are you going to quit gaming when DirectX10 is the standard for PC games?

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
After hearing that I can max out Crysis @ a res of 1280x1024 with my current 7800GT videocard I have decided that I will probaby not be upgrading to a Direct3D10 capable videocard for the "next-gen" era of PC gaming. 

The games that I have been looking forward to are as follows:

STALKER
Crysis
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
Supreme Commander
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
HL2: Ep2, Ep3

Games like Assassin's Creed, Alan Wake, UT3 (even though it would be better on PC) I can easily rent for the X360.  All those games will be able to run on DX9 and I am assumng that I will be able to max all of them out.. although I am not sure about Brothers in Arms.  Although I might not even get the new HL2 Episodes.. it has been so long and I just have lost interest and I do not think that the new episodes will really have that much to offer.. just a scenery change. 

What are you going to do.. accept the new DX10/Vista era or just bite the bullet and stop PC games.

BTW  I know it would be hard  to do but why can't PC games be rented??  There are many PC games that I would like to play  but have simply not wanted  to spend $50 for them.

Also, do you know if Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway will be a DX10 only?? (I doubt it because not everyone will have upgraded to Vista let alone a DX10 videocard)

 
Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#2 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
I do plan to get a DX10/Vista setup somewhere along the line, maybe after the summer, no sooner. So no, I will not quit PC gaming, nor will I ever even consider it. Call me bullheaded if you will, but thats just me. As for renting games, I think alot of it has to do with CD keys and copy protection. Since a few games can be played without the CD, you could basically rent a game, install it and just keep playing. Not sure if there are ways around this, but it seems like a hassle. Also, the lower (although marginally) price point of PC games doesn't really encourage renting. As for BiA, I doubt it will be DX10 only. It's coming out for the consoles as well and they are only capable of DX9.5. So why the PC version would be DX10 only is beyond me.
Avatar image for venomblack
venomblack

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 venomblack
Member since 2007 • 212 Posts
Don't judge DX 10 cards by what nvidia currently has out. As ATI rolls out there own and time marches on, DX 10 gaming will become VERY affordable. PC gaming is just something a console could never get right. No mods, not as precise controls, etc. Also, PC games can't be rented for the same reason stores won't let you exchange opened PC games. It's easy to hack / get CD keys. Pirating would be insanely easy unless devs forced more crap like StarForce down your throat. Also, eventually games will be DX 10 only. There will be a day when DX 9 is dropped completely. Won't happen anytime soon, but it will happen nonetheless.
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
After hearing that I can max out Crysis @ a res of 1280x1024 with my current 7800GT videocard I have decided that I will probaby not be upgrading to a Direct3D10 capable videocard for the "next-gen" era of PC gaming. 

The games that I have been looking forward to are as follows:

STALKER
Crysis
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
Supreme Commander
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
HL2: Ep2, Ep3

Games like Assassin's Creed, Alan Wake, UT3 (even though it would be better on PC) I can easily rent for the X360.  All those games will be able to run on DX9 and I am assumng that I will be able to max all of them out.. although I am not sure about Brothers in Arms.  Although I might not even get the new HL2 Episodes.. it has been so long and I just have lost interest and I do not think that the new episodes will really have that much to offer.. just a scenery change. 

What are you going to do.. accept the new DX10/Vista era or just bite the bullet and stop PC games.

BTW  I know it would be hard  to do but why can't PC games be rented??  There are many PC games that I would like to play  but have simply not wanted  to spend $50 for them.

Also, do you know if Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway will be a DX10 only?? (I doubt it because not everyone will have upgraded to Vista let alone a DX10 videocard)

 
wookieeassassin
No developer in their right mind would make a dx10 only game right now...save microsoft and halo2 which i think is a scummy move. We have yet to see the benefits of dx10 before moving on to the next-gen pc gaming. I am sure a Geforce 7 series video card will last for another 2-3 and by that time geforce 8 series will drop in price severely and getting a dx10 card won't be a problem. If ATI (or should I say AMD?) comes out with a dx10 card that works, prices will go down even lower, making the switch to dx10 gaming a lot easier.
Avatar image for Mediocre_man90
Mediocre_man90

968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Mediocre_man90
Member since 2006 • 968 Posts
I think you need to do a bit more research. You won't be able to max out Crysis with a 7800GT on 1280x1024. You can't max out recent DX9 games at 1280x1024 with that card.
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
actually I was told that my machine could in fact max out Crysis: Core 2 Duo E6600 Corsair PC6400C4 XMS2 DDR2 800MHz RAM running in dual channel mode nVidia 7800 GT 256MB PCI Express x16 Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 but honestly unless there is some way to rent PC games I don't feel like spending $50 on any game I want to play. It isn't like people don't pirate games now.
Avatar image for Mediocre_man90
Mediocre_man90

968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Mediocre_man90
Member since 2006 • 968 Posts

I agree that renting games would be great, but it would make profiting off of games almost impossible.

Who told you that you could max out Crysis? You have a pretty good rig, but we know next to nothing about how Crysis will run on any given computer at this point. Anybody who claims to know how a computer will run a game that nobody has played yet is pulling the information out of their ass.

Avatar image for AlphaHumana
AlphaHumana

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AlphaHumana
Member since 2006 • 618 Posts
I honestly can't foresee the day where I will quit PC gaming.  I haven't seen anything now or on the horizon that would encourage me to forsake PCs for consoles.  But quitting when DX10 becomes the standard?!  Whenever that ends up being...  Maybe I'm seriously missing something, but I've been PC gaming for a fairly long period of time (tandy 1000, then a 286 something were amongst the first PCs I can remember owning in all their 5.25" floppy goodness) - way before DirectX, and I can't even remember people discussing DirectX itself, or any of its subsequent generations engender nearly as much talk/hype/discussion as DX10 and its gaming implications.

So, no, I've never considered forsaking my PC :)  Oh yeah, once upon a time you could rent PC games - heck, most stores even allowed you to buy the games (*cough*install them*cough*)and return them for cash, not same-item exchange!  We couldn't bank on their stupidity for long though ;)
Avatar image for Captain-Seal
Captain-Seal

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Captain-Seal
Member since 2004 • 505 Posts
I will never stop PC gaming even if I do fall behind on hardware, I'll just play what I have. But I'll be getting Vista sometime soon but I won't have a dx10 video card.
Avatar image for godofratz
godofratz

398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 godofratz
Member since 2005 • 398 Posts
There's no reason to quit PC gaming unless games REQUIRE Vista and they won't for awhile.  
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="wookieeassassin"]actually I was told that my machine could in fact max out Crysis: Core 2 Duo E6600 Corsair PC6400C4 XMS2 DDR2 800MHz RAM running in dual channel mode nVidia 7800 GT 256MB PCI Express x16 Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 but honestly unless there is some way to rent PC games I don't feel like spending $50 on any game I want to play. It isn't like people don't pirate games now.

whoever told you was just guessing, and their opinion doesn't really carry much weight. speaking from personal experience, if you looked at crysis in the state it was in when the 7900gt's first were released, it wouldn't even run on nvidia 7x00-series cards, period.. only ati x1k's. no way to know for sure until the game's actually out, though. i'm guessing it'll be hard on your graphics card.
Avatar image for Royas
Royas

1448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#12 Royas
Member since 2002 • 1448 Posts
I can safely say that the chances of my quitting PC gaming are about the same as the chances of a pig flying out of my rear.  Not too terribly likely  :)

I will be waiting for a bit to move to Vista and DX10 cards, I want the initial start bugs to get worked out of the system.  Maybe in a year, they won't be hitting the DX10 only games hard for a while yet.  Not enough early adopters to make it financially smart.  The only way I would even consider quitting would be if they can't get Vista relatively smooth running in that time, and even then I'll still have my current box and all of my current games.  So, PC gaming forever, baby!
Avatar image for OgreB
OgreB

2523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 OgreB
Member since 2004 • 2523 Posts

You can not max out Crysis with that rig! Whoever told you that was lying!

You could not even max out most games out today with that...especially that card..ugghhh!

As for the question....huh?

DX10 is the future of gaming...so get used to it

However most games made in the next year or so will be DX9 compatiable ( except Halo...but who cares about that game?)

I for one am going to be happy to take the DX10 plunge as the difference betwen 9 and 10 is amazing.

Just waiting for the Vista bugs and drivers to be worked out before I install my Vista premium...

You might be able to max out Crysis with this rig...

QX6700@ 2.6

Dual 8800 GTXs

4 GIG ddr 2..

And you will be suprised in the difference between Crysis in DX9 and DX10...

And I say NO! most PC gamers are not going to stop gaming because of DX10

Cheaper DX10 cards will be out soon...

Avatar image for DarKre
DarKre

9529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 DarKre
Member since 2003 • 9529 Posts
I'm pretty sure you could still run games on DX 8 5 years after DX 9 came out. And if you dont upgrade by then..well thats your problem.
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#15 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
Ill porbably switch to consoles b/c its so much cheaper.
Avatar image for Pete5506
Pete5506

10112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#16 Pete5506
Member since 2006 • 10112 Posts
I am going to game, I just need to upgrade
Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
No. I am not gonna quit pc gaming.
Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
ahh no i'll just upgrade are u crazy why would i quit gaming just cuz i have to upgrade
Avatar image for Arcadius
Arcadius

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 Arcadius
Member since 2002 • 959 Posts
[QUOTE="venomblack"]Don't judge DX 10 cards by what nvidia currently has out. As ATI rolls out there own and time marches on, DX 10 gaming will become VERY affordable. PC gaming is just something a console could never get right. No mods, not as precise controls, etc. Also, PC games can't be rented for the same reason stores won't let you exchange opened PC games. It's easy to hack / get CD keys. Pirating would be insanely easy unless devs forced more crap like StarForce down your throat. Also, eventually games will be DX 10 only. There will be a day when DX 9 is dropped completely. Won't happen anytime soon, but it will happen nonetheless.

QFT
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
if I am not mistaken the project lead said that a 7800GTX could run the game on very high settings or max.. so I am assuming that my 7800GT should be able to run it pretty high w/ DX9. OgreB I surely hope you are not serious as very very few applicationa need a quad core processor or 4GB of RAM or the most ridiculous.. 2 8800GTXs

the price of PC games greatly outweighs the value of entertainment you get from them. Most games are $50 and you cannot rent them, and if you get it out of the box and it just is plain crap you can't return it and in a given year there are maybe only 4-5 quality titles that are released. But even quality titles do not mean they have replay value.



Avatar image for fieryfood_dude
fieryfood_dude

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 fieryfood_dude
Member since 2002 • 253 Posts
With all the negativity towards Games for Windows and Vista, I wonder if this will scare developers off from developing AAA pc games?
Avatar image for 1Lonehawk
1Lonehawk

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 1Lonehawk
Member since 2005 • 873 Posts
If developers wanna make money with PC games they'll keep making them DX9 compatible. It will be years before Vista and DX10 hardware are all ironed out and enough people have that stuff before one could make a DX10 only game that profits.

I'd bet my paycheck that MS is gonna lose money on their first DX10 only game for vista. They'll do it as a prospective move to try to force more people to buy vista and upgrade to DX10 stuff. But XP users will be safe for 98% of games for a good few years to come. By then, hardware will be cheaper, Vienna may even be out so we could maybe skip vista alltogether and the vid cards will be solid. The transition will slowly rise as more people can afford it. At that time, when the numbers are right, then developers will feel safer making DX10 only games. So PC gaming is here to stay if you ask me.

The only thing that never changes is that things always change. We will adapt. We will make the biological and technological essence of consoles to service.....us. Resistance if futile (specially where MS is concerned! :P ) Controllers are irrelevant. Console preference is irrelevant. The PC will dominate. Youuuuuuuu betcha! :D
Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
im going with xbox 360 and 8800gtx....
Avatar image for timma25
timma25

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 timma25
Member since 2005 • 1131 Posts

I'm 16 now.. when dx10 is used commonly ill prolly be at school or working and not game much (at least enough to justify the current price). Otherwise ill b too poor to get a vista pc anyways lol

Avatar image for jamesgj
jamesgj

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#25 jamesgj
Member since 2005 • 1190 Posts

if I am not mistaken the project lead said that a 7800GTX could run the game on very high settings or max.. so I am assuming that my 7800GT should be able to run it pretty high w/ DX9. OgreB I surely hope you are not serious as very very few applicationa need a quad core processor or 4GB of RAM or the most ridiculous.. 2 8800GTXs

the price of PC games greatly outweighs the value of entertainment you get from them. Most games are $50 and you cannot rent them, and if you get it out of the box and it just is plain crap you can't return it and in a given year there are maybe only 4-5 quality titles that are released. But even quality titles do not mean they have replay value.
wookieeassassin

You are correct about 7800GTX should run the game on very high settings or max also he stated the 1900X Raiden or something. Not sure why people think that you need the nicest card on the market to play this game they also said should be able to play on low settings with a 6600GT. 

Avatar image for jamesgj
jamesgj

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#26 jamesgj
Member since 2005 • 1190 Posts

Here we are.


Here is a list of confirmed information...

  • Crysis will run on both DX9 & DX10 as well as Windows XP and Windows Vista.
  • A graphics card that supports Shader Model 2 or higher is required.
  • CryEngine2 is estimated to scale back 2 years, and scale ahead 1.5 years.
  • A single 7800GTX will run the game quite well on fairly high settings according to Crysis Art Director, Michael Khaimzon.
  • Jack Mamais of Crytek said in an exclusive Crysis-Online interview that his X1900XT runs the game very well at reasonably high settings ( still unoptmized ).
  • Crysis will dynamically utilize all processing threads available. Meaning quad-core processors will be supported.

The following specs are estimates made by myself based on the above mentioned information and other sources. These estimates are NOT official - but are based on official information.

Minimum Requirements
CPU: Athlon 64 3000+/Intel 2.8ghz
Graphics: Nvidia 6200 or ATI X1300 - Shader Model 2.0
RAM: 768MB on Windows XP or 1GB on Windows Vista
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 256k+
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP



Recommended Requirements
CPU: Dual-core CPU (Athlon X2/Pentium D)
Graphics: Nvidia 7600 or ATI X1600 Pro (SM 3.0) or DX10 equivalent
RAM: 1.5GB+
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 512k+ (128k+ upstream)
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP
Avatar image for c_doody_1999
c_doody_1999

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 c_doody_1999
Member since 2005 • 533 Posts

Ask a silly question, "games are starting to look better, will you now abandon them?" er no, i rely on my pc for games, and would never get a console. why abandon the cutting edge?

Every revelation of windows microsoft forces a new pill down our throat, an especially big one, this time, with the new generation, we moan for a while then accept it and eventually love that we are on the foretront of the gameing technology world.

the cycle continues

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#28 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

Microsoft is planning on releasing service pack 1 for Vista this summer.  hopefully there will be drivers released for Vista so relatively new games can run.  Once all that will happen I am planning on getting a new computer.  So I am not quitting on pc gaming so Im just getting a computer so I could met the requirements of next generation games soon to be released this fall and next year.

Avatar image for skyyfox1
skyyfox1

13015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#29 skyyfox1
Member since 2003 • 13015 Posts
hell no i am not going to quit!  i am going to find a way to buy a dx10 machine.  my current system has a geforce 7800 gs in it.  it works great for now.  but we will see if the new games are any good with this hardware.  i have always tried to stay on top of things with at least decent hardware that is going to make my pc gaming fun.  i will not settle for second best.  right now, i can play fear, cod 2, bf2, etc at high settings.  so when there are games out that need the hardware, like crysis, then maybe i will upgrade.  but until then i am just fine with what i got.  but for sure, if need be, i will be upgrading and playing the new games that come out.
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
jamesgj: response to gamestop-stop games when DX10 is standard: yeah so I think my system that has: Intel Core 2 Duo E660 (2.4GHz) Corsair PC6400C4 XMS2 DDR2 800MHz RAM (dual channel mode) nVidia 7800GT 256MB PCI Express x16 Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 (non-pro) I should be able to run it on high settings I presume and possibly (hopefully) I can max it out at 1280x1024 in DX9 mode, and if the only thing I couldn't max would be like AA or something I could just have AA off. Minor graphics upgrades aren't worth the price of a new videocard. DX10 is going to have to completely replace DX9 before I would consider upgrading.. although most likely I won’t and will just welcome the X360 as my game platform because I can rent games for it. While I prefer playing games on the PC to a console and I enjoy playing PC games (generally PC games are better than console games) the PC's lack of ability to rent games, the price of games that you cannot rent, the high cost of hardware upgrades (especially when you consider that few quality titles actually come out in a year or two's time) are bringing me to a point where the fun I get out of them is no longer worth what it costs to play them.

Ask a silly question, "games are starting to look better, will you now abandon them?" er no, i rely on my pc for games, and would never get a console. why abandon the cutting edge?

Honestly that is the point many people are taking.. "Look how amazing these games look!! We must accept this next generation of games because they look so amazing!!" There are many games that look great but are NOT great. Just because games are looking better does not mean they are getting better and does not logically force anyone to adopt the "next-gen of PC gaming" The next-gen of PC gaming is when developers make games that are generally less crappier then the last-gen by introducing new types of gameplay, etc. The argument of why should we abandon games just as they are starting to look good is not a good one. That is exactly what they are trying to sell to gamers. The idea that this graphics are amazing and if the graphics are amazing the game must be good as well. This is simply NOT true. There are plenty of fun games out there that are free: there are flash and java games on the internet and there are also free and open-source (FOSS) games that are fun to play as well.. but they do not require the latest and greatest hardware. The idea that if a game looks really good and we are paying alot for hardware to play it is ungrounded and what the gaming industry banks on. They are out to make money and generally there are too few quality titles out to force the adoption of another "era" of gaming. There are many many more things that can be done with a computer and A LOT of them are free. I just simply do not think the price of upgrades and games is worth the actual enjoyment I will get out of them. Btw, Microsoft or any other company does not force any "pill" down my throat. If I don't want Vista I won't get Vista. sorry for my rant
Avatar image for Terrorantula
Terrorantula

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#31 Terrorantula
Member since 2007 • 1795 Posts
I think Microsoft are trying to back Pc gamers into a corner saying "you must buy vista and DX10 now or we'll cut u from features" like i don't see why they can't just patch Windows XP with SP3 and have it support DX10 like other OS did with privious dx's. Also how they're making dx9 games look alot worse than dx10 games on purpose so u'll buy dx10 os and gpu.

Crysis for example looks fantastic on dx9 and nearly as good as dx10, however other games close with microsoft like AOC are making it look bad on purpose. I mean lighting through trees isnt in dx9 version? Hmmm.
Wheres dx9l aswel? Which was meant to put some kool dx10 features onto dx9?

Games like Mass effect and Gears of War and UT07 + all future games on consoles which don't have dx10 all look just as good as crysis and that/ However Microsoft seem to be trying to stop that.


Microsoft arn't doing anything for gamers, just their wallets.
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
absolutely.. Microsoft wants to get Vista out into the homes of the gamers. Primarily they want to make money, and that means appealing to the PC gaming population. They see that the PC gaming population, although being a small % of the population overall is a very profitable enterprise and are looking to cash in on it. If they make it so that Windows XP can no longer support the latest in games you are going to have gamers going out and "upgrading" (this is debatable) to Vista. I do not know personally is the Direct3D10 API was created specifically to be run with Vista or not but if so that is a pretty scummy thing to do. Microsoft will still make money on the games sold for Windows if they keep XP supported with DX10 although they will not make the same amount that they would if gamers just feel they should "suck it up and adopt the 'future' of gaming". It is honestly a marketing ploy to sell Vista and personally I am not going to support that. The Direct3D10 API should be available for Windows XP. Direct3D10 might be a more capable API package than DirectX9 is (I do not know the technical stuff about it.. only the press that is mostly riding on Crysis.. which by the way all those amazing shots we saw when it was first revealed.. those screens = DX9 Maxed.. not Direct3D10) but Crysis is proof that DirectX9 is very capable of making games with good graphics. I for one am not going to support Microsoft's marketing strategy of Direct3D10 being a Vista exclusive.. that is ridiculous. There are plenty of PC gamers out there who just want to play games and spend their money to upgrade their hardware and buy those games they want to play. We live in a capitalist society.. so if we tell Microsoft we are not buying Vista because we do not support their whole DX10- Vista super gaming package they will have to change. People can NOT be afraid of a company no matter who it is. If you are willing to pay for something you do not like or you do not think you need to have (Vista) to play your PC games then Microsoft has backed you as a consumer into a corner and is making you be dependent on their operating system to play your PC games. Come on people.. just start a massive counter movement and tell Microsoft you will not buy into DX10 gaming unless they make it available for XP through a service pack of sorts. Do not let a company make your buying decisions for you by making you feel forced to do anything.

Every revelation of windows microsoft forces a new pill down our throat, an especially big one, this time, with the new generation, we moan for a while then accept it and eventually love that we are on the foretront of the gameing technology world.

any company that forces a metaphorical "pill" down my throat and tries to force adoption is not thinking about the consumer. If enough people don't buy into MS Vista-DX10 only crap they will have to change. Although there will be many that will just be a "good little consumer" and buy it because they feel they have no say in what Microsoft will do. You cannot just "be a good little consumer".. do not buy/buy into a company's product or marketing scheme because you feel that you are dependent upon that product. Refusing to buy some products actually makes the products better. Don't let a company pull you around by some strings because you like to play games. People.. you could easily buy 2 games to play for the price you are going to pay for an OEM Home Premium version of Vista.
Avatar image for KratosAurion7
KratosAurion7

284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 KratosAurion7
Member since 2005 • 284 Posts

This is just another reason to continue gaming.

Avatar image for MASTERCHIEFUSMA
MASTERCHIEFUSMA

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#34 MASTERCHIEFUSMA
Member since 2003 • 229 Posts
I will always be a PC gamer till parts get so expensive till i cannot afford them, as for DirectX10 coming out i could care less until more games start using it, if i can my games on DirectX9 till 10 comes out i will do so till i have to upgrade my parts which will be a sad day cause it will put me in Debt :cry:
Avatar image for Nuclear_Kernel
Nuclear_Kernel

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Nuclear_Kernel
Member since 2006 • 163 Posts
I agree with wookieeassassin. Nobody on this thread said anything about the fact that Vista doesn' t support OpenGL (for newbies is the tehnology behind games like Doom 3, Prey, etc). The exclussion on OpenGL is move by MS to force developers to make games using DX10.
From different articles DX10 is hailed as an significant advancement, programmers will have a easier job (a cut in time to develop the game so perhaps smaller prices).
For all the console fanboys out there PC gaming is SUPPERIOR to console gaming! (Your games are made on a PC then tested on a console. Deal with it). I started on a ATARI console, moved NINTENDO then to PC where I' ll stay. As for the money I buy only the games that at the end year are nominated to Game to Year :P then I exchange with fellow addicts or have playing session at their homes.
You guys haven' t heard of borrowing from a friend a game?
Avatar image for kort-nilsen
kort-nilsen

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 kort-nilsen
Member since 2004 • 1161 Posts
Is this thread meant as a joke?
Avatar image for CubePrime_basic
CubePrime_basic

3230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 CubePrime_basic
Member since 2003 • 3230 Posts
I agree with wookieeassassin. Nobody on this thread said anything about the fact that Vista doesn' t support OpenGL (for newbies is the tehnology behind games like Doom 3, Prey, etc). The exclussion on OpenGL is move by MS to force developers to make games using DX10.
From different articles DX10 is hailed as an significant advancement, programmers will have a easier job (a cut in time to develop the game so perhaps smaller prices).
For all the console fanboys out there PC gaming is SUPPERIOR to console gaming! (Your games are made on a PC then tested on a console. Deal with it). I started on a ATARI console, moved NINTENDO then to PC where I' ll stay. As for the money I buy only the games that at the end year are nominated to Game to Year :P then I exchange with fellow addicts or have playing session at their homes.
You guys haven' t heard of borrowing from a friend a game?
Nuclear_Kernel
Nuclear Kernel, OpenGL 2.0 is part of Vista, however it will be the last version to be part of that operating system. All they [m$] say is that for the few years Vista will be out before Viena comes in, no OpenGL update will be made. I'm not even 100% Microsoft will really stop updating OpenGL for Vista if a new release comes along - it's all speculation to promote DX10.
Avatar image for belboz
belboz

1548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 belboz
Member since 2003 • 1548 Posts
I have no intentipon to quit PC gaming. The day people stops making games for the PC, I'll probably quit gaming, unless the consoles at that time starts allowing mouse/keyboard as a controll scheme.

Yeah, I know. I'm weird, but I just don't enjoy playing with a controller. The wii might be an exception; I've playe 15 minutes with that and I liked the innovation. If it gets good games that are able to use the controller, I might chage my mind, and buy a console.
Avatar image for CubePrime_basic
CubePrime_basic

3230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 CubePrime_basic
Member since 2003 • 3230 Posts
Is this thread meant as a joke?kort-nilsen
The only, and I mean the ONLY difference with DX10 compared to other DX releases is that it was exclusive to a new OS before it was even out... and DX10 is phenomenal achievement for PC gamers. If only NVidia could get up their asses and release some drivers and M$ stoped selling Windows for undreads...
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
I am just saying I for one am not going to get Vista just because DX10 is Vista exclusive. MS does not get any money until they allow DX10 on XP. If enough people refuse and tell MS that we shouldn't have to switch to Vista to play DX10 games then if they want money from games they will allow DX10 to be on XP. Come on people.. just tell Microsoft no games until DX10 goes on XP.. don't let them push you as a consumer around.. DX10 should be available to XP.
Avatar image for opollo
opollo

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 opollo
Member since 2005 • 94 Posts

Vista is a great piece of programming, however i will not be told that

everytime i buy a new piece of kit the OS cant upgrade and therefore

be needing to go out and buy another Vista.  Vista is only software

and therefore should not be the one demanding anything other than we carry on

using microsoft OS and should be able multitaskable as XP can do this

so why not Vista!

Is this not illigal that they are monopolising on us havin to

buy another Vista everytime we want a new cpu or gfx card?

Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
I guess it technically isn't monopolizing because you *could* buy a console like a PS or a Wii or you could even buy an Xbox360. Simply get a large amount of people to refuse the product until it does what you want it to do. If enough people do not buy Vista because of the DX10-only then Microsoft will release DX10 for XP. Just use your rights as a consumer.
Avatar image for Kev_Boy
Kev_Boy

1527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#43 Kev_Boy
Member since 2003 • 1527 Posts
Why would they need to work on getting DX10 in an old operating system for free?
That makes no sense!

DX10 is part of the feature-set of Windows Vista and beyond.
Avatar image for neatfeatguy
neatfeatguy

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#44 neatfeatguy
Member since 2005 • 4415 Posts

After hearing that I can max out Crysis @ a res of 1280x1024 with my current 7800GT videocard I have decided that I will probaby not be upgrading to a Direct3D10 capable videocard for the "next-gen" era of PC gaming. 

The games that I have been looking forward to are as follows:

STALKER
Crysis
Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway
Supreme Commander
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
HL2: Ep2, Ep3

Games like Assassin's Creed, Alan Wake, UT3 (even though it would be better on PC) I can easily rent for the X360.  All those games will be able to run on DX9 and I am assumng that I will be able to max all of them out.. although I am not sure about Brothers in Arms.  Although I might not even get the new HL2 Episodes.. it has been so long and I just have lost interest and I do not think that the new episodes will really have that much to offer.. just a scenery change. 

What are you going to do.. accept the new DX10/Vista era or just bite the bullet and stop PC games.

BTW  I know it would be hard  to do but why can't PC games be rented??  There are many PC games that I would like to play  but have simply not wanted  to spend $50 for them.

Also, do you know if Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway will be a DX10 only?? (I doubt it because not everyone will have upgraded to Vista let alone a DX10 videocard)

 
wookieeassassin

Do what I do when it comes to buying PC games.

1. Save a little extra cash for one of the new games coming out that you really want, then grab it off the shelf and spend $40-50 on it. Now you have a game that you really want. Play the heck out of it to get your money's worth.

2. Wait for prices to drop on other titles and pick them up when they hit $20-30 price range....granted, depending on the hype of the game and how well the game has been selling; you might have to hold off 6-12 months before you see the prices drop.

3. Before you know it, you're picking up games that you wanted 6-12 months back at a lower cost and by the time you get done playing through those, the newer games that have been coming out are soon 3-6+ months old and the price on them may have dropped.

The cycle continues like this, as long as you don't rush through every single game that you've purchased.

A quick example: I wanted Company of Heroes when it came out, but I waited a while before I got it because I have a lot of troubles accepting the fact that a game costs $50. I ended up getting for about $30.00 a good 4-5 months back. I haven't beat the game yet...still have 5 more missions to play through. I've spent time online playing with and/or against my little brother. Perhaps in the next week or two I'll beat it and by that time STALKER will be out and I'll pick up a copy of that...after a bit Alone in the Dark will be out...but let's not forget that I haven't beat NWN2.

As you can see....I usually do a pretty good job following the 3 steps listed above. Granted I don't have the newest games right when they come out, but I'm ok with that.

Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#45 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts

Like I have been saying in a lot of threads about this subject -

I was going to buy a X1950XT for like $200 but because DX10 is almost here and new cards are almost here I have decided to wait.  I am going to spend that money on an Xbox 360 because I would rather play Forza 2 than Crysis.  Then maybe towards the end of the year, around the holidays I will look into upgrading my system with a DX10 card and CPU.  But honestly I'm not very excited about any of these early DX10 games coming out this year for PC and feel like it’s a waist of money to buy hardware now when it cost the most just to play them.
 
I would rather get a 360 and be able to play Forza 2 and GTA4 when they come out and then buy the DX10 card and new CPU later when they are cheaper and there are some new DX10 games I actually want to play on PC.

Avatar image for geitenvla
geitenvla

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#46 geitenvla
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
I decide when I can see for myself how great (or not) it is. I'm not planning to go on Vista soon; I'd rather have a working OS. When most of the bugs, leaks, etc. are patched (SP) and when there are cool games that I want to run on DX10, I'll make up my mind.
Avatar image for mouthforbathory
mouthforbathory

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 mouthforbathory
Member since 2006 • 2114 Posts
Who needs a bloody Service Pack for XP when someone could possibly hack DX10 from Vista, and copy it's features into XP?  It'll be kinda like Cedega for Linux, except it's not emulation but the real thing XD!!!!!!
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
Why would they need to work on getting DX10 in an old operating system for free?
That makes no sense!

DX10 is part of the feature-set of Windows Vista and beyond.
Kev_Boy


well we have already paid for XP. DX10 isn't some fancy application it is an API. It could be put on XP.  Your statement just says "I just buy it because Microsoft says I need it to play my latest and greatest looking games and that buying Vista is the only way."  An API shouldn't be esclusive to an OS.  That makes no sense.
Avatar image for wookieeassassin
wookieeassassin

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 wookieeassassin
Member since 2006 • 1678 Posts
neatfeatguy: that is a pretty good cycle you have got there. 

You have a few games that you want to get.  You wait to get the first one on the list until it's price drops.  Then when it drops you get that one.  By the time you are done playing it (plus probably a month or so) the next game will have dropped.  With your method with say $250 (taxes not included) you get 6 (or even more depending on the price drop) games instead of 5 if you just wait 6-12 months for the games you want to play.

That is a pretty good strategy and that sounds like something I might try.  Also, I haven't really thought of it before recently but if you tend to stay a year or so behind the trends in gaming you will have just as much fun and spend less money.. probably a lot less money.  I built my PC for it's main purpose to play PC games but lately the prices of hardware upgrades and the prices of games are too much for me. As I don't have a steady flow of income because I do not have a job.. ( because I just don't have anything I need to pay for so I don't see the point) the price issue is a bit more as I feel like I should save the money I have right now.  I still do like PC gaming but now I seem to be doing less and less gaming and more and more other things. 

I used to be one of those people that had to have the latest and greatest hardware and had to have the popular game the day it was released and if I had had to care about how much money I was spending then I would have not been so quick to jump on the bandwagon.
Avatar image for Glordit
Glordit

1525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 Glordit
Member since 2005 • 1525 Posts
There's no reason to quit PC gaming unless games REQUIRE Vista and they won't for awhile.  godofratz
Even if they DO people will still purchase it! with Quad core droping to $500 by Q4 and a host of DX10 cards comming out 8300/8600/8900 and X2xxxSeries DX10 gaming will probably be the best thing to happen to PC's! :lol: [8300GT looks like a good card for the price] Consoles can have thier one system playes them all the same! I am going to get a DX10 card Daul Core/Quad core and Vsta to play some of PC gaming history the First DX10 game! and S.T.A.L.K.E.R, man finaly its actually comming out! :P