said most European countries suffer from birth rates that are too low (for instance Germany is having some issues with its elder plan). America's birth rate overall is fairly stable but it could be a bit higher, I think our population only grows because of immigration. I heard on tv that the U.S. birth rate is currently at an average of 2.1 and that if that average were increased to 2.7 that increase would make Social Security solvent (I read somewhere else that a 5% increase in the U.S. birth rate would lead to a 7 Trillion dollar reduction in the national debt due to increased tax revenues).
No. However i do believe it's selfish to have children, while in poverty. "I want a baby" should not trump financial responsibility, and if you're unable to care for a child, you shouldn't be trying to have one.Nibroc420Most poor people in the U.S. are only poor for a little bit. I've read that only 5% of Americans are chronically poor, most people that experience poverty get out of it by two years, though this was based on 2006 figures and the economy is probably a bit worse today.
Most poor people in the U.S. are only poor for a little bit. I've read that only 5% of Americans are chronically poor, most people that experience poverty get out of it by two years, though this was based on 2006 figures and the economy is probably a bit worse today. That doesn't change my opinion.[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]No. However i do believe it's selfish to have children, while in poverty. "I want a baby" should not trump financial responsibility, and if you're unable to care for a child, you shouldn't be trying to have one.whipassmt
How can someone's reason for not having kids be selfish if they have no obligation to have kids?It depends on her reason for not wanting to have kids. If the reason is selfish then she would be acting selfishly, but if the reason isn't selfish (say she wants to be a nun or maybe a soldier or some similar kind of service to the common good) then it wouldn't be selfish.
whipassmt
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment