[QUOTE="J-REAL"][QUOTE="gbarules2999"][QUOTE="J-REAL"][QUOTE="gbarules2999"] Time for a brain fart.
So, games like Call of Duty are propoganda, in which that they glorify certain aspects of the army, as killing terrorists. But what I have to ask is this: is it intentional propoganda? I mean, sure, you have America's Army which is built for such things to the core, but did CoD's developers say to themselves "let's make a game where the army are looked at with very pretty glasses" and make it a game? No, they went where two things are.
First, the trends. The money, where it is proven that when you shoot terrorists in some form, people will buy your game. It's a very taboo subject that will eventually move on once we get into aonther sort of confict. People want to pretend that they know and support what's happening in Iraq or whatever, when most of us don't have a clue; the games take advantage of that, and that's where the market is now (love it or hate it).
Second, the fact of the confict. The concept of a video game is appropriating conficts and letting the player get through them. Well, we have a very real confilct happening over seas right now, and so when the real life events match what a video game is in concept then why not make it based on that? It simply works, as we all know: WWII shooters are undeniably video games, and so are modern day shooters. Developers go for the easy targets, because, well, they're easy.
I know that when I fire up America's Army, I will be confronted with suggestions. Nothing stright out, but pointers that make me morally think that the Army is the right place to be. But when I fire up CoD or GRAW, those games don't have that much of that kind of thing, because it wasn't in the design documents. It simply doesn't affect the way I see life or the army or whatever, and none of it will make up my mind for me.
It'd be foolish to write it off completely, but in the end it's all fun and games, literally.
profanityVP
Your right it is all fun and games and that is good none of it will make up your mind. =)
Like I said in a past post the developers dont know what they do they are in it for the money but the people who are truely over this industry will not back certain games. Yes people will say because those games would not sell which is true, but its mainly becuase of the back lash a company will get becuase that company is going agaisnt the grain. The higher ups wants everyone to go with the grain its not about money for these people. These people print money so why it they be in it for the money. Like I said its way bigger than money for them.
The higher ups? What?
So you're saying that the US Governement is forcing Activision to make Call of Duty a propoganda machine? Is that it? Or is the Government behind the scheme to make the market like these types of games...what?
I think that intelligence osmosis is coming into affect, so I better stop trying to understand this post...it makes less and less sense the more I read it...
LoL!
The US government and any other governments are nothing but tools also. When I say higher ups I mean the people/families that truely rule this planet. You might not believe that but two families own 80% of the world wealth and its these people who are in control of the propaganda that goes on in entertainment. The government is nothing but a tool to get pass you.
its not that game developers intentionally make propaganda tools, its just that, that is where the profit is,, and its established like that, because the higher powers want our state to be as it is,,
say for example rothschild,, that family can manipulate you guys to think and feel exactly how they want you to,,
they started the feminist movement, the gay rights movement, and so forth,, they put morals into your heads, so u think that so and so are bad ,, and you guys are good people,,,,
but yeah its not a structured system where activision wanted to make proganda games, its just that the powers can manipulate circumstances for their advantage,,,
100% agreed
Log in to comment