Dark Souls not optimized on PC - "Strictly a port"

  • 140 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

Am i really surprised?

Bleh, i wasn't going to get it anyway....

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

I have a feeling this will be one of those situations where they release a bad port for PC, and use the poor sales to justify not making any other games for PC. I hope that's not the case, but I have a bad feeling about it.

Avatar image for omenodebander
omenodebander

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 omenodebander
Member since 2004 • 1401 Posts

don't care, I will still buy it.

Avatar image for mAArdman
mAArdman

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mAArdman
Member since 2003 • 1612 Posts

disappointing but not unexpected

Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#6 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11620 Posts

I guess the Japanese don't believe in the phrase "if something's worth doing, its worth doing right."

This sounds disasterous, I might not get it because I don't want to make developers think we are willing to lap up lazy table scraps bestowed on us through begging and pity.

i have zero faith in Japanese developers when it comes to PC games and this sounds like it won't change my mind.

Avatar image for l0ner_1
l0ner_1

353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 l0ner_1
Member since 2003 • 353 Posts

Well... looking on the bright side. This series has some hardcore followers, I'm sure that will see all kinds of mods to optimize it. Something console version couldn't get.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#8 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Are you flipping KIDDING me?

I mean seriously?
All I was hoping for was the FPS issues to be fixed that the console version suffered from.

After we just got an amazing multiplat version of MP3, to hear this is dissapointing.

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#9 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

"not fixing the framerate issues"

Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

Still gonna buy it...probably...:?

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#11 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

Still gonna buy it...probably...:?

agpickle

Having...

Second thoughts?

I know I am.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#12 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

"not fixing the framerate issues"

Masenkoe

Awesome gif, lol.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I guess the Japanese don't believe in the phrase "if something's worth doing, its worth doing right."

This sounds disasterous, I might not get it because I don't want to make developers think we are willing to lap up lazy table scraps bestowed on us through begging and pity.

i have zero faith in Japanese developers when it comes to PC games and this sounds like it won't change my mind.

with_teeth26
*remembers the FF 14 beta* *puts shotgun in mouth*
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
They don't have to fix anything, PCs are perfectly capable of handling what the PS3 and 360 could not. The community will do the rest.
Avatar image for rhazzy
rhazzy

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 rhazzy
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Prexxus

Some fans made a petition...some...yeah?Just some...Let me...not act like a **** beggar and not question what is given to me...you may do so if you please...But i play on PC because it has high standards which can never be achived on console...and i dont want a piece of **** port...ok?
Let me ,let them know...that the majority of pc gamers want quality products...and if they cannot deliver they can shove their game where the sun dont shine...we(the other ones who didnt sign the petition)have the same right to make our opinion known and heard...


Let me ...let them know that we are not retards that have saliva coming out of our mouths and we dont not buy every pice of **** that they put out...
We know what quality is and we demant it...by giving us quality game they show us respect...let me be an **** who demands respect(from devs) and dont turn me in to a **** beggar...Ok?Thank you

P.S> And speak for yourself and be greatful when it comes to ur own persona...dont speak for others and do not try to take away the right to demand quality products...You may have a standard when it comes to games...so do i...i respect them and i choose the games i buy and play based on that...

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#16 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

I'm sure it will run fine on my PC. I'm not worried. Also, all I got out of his quotes is that they are porting the game and they aren't optimizing it. Sounds like every single port I've seen in the past several years.

Sure if you have a 5 year old PC you might have some of the framerate problems they had on consoles because they "didn't optimize it."

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Seriously guys, what more do you need to see? They are flat out TELLING you not to buy there game at this point.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#18 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

Should have given it to someone else to fix since they're too incompetent.

Avatar image for tanerb
tanerb

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 tanerb
Member since 2003 • 1300 Posts

no preorder for sure. will wait for the reviews. just because they realease it in pc does not mean i will snap buy it

Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

rhazzy

Some fans made a petition...some...yeah?Just some...Let me...not act like a **** beggar and not question what is given to me...you may do so if you please...But i play on PC because it has high standards which can never be achived on console...and i dont want a piece of **** port...ok?
Let me ,let them know...that the majority of pc gamers want quality products...and if they cannot deliver they can shove their game where the sun dont shine...we(the other ones who didnt sign the petition)have the same right to make our opinion know and heard...


Let me ...let them know that we are not retards that have saliva coming out of our mouths and we dont not buy every pice of **** that they put out...
We know what quality is and we demant it...by giving us quality game they show us respect...let me be an **** who demands respect(from devs) and dont turn me in to a **** beggar...Ok?Thank you

P.S> And speak for yourself and be greatful when it comes to ur own persona...dont speak for others and do not try to take away the right to demand quality products...You may have a standard when it comes to games...so do i...i respect them and i choose the games i buy and play based on that...

You sure that's not saliva foaming out of your mouth?

I really hope you don't think console games can't achieve the standards a PC one can.

Ive been a PC owner for over 20 years. I have also owned many consoles during that time. I can tell you from experience that a LOT of console games are the same or higher quality then a TON of PC games.

Not once in my posts did I speak for anyone but myself. Not once did I try to take your "rights" from you ( lol ). You can go ahead and demand all you want! That is your right. Don't worry I won't come to your house and stop you. Really. I won't.

Every time you post on these boards it amazes me how ignorant a human you are. I'm sure most people here know this by now as well.

P.S. You need a serious reality check.

P.S.S. Most beggars I've ran into sound smarter then you.

Avatar image for tanerb
tanerb

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 tanerb
Member since 2003 • 1300 Posts

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Prexxus

Is this a joke? they do it for money. They saw the petition and decided to make some easy money with no effort. they should have looked at the history of failed ports.

Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

tanerb

Is this a joke? they do it for money. They saw the petition and decided to make some easy money with no effort. they should have looked at the history of failed ports.

Did I say it was not for money? I said they did not plan on doing it and did not NEED to do it.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#23 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Prexxus

And in all honestly, they're working hard and really seem to care for the fanbase.

They listened to the community when they asked for it, they're giving us extra content added free of charge, and the fact is these guys have very little experience developing for PC and don't exactly have a gigantic budget to build a PC version from the ground up.

Its a great game and that's why its worth buying, not because it had 120 frames per second and infinite mod support, and I can almost assure that if this version sells well that the sequel would be done MUCH better on PC.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#24 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

I guess the Japanese don't believe in the phrase "if something's worth doing, its worth doing right."

This sounds disasterous, I might not get it because I don't want to make developers think we are willing to lap up lazy table scraps bestowed on us through begging and pity.

i have zero faith in Japanese developers when it comes to PC games and this sounds like it won't change my mind.

with_teeth26
The first sentence in your post says it all. I don't mind a straight port, but at least do it right. And what i mean by doing it right, means make it well optimized. I am very disappointed with this news, to be honest. I refuse to play a game where the framerate goes 50fps one second, and then 15fps the other. That's unacceptable.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#25 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

SPYDER0416

And in all honestly, they're working hard and really seem to care for the fanbase.

They listened to the community when they asked for it, they're giving us extra content added free of charge, and the fact is these guys have very little experience developing for PC and don't exactly have a gigantic budget to build a PC version from the ground up.

Its a great game and that's why its worth buying, not because it had 120 frames per second and infinite mod support, and I can almost assure that if this version sells well that the sequel would be done MUCH better on PC.

I totally understand where you guys are coming from... but why do all that and not OPTIMIZE the game? What would be the point of bringing the game with those added content, but not code it so the game runs WELL? Why even bother? But let's get real, they're not doing it just for the fanbase. They want to make money. Who doesn't? But it was a terrible decision to not optimize a game for the PC.
Avatar image for rhazzy
rhazzy

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 rhazzy
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

[QUOTE="rhazzy"]

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Prexxus

Some fans made a petition...some...yeah?Just some...Let me...not act like a **** beggar and not question what is given to me...you may do so if you please...But i play on PC because it has high standards which can never be achived on console...and i dont want a piece of **** port...ok?
Let me ,let them know...that the majority of pc gamers want quality products...and if they cannot deliver they can shove their game where the sun dont shine...we(the other ones who didnt sign the petition)have the same right to make our opinion know and heard...


Let me ...let them know that we are not retards that have saliva coming out of our mouths and we dont not buy every pice of **** that they put out...
We know what quality is and we demant it...by giving us quality game they show us respect...let me be an **** who demands respect(from devs) and dont turn me in to a **** beggar...Ok?Thank you

P.S> And speak for yourself and be greatful when it comes to ur own persona...dont speak for others and do not try to take away the right to demand quality products...You may have a standard when it comes to games...so do i...i respect them and i choose the games i buy and play based on that...

You sure that's not saliva foaming out of your mouth?

I really hope you don't think console games can't achieve the standards a PC one can.

Ive been a PC owner for over 20 years. I have also owned many consoles during that time. I can tell you from experience that a LOT of console games are the same or higher quality then a TON of PC games.

Not once in my posts did I speak for anyone but myself. Not once did I try to take your "rights" from you ( lol ). You can go ahead and demand all you want! That is your right. Don't worry I won't come to your house and stop you. Really. I won't.

Every time you post on these boards it amazes me how ignorant a human you are. I'm sure most people here know this by now as well.

P.S. You need a serious reality check.

P.S.S. Most beggars I've ran into sound smarter then you.


Dont try to be a smart ass after you made a fool out of urself...and dont insult me because i did not insult you...

You made a jackass out of urself on the last post where you sounded actually like the biggest idiot on these forums and i didnt say that to you nor did i insult you...and the next thing you do is what...make a post where you say u wont come over to my house...dude wtf?...are u from this planet?
Are you even aware of what u are typing...

Guys like you who say to others that they should be greatful for a piece of **** make me sick...your the kind of guy who after someone urinates on him sayz thanks!

Guess what?You should thank me by now....

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#27 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

I guess the Japanese don't believe in the phrase "if something's worth doing, its worth doing right."

This sounds disasterous, I might not get it because I don't want to make developers think we are willing to lap up lazy table scraps bestowed on us through begging and pity.

i have zero faith in Japanese developers when it comes to PC games and this sounds like it won't change my mind.

Elann2008

The first sentence in your post says it all. I don't mind a straight port, but at least do it right. And what i mean by doing it right, means make it well optimized. I am very disappointed with this news, to be honest. I refuse to play a game where the framerate goes 50fps one second, and then 15fps the other. That's unacceptable.

And we have no indication that it will suffer from framerate problems on a modern PC. The framerate problems on the 360 and PS3 were on very old tech. So they didn't pay special attention to optimization or the framerate problems that existed on consoles. So what. Most PC's will be able to handle poorly optimized games written for consoles by brute force.

My 3 year old 4890 would run every console port at 1080p and 60fps. If they are locking DS at 30 fps (which hasn't been verified as far as I know), framerates will not be an issue.

So they aren't giving PC special attention and just doing a simple port. So what. It will run better than my PS3. And I can sell my PS3 and I will have one of the best games I've ever played on my PC.

Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts
[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Elann2008

And in all honestly, they're working hard and really seem to care for the fanbase.

They listened to the community when they asked for it, they're giving us extra content added free of charge, and the fact is these guys have very little experience developing for PC and don't exactly have a gigantic budget to build a PC version from the ground up.

Its a great game and that's why its worth buying, not because it had 120 frames per second and infinite mod support, and I can almost assure that if this version sells well that the sequel would be done MUCH better on PC.

I totally understand where you guys are coming from... but why do all that and not OPTIMIZE the game? What would be the point of bringing the game with those added content, but not code it so the game runs WELL? Why even bother? But let's get real, they're not doing it just for the fanbase. They want to make money. Who doesn't? But it was a terrible decision to not optimize a game for the PC.

Because when the boss says it has to be done by a certain date. You're doing something brand new you have never attempted before. You don't have the luxury of doing everything you would like. Do you really think these devs are saying to themselves after all these hours of work "yay we have an unoptimized game for them" these people want to create something amazing. That does not mean they can always do that. In the end if the boss says you do it one way then you do it that way.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#29 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

I guess the Japanese don't believe in the phrase "if something's worth doing, its worth doing right."

This sounds disasterous, I might not get it because I don't want to make developers think we are willing to lap up lazy table scraps bestowed on us through begging and pity.

i have zero faith in Japanese developers when it comes to PC games and this sounds like it won't change my mind.

Mr_Ditters

The first sentence in your post says it all. I don't mind a straight port, but at least do it right. And what i mean by doing it right, means make it well optimized. I am very disappointed with this news, to be honest. I refuse to play a game where the framerate goes 50fps one second, and then 15fps the other. That's unacceptable.

And we have no indication that it will suffer from framerate problems on a modern PC. The framerate problems on the 360 and PS3 were on very old tech. So they didn't pay special attention to optimization or the framerate problems that existed on consoles. So what. Most PC's will be able to handle poorly optimized games written for consoles by brute force.

My 3 year old 4890 would run every console port at 1080p and 60fps. If they are locking DS at 30 fps (which hasn't been verified as far as I know), framerates will not be an issue.

So they aren't giving PC special attention and just doing a simple port. So what. It will run better than my PS3. And I can sell my PS3 and I will have one of the best games I've ever played on my PC.

You're absolutely wrong. PC hardware doesn't handle poorly optimized games by Brute Force. Maybe you should coin that phrase yourself, but don't spread it around here. Didn't GTA IV teach you anything? Assassin's Creed games had horrid frame dips. No GTX 580 or GTX 680 out there can make a game run at 60fps+ consistently by "brute force." Whoever taught you that, is dead wrong. And I'm not going to be an apologetic fanboy. I'm going to call it like I see it. If reviews come out and most users report that the game runs fine. I will buy it. If it doesn't, then I'm not going to purchase. That's really up to me.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#30 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

And in all honestly, they're working hard and really seem to care for the fanbase.

They listened to the community when they asked for it, they're giving us extra content added free of charge, and the fact is these guys have very little experience developing for PC and don't exactly have a gigantic budget to build a PC version from the ground up.

Its a great game and that's why its worth buying, not because it had 120 frames per second and infinite mod support, and I can almost assure that if this version sells well that the sequel would be done MUCH better on PC.

Prexxus

I totally understand where you guys are coming from... but why do all that and not OPTIMIZE the game? What would be the point of bringing the game with those added content, but not code it so the game runs WELL? Why even bother? But let's get real, they're not doing it just for the fanbase. They want to make money. Who doesn't? But it was a terrible decision to not optimize a game for the PC.

Because when the boss says it has to be done by a certain date. You're doing something brand new you have never attempted before. You don't have the luxury of doing everything you would like. Do you really think these devs are saying to themselves after all these hours of work "yay we have an unoptimized game for them" these people want to create something amazing. That does not mean they can always do that. In the end if the boss says you do it one way then you do it that way.

I'm well aware of some corporate practices. That's pretty common sense. But you honestly cannot assume that's what's happening here. You're not working at FromSoftware. And I doubt anyone from there will make an open statement about it. So for now, we will have to wait for the game to come out and see for ourselves. But I still stand by what I said, if **** does hit the fan on launch day.

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

sad but ---->

"Daisuke told the website that time restraints and a lack of experience in PC ports is to blame: ?To be completely honest, we?re having a tough time doing it due to our lack of experience and knowledge in terms of porting to PC"

not fair to blame form software, they only speaks the truth, these guys are nice enough to port such master piece to PC, and they are inexperienced at doing so. hell what was the last PC game they did? never, even that ninja game was ported by a 3rd party company. I will still buy it the second time to show my respect.

and theoretically, I don't believe hardware with massive computing power will have trouble handling the poorly handled pixel per sec overload that cause trouble in console version. I'm not talking about i5 + GTX480 or such, but 3rd gen I7 + GTX680 or GTX580 SLI +32G ram. anyway I'm ready.

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#32 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] The first sentence in your post says it all. I don't mind a straight port, but at least do it right. And what i mean by doing it right, means make it well optimized. I am very disappointed with this news, to be honest. I refuse to play a game where the framerate goes 50fps one second, and then 15fps the other. That's unacceptable.Elann2008

And we have no indication that it will suffer from framerate problems on a modern PC. The framerate problems on the 360 and PS3 were on very old tech. So they didn't pay special attention to optimization or the framerate problems that existed on consoles. So what. Most PC's will be able to handle poorly optimized games written for consoles by brute force.

My 3 year old 4890 would run every console port at 1080p and 60fps. If they are locking DS at 30 fps (which hasn't been verified as far as I know), framerates will not be an issue.

So they aren't giving PC special attention and just doing a simple port. So what. It will run better than my PS3. And I can sell my PS3 and I will have one of the best games I've ever played on my PC.

You're absolutely wrong. PC hardware doesn't handle poorly optimized games by Brute Force. Maybe you should coin that phrase yourself, but don't spread it around here. Didn't GTA IV teach you anything? Assassin's Creed games had horrid frame dips. No GTX 580 or GTX 680 out there can make a game run at 60fps+ consistently by "brute force." Whoever taught you that, is dead wrong. And I'm not going to be an apologetic fanboy. I'm going to call it like I see it. If reviews come out and most users report that the game runs fine. I will buy it. If it doesn't, then I'm not going to purchase. That's really up to me.

Funny you should say that. I am installing GTA4 as we speak. The gripe I have with GTA4 is that it is a **** to install because of DRM. But I have all of those games and they all run better than on my PS3. So what was your point again?

Edit: I'll add that I was mistaken. GTA4 doesn't run at 60 fps at 1080p, but it still runs better than my PS3.

Edit 2: Well after playing GTA4. At default settings at 1080p-never drops below 50fps. If I turn everything all the way up (view distance, textures, etc.) it never drops below 35 fps. If I set it lower than default settings or a lower resolution, it never drops below 60 fps.

Avatar image for rhazzy
rhazzy

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 rhazzy
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

And in all honestly, they're working hard and really seem to care for the fanbase.

They listened to the community when they asked for it, they're giving us extra content added free of charge, and the fact is these guys have very little experience developing for PC and don't exactly have a gigantic budget to build a PC version from the ground up.

Its a great game and that's why its worth buying, not because it had 120 frames per second and infinite mod support, and I can almost assure that if this version sells well that the sequel would be done MUCH better on PC.

Prexxus

I totally understand where you guys are coming from... but why do all that and not OPTIMIZE the game? What would be the point of bringing the game with those added content, but not code it so the game runs WELL? Why even bother? But let's get real, they're not doing it just for the fanbase. They want to make money. Who doesn't? But it was a terrible decision to not optimize a game for the PC.

Because when the boss says it has to be done by a certain date. You're doing something brand new you have never attempted before. You don't have the luxury of doing everything you would like. Do you really think these devs are saying to themselves after all these hours of work "yay we have an unoptimized game for them" these people want to create something amazing. That does not mean they can always do that. In the end if the boss says you do it one way then you do it that way.

Lets take whatever they do...because they were nice enough to do it...dosent matter if is a **** lets not forget that the boss said this and that...so it is only logical to buy their product...right?
The devs: "we give you s a **** product..."

You: "They want to create something amazing"...ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :D...have you played in Seinfield or smth?coz u are hilarious...
Amazing logic you have there my beggar friend...truly amazing...

I cant wait for you to expand your logic in the future posts...

Avatar image for Prexxus
Prexxus

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Prexxus
Member since 2003 • 1443 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] I totally understand where you guys are coming from... but why do all that and not OPTIMIZE the game? What would be the point of bringing the game with those added content, but not code it so the game runs WELL? Why even bother? But let's get real, they're not doing it just for the fanbase. They want to make money. Who doesn't? But it was a terrible decision to not optimize a game for the PC.rhazzy

Because when the boss says it has to be done by a certain date. You're doing something brand new you have never attempted before. You don't have the luxury of doing everything you would like. Do you really think these devs are saying to themselves after all these hours of work "yay we have an unoptimized game for them" these people want to create something amazing. That does not mean they can always do that. In the end if the boss says you do it one way then you do it that way.

Lets take whatever they do...because they were nice enough to do it...dosent matter if is a **** lets not forget that the boss said this and that...so it is only logical to buy their product...right?
The devs: "we give you s a **** product..."

You: "They want to create something amazing"...ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :D...have you played in Seinfield or smth?coz u are hilarious...
Amazing logic you have there my beggar friend...truly amazing...

I cant wait for you to expand your logic in the future posts...

I can never be sure if you're just that dumb or trolling.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
IS THIS A JOKE or REAL? It's basically a developer saying "Hey, we KNOW that this game has PROBLEMS, but we are not going to fix them so buy it anyway". They can Go F*** themselves then...
Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Look, at long as it's a port like Capcoms efforts with Street Fighter 4, RE5 etc. I'll be more than happy.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Look, at long as it's a port like Capcoms efforts with Street Fighter 4, RE5 etc. I'll be more than happy.-CheeseEater-
That's the point, it ISN'T. They have said it will have the same problems as the console version.
Avatar image for kaealy
kaealy

2179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 kaealy
Member since 2004 • 2179 Posts
So, the issue with the frame rate problem isn't based on the hardware but of some other serious flaw with the game? Are they for real?
Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Still gonna buy it...probably...:?

agpickle

This....

I really want the game, but if they can't do it properly, it should be outsourced or not done at all:?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73742

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#40 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73742 Posts

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Prexxus

Let me get this straight. PC gamers must be gratefully because the game is going to be a less than stella port for $50.:|

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

Pedro

Let me get this straight. PC gamers must be gratefully because the game is going to be a less than stella port for $50.:|

Exactly. You either do a good job, or don't bother. We aren't the console crowd that settles for average to poor.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#42 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

And we have no indication that it will suffer from framerate problems on a modern PC. The framerate problems on the 360 and PS3 were on very old tech. So they didn't pay special attention to optimization or the framerate problems that existed on consoles. So what. Most PC's will be able to handle poorly optimized games written for consoles by brute force.

My 3 year old 4890 would run every console port at 1080p and 60fps. If they are locking DS at 30 fps (which hasn't been verified as far as I know), framerates will not be an issue.

So they aren't giving PC special attention and just doing a simple port. So what. It will run better than my PS3. And I can sell my PS3 and I will have one of the best games I've ever played on my PC.

Mr_Ditters

You're absolutely wrong. PC hardware doesn't handle poorly optimized games by Brute Force. Maybe you should coin that phrase yourself, but don't spread it around here. Didn't GTA IV teach you anything? Assassin's Creed games had horrid frame dips. No GTX 580 or GTX 680 out there can make a game run at 60fps+ consistently by "brute force." Whoever taught you that, is dead wrong. And I'm not going to be an apologetic fanboy. I'm going to call it like I see it. If reviews come out and most users report that the game runs fine. I will buy it. If it doesn't, then I'm not going to purchase. That's really up to me.

Funny you should say that. I am installing GTA4 as we speak. The gripe I have with GTA4 is that it is a **** to install because of DRM. But I have all of those games and they all run better than on my PS3. So what was your point again?

Edit: I'll add that I was mistaken. GTA4 doesn't run at 60 fps at 1080p, but it still runs better than my PS3.

Edit 2: Well after playing GTA4. At default settings at 1080p-never drops below 50fps. If I turn everything all the way up (view distance, textures, etc.) it never drops below 35 fps. If I set it lower than default settings or a lower resolution, it never drops below 60 fps.

Take your GTA IV PC blinds off. A lot of people will disagree with you. If you insist on arguing about it, then go over to the wall over there and talk it out. There is no argument just because YOU'RE the only one that doesn't have an issue with a game. That doesn't make it right, nor does it make everyone's situation perfect, with rainbows and unicorns. Sorry, I'm not one of those people that proclaim a game excellent or perfect because it runs beautifully on my PC but runs like ass on many other's. That's not how I look at things. My world isn't flat and one-sided as yours.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#43 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Pedro"]

[QUOTE="Prexxus"]

A port they decided to do because of a fan made petition. They did not plan on doing it. They did not need to do it.

Even if it's unoptimized they are working hard to bring it to PC. Be greatful because honestly it's enough of a smash hit to not even need to touch the PC market.

FelipeInside

Let me get this straight. PC gamers must be gratefully because the game is going to be a less than stella port for $50.:|

Exactly. You either do a good job, or don't bother. We aren't the console crowd that settles for average to poor.

Emphatic, THANK YOU. I couldn't agree more.
Avatar image for Code135
Code135

892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Code135
Member since 2005 • 892 Posts

Daisuke told the website that time restraints and a lack of experience in PC ports is to blame: ?To be completely honest, we?re having a tough time doing it due to our lack of experience and knowledge in terms of porting to PC. First we thought it would be a breeze, but it?s turned out not to be the case. We?re still developing right now ? we?re crunching right now.?PC Gamer

ALL games whether for consoles or PCs are made on PC - drawn, designed and etc. ... how can they blame lack of experience in PC ports ? Port it with the framerate issues it has ? No optimizations since they are rushing to get it on the market ASAP ?!

Well F that ... so much for pre-purchase - game will stay in steam wishlist till it drops during a sale for 5 euro max.

This is why I hate japanese developers - they don't know SH*T about how to make a PC game. All they have in their head are arcades, Sega, Nintendo and PS.

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
Do a proper job or dont even bother. Porting across the console FPS issues? It might as well of stayed on consoles.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#46 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="rhazzy"]

[QUOTE="Prexxus"] Because when the boss says it has to be done by a certain date. You're doing something brand new you have never attempted before. You don't have the luxury of doing everything you would like. Do you really think these devs are saying to themselves after all these hours of work "yay we have an unoptimized game for them" these people want to create something amazing. That does not mean they can always do that. In the end if the boss says you do it one way then you do it that way. Prexxus

Lets take whatever they do...because they were nice enough to do it...dosent matter if is a **** lets not forget that the boss said this and that...so it is only logical to buy their product...right?
The devs: "we give you s a **** product..."

You: "They want to create something amazing"...ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :D...have you played in Seinfield or smth?coz u are hilarious...
Amazing logic you have there my beggar friend...truly amazing...

I cant wait for you to expand your logic in the future posts...

I can never be sure if you're just that dumb or trolling.

Unfortunately I think this is the real deal, he actually seems this angry about it and is actually this terrible at expressing his thoughts on the internet.

I don't like to stoop to insults, but that was so terribly written, long and hard to read that I think my 2nd grade cousin would have an easier time crafting better sentence structure and a good debate then that.

Dark Souls is a straight port, and it was an amazing game on consoles so its not like it being similar to consoles will make it worse on PC. It will still be a great game just missing some PC features, and for a good reason that's been stated many times. In fact it wasn't even some sort of unpolished and rough mess on consoles, the graphics were great and the framerate only took a hit in select areas, and I imagine a good rig could keep the framerate running smoother in those areas then on consoles.

I mean don't look a gift horse in the mouth guys, if you were excited enough to want it, here it is, and now you get your chance to let your voice be heard. There's a great chance the sequel will offer all you asked for with improved graphics and performance options and be much better optimized, but if you want to voice REAL complaints wait until you try the game and have REAL complaints to give them, and don't be like some asshat that screams and uses poor grammar and sentence structure because then you come off as some immature 12 year old, not someone developers will want to listen to.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
Im one of the guys that signed the petition for DS to come to PC. However... I wrote that there was some minimum requirements... Not to many yet they are not doing a single one of them... The same issues will be on the pc as the consoles. I... Yeah... Just dont release the game... If you are not going to spend the time to make a proper version with the minimum basic things that a pc version should have dont bother at all. And no... If this is how its going to be i wont buy it. They them self just went out and said "Dont buy it... it will suck" and i agree, it will suck and i wont buy it.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
I don't understand these reactions, you knew this two months ago, what you thought something might change in two months after they said it'll be identical to consoles?
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#49 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

I don't understand these reactions, you knew this two months ago, what you thought something might change in two months after they said it'll be identical to consoles?DanielDust

Judging by this thread, yes many of the complainers did immediately forget or assume they were just joking the whole time two months ago.

Avatar image for illmatic87
illmatic87

17935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 564

User Lists: 0

#50 illmatic87
Member since 2008 • 17935 Posts
They didnt have to port this game for the PC in the first place. But, what can you do?