You guys ARE NOT going to believe this...

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"] That's a pretty dumb way of looking at things. Whatever, I'm done with this. Have fun with your robots/androids... :lol:The_Ish

Right, leave the thread without actually rebuking my argument while calling it dumb. Nice.

I thought we were talking about androids, which are the latter.

Panzer-schreck

Androids are only robots made to look like humans. If all robots that were sentient were androids, we could call Bender and android. He isn't.

That said, being a robot doesn't necessarily mean that they are made of metal and circuitry either. If you were to clone a human from a mix of many people's genes for the sole purpose of doing a specific task and constructing his/her brain so that they cannot disobey...you would have built an android. Take the Clone Troopers from Star Wars. They are not in actuality human, they are robots/androids, since they cannot disobey orders.

[QUOTE="_Kazi_"]

That scientist has completley missed the entire point of love, sexual human relationships and why people like fall in love with each other. Personally this guy couldn't be more wrong. People fall in love for so many differant reasons, and its deffinaitly not because they have the SAME personality but because they have differant personalities. Yes, people see the physical body attractive but its not just about that, and we should all no that.

Plus bangin' a robot is gross and you have to be a royal, first class, five star loser to do it.:P

P.S. - We haven't in fact got to the stage of Artificial Intelligance. A computer, or robot will never be able to think for itself, or like a human for that matter. Computers are designed to be told what to do by the user. The amount of memory, processing power and time to programme the smallest fo human reaction would take decades to do.

A.I. WILL NEVER EXIST!!!!!

wemhim

No. I'm not arrogant and i'm not saying that i know what will happen in the next 60 years, but neither do you, no one does. I am merely basing my views by looking at modern society and the advancement of computer technology.We're still telling computers what to do instead of computers doing there own thing. Do you have any solid evidence of a computer making rational, un-explanitory decisions on its own with out any human aid? Well I haven't. And i'm pretty sure thats the defintion if A.I. All computers, computer programs, robots whatever you want to call them, they have all been programmed by humans. Humans tell them what to do. We are they're conceince and they do the calculation.

A.I. is suppossed to mimic humans and there personalities and emotions, but how can it? Humans are rational, un-decisive and to a computer very slow. We couldn't be more differant.

You say that anyone how thinks they know what will happen in the next 60 years is arrogant? But then surely the scientist who stateing that in the next century we will be humping robots is arrogant as well? And from what I gather your on his side?

You haven't given much of a reply just by saying that A.I. does exist. How? Where? When? And who came up with it? If you can give me solid proof of a computer that can mimic or duplicate a human and there emotions you let me know. But looking at how computers are advancing now? We're advancing in the wrong direction for A.I.

I still stand by my statement. A.I. will never exist. And that scientist is nuts.

P.S. - I was more talking about the scientists views on love and human relationship. He states that people fall in love because they are alike. But from what I've seen, experienced and heard, it's the complete opposite. People fall in love because the other person is so much differant from them. What people see in each other when there in love is what they strive to be but know that they never could be.

I haven't left yet. But I will after this response. I really couldn't care less anymore about your argument. You will remain a virgin and these practices will be shunned by the rest of society. :PFunkdaddy13

Okay, insult me and make assumptions, without ever actually responding to my argument and call it dumb. Even better.

guy: give it to me, clown.

sexrobot: i love sex

guy: o, you're so hawt

sexrobot: i want you

guy: it's almost like i'm not a virgin

sexrobot: take my clothes off

guy: i didn't put any on you

sexrobot: i love sex

guy: i love you

sexrobot: i want you

guy:and you never argue, and I can have you in childlike forms

sexrobot: take my clothes off

[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"]

That scientist has completley missed the entire point of love, sexual human relationships and why people like fall in love with each other. Personally this guy couldn't be more wrong. People fall in love for so many differant reasons, and its deffinaitly not because they have the SAME personality but because they have differant personalities. Yes, people see the physical body attractive but its not just about that, and we should all no that.

Plus bangin' a robot is gross and you have to be a royal, first class, five star loser to do it.:P

P.S. - We haven't in fact got to the stage of Artificial Intelligance. A computer, or robot will never be able to think for itself, or like a human for that matter. Computers are designed to be told what to do by the user. The amount of memory, processing power and time to programme the smallest fo human reaction would take decades to do.

A.I. WILL NEVER EXIST!!!!!

_Kazi_

No. I'm not arrogant and i'm not saying that i know what will happen in the next 60 years, but neither do you, no one does. I am merely basing my views by looking at modern society and the advancement of computer technology.We're still telling computers what to do instead of computers doing there own thing. Do you have any solid evidence of a computer making rational, un-explanitory decisions on its own with out any human aid? Well I haven't. And i'm pretty sure thats the defintion if A.I. All computers, computer programs, robots whatever you want to call them, they have all been programmed by humans. Humans tell them what to do. We are they're conceince and they do the calculation.

A.I. is suppossed to mimic humans and there personalities and emotions, but how can it? Humans are rational, un-decisive and to a computer very slow. We couldn't be more differant.

You say that anyone how thinks they know what will happen in the next 60 years is arrogant? But then surely the scientist who stateing that in the next century we will be humping robots is arrogant as well? And from what I gather your on his side?

You haven't given much of a reply just by saying that A.I. does exist. How? Where? When? And who came up with it? If you can give me solid proof of a computer that can mimic or duplicate a human and there emotions you let me know. But looking at how computers are advancing now? We're advancing in the wrong direction for A.I.

I still stand by my statement. A.I. will never exist. And that scientist is nuts.

Mummy? was daddy an robot?Whicker89

yes, but he also was an hero.

[QUOTE="Panzer-schreck"]

I thought we were talking about androids, which are the latter.

The_Ish

Androids are only robots made to look like humans. If all robots that were sentient were androids, we could call Bender and android. He isn't.

That said, being a robot doesn't necessarily mean that they are made of metal and circuitry either. If you were to clone a human from a mix of many people's genes for the sole purpose of doing a specific task and constructing his/her brain so that they cannot disobey...you would have built an android. Take the Clone Troopers from Star Wars. They are not in actuality human, they are robots/androids, since they cannot disobey orders.

They are made to look like humans, yes. But they're also made to resemble humans in behavior...or be programmed to be better than humans in some behaviors.;)

keep in mind, most of what is being discussed is theoretical and far in the future (decades).

[QUOTE="Whicker89"]Mummy? was daddy an robot?Messer_Partei

yes, but he also was an hero.

They are made to look like humans, yes. But they're also made to resemble humans in behavior...or be programmed to be better than humans in some behaviors.;)

keep in mind, most of what is being discussed is theoretical and far in the future (decades).

Panzer-schreck

That makes them tools. Thanks.

[QUOTE="_Kazi_"][QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"]

That scientist has completley missed the entire point of love, sexual human relationships and why people like fall in love with each other. Personally this guy couldn't be more wrong. People fall in love for so many differant reasons, and its deffinaitly not because they have the SAME personality but because they have differant personalities. Yes, people see the physical body attractive but its not just about that, and we should all no that.

Plus bangin' a robot is gross and you have to be a royal, first class, five star loser to do it.:P

P.S. - We haven't in fact got to the stage of Artificial Intelligance. A computer, or robot will never be able to think for itself, or like a human for that matter. Computers are designed to be told what to do by the user. The amount of memory, processing power and time to programme the smallest fo human reaction would take decades to do.

A.I. WILL NEVER EXIST!!!!!

wemhim

No. I'm not arrogant and i'm not saying that i know what will happen in the next 60 years, but neither do you, no one does. I am merely basing my views by looking at modern society and the advancement of computer technology.We're still telling computers what to do instead of computers doing there own thing. Do you have any solid evidence of a computer making rational, un-explanitory decisions on its own with out any human aid? Well I haven't. And i'm pretty sure thats the defintion if A.I. All computers, computer programs, robots whatever you want to call them, they have all been programmed by humans. Humans tell them what to do. We are they're conceince and they do the calculation.

A.I. is suppossed to mimic humans and there personalities and emotions, but how can it? Humans are rational, un-decisive and to a computer very slow. We couldn't be more differant.

You say that anyone how thinks they know what will happen in the next 60 years is arrogant? But then surely the scientist who stateing that in the next century we will be humping robots is arrogant as well? And from what I gather your on his side?

You haven't given much of a reply just by saying that A.I. does exist. How? Where? When? And who came up with it? If you can give me solid proof of a computer that can mimic or duplicate a human and there emotions you let me know. But looking at how computers are advancing now? We're advancing in the wrong direction for A.I.

I still stand by my statement. A.I. will never exist. And that scientist is nuts.

Well could you elaborate on what MGS acctually is? From what I know the defintion of A.I. is that a man-made creation can mimic or duplicate himself. That includes personality and emotion, and thats impossible to programme. Even in 60 years from now.

Anyway, I was more touching on the scientists view on love and human relationship than A.I. He states that people fall in love because of similarity between personality. But from what I've seen, heard and experienced its the complete opposite. People fall in love because they see the person they strive to be or the qualities of that person that they respect, but know that theycould never be them, or like them. Thus they fall in love. Bu hey , thats what I think love is. I'm sure you have your own defintion.

[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"][QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"]

That scientist has completley missed the entire point of love, sexual human relationships and why people like fall in love with each other. Personally this guy couldn't be more wrong. People fall in love for so many differant reasons, and its deffinaitly not because they have the SAME personality but because they have differant personalities. Yes, people see the physical body attractive but its not just about that, and we should all no that.

Plus bangin' a robot is gross and you have to be a royal, first class, five star loser to do it.:P

P.S. - We haven't in fact got to the stage of Artificial Intelligance. A computer, or robot will never be able to think for itself, or like a human for that matter. Computers are designed to be told what to do by the user. The amount of memory, processing power and time to programme the smallest fo human reaction would take decades to do.

A.I. WILL NEVER EXIST!!!!!

_Kazi_

No. I'm not arrogant and i'm not saying that i know what will happen in the next 60 years, but neither do you, no one does. I am merely basing my views by looking at modern society and the advancement of computer technology.We're still telling computers what to do instead of computers doing there own thing. Do you have any solid evidence of a computer making rational, un-explanitory decisions on its own with out any human aid? Well I haven't. And i'm pretty sure thats the defintion if A.I. All computers, computer programs, robots whatever you want to call them, they have all been programmed by humans. Humans tell them what to do. We are they're conceince and they do the calculation.

A.I. is suppossed to mimic humans and there personalities and emotions, but how can it? Humans are rational, un-decisive and to a computer very slow. We couldn't be more differant.

You say that anyone how thinks they know what will happen in the next 60 years is arrogant? But then surely the scientist who stateing that in the next century we will be humping robots is arrogant as well? And from what I gather your on his side?

You haven't given much of a reply just by saying that A.I. does exist. How? Where? When? And who came up with it? If you can give me solid proof of a computer that can mimic or duplicate a human and there emotions you let me know. But looking at how computers are advancing now? We're advancing in the wrong direction for A.I.

I still stand by my statement. A.I. will never exist. And that scientist is nuts.

Well could you elaborate on what MGS acctually is? From what I know the defintion of A.I. is that a man-made creation can mimic or duplicate himself. That includes personality and emotion, and thats impossible to programme. Even in 60 years from now.

Anyway, I was more touching on the scientists view on love and human relationship than A.I. I edited my last post if you want to read it.

[QUOTE="_Kazi_"][QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"][QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="_Kazi_"]

That scientist has completley missed the entire point of love, sexual human relationships and why people like fall in love with each other. Personally this guy couldn't be more wrong. People fall in love for so many differant reasons, and its deffinaitly not because they have the SAME personality but because they have differant personalities. Yes, people see the physical body attractive but its not just about that, and we should all no that.

Plus bangin' a robot is gross and you have to be a royal, first class, five star loser to do it.:P

P.S. - We haven't in fact got to the stage of Artificial Intelligance. A computer, or robot will never be able to think for itself, or like a human for that matter. Computers are designed to be told what to do by the user. The amount of memory, processing power and time to programme the smallest fo human reaction would take decades to do.

A.I. WILL NEVER EXIST!!!!!

wemhim

No. I'm not arrogant and i'm not saying that i know what will happen in the next 60 years, but neither do you, no one does. I am merely basing my views by looking at modern society and the advancement of computer technology.We're still telling computers what to do instead of computers doing there own thing. Do you have any solid evidence of a computer making rational, un-explanitory decisions on its own with out any human aid? Well I haven't. And i'm pretty sure thats the defintion if A.I. All computers, computer programs, robots whatever you want to call them, they have all been programmed by humans. Humans tell them what to do. We are they're conceince and they do the calculation.

A.I. is suppossed to mimic humans and there personalities and emotions, but how can it? Humans are rational, un-decisive and to a computer very slow. We couldn't be more differant.

You say that anyone how thinks they know what will happen in the next 60 years is arrogant? But then surely the scientist who stateing that in the next century we will be humping robots is arrogant as well? And from what I gather your on his side?

You haven't given much of a reply just by saying that A.I. does exist. How? Where? When? And who came up with it? If you can give me solid proof of a computer that can mimic or duplicate a human and there emotions you let me know. But looking at how computers are advancing now? We're advancing in the wrong direction for A.I.

I still stand by my statement. A.I. will never exist. And that scientist is nuts.

Well could you elaborate on what MGS acctually is? From what I know the defintion of A.I. is that a man-made creation can mimic or duplicate himself. That includes personality and emotion, and thats impossible to programme. Even in 60 years from now.

Anyway, I was more touching on the scientists view on love and human relationship than A.I. I edited my last post if you want to read it.

Yeah I just chose that avatar from random.:P But that game still requires the user to entire commands and the computer obeys.

Robot sex. Sounds good ;)Dethshoot

Yeah. ;)

[QUOTE="Panzer-schreck"][QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="Panzer-schreck"][QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="Panzer-schreck"]

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"]Gross...snakebeater3

Not so much if the androids are human like. Imagine something like android 18...you can't even tell she's an android.

That's the thing. I think the technology would be advanced enough so that you couldn't tell the difference many years from now.

Having sex with a "robot" is disgusting. I'm talking androids here.

Looking at this objectively, the median girl of most population samples I would have to say is probably around 6-7 on the "hotness" scale out of 10. One is lucky if he mananges to get an 8 or higher in bed. Their skill in bed could be anything from 1-10.

So let's say that an optimal realistic situation that an "average" guy can get is a combined score of the two categories of 16 or 17 or so out of 20.

Let's say technology engineers a 10 on both scales, giving you a 20/20. Let's say that the android also has been programmed with a great personality.

Still disgusting? I don't think so.

wow wierdo. try getting a real girl.

:|

I think cloning is a better idea. Id much rather have sex with a clone than with a robot. Instead of having to program a robot, you could just teach a clone as it grew up. Of course, you would have to wait for it to grow up...lobodob

That's a bad idea if I've ever seen one.

WTF.....that is just .........ahhhhhnursey1

What type of "ahhhhhh"? ;)

[QUOTE="KingsofQueens"]

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="KingsofQueens"][QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"]:lol: You guys are all pervs... Seriously, only a real nerd would have sex with a robot and not a real woman.Funkdaddy13

Asking a pointless question where there is no way of proving the answer on a forum. Now that's class!:lol:

You're not helping yourself, "Cassanova." And ironically, you've already made yourself look insecure based upon your responses :lol:

[QUOTE="KingsofQueens"]

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="KingsofQueens"][QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"]:lol: You guys are all pervs... Seriously, only a real nerd would have sex with a robot and not a real woman.Funkdaddy13

Asking a pointless question where there is no way of proving the answer on a forum. Now that's class!:lol:

Just because I've been discussing Karl Popper's impact on the scientific theory all ****ing day, I'll bring it to this thread.

Your theory: All guys who want to have sex with androids are virgins.

Theories cannot be proved. But they can be disproved.

I've had sexual intercourse before with a girl before. I would want to have sex with an android. Theory disproved.

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="KingsofQueens"]

[QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"][QUOTE="KingsofQueens"][QUOTE="Funkdaddy13"]:lol: You guys are all pervs... Seriously, only a real nerd would have sex with a robot and not a real woman.Panzer-schreck

Asking a pointless question where there is no way of proving the answer on a forum. Now that's class!:lol:

Just because I've been discussing Karl Popper's impact on the scientific theory all ****ing day, I'll bring it to this thread.

Your theory: All guys who want to have sex with androids are virgins.

Theories cannot be proved. But they can be disproved.

I've had sexual intercourse before with a girl before. I would want to have sex with an android. Theory disproved.

I'm not gonna say how many girls I've had sex with but let's just say i'm not a virgin and I think it would be awesome to sex up an android :D

[QUOTE="Panzer-schreck"]

Just because I've been discussing Karl Popper's impact on the scientific theory all ****ing day, I'll bring it to this thread.

Your theory: All guys who want to have sex with androids are virgins.

Theories cannot be proved. But they can be disproved.

I've had sexual intercourse before with a girl before. I would want to have sex with an android. Theory disproved.

import_fighter1

I'm not gonna say how many girls I've had sex with but let's just say i'm not a virgin and I think it would be awesome to sex up an android :D

"Chii"?...

I think cloning is a better idea. Id much rather have sex with a clone than with a robot. Instead of having to program a robot, you could just teach a clone as it grew up. Of course, you would have to wait for it to grow up...lobodob

Aren't clones just like humans though (assuming we're talking about cloning humans here!)? So basically you would get cloned humans and breed them to be sex slaves? That seems kind of wrong. If you're going to do that, why not just take kids put up for adoption. That sounds wrong on so many levels, but isn't cloning kind of the same thing? The clone wouldn't have a choice, just like the unwanted child.

I'm going to stop now before I get investigated by the FBI for all sorts of wrong things that I've just thought up. This is the first time I've explored the off topic board. I don't think I'll be coming back!

[QUOTE="lobodob"]I think cloning is a better idea. Id much rather have sex with a clone than with a robot. Instead of having to program a robot, you could just teach a clone as it grew up. Of course, you would have to wait for it to grow up...pandadude01

Aren't clones just like humans though (assuming we're talking about cloning humans here!)? So basically you would get cloned humans and breed them to be sex slaves? That seems kind of wrong.

QFT

You fail at life if you get married to and have sex with... a robot :?Tezcatlipoca666

Android>>>>>>robot. Get it right :P

.K-E316

So what would we call people who have sex mainly with robots?SinkO

Robofiles.

sex with a piece of metal.... If im still alive, im going to start the first robot-marriatal rebellion to destroy the sex robot factories which will ultimately lead to the survival of the human race. So if you want to join me, contact my GS account in 47 years.Montaya

Look, now you've made Chii cry. I hope you're happy.