Can only afford one of these two games right now, which would you guys say has the best moody atmosphere? Also what makes it stand out more from the other? I know they are two pretty different games but any info would be appreciated
cheers
This topic is locked from further discussion.
If atmosphere wise : Stalker games are best from what i ever played.
Fallout 3 is more of an RPG than shooter (combat is really bad outside VATS) where Stalker is more FPS with inventory and upgrade system. Its what you like more : long fights with in nice sci-fi/fantasy world or really challenging tactical fights in one of the most atmospheric worlds ive seen in game.
Gunfight is more fun in Stalker without contest.
I would recommend Stalker . I always get bored of fallout 3 in ~15-17 hours (tryed to play it 3 times , never finished) , where stalker keeps me hooked up untill the end.
If you base on atmosphere it is STALKER hands down, partly because of all the things you need doing all the time (Maintining weapons, eat, sleep, make sure you have the right equipment). It is a more random world, so there is far less to expect, and mroe to jsut accept.
It is darker way more moody, often drab and chilly. Tense aswell. it is a dark world, where passion and humanity is a luxery, you often feel alone, valnurable, and like you are just a single lifeform in a zone that generally does not care about life, life is cheap afterall, it only cost a bullet ;)
That said FO3 is not bad, but it is far from moody, it is often borderline slaptick, and generally tongue in cheek, it lacks the decayed beauty of STALKER, and has this almost artifical feel to it. But it is fun, there is alot to explore, and alot to find. If you spring for FO3 be sure to buy the GOTY edition, because it has far more content, and the GOTY edition will last you a really really long time.
FO3 is more player friendly aswell, where STALKER can be quite unforgiving, you can carry alot, ammo is weightless, and unless you play with the diffeculty slider on max, ig almsot have to try to die, to suceed at it.
Weapons and gunplay are less interresting in this game, but it israrely a negative as such, it oddly fits the general feel of FO3, nearly cartoony at times.
It is overall a very good exploring game, with alot of fun mechanics thrown in, that will last most people atleast 100 hours (if it is the GOTY edition) where as STALKER CoP will likely last you 20-30 hours on the average difficulty with exploring buying guns, and somewhat hectic gunfights.
I think stalker definitly makes you feel like y our there, but for an apocolyptic wasteland, i think it needs more garbage and random things kinda like F3 did. If your looking for a good long playing session go for F3. If your just looking for something cheap and short fun, try Stalker.
Nothing touches the Stalker games in terms of atmosphere.
psn8214
i wouldnt say this, it just would not be accurate. cause there are games that can come very close, and even surpass.
but i will say this, Stalker (only one i played was SOC) did have an amazing atmosphere, very deep and sometimes spooky (i absolutely loved it) waiting till i upgrade GPU before i get the other 2 stalker games.
but i think there have been a few better than it, and i think there will be more to come that will be as well.
but i will say this, Stalker (only one i played was SOC) did have an amazing atmosphere, very deep and sometimes spooky (i absolutely loved it) waiting till i upgrade GPU before i get the other 2 stalker games.
Lach0121
Why wait? You've got two 8800GTs. That'll run Call of Pripyat just fine. Hell, I'm running it on an 8400GS with a pretty solid framerate.
I played both games and finished them. I would say Stalker Call of Pripyat has the best atmosphere and best lightning effects and graphics, especially if your PC is capable at maxed setting.
FO3 pure win , wtf your talkin about guys ? stalker doesnt have real exploration , most of the fields look the same and you cant really find anything there besides artifacts ... in fallout you explore for various things , like lore notes , books and weapons , bobble heads and nuka cola , also the music sound effects and graphics are way better...
i dont understand how people can compare stalker crap (srry to say that but that game is just pure crap ... ) vs fallout , wich makes excelent postapocalyptic atmosphere ... you guys talk total **** and yes i have played all stalker games and fallout 3 , spend more than 100 hours in that game , explored almost everything and found that ultimate experience comparing stalker vs fallout is like saying sims 3 is ultimate gamers game and its a freakin Esport ...
The atmosphere in STALKER games crushes the one in Fallout 3 in so many ways it's not even funny.
It's like comparing a NFS game to Big Rigs.
As Phoenix534 said, asking this question is an insult to the STALKER games.
And as Renevent42 said, anyone categorizing STALKER as pure crap does not have an opinion worth being considered. Especially if praising Fallout 3, that makes it even more downright ridiculous.
FO3 pure win , wtf your talkin about guys ? stalker doesnt have real exploration , most of the fields look the same and you cant really find anything there besides artifacts ... in fallout you explore for various things , like lore notes , books and weapons , bobble heads and nuka cola , also the music sound effects and graphics are way better...Farkeman
Yes, I also enjoyed exploring the copy and paste world of Fallout 3. "This office building looks strangely familiar. No matter, it's full of Nuka Cola instead of the other one that was full of mole rats!"
i have all stalkers games ,i enjoyed it and bought it just because its pc exclusive games and thats the only reason i respect it , but if you dare to compare 100$ and 3 bottles of vodka budget game wich is barely playable againts goty fallout 3 , that has the best moding community in entire gaming history than yes stalker is a crap ... i believe people praises stalker for it being pc exclusive only ... stalker is poor clunky game , with no voice dialogue , no good graphics or animations , everything is weird and clunky , how the hell that could be good atmosphere ?Farkeman
Fallout 3's modding community is nowhere near as good as many others. N O W H E R E. That's just, like what you said before, downright ludicrously wrong. Even its older brother Oblivion has a way better community.
Also, you realize STALKER games graphics are considered to be the best just behind Crysis and Shattered Horizon, on par with ArmA 2?
Your words are hollow.
so ok lets compare atmosphere on those games :
Stalker cop
+ good lighning
+ some npc's actualy do something , plays guitar , tells russian jokes etc.etc. i found that a + for atmosphere
+ anomalies
+ various events in stalker world ( loved that storm thing , when you have to hide , cant remember the name of it :( )
- outdated graphics
- bad animations
- no voiced "chats"/voice overs ( i mean cmon , its like playing early 90's game where you have to read everything )
- clunkyness and some noticable bugs
- lack of music sound track
- bad performance ( i dont know if it counts to atmosphere but it definetly ruined a lot of my game till i figure it out how to fix that quad core problem )
Fallout 3
+ great music
+ great sounds
+ good animations
+ companions ( i found that its a + for atmosphere )
+ postapocalypti green ( that green effect , makes excelent atmosphere )
+ exploration benefits , lore notes and books , radio messages etc.etc.
+ voice overs , voice actors , radio etc.etc.
+ theres always npc around that you can talk with or save or kill ...
+living world around you , events ...
- clunky shooting mechanics (that doesnt effect atmosphere at all tbh)
- some repetative textures ( just like in all freakin games )
+++ every minus can be fixed by mods... so you can see that Fallout clear winner :)
so ok lets compare atmosphere on those games :
Stalker cop + good lighning
+ some npc's actualy do something , plays guitar , tells russian jokes etc.etc. i found that a + for atmosphere
+ anomalies
+ various events in stalker world ( loved that storm thing , when you have to hide , cant remember the name of it :( )
- outdated graphics
- bad animations
- no voiced "chats" ( i mean cmon , its like playing early 90's game where you have to read everything )
- clunkyness and some noticable bugs
- lack of music sound track
- bad performance ( i dont know if it counts to atmosphere but it definetly ruined a lot of my game till i figure it out how to fix that quad core problem )
Fallout 3 + great music
+ great sounds
+ good animations
+ companions ( i found that its a + for atmosphere )
+ postapocalypti green ( that green effect , makes excelent atmosphere )
+ exploration benefits , lore notes and books , radio messages etc.etc.
+ voice overs , voice actors , radio etc.etc.
+ theres always npc around that you can talk with or save or kill ...
+living world around you , events ...
- clunky shooting mechanics (that doesnt effect atmosphere at all tbh)
- some repetative textures ( just like in all freakin games )
+++ every minus can be fixed by mods...
so you can see that Fallout clear winner :)Farkeman
I'm speechless. A list with a bunch of made up and/or meaningless points, and you think you are entitled to claim Fallout 3 as "clear winner"?
Wow...just wow.
Also, you realize STALKER games graphics are considered to be the best just behind Crysis and Shattered Horizon, on par with ArmA 2?
Your words are hollow.
N30F3N1X
i rofl , no realy i actualy did it ! stalker best graphics ? are you **** kidding me ? ive seen better graphics in indie games ... behind crysis ? behind arma 2 ? dude dude , you need to wake up maybe your comparing low graphics of crysis to stalker ? maybe then its behind it ...
EDIT : well dude then deny my list plz . what do u think is not ok with it? everything is true and you know it ...
i rofl , no realy i actualy did it ! stalker best graphics ? are you **** kidding me ? ive seen better graphics in indie games ... behind crysis ? behind arma 2 ? dude dude , you need to wake up maybe your comparing low graphics of crysis to stalker ? maybe then its behind it ...
Farkeman
You are the one that needs to wake up.
Look at System Wars threads if you do not believe me. STALKER and ArmA 2 are always mentioned in graphic threads, just behind Crysis and Shattered Horizon.
Graphic-wise Fallout 3 is not even as high as the knee of STALKER games.
EDIT : well dude then deny my list plz . what do u think is not ok with it? everything is true and you know it ...
Farkeman
The only "true" thing that can be obtained from your list is that you are a huge Fallout 3 fanboy, oblivious to the rest of the gaming world.
The whole thread has been saying STALKER games except you, and you insult everyone else with
wtf your talkin about guys ?Farkeman
that game is just pure crapFarkeman
best moding community in entire gaming historyFarkeman
(that doesnt effect atmosphere at all tbh)Farkeman
( just like in all freakin games )Farkeman
I would moderate you for trolling and offensive content if I could, even though it's obvious you are not doing it on purpose.
Fallout 3 atmosphere better than STALKER atmosphere. Right. Next thing we know is that sliced bread is fake and fried chips are a lie.
dude , have you even played those games ?
random screenshots from google :
stalker :http://img.techpowerup.org/091011/ss_pitt_10-04-09_12-57-51_(pripyat).jpg
Fallout :http://www.1337life.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/springvale1.jpg
Crysis :http://img258.imageshack.us/i/crysis2008012710135504sl8.jpg/
now compare you little troll ... your a waste of time ...
Farkeman
Define "you". Because you are pointing your finger to the whole rest of the posters in this thread.
The only troll here, sir, is the guy I'm quoting.
A bunch of "random google screenshots" won't help your point. If you want to make a comparison, use screenshots with maxed out settings and similar scenes.
dude , im telling you the facts and ur telling nothing ! if stalker has really out dated graphics but it is praised because of high details and highest graphics i could find is 8 by ign ... http://pc.ign.com/articles/106/1067251p2.html , 8 is no where close to crysis 10 and from 8 to 10 there is atleast 2 thousand games that has higher graphics rating :) i asume that you never played fallout 3 or crysis , the only game you played here is stalker ...Farkeman
Yeah listen to this guy! He totally knows what he's talking about and how to read reviews! Look at all the games with higher graphics scores than STALKER...for instance Puzzle Quest!
http://psp.ign.com/articles/777/777130p2.html
8.5!
/sarcasm
[QUOTE="Renevent42"]I still want to know what indie game has graphics better than STALKER...I'm obviously missing out :PFarkeman
:lol:
Do you wear glasses by any chance? Might want to get your eyes checked out...just saying.
dude , im telling you the facts and ur telling nothing !Farkeman
Bull****. It's the other way around. As you can see, the whole thread disagrees with you. Your "facts" are empty.
if stalker has really out dated graphics but it is praised because of high details and highest graphics i could find is 8 by ign ... http://pc.ign.com/articles/106/1067251p2.html , 8 is no where close to crysis 10 and from 8 to 10 there is atleast 2 thousand games that has higher graphics rating :) i asume that you never played fallout 3 or crysis , the only game you played here is stalker ...Farkeman
Yes, you're telling the "facts".
Part of my Fallout 3 mod list:
My bad, here's the PC version
http://pc.ign.com/articles/827/827071p2.html
We all supposed to believe STALKER only has .5 points better graphics than Puzzle Quest? Or are you simply using that score incorrectly?
Here's another:
Machinarium
http://pc.ign.com/articles/103/1036865p1.html
It's a very artistic game and all, but does anybody here think this game has better graphics than STALKER? Heck, it got a 9.5...if we were to use the score like you do the game has some of the best graphics on the planet!
it got 9.5 for artistic graphics ... stalker got 8 because of high details , but overal graphics are out dated .FarkemanThe point is, you can't use the graphics score to determine graphics fidelity...as there are things like style and artistic merit weighed in the score...both those measures are extremely subjective. Anyways, why am I arguing with you? You actually said STALKER and Fallen Earth have roughly the same graphics....there's a good chance you need glasses. I have played Fallen Earth too, and STALKER has MUCH better graphics. It's not a knock on Fallen Earth though...that game is a MMO who expects it to have the same graphical fidelity as a SP game?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment