Diablo 3 auction fees: 15% fee plus 15% for PayPal xfers....

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for attirex
attirex

2533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 attirex
Member since 2007 • 2533 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/news/diablo-iii-auction-house-fees-global-play-revealed-6374435

Yippee?

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
I was in after "OMG Diablo 3 BE P2W", but now... INB4 OMG U CAN'T TOTALLY PROFIT from teh REAL MONEY AUCTION HAUZ!!!!!!1111.....how be I suppose to make real muniz off it? OMG HAX
Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-

Shame on Blizzard! They must think they're a for-profit company that has a right for a profit!

Oh wait...

:roll:

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

They also didn't mention that the highest price for an item is 250 (euro - oh look, this bug still is here, no euro sign support)/$/etc, like anyone will actually get that kind of money, if the community will go crazy with the AH you might have the full end set and amazing weapons for 100 at most.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Cwagmire21

Shame on Blizzard! They must think they're a for-profit company that has a right for a profit!

Oh wait...

:roll:

Gordon Gekko had it all wrong. He added an extra vowel. Greed isn't good - it's god! I fully expected the shills and cultists to bow down, bend over, and support this. There is indeed a sucker born every minute. :P

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

15 percent for paypal, paypal is only 7

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Time to grind to inferno as fast as I can to capitilize on this! :D

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

Nobody cares wildflower, only those that have nothing better to do (like you), hate it, a thing that they'll never come into contact it, and actually bother to talk about such things on forums.

The two kinds of people that will actually get to play Diablo 3, don't care enough to discuss RMAH, because one type doesn't care and the other that is going to actually sell something doesn't have to justify or talk about anything, however, both types will just enjoy the game while frustrated people that are not significant to the game/company will just continue to be frustrated and discuss among themselves how "X" the company "Y" is for doing something.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-

Shame on Blizzard! They must think they're a for-profit company that has a right for a profit!

Oh wait...

:roll:

Gordon Gekko had it all wrong. He added an extra vowel. Greed isn't good - it's god! I fully expected the shills and cultists to bow down, bend over, and support this. There is indeed a sucker born every minute. :P

I would rather players be safer, and blizzard gain support than shady dealings. wouldnt you?
Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

Time to grind to inferno as fast as I can to capitilize on this! :D

ChubbyGuy40

I thought you were consolite

EDIT: Seems you are on SW at least

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I thought you were consoliteAzatiS

...seriously? You must not read the forums very often. Just because I defend Nintendo doesn't make me a consolite.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.Wasdie

Not all gold farmers are Chinese (I was modded once for saying that :D ) and with Blizzard and Paypal taking a 30% cut from each sale I can see a black market still existing and thriving. As a gold seller I can cut the AH price by 15%, still make more than I would "legally" selling, and the customer is still getting a savings.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

[QUOTE="AzatiS"]I thought you were consoliteChubbyGuy40

...seriously?

Yeah , im not trolling. I thought you were/are and what you said about playing D3 shocked me

Avatar image for Gamesterpheonix
Gamesterpheonix

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Gamesterpheonix
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts
lol how does this not make sense to you guys? You're taking a digital item you find IN GAME that you spent no real money for aside from buying the game itself and then selling it in the RMAH. Do you REALLY think they would just let everyone sell for 100% profit with no benefit to them? Hell no. Yes they make money off the game itself but if you're making some money off the game too then they need to make money off you. lol it makes perfect sense guys. You still make some money dont you? And cant you factor in that 15% when you set prices?
Avatar image for Renevent42
Renevent42

6654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Renevent42
Member since 2010 • 6654 Posts
I think it's fairly obvious this is Blizzard's way of monetizing Diablo 3, and that's the main objective. With that said it's not a big issue, at least if you don't want it to be. You can ignore the RMAH and just play however you want.
Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts

People were going to pay to win anyways. The only difference is that instead of gold farmers making all the money the player and blizzard split the money.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

People were going to pay to win anyways. The only difference is that instead of gold farmers making all the money the player and blizzard split the money.

Moriarity_
I still don't get the insanity of people calling this option as pay to win. How exactly do you win in Diablo by paying for gear? you're "selling" your enjoyment and cutting some serious time from the game and the fun you might have, in reality, it's pay to lose. The only thing that would fit is PvP that at the moment doesn't exist, in a final form and they're also thinking about how to make it work, PvP only sets obtainable through playing the game (only) and not allowing purchased gear are on their list (one needs no extra work, the other needs a lot so it's not that plausible).
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.-wildflower-

Not all gold farmers are Chinese (I was modded once for saying that :D ) and with Blizzard and Paypal taking a 30% cut from each sale I can see a black market still existing and thriving. As a gold seller I can cut the AH price by 15%, still make more than I would "legally" selling, and the customer is still getting a savings.

I would rather take a 30% premium and be guaranteed a safe, successful transaction than jeapordizing my CC or worrying about my Paypal account from a gold farming 3rd party.

I think you overestimate the value of cheaper transactions when security is at risk.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#21 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Amazon takes around the same amount when I sell things on there site to

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Moriarity_"]

People were going to pay to win anyways. The only difference is that instead of gold farmers making all the money the player and blizzard split the money.

DanielDust
I still don't get the insanity of people calling this option as pay to win. How exactly do you win in Diablo by paying for gear? you're "selling" your enjoyment and cutting some serious time from the game and the fun you might have, in reality, it's pay to lose. The only thing that would fit is PvP that at the moment doesn't exist, in a final form and they're also thinking about how to make it work, PvP only sets obtainable through playing the game (only) and not allowing purchased gear are on their list (one needs no extra work, the other needs a lot so it's not that plausible).

I never really thought about it that way. When you look at Diablo, the gameplay is certainly entertaining, but the best part of it is finding new loot. When you just buy your loot, you ruin that fun for yourself.
Avatar image for Fandangle
Fandangle

3433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Fandangle
Member since 2003 • 3433 Posts

I think it is called a processing fee.

If this annoys you don't even look at what your bank might be charging you for accessing your own $$.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#24 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

Shame on Blizzard! They must think they're a for-profit company that has a right for a profit!

Oh wait...

:roll:

MBirdy88

Gordon Gekko had it all wrong. He added an extra vowel. Greed isn't good - it's god! I fully expected the shills and cultists to bow down, bend over, and support this. There is indeed a sucker born every minute. :P

I would rather players be safer, and blizzard gain support than shady dealings. wouldnt you?

Pretty much how I feel about it, I mean I expected blizzard and/or paypal to take some off the top of every RMAH sale completed. The thing I look at is this, I expect to get around 70-75% for anything I sale on the RMAH, anymore would be a bonus. Yes, I plan to be selling a few things on it. Prolly not buying from it though.

I would rather it be embraced, and made easier, as well as safer, rather than spend so much money on trying to stop it. At least more people benefit from this method, then trying to stop it all together, and end up wasting a bunch of money and developement time, on a game that is already taking forever lol.

A few LAW makers could learn from this ^^ as well, instead of blindly trying to censor, or prohibit, ban etc.

Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-

Shame on Blizzard! They must think they're a for-profit company that has a right for a profit!

Oh wait...

:roll:

Gordon Gekko had it all wrong. He added an extra vowel. Greed isn't good - it's god! I fully expected the shills and cultists to bow down, bend over, and support this. There is indeed a sucker born every minute. :P

I love when people bash companies because they want to make money. They aren't running a charity. If you don't like it, vote with your wallet.

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Wasdie

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.

Don't bother...there is no point trying to have a logical argument with some people...
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

I never really thought about it that way. When you look at Diablo, the gameplay is certainly entertaining, but the best part of it is finding new loot. When you just buy your loot, you ruin that fun for yourself.Grodus5

It's always been like that, the best part of Diablo 2 was the economy. Only here on Gamespot Diablo 2 "was fine without it".

Goes to show how many of those who criticize the RMAH have a clue of why it is being implemented.

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-
A company, whose entire purpose is to make money, creates a new system which allows it to make money. Truly shocking... In other news, the earth is round and rotates around the sun!
Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Bruin1986

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.

Don't bother...there is no point trying to have a logical argument with some people...

True, and that's why until this very moment, I've never addressed anything you've had to say.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

True, and that's why until this very moment, I've never addressed anything you've had to say.

-wildflower-

...you just did.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

True, and that's why until this very moment, I've never addressed anything you've had to say.

N30F3N1X

...you just did.

Hence the, "...until this very moment..."

Reading comprehension is fun!

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

True, and that's why until this very moment, I've never addressed anything you've had to say.

N30F3N1X

...you just did.

No she didn't...
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Hence the, "...until this very moment..."

Reading comprehension is fun!

-wildflower-

And you're also criticizing something you know nothing of.

Comprehension is general is fun!

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

And you're also criticizing something you know nothing of.

N30F3N1X

And what would that be?

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Bruin1986

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.

Don't bother...there is no point trying to have a logical argument with some people...

Specially if those people are blizzard fanboys as well... I am fan of diablo universe since first game but you dont wanna hear my opinion about RMAH. Anyways i dont care much but im not blind enough to think 100 other reasons why Blizzard did this and bypass the main reason. Extra and very easy cash and that alone. Anyways. I cant wait for game , besides that im hardcore all over.

Avatar image for SKaREO
SKaREO

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 SKaREO
Member since 2006 • 3161 Posts
Scumbag: I can buy epic lewtz and pay to win! Blizzard: Hey! That's not allowed. Banned! Scumbag: Damn, I guess they don't like people using real money to beat the game. Blizzard: Everyone can now buy epic lewtz through our auction house as long as we get a cut of the profits... Twice. Scumbag: Dafuq? * then, Blizzard encouraged everyone to be a scumbag gamer * The End
Avatar image for jaay55
jaay55

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 jaay55
Member since 2007 • 205 Posts

isnt it 1.00$ + 15% fee? I thought only stackables (crafting mats and such) are 15% + 15% paypal fee?

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

-wildflower-

It's more about shutting down the chinese goldfarming/runefarming websites.

Players are going to pay cash for their items.

This is exactly like prohibition ending.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

GummiRaccoon

It's more about shutting down the chinese goldfarming/runefarming websites.

Players are going to pay cash for their items.

This is exactly like prohibition ending.

Really? Blizzard nickle-and-diming their customers in an effort to pinch out an even greater profit than they already are is now equivalent to ratifying the 21st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? I'll give you this, Blizzard fans never fail to amaze me with their ability to rationalize everything that company does. Talk about making a silk purse from a sow's ear...

Next time, for an even greater impact, use the 13th Amendment. You could say Blizzard is freeing its people from the shackles of gold and item sellers. We shall overcome, indeed!

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

Really? Blizzard nickle-and-diming their customers in an effort to pinch out an even greater profit than they already are is now equivalent to ratifying the 21st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? I'll give you this, Blizzard fans never fail to amaze me with their ability to rationalize everything that company does. Talk about making a silk purse from a sow's ear...

Next time, for an even greater impact, use the 13th Amendment. You could say Blizzard is freeing its people from the shackles of gold and item sellers. We shall overcome, indeed!

-wildflower-

I dont understand how this is nickle-and-diming.

Avatar image for MLBknights58
MLBknights58

5016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MLBknights58
Member since 2006 • 5016 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

The RMAH was never about the player making money and has always been about Blizzard monetizing these transactions for their own benefit.

Wasdie

It was also about protecting people who were going to buy from chinese gold farmers anyways.

They figured since they can't stop it, might as well make it secure and cash in on it. I don't blame them.

I've been saying this for months. I completely agree with what Blizzard is doing.

The hard counter to the RMAH : don't use it.

Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

Really? Blizzard nickle-and-diming their customers in an effort to pinch out an even greater profit than they already are is now equivalent to ratifying the 21st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? I'll give you this, Blizzard fans never fail to amaze me with their ability to rationalize everything that company does. Talk about making a silk purse from a sow's ear...

Next time, for an even greater impact, use the 13th Amendment. You could say Blizzard is freeing its people from the shackles of gold and item sellers. We shall overcome, indeed!

XaosII

I dont understand how this is nickle-and-diming.

You're right. That is a poor choice of words.

It's simply greed. I remember when EQ2 introduced a similar system, allowing real money for items on selected servers, and there was a huge outcry. WoW fans ridiculed SOE to no end. How quickly things change.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#44 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

Really? Blizzard nickle-and-diming their customers in an effort to pinch out an even greater profit than they already are is now equivalent to ratifying the 21st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? I'll give you this, Blizzard fans never fail to amaze me with their ability to rationalize everything that company does. Talk about making a silk purse from a sow's ear...

Next time, for an even greater impact, use the 13th Amendment. You could say Blizzard is freeing its people from the shackles of gold and item sellers. We shall overcome, indeed!

-wildflower-

I dont understand how this is nickle-and-diming.

You're right. That is a poor choice of words.

It's simply greed. I remember when EQ2 introduced a similar system, allowing real money for items on selected servers, and there was a huge outcry. WoW fans ridiculed SOE to no end. How quickly things change.

It called fanboyism and its better for you not get such people too serious.
Avatar image for -wildflower-
-wildflower-

2997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 -wildflower-
Member since 2003 • 2997 Posts

It called fanboyism and its better for you not get such people too serious.AzatiS

Yeah, I know, but he was correct - what I said was poorly phrased.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#46 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
I see no problem with this, if anything it might be a chance to make some money back. Put in 50hrs, get some unique item I don't want and sell it for a few bucks would be alright. I very much doubt I'll be buying weapons with money or gold, but I may sell stuff.
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#47 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
Im not bothered by it, i wont be playing Diablo 3 hoping to make any sort of money from it.
Avatar image for Brean24
Brean24

1659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Brean24
Member since 2007 • 1659 Posts
This doesn't bother me, I will be using the separate in-game gold auction house anyway.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Pay 2 Win confirmed. Blizz fanboys celebrate!
Avatar image for Haarhus
Haarhus

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Haarhus
Member since 2010 • 29 Posts
Pay 2 Win confirmed. Blizz fanboys celebrate!KHAndAnime
Win what? PvP in D3 is not competitive.