Battlefield 3- Multiplatform

[QUOTE="ExESGO"][QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"]

Im expecting a multiplat akin to a valve multiplat. It will be on console, but the true experience
will be pc.

blues35301

Quality > quantity, everyday.Ondoval

[QUOTE="blues35301"]

[QUOTE="ExESGO"] Lets hope DICE does that.DanielDust

[QUOTE="Ondoval"]Quality > quantity, everyday.ExESGO

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]

[QUOTE="blues35301"]


Yeah how come Valve is the only dev that knows how to make the pc version of their multiplats
actually FEEL like pc games. Look at all the consolized recent pc games gone multiplat that
feel awkward and consolized both control and design wise. Fear 2, Far Cry 2, BC2, probably
Crysis 2 (the videos show that it is) I could go on.


Meanwhile the Half Life episodes and the rest of orange box feel great on pc and take full
advantage of pc within the limitations of source engine. And they're multiplats.

TerrorRizzing

BF2 2005 game has bigger map than BC2 2010 ???At the end BC2 was the console game but ported very well on PC

But BF3 must/should be bigger than BF2 imo

RIP Battlefield series, it was fun while it lasted.

dsgsdfgf

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"][QUOTE="ExESGO"] True, I remember that PS3 game, MAG was it.. yeah. I played on my friend's PS3 and the hole game was utter chaos and mindless running.d10sfan

Game like that could work on the consoles, just needs to be more interesting.

If MAG sold on PCs, do you think it would do much better?

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Are the high settings justifiable visually to the performance you get? Compared to say... medium or medium-low?

This is also not to mention that a true BF3 would be much larger in scale so it would most likely be even more demanding.

Mystic-G

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

The poor performance of the Frostbite engine is what worries me most. Let's say BF3 will be a true sequel on PC. Can you imagine the monster requirements?

Unless there's a overhaul on the engine for PC, I can only assume it'll eat up and spit out gaming PCs like nothing.

TerrorRizzing

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]. Valve doesn't do multiplatform games, that's why, because in almost all cases
multiplatform means console port, Valve does PC games that get ported to consoles.

badtaker

BF2 2005 game has bigger map than BC2 2010 ???At the end BC2 was the console game but ported very well on PC

But BF3 must/should be bigger than BF2 imo

[QUOTE="badtaker"]

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"] they all do the same thing, they make a game on two or three platforms at once. Usually a true port is done by a different dev team in my eyes. I dont even feel like bc2 is a port, even without mod support. What you guys are asking for would mean bc2 on pc would be an entire different game. We already got more players at once and a smoother overall play experience on pc, give us mods and we can take care of the rest in ut2k4 fashion

Philhellene

BF2 2005 game has bigger map than BC2 2010 ???At the end BC2 was the console game but ported very well on PC

But BF3 must/should be bigger than BF2 imo

[QUOTE="Philhellene"]

[QUOTE="badtaker"]

BF2 2005 game has bigger map than BC2 2010 ???At the end BC2 was the console game but ported very well on PC

But BF3 must/should be bigger than BF2 imo

badtaker

Atleast their trying to pull in the PC community with BC2. They are always updating and we get DLC for free. BC2 is still a great game.

Also, I thought I read a while ago that BF3 was supposed to be on the Frostbite 2 engine?

Atleast their trying to pull in the PC community with BC2. They are always updating and we get DLC for free. BC2 is still a great game. 9mmSpliff

[QUOTE="9mmSpliff"]Atleast their trying to pull in the PC community with BC2. They are always updating and we get DLC for free. BC2 is still a great game. DanielDust

[QUOTE="9mmSpliff"]Atleast their trying to pull in the PC community with BC2. They are always updating and we get DLC for free. BC2 is still a great game. DanielDust

Its not a real sequel because more players can experience the Battlefield series? as a PC gamer. that's just sad.krazy-blazer

Real Battlefield games have 64 players on a server. Consoles can only do like 24 players at a time.

This game is just going to be a joke, and a slap in the face. It's not a real Battlefield 3. There's no way it could be. How could they make the maps work for 24 players on consoles, and 64 on PC? They can't.

Atleast we will have Dx11, like in BC2. But I agree, we should have had the same maps with different modes already. I want to play onslaught and that has yet to come if it even is :(9mmSpliff