APB a big fail

"If we go by your logic, we still don't have 3D RTSs."

"PRECISELY lieutenant"

We got 1 zombie half awake sky's the limit now lmfao

I am open to any counter arguement -- once I actually hear one

God you can't be serious, dude I know you like to argue with people even if you haven't got a clue and then you still argue because you don't want to believe how much of an ***** you are but to take it so far....just go hide in a corner with your stupidity, ignorance and all.

Also read this while you're at it maybe it'll increase your neural activity .

I see no arguement there

I will wait

x axis + y axis equals 3, we'd love to see that wouldn't we jackie

I see no arguement there

I will wait

x axis + y axis equals 3, we'd love to see that wouldn't we jackie

Kaelken

In every game where you walk around you're restricted to move only on the x and z planes

huh?

Okay this guy is saying every game out there is in 2D, I love where this is going

Learn your geometry... There's 3 Axis, X,Y and Z

X is the horizontal (left and right)

Y is Vertical (up and down)

Z is forward and Backwards.

Btw, love how you simply ignore the rest of my post to fit your argument.

Here's another approach and my last attempt to convince you of your stupidity.

For you to consider a game as being 3D you'd have to be able to move in thickness, width and depth. But sure, you solve that problem, and earn yourself a Nobel.

Remember kids, stay in school and learn that an object is in 3D if it has the 3 basic dimensions, adding movement into the equation is *****ded because movement has nothing to do with it.

so

In every game where you walk around you're restricted to move only on the x and z planes

Nibroc420

and if

Y is Vertical (up and down)

Nibroc420

... your saying there hasn't been a single game released where you could crouch or jump, terrific

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Here's another approach and my last attempt to convince you of your stupidity. For you to consider a game as being 3D you'd have to be able to move in thickness, width and depth. But sure, you solve that problem, and earn yourself a Nobel.Nibroc420

I can remember even now this super fun 3D game.

You could go left, right, front, back, jump, the whole deal, too bad games barely evolved since and we still have 2D games, like all the RTSs, Witcher, Dragon Age, etc.

I have a very precise arguement

x + y = 2

I find it insanely funny how this is beyond you

so

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]

In every game where you walk around you're restricted to move only on the x and z planes

Kaelken

and if

Y is Vertical (up and down)

Nibroc420

... your saying there hasn't been a single game released where you could crouch or jump, terrific

nibroc you are going to fail math, physics and any subject at school that requires you to use cognitive abilities, out there in india, which is mostly all of them yeah, you have my word on that

I am still waiting on someone, perhaps one of the top flamers to come in here and explain how

x-axis + y-axis = 3 axises

Kaelken

nibroc you are going to fail math, physics and any subject at school that requires you to use cognitive abilities, out there in india, which is mostly all of them yeah, you have my word on that

I am still waiting on someone, perhaps one of the top flamers to come in here and explain how

x-axis + y-axis = 3 axises

Kaelken

because 3D relates to perspective in this case...not axis of motion.

this is 2D:

this is 3D:

because 3D relates to perspective in this case...not axis of motion.

cobrax25

This is what happens with a language that is left up to interpretation.

Both of you could be right if the perception is skewed enough.

Diablo3 could be considered 3d since the models are 3d, and there are destructibleenvironments, spells ect.

Or 2d because Its on a flat freaking screen. (all of gaming, "nvidia 3d gaming aside")

With the right filters the "truth" changes a bit.

I thought the same from the start, it looked like a bad copy of game turned into MMO, just like Matrix - crappy graphics, crappy gameplay

Wtf is APB?

What a ridiculous argument that isn't relevant to the thread it's contained in. Diablo 3 is a 3-dimensional game contained by a 2-dimensional control scheme. Kaelken's argument is legitimate, but if you wish Diablo 3 to control in 3D, then you can simply play another game (Hellgate London anyone?).KHAndAnime

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]What a ridiculous argument that isn't relevant to the thread it's contained in. Diablo 3 is a 3-dimensional game contained by a 2-dimensional control scheme. Kaelken's argument is legitimate, but if you wish Diablo 3 to control in 3D, then you can simply play another game (Hellgate London anyone?).DanielDust

We didn't miss his point, we are just smart enough to see he is wrong.

"because diablo 3's gameplay is 2D as far as I know..."

Well...I guess you don't know much then.

Also, I bet you *are* kaeleken (or whatever the name was) anyways...you just joined today to come to his defense?

We didn't miss his point, we are just smart enough to see he is wrong.

"because diablo 3's gameplay is 2D as far as I know..."

Well...I guess you don't know much then.

Also, I bet you *are* kaeleken (or whatever the name was) anyways...you just joined today to come to his defense?

Renevent42

If people wouldn't be able to use their brain to interpret 3D on 2D (paper, screens) then nowadays we'd still be digging holes with sticks.

In this troll "orgy" there are two types of people, those that accept games as being 3D and those that feel that they are smarter than the others and they have some smart, out of this world, revolutionary answers like, a game can't be 3D because our monitor is 2D and because characters don't jump it's 2D gameplay (technically characters in Diablo jump at certain spells/attacks).

Anyway, last post regarding Diablo 3 in this thread and also last post in this "interesting" APB thread since it's obviously pointless to try to convince the ones that act logical and smart when all they say is irrational.