Another sad day in the modern age, anti piracy taken too far

  • 114 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#51 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Hell last time i heard that they sued a pub called "the hobbit" becasue that pub which existed for more than 20 years was hurting their copyrights of the LOTR franchise.dakan45

We have a pub in our neighboring city (Bossier) that is named Bilbo Baggins'. Which I am sure isn't too far behind the pub you mentioned.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#52 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

If you are American you should do something about it.

dakan45

I must point out that in The States, that Dissent is no longer allowed on stage, and protesting is basically illegal.

Also freedom of speech is extremely one-sided now.

IE West Boro baptist church gets freedom of speech vote (in their favor) by the Supreme Court, when protest a soldier's funeral, thanking "god" for IEDs because the soldier was gay.

Not even 2 years later, 99 percent have their freedom of speech severely limited by the same Supreme Court.

I would love to do something about it, but problem is, what can we do, that doesn't give them the chance to call us criminals and lock us in a cage!?!

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#53 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Yup, so much praise for the US when in reallity its full of crap, sorry but its true.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#54 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Yup, so much praise for the US when in reallity its full of crap, sorry but its true.dakan45

No need to apologize my friend, I live in the states, but I am not blinded by the BS rhetoric we are exposed to everyday.

Cause what you say is true, and I don't hate my country, I would love to be proud of it, but that is becoming more difficult all the time.

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts

I feel lucky that I live in Europe! Any legislation like that would never hope to make it through the EU parliament, SOPA and ACTA were both turned down, and others will follow and be turned down as well. America land of the free my @ss!

QQabitmoar
mega corps have deep pockets to fund these anti-piracy schemes. You can be sure whatever good ol' USA does to the internet will ripple into Europe.
Avatar image for MacBoomStick
MacBoomStick

1822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MacBoomStick
Member since 2011 • 1822 Posts

So everybody should cancel their ISP. Is there a list of ISP's partaking in this? If you all threaten to switch providers or cancel they wont do crap They want money too.

Avatar image for Kane04
Kane04

2115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Kane04
Member since 2006 • 2115 Posts
I think the problem is the "traditional" music and movie industry is that now a days the quality content is so little that they need squeeze every bit of it. When people like Alex Day, Ray William Johnson and other good old boys sit in front of their computers making videos for YouTube and are able to generate more income than the "professionals" with all the marketing backing that up the industry should be scared. Without trying to sound like a hipster, frankly who cares? Barely anything good is on the theater's or record stores anyway. For me they can keep their content, I rather watch original "amateur" one and those yes, are worth your money... well some are.
Avatar image for lockjaw333
lockjaw333

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 lockjaw333
Member since 2003 • 1743 Posts
Wait, so why would I not just cancel my service if they try to threaten me with copyright infringements? For the record I buy all of my games and music, but lord knows how many copyrights we violate just by surfing the internet everyday. Honestly I find it hard to believe that companies that provide a SERVICE would do something like this. What is the threat of "limiting bandwidth until customers sign a notice" when I could just cancel my service if they try it? Realistically we have the power, not them. We pay them for a service, and if they dont provide that service to what we expect then we won't continue to pay. I doubt this will work out. I only see this possibly identifying users who have huge amounts of illegal traffic and large amounts of pirated media. And even then, the worst they can do is a slap on the wrist and a "please stop doing that", cuz they want that money they are paying them! Again I don't pirate, but this is laughable.
Avatar image for quebec946
quebec946

1607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 quebec946
Member since 2007 • 1607 Posts

that what you call lawful evil

enforcing a law with a fist of tyranny.

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts

So everybody should cancel their ISP. Is there a list of ISP's partaking in this? If you all threaten to switch providers or cancel they wont do crap They want money too.

MacBoomStick

I would cancel my ISP if they took part in a similar scheme in the UK. I'd go with a smaller ISP that doesnt have to comply with stupid laws. My entire internet activity being scrutinised is a big-brother step too far.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#61 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

My friend is advising me to setup something called a putty proxy, before July 12th.

As this is starting to really bother me. Now I don't pirate, but anyone with a working brain can tell this just doesn't involve piracy, as well as won't be the final act in this either.

Problem is, where I am if I get rid of My ISP, I don't know of any available in my area that isn't on that list.

Comcast, AT&T. Both on that list. Both are the only providers in my area, that I know of. (that doesn't have something ridiculous, like an atrociously low bandwidth cap)

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="MacBoomStick"]

So everybody should cancel their ISP. Is there a list of ISP's partaking in this? If you all threaten to switch providers or cancel they wont do crap They want money too.

bonafidetk

I would cancel my ISP if they took part in a similar scheme in the UK. I'd go with a smaller ISP that doesnt have to comply with stupid laws. My entire internet activity being scrutinised is a big-brother step too far.

You'd still have to finish paying for the duration of your contract unfortunately. :(
Avatar image for Sentinel112
Sentinel112

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Sentinel112
Member since 2006 • 571 Posts
The USA is so rotten down the core. It has become a foul and decadent place. A perversion for what it once stood. Moral Decay reigns supreme. An unstoppable truck on the highway to Hell. How the majority of american civilians are so blinded that they can not see they are being ruled by a race I shall not name. I call them the universal enemies of the truth since in the use of lies and deceit, lies their greatest strength. They practically hold every key position in society and love to apply Hegelian Dialects to advance their world conquest.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"] Hell last time i heard that they sued a pub called "the hobbit" becasue that pub which existed for more than 20 years was hurting their copyrights of the LOTR franchise.Lach0121

We have a pub in our neighboring city (Bossier) that is named Bilbo Baggins'. Which I am sure isn't too far behind the pub you mentioned.

....that....is.....awesome

Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

seems crazy that ISPs would go for this i mean its only gonna hurt them a ton. Not only is all that tracking a massive undertaking but the amount of pirates is so high and many people do it chronically. If they really start harassing and going after all of these people they are gonna lose metric tons of customers. Notice how none of them said they would actually terminate service because they know it would be a disaster if they just started cutting people off. Worst of all is that it wont stop anything pirates are still gonna pirate.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#66 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="Sentinel112"]The USA is so rotten down the core. It has become a foul and decadent place. A perversion for what it once stood. Moral Decay reigns supreme. An unstoppable truck on the highway to Hell. How the majority of american civilians are so blinded that they can not see they are being ruled by a race I shall not name. I call them the universal enemies of the truth since in the use of lies and deceit, lies their greatest strength. They practically hold every key position in society and love to apply Hegelian Dialects to advance their world conquest.

Thats becasue most americans are brainwashed with being "Real americans" and proudly wearing a flag pin on ther clothes.
Avatar image for Travis_Odell
Travis_Odell

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Travis_Odell
Member since 2008 • 1775 Posts

Hearing the rich **** about piracy makes the poor want to pirate more.

Avatar image for Falconoffury
Falconoffury

1722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Falconoffury
Member since 2003 • 1722 Posts

I wouldn't say that the USA is rotten to the core, but it is too politically influenced by huge corporations, rather than the people. Consumer protection laws are far weaker in the USA than in Europe, because they hurt business. Conservatives would argue that free markets work best, but the markets are nowhere near free in the USA. Laws favor big business. I don't know what it is going to take to really change that.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#69 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="WizardGlass"][QUOTE="neo_87"][QUOTE="WizardGlass"] it doesnt stop pirates.... just use a private tracker torrent site...you will never be caught.

Why are you promoting piracy? Why would I do such a thing if I can buy the original game and help the game developers? I am not a thief.

did i say i was? you are a little dramatic. it isnt good for anyone. pirates just use private trackers.... end of problem. thena ll that happens is the legits get spied on, and the pirates continue to pirate.

exactly.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#71 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Its really sickening to see our so called elected leaders sit by and enable this to happen. The rich treating all their customers as criminals, to make sure they keep getting that hyper capitalist flow of "god" money.

Of course these are the same leaders that enable the war on drugs, which has done nothing but turn millions of (non-violent people) into criminals and on their record for the rest of their life, as well as great contribute to our national debt.

The same leaders who have us waging war on other countries (for various reasons, freedom NOT being one of them) that war machine has put us in so much debt it isn't even funny.

Have removed due process for its citizens, instated the Patriot Act. Removed more rights and liberties than any "terrorist" orginization has.

Supreme court rulled that Money is speech (power), and that corporations now have the rights of citizens. (if you don't see the problem there, open your eyes)

^^ We can't count on Government to step in and do whats right. (remember they tried SOPA, and PIPA)

I am outraged at this, and no I am not a pirate.

IF transparencyis what is called for on the private citizen, I demand that it also be applied to these corporations that rule us, as well as the government they use as a tool to do so.

Lach0121
Haha well said. I'm sorry, it's no laughing matter but I couldn't help but read this and agree with you on all levels. Funny you mention the Patriot Act, and one of the things it can do is shut you up and throw you in prison for speaking or knowing the truth. No trial. No hearing.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#72 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Its really sickening to see our so called elected leaders sit by and enable this to happen. The rich treating all their customers as criminals, to make sure they keep getting that hyper capitalist flow of "god" money.

Of course these are the same leaders that enable the war on drugs, which has done nothing but turn millions of (non-violent people) into criminals and on their record for the rest of their life, as well as great contribute to our national debt.

The same leaders who have us waging war on other countries (for various reasons, freedom NOT being one of them) that war machine has put us in so much debt it isn't even funny.

Have removed due process for its citizens, instated the Patriot Act. Removed more rights and liberties than any "terrorist" orginization has.

Supreme court rulled that Money is speech (power), and that corporations now have the rights of citizens. (if you don't see the problem there, open your eyes)

^^ We can't count on Government to step in and do whats right. (remember they tried SOPA, and PIPA)

I am outraged at this, and no I am not a pirate.

IF transparencyis what is called for on the private citizen, I demand that it also be applied to these corporations that rule us, as well as the government they use as a tool to do so.

Elann2008

Haha well said. I'm sorry, it's no laughing matter but I couldn't help but read this and agree with you on all levels. Funny you mention the Patriot Act, and one of the things it can do is shut you up and throw you in prison for speaking or knowing the truth. No trial. No hearing.

Thx.

Yes this is why I can't help but cringe when I hear some of these blind patriotic people (or the politician's on stage) start talking about Freedom, or "free country."

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="NerubianWeaver"]There are many ways to bypass it 1) use VPN 2) use usenet 3) stick with private trackers + seedbox

when the hardware you're running through is 'compromised' stuff like VPNs aren't safe - we use some products at work that can crack open people's SSLVPN traffic and watch what they're doing inside. they sign their rights away because it's the office connection so i don't think the ISPs could get away with it, but the capability IS out there.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Thats totally bs, and they are walking a fine line of breaking the interent privacy act. It still will not stop piracy. But its a sad statment when pirates are hurting no one in reality and these people have nothing to better do with your time. You have billions of dollars now go shut up and go play on your yaht and go fly around the world in your G6 and leave people alone. They are causing nothing but hatred for the industries

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#75 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Thats totally bs, and they are walking a fine line of breaking the interent privacy act. It still will not stop piracy. But its a sad statment when pirates are hurting no one in reality and these people have nothing to better do with your time. You have billions of dollars now go shut up and go play on your yaht and go fly around the world in your G6 and leave people alone. They are causing nothing but hatred for the industries

James161324
what he said. So they got our money, they reinforced the indurtry and now they want to control the internet so they make more money, wtf? they dont wanna live in this planet anymore and building spaceships?
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts
terrible just terrible
Avatar image for GLaDoSxxx
GLaDoSxxx

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 GLaDoSxxx
Member since 2012 • 181 Posts

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/15/american-isps-to-launch-massive-copyright-spying-scheme-on-july-12/

http://www.exophrine.com/2012/03/your-isps-spying-on-you-so-dont-be.html

The vagueness about this is depressing, and scary.

So do you violate this if you happen to watch a Youtube video uploaded that isn't copywritten, or infringes?

Once again the Music industry, and Movie industry want to see us squirm under the thumb, which is why I will have all my music in CC (without blood sucking labels, publishers)

This is becoming ridiculous.

If piracy/censor/and now SPY threads are not supposed to be in this section of forums, please mods, move it to the correct location.

Lach0121

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#78 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/15/american-isps-to-launch-massive-copyright-spying-scheme-on-july-12/

http://www.exophrine.com/2012/03/your-isps-spying-on-you-so-dont-be.html

The vagueness about this is depressing, and scary.

So do you violate this if you happen to watch a Youtube video uploaded that isn't copywritten, or infringes?

Once again the Music industry, and Movie industry want to see us squirm under the thumb, which is why I will have all my music in CC (without blood sucking labels, publishers)

This is becoming ridiculous.

If piracy/censor/and now SPY threads are not supposed to be in this section of forums, please mods, move it to the correct location.

GLaDoSxxx

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

Avatar image for GLaDoSxxx
GLaDoSxxx

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 GLaDoSxxx
Member since 2012 • 181 Posts

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/15/american-isps-to-launch-massive-copyright-spying-scheme-on-july-12/

http://www.exophrine.com/2012/03/your-isps-spying-on-you-so-dont-be.html

The vagueness about this is depressing, and scary.

So do you violate this if you happen to watch a Youtube video uploaded that isn't copywritten, or infringes?

Once again the Music industry, and Movie industry want to see us squirm under the thumb, which is why I will have all my music in CC (without blood sucking labels, publishers)

This is becoming ridiculous.

If piracy/censor/and now SPY threads are not supposed to be in this section of forums, please mods, move it to the correct location.

Lach0121

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

GLaDoSxxx

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

:lol: Wow....yeah...umm...no

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#81 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

GLaDoSxxx

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

If you truly believe that, then you don't understand the implications of this, their next step, or their end-game.

This has little to do with piracy, this has to do with censorship! IF you don't see that, them maybe you should actually understand what this is about, before posting with such limited knowledge of the subject. No offense friend.

Avatar image for GLaDoSxxx
GLaDoSxxx

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 GLaDoSxxx
Member since 2012 • 181 Posts

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

wis3boi

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

:lol: Wow....yeah...umm...no

A valid argument. You've proven your point well. (please note the sarcasm).

Note that I believe that people have too many damned freedoms in this country to begin with. Allowing them to hide behind an internet connection for illegal activities has to stop. And your IP watching what you download is just the way to stop it. I also think that there should be cameras on every street corner watching all the criminals. No one should be allowed to have a firearm unless they are military or law enforcement. I think that a national curfew should be enacted at midnight for everyone not working those hours to cut down on criminal activities. Oh, and I LOVE Obamacare. So you can all shut up and stop trying to make me think like you criminals do. You're all wrong.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#83 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

GLaDoSxxx

:lol: Wow....yeah...umm...no

A valid argument. You've proven your point well. (please note the sarcasm).

Note that I believe that people have too many damned freedoms in this country to begin with. Allowing them to hide behind an internet connection for illegal activities has to stop. And your IP watching what you download is just the way to stop it. I also think that there should be cameras on every street corner watching all the criminals. No one should be allowed to have a firearm unless they are military or law enforcement. I think that a national curfew should be enacted at midnight for everyone not working those hours to cut down on criminal activities. Oh, and I LOVE Obamacare. So you can all shut up and stop trying to make me think like you criminals do. You're all wrong.

Every single person in this country is a criminal... (everyone you know) You don't always know your breaking the "law." 90% of the time, people don't get caught doing it. But NO ONE, and I meanNo one,doesn't break the law!

Either troll, or just ignorant... Choose your poison here.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

GLaDoSxxx

:lol: Wow....yeah...umm...no

A valid argument. You've proven your point well. (please note the sarcasm).

Note that I believe that people have too many damned freedoms in this country to begin with. Allowing them to hide behind an internet connection for illegal activities has to stop. And your IP watching what you download is just the way to stop it. I also think that there should be cameras on every street corner watching all the criminals. No one should be allowed to have a firearm unless they are military or law enforcement. I think that a national curfew should be enacted at midnight for everyone not working those hours to cut down on criminal activities. Oh, and I LOVE Obamacare. So you can all shut up and stop trying to make me think like you criminals do. You're all wrong.

Move to the UK, specifically London?
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#85 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

:lol: Wow....yeah...umm...no

Hexagon_777

A valid argument. You've proven your point well. (please note the sarcasm).

Note that I believe that people have too many damned freedoms in this country to begin with. Allowing them to hide behind an internet connection for illegal activities has to stop. And your IP watching what you download is just the way to stop it. I also think that there should be cameras on every street corner watching all the criminals. No one should be allowed to have a firearm unless they are military or law enforcement. I think that a national curfew should be enacted at midnight for everyone not working those hours to cut down on criminal activities. Oh, and I LOVE Obamacare. So you can all shut up and stop trying to make me think like you criminals do. You're all wrong.

Move to the UK, specifically London?

Actually I think he would be more at home, living in a prison, at least by his description above.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

This is awesome news! Go get them boys!!!!

GLaDoSxxx

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

Its not really its a statement that the goverment will allow Companies to controll the interent. Most torrents are illegal, but its also used for alot of good, p2p is a free way to distrubute mods, free music and etc. I can understand this movement if it was the 90's where the music indusutry was being hurt by napster and what not. But these indusuturys keep growing. And the sadest part most of the creators really couldn't care about piracy, they would prefer you would buy it but they are happy people are enjoying the content they make.

Plus piracy is the only thing keeping them from charging what ever they want. If there is nothing keeping them in check, no piracy. Congrats that dvd you want can now be 40 dollars, that game 100 dollars.

If this is allowed and goes on, they are watching everything you do. It is the end of freedom on the interent. The idiots in DC buy to much in the lies, and don't relize what they are starting. O and everyone has something to hide.

Avatar image for IxX3xil3d0n3XxI
IxX3xil3d0n3XxI

1508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#87 IxX3xil3d0n3XxI
Member since 2006 • 1508 Posts
Losing faith in this country. Its just the poor getting poorer while the rich get richer.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

If you are American you should do something about it.

Lach0121

I must point out that in The States, that Dissent is no longer allowed on stage, and protesting is basically illegal.

Also freedom of speech is extremely one-sided now.

IE West Boro baptist church gets freedom of speech vote (in their favor) by the Supreme Court, when protest a soldier's funeral, thanking "god" for IEDs because the soldier was gay.

Not even 2 years later, 99 percent have their freedom of speech severely limited by the same Supreme Court.

I would love to do something about it, but problem is, what can we do, that doesn't give them the chance to call us criminals and lock us in a cage!?!

The Westboro Baptist Church actually plans ahead and applies for permits to conduct their hateful protests legally. The Occupy Wall Street movement just shows up and camps out in front of businesses. That is the difference. If you want to organize an OWS protest in your city, you only need to apply for a permit. There is nothing that says you cannot protest.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

In no way, shape, or form is this "awesome news."

James161324

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

Its not really its a statement that the goverment will allow Companies to controll the interent. Most torrents are illegal, but its also used for alot of good, p2p is a free way to distrubute mods, free music and etc. I can understand this movement if it was the 90's where the music indusutry was being hurt by napster and what not. But these indusuturys keep growing. And the sadest part most of the creators really couldn't care about piracy, they would prefer you would buy it but they are happy people are enjoying the content they make.

Plus piracy is the only thing keeping them from charging what ever they want. If there is nothing keeping them in check, no piracy. Congrats that dvd you want can now be 40 dollars, that game 100 dollars.

If this is allowed and goes on, they are watching everything you do. It is the end of freedom on the interent. The idiots in DC buy to much in the lies, and don't relize what they are starting. O and everyone has something to hide.

Why don't you just find a new ISP if you don't like the way your ISP is handling your internet? Why should the government tell an ISP what deals they can or cannot make with copyright holders? At the end of the day, the consumer has the power here. If you don't like it, stop paying for it.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#90 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Am I the only one who thinks this is good for people like us who actually buy games and other stuff like movies and music. I hope something similar is implemented in India because just banning the torrent sites although has helped curb piracy but has not completely abolished it. I think the same should be done in all countries.

neo_87

I agree, access to culture and information should be allowed only to those who can pay for it - that is if the providers even bother to supply it. Meanwhile the rest can rot away. After all, lots of stupid people = lots of cheap labour. It's not like information and services are the 21st centuries most valuable industries.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

[QUOTE="GLaDoSxxx"]

Sure it is. Unless you have something to hide.

PurpleMan5000

Its not really its a statement that the goverment will allow Companies to controll the interent. Most torrents are illegal, but its also used for alot of good, p2p is a free way to distrubute mods, free music and etc. I can understand this movement if it was the 90's where the music indusutry was being hurt by napster and what not. But these indusuturys keep growing. And the sadest part most of the creators really couldn't care about piracy, they would prefer you would buy it but they are happy people are enjoying the content they make.

Plus piracy is the only thing keeping them from charging what ever they want. If there is nothing keeping them in check, no piracy. Congrats that dvd you want can now be 40 dollars, that game 100 dollars.

If this is allowed and goes on, they are watching everything you do. It is the end of freedom on the interent. The idiots in DC buy to much in the lies, and don't relize what they are starting. O and everyone has something to hide.

Why don't you just find a new ISP if you don't like the way your ISP is handling your internet? Why should the government tell an ISP what deals they can or cannot make with copyright holders? At the end of the day, the consumer has the power here. If you don't like it, stop paying for it.

I can't i have no choice, i'm stuck with Time Warner or Verizion. The goverment job is to enforce the laws they made, and i don't know about you but this walks exteremly close to breaking the interenet privacy act. The problem is if nothing is done, where does it stop. You saw the crazy things that SOPA or Pipa could do. This is one step closer to companies having power to censor, what SOPA would have given them.

Avatar image for Gamesterpheonix
Gamesterpheonix

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 Gamesterpheonix
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts
The tech world needs to protest this, stop this, fight this and scream out loud. How come we're not hearing about this til now? How come we arent seeing more rage?
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#93 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

If you are American you should do something about it.

PurpleMan5000

I must point out that in The States, that Dissent is no longer allowed on stage, and protesting is basically illegal.

Also freedom of speech is extremely one-sided now.

IE West Boro baptist church gets freedom of speech vote (in their favor) by the Supreme Court, when protest a soldier's funeral, thanking "god" for IEDs because the soldier was gay.

Not even 2 years later, 99 percent have their freedom of speech severely limited by the same Supreme Court.

I would love to do something about it, but problem is, what can we do, that doesn't give them the chance to call us criminals and lock us in a cage!?!

The Westboro Baptist Church actually plans ahead and applies for permits to conduct their hateful protests legally. The Occupy Wall Street movement just shows up and camps out in front of businesses. That is the difference. If you want to organize an OWS protest in your city, you only need to apply for a permit. There is nothing that says you cannot protest.

Yeah because they got a permit, that makes it A-OK :roll: (legally you are correct, but then again anyone with a brain knows "current" legality is a freaking joke!)

Oh and because the state/city/parish/county/district will sure give anyone a permit who wants to protest right?!?

Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple.

Lastly, having to buy permits to exercise freedom of speech in the so called "free country." :lol: LOL

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

I must point out that in The States, that Dissent is no longer allowed on stage, and protesting is basically illegal.

Also freedom of speech is extremely one-sided now.

IE West Boro baptist church gets freedom of speech vote (in their favor) by the Supreme Court, when protest a soldier's funeral, thanking "god" for IEDs because the soldier was gay.

Not even 2 years later, 99 percent have their freedom of speech severely limited by the same Supreme Court.

I would love to do something about it, but problem is, what can we do, that doesn't give them the chance to call us criminals and lock us in a cage!?!

Lach0121

The Westboro Baptist Church actually plans ahead and applies for permits to conduct their hateful protests legally. The Occupy Wall Street movement just shows up and camps out in front of businesses. That is the difference. If you want to organize an OWS protest in your city, you only need to apply for a permit. There is nothing that says you cannot protest.

Yeah because they got a permit, that makes it A-OK :roll: (legally you are correct, but then again anyone with a brain knows "current" legality is a freaking joke!)

Oh and because the state/city/parish/county/district will sure give anyone a permit who wants to protest right?!?

Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple.

Lastly, having to buy permits to exercise freedom of speech in the so called "free country." :lol: LOL

I agree that the permitting system is a bit ridiculous, but I was just pointing out that your comparison of Fred Phelps' clan to OWS wasn't exactly apples to apples. It also makes sense that a city would be able to tell you where to set your protest up and how long you can continue protesting, within reason. If you have a bunch of protesters camp out in front of a business, that protest will damage that business's ability to attract customers. Also, this does not give anyone the ability to spy on "any" citizen. The ISP simply has the ability to spy on its own paying customers and it loses that ability as soon as those customers find somebody else to provide them internet service. It truly does suck for those who do not have the option to switch to an ISP who chooses not to spy on them, though.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#96 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"] The Westboro Baptist Church actually plans ahead and applies for permits to conduct their hateful protests legally. The Occupy Wall Street movement just shows up and camps out in front of businesses. That is the difference. If you want to organize an OWS protest in your city, you only need to apply for a permit. There is nothing that says you cannot protest.PurpleMan5000

Yeah because they got a permit, that makes it A-OK :roll: (legally you are correct, but then again anyone with a brain knows "current" legality is a freaking joke!)

Oh and because the state/city/parish/county/district will sure give anyone a permit who wants to protest right?!?

Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple.

Lastly, having to buy permits to exercise freedom of speech in the so called "free country." :lol: LOL

I agree that the permitting system is a bit ridiculous, but I was just pointing out that your comparison of Fred Phelps' clan to OWS wasn't exactly apples to apples. It also makes sense that a city would be able to tell you where to set your protest up and how long you can continue protesting, within reason. If you have a bunch of protesters camp out in front of a business, that protest will damage that business's ability to attract customers.

Also, this does not give anyone the ability to spy on "any" citizen. The ISP simply has the ability to spy on its own paying customers and it loses that ability as soon as those customers find somebody else to provide them internet service. It truly does suck for those who do not have the option to switch to an ISP who chooses not to spy on them, though.

Paragraph 1, I see, and I agree within reason.

The damage of the business' ability to attract customers, I can see how that would be a problem, of course. What isn't mentioned however, is that it is a one-sided setup. meaning that ^^ is bad, but if a business screws over most of its customers (which is far from rare in this corporatocracy) thats just known as business.This is one of the major issues. (now I am not saying every business damaged in that way, due to protests, deserves it)

Paragraph 2, Is a bit of a mis-understanding, I wasn't speaking of this situation (what the thread is initially about) about the:Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple. I was referring to the latest bills (since Patriot act) that have allowed this to happen. I wasn't speaking of this "anti-piracy" measure, but of laws and legislation that has been put into effect that does allow what I have in Italic.

And as added, I unfortunately don't know of any other ISPs in my area that offer decent speeds, and a decent bandwidth cap, that isn't AT&T or Comcast. Both (from what I gather) are in on this.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

Yeah because they got a permit, that makes it A-OK :roll: (legally you are correct, but then again anyone with a brain knows "current" legality is a freaking joke!)

Oh and because the state/city/parish/county/district will sure give anyone a permit who wants to protest right?!?

Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple.

Lastly, having to buy permits to exercise freedom of speech in the so called "free country." :lol: LOL

Lach0121

I agree that the permitting system is a bit ridiculous, but I was just pointing out that your comparison of Fred Phelps' clan to OWS wasn't exactly apples to apples. It also makes sense that a city would be able to tell you where to set your protest up and how long you can continue protesting, within reason. If you have a bunch of protesters camp out in front of a business, that protest will damage that business's ability to attract customers.

Also, this does not give anyone the ability to spy on "any" citizen. The ISP simply has the ability to spy on its own paying customers and it loses that ability as soon as those customers find somebody else to provide them internet service. It truly does suck for those who do not have the option to switch to an ISP who chooses not to spy on them, though.

Paragraph 1, I see, and I agree within reason.

Paragraph 2, Is a bit of a mis-understanding, I wasn't speaking of this situation (what the thread is initially about) about the:Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple. I was referring to the latest bills (since Patriot act) that have allowed this to happen. I wasn't speaking of this "anti-piracy" measure, but of laws and legislation that has been put into effect that does allow what I have in Italic.

And as added, I unfortunately don't know of any other ISPs in my area that offer decent speeds, and a decent bandwidth cap, that isn't AT&T or Comcast. Both (from what I gather) are in on this.

Yes, all of the major ISPs are in on it, but rather than signing petitions asking private companies to change their policies, it would be far more effective if everyone who does not support this measure would drop their subscription on July 12 and support a small local ISP. Their internet is not as fast, but if everyone did that, the major ISP's would be absolutely crippled, and that would send a strong message that when you treat your consumers like criminals, you lose those consumers.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#98 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"] I agree that the permitting system is a bit ridiculous, but I was just pointing out that your comparison of Fred Phelps' clan to OWS wasn't exactly apples to apples. It also makes sense that a city would be able to tell you where to set your protest up and how long you can continue protesting, within reason. If you have a bunch of protesters camp out in front of a business, that protest will damage that business's ability to attract customers.

Also, this does not give anyone the ability to spy on "any" citizen. The ISP simply has the ability to spy on its own paying customers and it loses that ability as soon as those customers find somebody else to provide them internet service. It truly does suck for those who do not have the option to switch to an ISP who chooses not to spy on them, though.PurpleMan5000

Paragraph 1, I see, and I agree within reason.

The damage of the business' ability to attract customers, I can see how that would be a problem, of course. What isn't mentioned however, is that it is a one-sided setup. meaning that ^^ is bad, but if a business screws over most of its customers (which is far from rare in this corporatocracy) thats just known as business.This is one of the major issues. (now I am not saying every business damaged in that way, due to protests, deserves it)

Paragraph 2, Is a bit of a mis-understanding, I wasn't speaking of this situation (what the thread is initially about) about the:Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple. I was referring to the latest bills (since Patriot act) that have allowed this to happen. I wasn't speaking of this "anti-piracy" measure, but of laws and legislation that has been put into effect that does allow what I have in Italic.

And as added, I unfortunately don't know of any other ISPs in my area that offer decent speeds, and a decent bandwidth cap, that isn't AT&T or Comcast. Both (from what I gather) are in on this.

Yes, all of the major ISPs are in on it, but rather than signing petitions asking private companies to change their policies, it would be far more effective if everyone who does not support this measure would drop their subscription on July 12 and support a small local ISP. Their internet is not as fast, but if everyone did that, the major ISP's would be absolutely crippled, and that would send a strong message that when you treat your consumers like criminals, you lose those consumers.

You replied before I could edit lol, so I carry it over in this one in the quotation above.

Now on to your current post. I agree 100% that would be the best way to go about doing it. Maybe something I will end up doing, I have to take another look at what all is avail in my area. But you are right, that would be the fastest way to get their attention, threaten their pocketbook, since this country, (and the big corporations) all but worship the IOUs written on cotton with dead slave owners printed on it. (or the electronic equivalent of)

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#99 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
ok so he has nothing to hide, like say porn and doesnt mind that the isp will know what sites he visits and they will have acess to his passwords also doesnt mind how the americans are treated like prisoners in their own country and he also likes obama care. Not sure if series or just messing with us.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"] The Westboro Baptist Church actually plans ahead and applies for permits to conduct their hateful protests legally. The Occupy Wall Street movement just shows up and camps out in front of businesses. That is the difference. If you want to organize an OWS protest in your city, you only need to apply for a permit. There is nothing that says you cannot protest.PurpleMan5000

Yeah because they got a permit, that makes it A-OK :roll: (legally you are correct, but then again anyone with a brain knows "current" legality is a freaking joke!)

Oh and because the state/city/parish/county/district will sure give anyone a permit who wants to protest right?!?

Secondly the ability to spy on any citizen, the ability to detain indefinitely any citizen, and do so without due process of any citizen, that "threatens the national security." This includes (buts sure as hell isn't limited to) protestors. Now unless you can show me where I am wrong, and really, I will have to respectfully say its not so simple.

Lastly, having to buy permits to exercise freedom of speech in the so called "free country." :lol: LOL

I agree that the permitting system is a bit ridiculous, but I was just pointing out that your comparison of Fred Phelps' clan to OWS wasn't exactly apples to apples. It also makes sense that a city would be able to tell you where to set your protest up and how long you can continue protesting, within reason. If you have a bunch of protesters camp out in front of a business, that protest will damage that business's ability to attract customers. Also, this does not give anyone the ability to spy on "any" citizen. The ISP simply has the ability to spy on its own paying customers and it loses that ability as soon as those customers find somebody else to provide them internet service. It truly does suck for those who do not have the option to switch to an ISP who chooses not to spy on them, though.

I do agree with your second point. But the interenet market has been dominated by pretty much everyone supporting. I have a few small companies but then my interenet would be next to useless. It will be vary interesting to see how this plays out.

For people saying VPN will work, in theory they will not, the way pirates got away with VPN was becuase the RIAA traced them from the outside, but this movement, always your ISP to see everything you are downloading, so they will see it from the inside before and after it goes threw a vpn.

And if anyone says this is a good thing, please stop for a second and think, yes it may slow down piracy, but what esle could it do. Your isp may track everything you do. This movements have the right intetions for stopping piracy, but they go past far more than what they should.

On a side note reading some of the comments it may have been taken out of context, this from another site

"The word from CNet is thatan antipiracy agreement between a number of ISPs(including Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast) and the RIAA & MPAA is nearing completion. Under the agreement, ISPs will step up their responses to copyright infringement complaints against subscribers. If a subscriber accumulates enough complaints, the ISP can throttle their bandwidth, limit their Web access to only the top 200 websites, and/or require participation in a 'copyright awareness' program that explains the rights of content creators. ISPs and rights holders will share the costs of the system. Ars Technicaconfirms the story with notes from an industry source, who mentions that the Obama administration is 'generally supportive' of the agreement."