bad company 2 on 5970 low fps ?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Hello am playing bc2..and i think i have low fps on my 5970 card...i have like 80-120fps but thats not the problem the problem is that my fps is droping to like 55-60 alot of times..and sometimes 50fps...and when u have a card for 600dollars u shall be able to stay over 60+ fps all the time..so is it anything wrong on my compter or what is it ? Please help me ! i am playing on maxed out settings dx11 ..catalyst 10.5 drivers atm tryed a bunch different... Specs: windows 7 64bit ultimate 8gb ram ddr2 amd 955 x4 3.8ghz OC ati asus 5970 2gb black edition 925mhz OC gigabyte ma770-ud3 rev 2.0 video of the problem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XozNrxZES0o
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#2 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
Chances are your 5970 is bottlenecked by the CPU. BC2 has unbalanced loading so CPU will see a much higher load than the GPU, unless your GPU is really weak. Things you can do: -Lower sound quality -Enable Vsync (may help smooth FPS in-game, but it will lower your maximum FPS) -Further overclock your CPU -Try changing "RenderAheadLimit" to 0 or 3 (instead of default 2). This is located in a text document called 'settings.ini' in your documents->BFBC2 folder
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#3 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
Oh, and try disabling unused background programs.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
DO NOT overclock your CPU, god, who would recommend such a thing for a 3.8ghz Phenom that probably has a stock cooler, even if it isn't a stock one that recommendation is still outrageous, it's not the CPU it's more than enough for this game, actually it's nothing, that's how the game is, performance isn't constant most of the time, if you want to do something about it just lower the shadow quality, it doesn't affect the multiplayer experience, visually, imo.
Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Hello again guys and thanks for the fast replys. Well i dont have stock cooler i have the noctua 12. And i cant overclock the cpu any more it wont boot up then. Hmm i tryed change render to 3. And will try lower sound quality. Maybe i will buy a new cpu a intel i7 920..and OC it to like 4ghz..Do you guys think that will do it any better ? Thanks again. Keep replying !
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

Chances are your 5970 is bottlenecked by the CPU. BC2 has unbalanced loading so CPU will see a much higher load than the GPU, unless your GPU is really weak. Things you can do: -Lower sound quality -Enable Vsync (may help smooth FPS in-game, but it will lower your maximum FPS) -Further overclock your CPU -Try changing "RenderAheadLimit" to 0 or 3 (instead of default 2). This is located in a text document called 'settings.ini' in your documents->BFBC2 folderSwiftstrike5
There is no way a phenom 2 at 3.8GHz is bottlenecking that card. his CPU is VERY good. The game is just a bad console port. That's all there is to it.

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Hmm okey...well 1 more thing to mention is that the gpu is only using 60% on each core when playing BC2..and i have tryed get a fix for it but havent found any yet..in dirt 2 for example its using 70-80% of the gpu.
Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I am uploading a video on Youtube of the problem. So stay tuned on this thread and then you can watch the video. It will be uploaded in like 30min max. I will get a link in the thread aswell. Thanks !
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#9 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Chances are your 5970 is bottlenecked by the CPU. BC2 has unbalanced loading so CPU will see a much higher load than the GPU, unless your GPU is really weak. Things you can do: -Lower sound quality -Enable Vsync (may help smooth FPS in-game, but it will lower your maximum FPS) -Further overclock your CPU -Try changing "RenderAheadLimit" to 0 or 3 (instead of default 2). This is located in a text document called 'settings.ini' in your documents->BFBC2 folderSF_KiLLaMaN

There is no way a phenom 2 at 3.8GHz is bottlenecking that card. his CPU is VERY good. The game is just a bad console port. That's all there is to it.

Yeah, it's a bad port because his CPU bottlenecks the card. I never said anything about other games. The load balancing is poor for BFBC2. If his performance is decreasing, it's because of the CPU, not the GPU.

DO NOT overclock your CPU, god, who would recommend such a thing for a 3.8ghz Phenom that probably has a stock cooler, even if it isn't a stock one that recommendation is still outrageous, it's not the CPU it's more than enough for this game, actually it's nothing, that's how the game is, performance isn't constant most of the time, if you want to do something about it just lower the shadow quality, it doesn't affect the multiplayer experience, visually, imo.DanielDust

The game performance DECREASES because the poor coding clogs up the CPU (120 -> 60FPS is poor coding. It's not normal for a game to drop that much from a stable FPS). And it was a ****ing suggestion, jeez. He clearly knows the capabilities of his system if he's already hit 3.8Ghz.

Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

WOW really you drop to 50-60fps?! That's an outrage its a console port its not optimized blah blah blah here we go again.

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Here is the video guys please watch and try help me :/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XozNrxZES0o
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
We can't do anything. The game is poorly optimized. You're lucky you can run it at 55-60 fps, I have to run it at 25-35 fps on low settings.
Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts
Pretty well known that ati hardware has issues with bfbc2. Oh and your cpu isn't bottlenecking anything.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Then you shouldn't suggest things if you don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what kind of sane person, that actually bothered to read the OP, would suggest to overclock a 3.8ghz quad core even further for a game that doesn't even use half the power it already has. This suggestion of yours is as bad is the other guy with the Sector 8 avatar gsomethingclaw, when there's game problems, you should format....but at least that's a suggestion that wouldn't damage the PC for absolutely no reason, because a console port doesn't perform constantly at a certain frame rate...
Avatar image for kazakauskas
kazakauskas

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 kazakauskas
Member since 2008 • 1332 Posts

I think stock ghz 955 wont bottleneck you on BFBC2 . tho i did read somewhere that 5970 has problems with using its full power , drivers or something . Or maybe its just poor optimization as other say .

Avatar image for webby1
webby1

4014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#16 webby1
Member since 2004 • 4014 Posts

I should probably read all the other posts, but make sure your drivers at up to date

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
it has nothing to do with his graphics card! . It is a console port that is optimized poorly for the PC, frame rate drop are quite common. The only thing you can do is lower the settings. You should be happy that you get FPS that high, most people don't.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#18 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
DO NOT overclock your CPU, god, who would recommend such a thing for a 3.8ghz Phenom that probably has a stock cooler, even if it isn't a stock one that recommendation is still outrageous, it's not the CPU it's more than enough for this game, actually it's nothing, that's how the game is, performance isn't constant most of the time, if you want to do something about it just lower the shadow quality, it doesn't affect the multiplayer experience, visually, imo.DanielDust
people get fine temps on a black edition x4 at around that clock speed. if you want 4ghz and over, then yes an aftermarket cooler should be installed.[QUOTE="adde94"]Hello again guys and thanks for the fast replys. Well i dont have stock cooler i have the noctua 12. And i cant overclock the cpu any more it wont boot up then. Hmm i tryed change render to 3. And will try lower sound quality. Maybe i will buy a new cpu a intel i7 920..and OC it to like 4ghz..Do you guys think that will do it any better ? Thanks again. Keep replying !

i highly doubt you'll get much of a difference if you switch cpu's. unless your current cpu isnt a black edition, or your mobo is very bad at OC'ing, etc.
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#19 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
Then you shouldn't suggest things if you don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what kind of sane person, that actually bothered to read the OP, would suggest to overclock a 3.8ghz quad core even further for a game that doesn't even use half the power it already has. This suggestion of yours is as bad is the other guy with the Sector 8 avatar gsomethingclaw, when there's game problems, you should format....but at least that's a suggestion that wouldn't damage the PC for absolutely no reason, because a console port doesn't perform constantly at a certain frame rate...DanielDust
Are you kidding me? He overclocked to 3.8Ghz already, so he CLEARLY knows the risks/limitations. If he wants more performance from a game that bottlenecks the CPU then he has to upgrade or overclock. I suggested the later. Apparently, I read the OP in further detail than you did. You suggested lowering the shadow settings? That's not what he wanted. It's not like the OP doesn't know that lowering graphical settings will increase performance...
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#20 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
^ true that. i dont think anyone who buys a 5970 expects to lower settings on anything right now.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
55-60 FPS is great for Bad Company 2. And you get better FPS most of the time. consider yourself lucky, most people can't even get 55 fps.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Then you shouldn't suggest things if you don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what kind of sane person, that actually bothered to read the OP, would suggest to overclock a 3.8ghz quad core even further for a game that doesn't even use half the power it already has. This suggestion of yours is as bad is the other guy with the Sector 8 avatar gsomethingclaw, when there's game problems, you should format....but at least that's a suggestion that wouldn't damage the PC for absolutely no reason, because a console port doesn't perform constantly at a certain frame rate...Swiftstrike5
Are you kidding me? He overclocked to 3.8Ghz already, so he CLEARLY knows the risks/limitations. If he wants more performance from a game that bottlenecks the CPU then he has to upgrade or overclock. I suggested the later.

Still don't see what you're trying to say (you say to overclock, I say it's stupid then you say the TC knows about overclocking...), because your last post shows even more than your first post was just for the sake of posting, you made several such suggestions over the years :/ you don't suggest an overclock for a CPU that is way more powerful after the initial overclock than the game would ever need, what the TC knows about overclocking is irrelevant, knowing about overclocking doesn't mean that he would go even further for nothing.

He obviously wouldn't want to lower settings on the most powerful ATI card, but that's everything he can do, the game has some problems with ATI and it has even more problems for Crossfire and SLI, even drivers are bad for such configurations for both ATI and Nvidia.

Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#23 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"][QUOTE="DanielDust"]Then you shouldn't suggest things if you don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what kind of sane person, that actually bothered to read the OP, would suggest to overclock a 3.8ghz quad core even further for a game that doesn't even use half the power it already has. This suggestion of yours is as bad is the other guy with the Sector 8 avatar gsomethingclaw, when there's game problems, you should format....but at least that's a suggestion that wouldn't damage the PC for absolutely no reason, because a console port doesn't perform constantly at a certain frame rate...DanielDust

Are you kidding me? He overclocked to 3.8Ghz already, so he CLEARLY knows the risks/limitations. If he wants more performance from a game that bottlenecks the CPU then he has to upgrade or overclock. I suggested the later.

Still don't see what you're trying to say (you say to overclock, I say it's stupid then you say the TC knows about overclocking...), because your last post shows even more than your first post was just for the sake of posting, you made several such suggestions over the years :/ you don't suggest an overclock for a CPU that is way more powerful after the initial overclock than the game would ever need, what the TC knows about overclocking is irrelevant, knowing about overclocking doesn't mean that he would go even further for nothing.

He obviously wouldn't want to lower settings on the most powerful ATI card, but that's everything he can do, the game has some problems with ATI and it has even more problems for Crossfire and SLI, even drivers are bad for such configurations for both ATI and Nvidia.

I'm posting for the sake of posting? Lol, look at my original post. All of those suggestions help CPU performance (except Vsync). You offered one suggestion, which is invalid and then continued to harass my suggestion about overclocking. So, don't overclock... there's plenty of other suggestions that might help in my post. He knows the risks/limitations of his system better than you do, so posting that overclocking is a bad idea is redundant and the way you stated it made you sound all-knowing. He will know if he can go further or not, YOU won't.

If you should know anything about this game, it's that the GPU usage is fairly low and that CPU usage is fairly high. Making suggestions to lower graphical settings on one of the most powerful cards on the market is, well, poorly thought out. The proper suggestion would be to find a more compatible driver, but that's most likely not the case.

Avatar image for ZimpanX
ZimpanX

12636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#24 ZimpanX
Member since 2005 • 12636 Posts

I don't think there is anything wrong but just to make sure, what resolution are you playing at?

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Exactly guys thats correct. I dont wanna lower the settings because i have such a expensive card...so thats why i wounder i mean the fps drops to 55 and stil very playable but that is not the problem. The fact is that i get worried that it drop to 55 on such a good card. I mean my old 5850 had 55fps so its drops to the same as an older card that whats worries me.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
Exactly guys thats correct. I dont wanna lower the settings because i have such a expensive card...so thats why i wounder i mean the fps drops to 55 and stil very playable but that is not the problem. The fact is that i get worried that it drop to 55 on such a good card. I mean my old 5850 had 55fps so its drops to the same as an older card that whats worries me.adde94
when exactly does it drop? just randomly? or when a lot of crap is happening. regardless of your system its going to drop when theres infantry running around and a tank blowing up buildings. that takes a lot out of a graphics card and system. have no fret though, not really a well optimized game. the first time i read your first post, i thought it was 30 fps. so thats my bad. :( lol sorry
Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Hehe ok no problem. Well it drops mostly on arica harbor and panamal canal but even on other maps. But most likley on panamal canal on the A objective in conquest..like when you look out over the entire map. And dosent matter where i am. If i look at a direction that will expose like half map it will go to like 55 fps. If there is buildings and such around me it stays up because i cant see so much and therefore no need for so much grafics to load am i correct ? But even that am worried that my card is broken because of the usage. Even in dirt 2 and left 4 dead 2 its only using 70-80% it shall be using atleast 90% i mean i want the power thats what i paid for. Help ! EDIT: playing on 1920x1200 resolution saw some1 asked. And to the drops again. Surprisely the fps dont drop more then 5-10 fps in explosions mostly it drops when i look out over the map as i said. But stil its the best card from ATI. I dont wanna lower my settings. Am just worried about the usage right now. And the fps. But if the usage would be higher the fps would go higher also.
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

Even though the game is poorly optimized, he is having an issue. He should never drop below 60fps unless theirs a big explosion. I had a similar issue when the latest patch came out, but after a reboot the performance was back to normal.

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Hmm and what system do you have ? and what settings ?....what can i do to fix my issue ? i mean the gpu is not even using the power ffs... !
Avatar image for lucfonzy
lucfonzy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 lucfonzy
Member since 2008 • 1835 Posts

Sound the alarm bells!

I play mine with everything on high, minus AA on an 8800GT, my FPS isn't perfect but I don't really mind it :P

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Just played dirt 2 now to try and i did use gpu-z and logged the gpu usage and looked at it after i played..and it was on 85-95% gpu usage the whole time. I think thats pretty good. ?
Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I dont **** get it .tryed left 4 dead 2 now and the gpu was only using 50-60 % i mean ?? what the F is wrong .
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
You can't possibly ask for 100% usage from games that, if drivers were perfect, wouldn't even require half of an 5970's power. What I do find curious is that Dirt 2 uses 85-95% of that card, might be because of faulty drivers or maybe because of DX 11 (shouldn't be) but it uses way too much. You can't possibly expect a game like, let's say Doom 3, to use as much of you card as Crysis.
Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#34 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
No need to complain about 50-60fps dips. That's really good fps that you're getting. Spoiled. :P
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
How many times do I have to say this? NOTHING IS WRONG WITH YOUR GRAPHICS CARD! The game is just terribly optimized and requires a lot more CPU than GPU. You are getting very good frame rates, why are you complaining?
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
How many times do I have to say this? NOTHING IS WRONG WITH YOUR GRAPHICS CARD! The game is just terribly optimized and requires a lot more CPU than GPU. You are getting very good frame rates, why are you complaining?SF_KiLLaMaN
Other people with similar specs have constant 60+ fps unless theirs an explosion. He's dropping into the 40's with nothing going on.
Avatar image for icyseanfitz
icyseanfitz

2493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 icyseanfitz
Member since 2006 • 2493 Posts

im actually going to be buying one of these cards (unless the flagship 6000 series comes out any time soon :)) and id say the reason its at 60% etc. is because the card doesnt need any more power to run the game fully so its not under full load; 55-60 fps is about the limit of smoothness that most people can actually discern in video games anyway. im going to say its just a badly optimized game because if there was something wrong with you're card you would not be running at such high fps anyway (probably like 15-20 fps) just hang on till dice eventually get around to patching the game or new drivers come out for the card

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]How many times do I have to say this? NOTHING IS WRONG WITH YOUR GRAPHICS CARD! The game is just terribly optimized and requires a lot more CPU than GPU. You are getting very good frame rates, why are you complaining?Cranler
Other people with similar specs have constant 60+ fps unless theirs an explosion. He's dropping into the 40's with nothing going on.

If you read his original post, he said it drops to 55-60 FPS. which is very good for this game. His graphics card is perfectly fine, BC2 doesn't even use all of my 8800 GTX. BC2 has frame rate drops all of the time, even for no reason. It is normal.
Avatar image for OgreB
OgreB

2523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 OgreB
Member since 2004 • 2523 Posts
Something is out of whack... Either it is unoptimized like previous posters have said....which means you just to live with it. Or it could be just a driver issue, something starts running the background ....AV or something...software conflict, malware or virus... Haven't played the game myself but I know how you feel... I have a 5970....and it crushes just about any game out there...only Metro 2033 in DX 11 ....16x12, AA, Tesselation,,everything on and maxed...gives it a workout.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Chances are your 5970 is bottlenecked by the CPU. BC2 has unbalanced loading so CPU will see a much higher load than the GPU, unless your GPU is really weak. Things you can do: -Lower sound quality -Enable Vsync (may help smooth FPS in-game, but it will lower your maximum FPS) -Further overclock your CPU -Try changing "RenderAheadLimit" to 0 or 3 (instead of default 2). This is located in a text document called 'settings.ini' in your documents->BFBC2 foldermorrowindnic

There is no way a phenom 2 at 3.8GHz is bottlenecking that card. his CPU is VERY good. The game is just a bad console port. That's all there is to it.

Freaking fanboys..... ITS NOT A CONSOLE PORT! How many damn times do we have to say this?

How am I fanboy? I own the game and play it regularly. I figured it was a console port because it show all of the signs of a console port, being it requires a lot of CPU and little GPU. Frostbite is also originally a console engine.

Avatar image for morrowindnic
morrowindnic

1541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 morrowindnic
Member since 2004 • 1541 Posts

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] There is no way a phenom 2 at 3.8GHz is bottlenecking that card. his CPU is VERY good. The game is just a bad console port. That's all there is to it.

SF_KiLLaMaN

Freaking fanboys..... ITS NOT A CONSOLE PORT! How many damn times do we have to say this?

How am I fanboy? I own the game and play it regularly. I figured it was a console port because it show all of the signs of a console port, being it requires a lot of CPU and little GPU. Frostbite is also originally a console engine.

Fanboy? Thinking that anything multiplatform that doesn't get 200fps is a port. The PC has MANY features that the console version doesn't have. It's a multiplatform game. The game runs GREAT for me. If you want a console port, go looks at MW2. Now that IS one.

Complaining about getting 55fps and not 60fps is REALLY retarded. Just because you have an awesome card, doesn;t mean it HAS to get 100fps. 55 or 60 fps wont make a difference if its the minimum.

Avatar image for adde94
adde94

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 adde94
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Well..i just wanna know if its normal that is only uses 60% ...if not i trade it in for a new 1 and maybe it uses like 85% :) ?????
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

Well..i just wanna know if its normal that is only uses 60% ...if not i trade it in for a new 1 and maybe it uses like 85% :) ?????adde94
that is very normal. BC2 doesn't even use 100% of my 8800 GTX even though it runs like ****.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

Freaking fanboys..... ITS NOT A CONSOLE PORT! How many damn times do we have to say this?

morrowindnic

How am I fanboy? I own the game and play it regularly. I figured it was a console port because it show all of the signs of a console port, being it requires a lot of CPU and little GPU. Frostbite is also originally a console engine.

Fanboy? Thinking that anything multiplatform that doesn't get 200fps is a port. The PC has MANY features that the console version doesn't have. It's a multiplatform game. The game runs GREAT for me. If you want a console port, go looks at MW2. Now that IS one.

Complaining about getting 55fps and not 60fps is REALLY retarded. Just because you have an awesome card, doesn;t mean it HAS to get 100fps. 55 or 60 fps wont make a difference if its the minimum.

:D That's funny. Do you even know what console port means? You can add a lot of features and it will still be a console port. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but most of them are poorly optimized. The Frostbite engine was originally made for consoles only. Then they ported the engine over to the PC to make BC2 for PC. BTW, I don't get 200 FPS on ANY game. I play BC2 with 25-35 FPS.
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#46 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]Chances are your 5970 is bottlenecked by the CPU. BC2 has unbalanced loading so CPU will see a much higher load than the GPU, unless your GPU is really weak. Things you can do: -Lower sound quality -Enable Vsync (may help smooth FPS in-game, but it will lower your maximum FPS) -Further overclock your CPU -Try changing "RenderAheadLimit" to 0 or 3 (instead of default 2). This is located in a text document called 'settings.ini' in your documents->BFBC2 folderSF_KiLLaMaN

There is no way a phenom 2 at 3.8GHz is bottlenecking that card. his CPU is VERY good. The game is just a bad console port. That's all there is to it.

yeah No phenom II at 2.6ghz (probably doesn't even need to be this high) or higher would bottleneck any graphics card out period.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]How many times do I have to say this? NOTHING IS WRONG WITH YOUR GRAPHICS CARD! The game is just terribly optimized and requires a lot more CPU than GPU. You are getting very good frame rates, why are you complaining?SF_KiLLaMaN
Other people with similar specs have constant 60+ fps unless theirs an explosion. He's dropping into the 40's with nothing going on.

If you read his original post, he said it drops to 55-60 FPS. which is very good for this game. His graphics card is perfectly fine, BC2 doesn't even use all of my 8800 GTX. BC2 has frame rate drops all of the time, even for no reason. It is normal.

I didnt say his graphics card wasnt fine, just that something is causing an issue. I have a 920 at 3ghz with 5870 cf. I play with vsync beacause the game is just too unsmooth with it off. I never drop below 60 unless theirs a huge explosion nearby. If you watch the video he actually dropped to 48fps with nothing going on.
Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

Just 1 thing... do you REALLY need 8x Anti Aliasing on a 1920x1200 resolution? Really? Try lowering your AA.

Other than that, I don't know if it still helps or not, but try forcing DX10.

C:\Users\[Username]\Documents\BFBC2

Open Settings and then chance DXVersion=Auto to DXVersion=10

Also, take a look here : http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/battlefield-bad-company-2_5.html#sect0

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

5970 is probably the weirdest card ever existed, mind you, you will get lower fps playing in lowest setting than highest setting, that card is designed to play everything at maximum resolution and settings, in most games 5970 benched, gaming at 2560x1680 max setting will get HIGHER fps than you playing at 1080p medium setting, (I'm totally serious)

so try to turn settings even higher to get fps increase, this game don't have alot graphic options, I suggest try AA16xQ or AA32xQ, at that AA, though you won't come close to the 85-120 fps I got with mine EVGA 480SLI 3G DDR5, but a solid 60-70 on your 5970 should be no problem

Avatar image for morrowindnic
morrowindnic

1541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 morrowindnic
Member since 2004 • 1541 Posts

[QUOTE="morrowindnic"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] How am I fanboy? I own the game and play it regularly. I figured it was a console port because it show all of the signs of a console port, being it requires a lot of CPU and little GPU. Frostbite is also originally a console engine.

SF_KiLLaMaN

Fanboy? Thinking that anything multiplatform that doesn't get 200fps is a port. The PC has MANY features that the console version doesn't have. It's a multiplatform game. The game runs GREAT for me. If you want a console port, go looks at MW2. Now that IS one.

Complaining about getting 55fps and not 60fps is REALLY retarded. Just because you have an awesome card, doesn;t mean it HAS to get 100fps. 55 or 60 fps wont make a difference if its the minimum.

:D That's funny. Do you even know what console port means? You can add a lot of features and it will still be a console port. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but most of them are poorly optimized. The Frostbite engine was originally made for consoles only. Then they ported the engine over to the PC to make BC2 for PC. BTW, I don't get 200 FPS on ANY game. I play BC2 with 25-35 FPS.

I get 50-60fps in BC2 runs good for me.

The game was design with both consoles and PC in mind. A port is just that a port. The exact same game on multiple systems, but design for a certain system. BC2 is not the same on PC. It is better, and runs good.