ME2 Marks the beginning of the end for PC gaming...

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Erratic_Knight
Erratic_Knight

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Erratic_Knight
Member since 2003 • 167 Posts

This is pathetic imo...

It's clear that ME2 was MADE for consoles, its throws achievement messages in your face, it chops up the game into small chapters with end reports, and it strips away any freedom that pc gamers take for granted.

Hell that's why we play on PC, freedom, control and graphics. We don't get mods but we do get a stripped down port or what the devs like to call a streamlined system... Taking away freedoms/customizations/abilities/ etc, that I previously had and should still have is bull, plain and simple...

It's not streamlined; it's neutered, it's simple, and it's shallow... all facets of console games...

And companies want to know why people pirate games like this...

Avatar image for chapman86
chapman86

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 chapman86
Member since 2004 • 583 Posts

hmm, I haven't played ME2 yet, but when I played ME1, it did feel like console port, but I enjoyed it overall.

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
ME2 was MADE to work well on both the 360 and the PC without any drastic changes in the gameplay. Just because a PC game works well on a console does not mean that it was made for consoles. This thread is the beginning of the end of PC gaming....
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

Get over it Erratic. If we had more games like ME2 and less shovelware, the PC would be great.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#5 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

ME2 is a fantastic game.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
This guy posted the same thing in the ME2 forums. He is just trying to get a rise out of ppl.
Avatar image for jedinat
jedinat

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jedinat
Member since 2003 • 3560 Posts
Really ignorant post TC. Mass Effect wasn't even originally a PC game. The first one came out on Xbox half a year before the PC release. What were you expecting?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

TC is "that" part of the PC community I dislike so much. The "whiny" people.

Avatar image for Lost-Memory
Lost-Memory

1556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Lost-Memory
Member since 2009 • 1556 Posts
ME2 was MADE to work well on both the 360 and the PC without any drastic changes in the gameplay. Just because a PC game works well on a console does not mean that it was made for consoles. This thread is the beginning of the end of PC gaming....Iantheone
You don't understand. I know how he feels and it's true. we don't want stupid ports of great games. we want our own versions built from the ground up. Just like it used to be.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

This is pathetic imo...

It's clear that ME2 was MADE for consoles, its throws achievement messages in your face, it chops up the game into small chapters with end reports, and it strips away any freedom that pc gamers take for granted.

Hell that's why we play on PC, freedom, control and graphics. We don't get mods but we do get a stripped down port or what the devs like to call a streamlined system... Taking away freedoms/customizations/abilities/ etc, that I previously had and should still have is bull, plain and simple...

It's not streamlined; it's neutered, it's simple, and it's shallow... all facets of console games...

And companies want to know why people pirate games like this...

Erratic_Knight
100% agree with the tc, i say 100% because he also made the same point i made on the fact that people pirate games becuase the pc version is too consolish to bother. Anyway i guess i most definetly not the only one who thinks that the pc version quality of ME2 is worse than the first!!
Avatar image for BackHatch
BackHatch

273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 BackHatch
Member since 2010 • 273 Posts

Bla bla bla... who cares? Beginning of the end??? Really? Where the hell have you been? The Beginning of the end happened 3 or 4 years ago! We all know games are made for console first and PC second... duh!! Consoles are where the money is.

Given your post, and how out of touch you seem to be I'm going to have to break some other bad news to you... The audio CD is pretty much dead. Yeah man most people listen to music from .mp3's now.Sorry to break that news to you too on the same day...

Avatar image for Aslyum_Beast
Aslyum_Beast

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Aslyum_Beast
Member since 2008 • 975 Posts

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

Avatar image for Erratic_Knight
Erratic_Knight

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Erratic_Knight
Member since 2003 • 167 Posts

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

Aslyum_Beast

Has nothing to do with a high horse, has to do with mindless people accepting inferior products... ME2 is just good enough rather than as good as it could be... It's streamlined with less features not because it makes the game better, but because they can get away with less and people will still buy it... No inventory system, no free planet exploration, the list goes on... The fact that the things removed weren't perfect in ME1 doesn't mean that they should be removed rather it means they should be fixed and tweaked... Instead they were stripped, and we received a lesser product...

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="Aslyum_Beast"]

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

Erratic_Knight

Has nothing to do with a high horse, has to do with mindless people accepting inferior products... ME2 is just good enough rather than as good as it could be... It's streamlined with less features not because it makes the game better, but because they can get away with less and people will still buy it... No inventory system, no free planet exploration, the list goes on... The fact that the things removed weren't perfect in ME1 doesn't mean that they should be removed rather it means they should be fixed and tweaked... Instead they were stripped, and we received a lesser product...

Amen to that, thats what i am saying too. It has nothing to do with being dumbed down or not being a great game. The game itself is just fine. But i am saying exactly the same thing. The product is inferior. They remove stuff because they can get away with it and make us pay the same price for the inferior product. ME1 was a much better product on pc!
Avatar image for BackHatch
BackHatch

273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 BackHatch
Member since 2010 • 273 Posts

[QUOTE="Aslyum_Beast"]

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

Erratic_Knight

Has nothing to do with a high horse, has to do with mindless people accepting inferior products... ME2 is just good enough rather than as good as it could be... It's streamlined with less features not because it makes the game better, but because they can get away with less and people will still buy it... No inventory system, no free planet exploration, the list goes on... The fact that the things removed weren't perfect in ME1 doesn't mean that they should be removed rather it means they should be fixed and tweaked... Instead they were stripped, and we received a lesser product...

And audio CDs are superior quality than MP3s. So what? MP3 quality is close enough and the other advantage far out way the quality difference and people will never buy audio CDS anymore. Time to join the real world. Just be happy ME2 IS AVAILABLE AT ALL on PC!

Avatar image for greatmax1
greatmax1

1868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 greatmax1
Member since 2006 • 1868 Posts
You guys should stop complaining about every single little problem and just enjoy what you have. If you always imagine how much better something could have been, you'll end up whining all your life. When you eat a sandwich, do you wonder how tastier it could have been? How the bread is so dumbed down compared to the one you had when you were a kid. No, you eat the ****ing sandwich without thinking about it. Why can't you guys do the same with games? It's just entertainment. tl;dr : You will enjoy your games a lot more if you play them for what they are instead of what they could have been.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Yes you are right, but dont you see what happens here? People who like the game say thats its amazing. Which is exactly what i did when everyone was bashing mw2 and saying that its an inferior port etc,etc. Well thats how it always is, so why bother? We praise the games that we like and bash the games that we dont like despise the flaws or achievements ;)
Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
ME2 was a fun game. I enjoyed it. I dont care if it felt like a console games. Console games are also fun. I dopnt see the big deal here =/
Avatar image for jedinat
jedinat

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 jedinat
Member since 2003 • 3560 Posts

[QUOTE="Erratic_Knight"]

[QUOTE="Aslyum_Beast"]

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

BackHatch

Has nothing to do with a high horse, has to do with mindless people accepting inferior products... ME2 is just good enough rather than as good as it could be... It's streamlined with less features not because it makes the game better, but because they can get away with less and people will still buy it... No inventory system, no free planet exploration, the list goes on... The fact that the things removed weren't perfect in ME1 doesn't mean that they should be removed rather it means they should be fixed and tweaked... Instead they were stripped, and we received a lesser product...

And audio CDs are superior quality than MP3s. So what? MP3 quality is close enough and the other advantage far out way the quality difference and people will never buy audio CDS anymore. Time to join the real world. Just be happy ME2 IS AVAILABLE AT ALL on PC!

Yeah, the music format comparison doesn't really work at all... if I was into music I would order CDs and rip them to FLAC. You're just affirming his statement that mindless people accept inferior products. Erratic_Knight is indeed throwing a fit about nothing, but your argument isn't helping.
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
And here I thought PC gaming was already dying. Mass Effect 2 is a better game than the original. It removed everything unnecessary, features that were mediocre at best in the first one. PC games have had achievements for quite some time already. Just look at Steam. Or Lord of the Rings Online, which added achievements to MMOs three years ago.
Avatar image for HenriH-42
HenriH-42

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#21 HenriH-42
Member since 2007 • 2113 Posts

Agreed, might as well not have the game on PC if you're not going to take advantages of the platform's features. I don't play on PC just to play console ports with kb&m and slightly higher resolution.

Probably why I only buy PC exclusive games or games that are clear that they were made on PC first then consoles later.

Avatar image for jedinat
jedinat

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jedinat
Member since 2003 • 3560 Posts
Agreed, might as well not have the game on PC if you're not going to take advantages of the platform's features. I don't play on PC just to play console ports with kb&m and slightly higher resolution.HenriH-42
Beyond that what, exactly, are the PC's features? I'm all for PC exclusives, but careless sweeping statements really annoy me. "PC Game" is not a genre.
Avatar image for dos4gw82
dos4gw82

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 dos4gw82
Member since 2006 • 1896 Posts

Get over it Erratic. If we had more games like ME2 and less shovelware, the PC would be great.

millerlight89
QFT
Avatar image for HenriH-42
HenriH-42

2113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#24 HenriH-42
Member since 2007 • 2113 Posts

Beyond that what, exactly, are the PC's features? I'm all for PC exclusives, but careless sweeping statements really annoy me. "PC Game" is not a genre.jedinat

It might as well be. When you look at a game, you can easily tell if it was made for consoles or for PC. Just take a look at, for example, Heroes of Might and Magic on PS2 and HoMM III on PC. Or Oblivion vs Morrowind. Bioshock vs System Shock, etc. You can feel what platform the game was designed for by just playing it.

As to what are PC's features? Well, the menu and the interface should be designed for keyboard and mouse. Taking a look at Morrowind vs Oblivion again, it's fairly obvious which had a HUD designed for which platform. The text and HUD should be small and contain as much information as possible. The game should allow to save anywhere, unless it's something like Penumbra. You should have complete control over the game's settings, whether it's graphics, sound or controls. If it's multiplayer it should have dedicated servers. The control should feel more than just the mouse emulating the analog stick (see Dead Space). I'm sure I'm forgetting lots of things, but you get the idea.

Avatar image for RichardStallman
RichardStallman

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 RichardStallman
Member since 2009 • 1233 Posts
I agree completely.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I think HenriH-42 covered up everything. Its one thing to play a game with all kinda settings like anisotropic, vsync, antialising, and physics and AGEIA incoparation plus ACTUAL DX10 and DX11 features and not pretending that those features are there. I just dont get it, cant they see that pc can take higher detail in texture quality? Why do i have to see blurry textures from the console version and i cant override those setings by myself? Why cant i have an inventory in games like bioshock and why the inventory gotta be like eg fallout 3 and not big with full mouse support like stalker and system shock? Why i cant install mods on games like eg: borderlands? Or why i have to play bionic commando and see x360 buttons?
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#27 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]I think HenriH-42 covered up everything. Its one thing to play a game with all kinda settings like anisotropic, vsync, antialising, and physics and AGEIA incoparation plus ACTUAL DX10 and DX11 features and not pretending that those features are there. I just dont get it, cant they see that pc can take higher detail in texture quality? Why do i have to see blurry textures from the console version and i cant override those setings by myself? Why cant i have an inventory in games like bioshock and why the inventory gotta be like eg fallout 3 and not big with full mouse support like stalker and system shock? Why i cant install mods on games like eg: borderlands? Or why i have to play bionic commando and see x360 buttons?

Well,regarding the graphics settng,unlike some people have said before you can go to the mass effect 2 config and select the amount of AF you want for it(among other things)and everything else you can force on your GC control panel.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]I think HenriH-42 covered up everything. Its one thing to play a game with all kinda settings like anisotropic, vsync, antialising, and physics and AGEIA incoparation plus ACTUAL DX10 and DX11 features and not pretending that those features are there. I just dont get it, cant they see that pc can take higher detail in texture quality? Why do i have to see blurry textures from the console version and i cant override those setings by myself? Why cant i have an inventory in games like bioshock and why the inventory gotta be like eg fallout 3 and not big with full mouse support like stalker and system shock? Why i cant install mods on games like eg: borderlands? Or why i have to play bionic commando and see x360 buttons?Arach666
Well,regarding the graphics settng,unlike some people have said before you can go to the mass effect 2 config and select the amount of AF you want for it(among other things)and everything else you can force on your GC control panel.

Doesn't that kill the whole point of having those settings in game, or the developers working into the pc version beeing a superio product on its own and not a polished port from the console which is manily the man versions for games nowadays?

Avatar image for i_saw_a_mudcrab
i_saw_a_mudcrab

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 i_saw_a_mudcrab
Member since 2007 • 1015 Posts

ME1 sucked too, big deal.

Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

God Mass Effect IS a console game. It was a 360 game in the beginning and nothing has changed.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#31 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="dakan45"]I think HenriH-42 covered up everything. Its one thing to play a game with all kinda settings like anisotropic, vsync, antialising, and physics and AGEIA incoparation plus ACTUAL DX10 and DX11 features and not pretending that those features are there. I just dont get it, cant they see that pc can take higher detail in texture quality? Why do i have to see blurry textures from the console version and i cant override those setings by myself? Why cant i have an inventory in games like bioshock and why the inventory gotta be like eg fallout 3 and not big with full mouse support like stalker and system shock? Why i cant install mods on games like eg: borderlands? Or why i have to play bionic commando and see x360 buttons?dakan45

Well,regarding the graphics settng,unlike some people have said before you can go to the mass effect 2 config and select the amount of AF you want for it(among other things)and everything else you can force on your GC control panel.

Doesn't that kill the whole point of having those settings in game, or the developers working into the pc version beeing a superio product on its own and not a polished port from the console which is manily the man versions for games nowadays?

Hmm,well the PC version has it´s own interface so I guess if they didn´t really cared about the PC,they would have just make xbox controller compatible anyway.

Oh well,maybe you have a point there...

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
The elitism and extreme ignorance is so overwhelming that I don't even know where to start here.
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
[QUOTE="Erratic_Knight"]

This is pathetic imo...

It's clear that ME2 was MADE for consoles, its throws achievement messages in your face, it chops up the game into small chapters with end reports, and it strips away any freedom that pc gamers take for granted.

Hell that's why we play on PC, freedom, control and graphics. We don't get mods but we do get a stripped down port or what the devs like to call a streamlined system... Taking away freedoms/customizations/abilities/ etc, that I previously had and should still have is bull, plain and simple...

It's not streamlined; it's neutered, it's simple, and it's shallow... all facets of console games...

And companies want to know why people pirate games like this...

dakan45
100% agree with the tc, i say 100% because he also made the same point i made on the fact that people pirate games becuase the pc version is too consolish to bother. Anyway i guess i most definetly not the only one who thinks that the pc version quality of ME2 is worse than the first!!

omg, just get out. sell your pc get a console and leave the pc forums alone.
Avatar image for DaRockWilder
DaRockWilder

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 DaRockWilder
Member since 2002 • 5451 Posts

Get over it Erratic. If we had more games like ME2 and less shovelware, the PC would be great.

millerlight89
I agree.
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

This is pathetic imo...

It's clear that ME2 was MADE for consoles, its throws achievement messages in your face, it chops up the game into small chapters with end reports, and it strips away any freedom that pc gamers take for granted.

Hell that's why we play on PC, freedom, control and graphics. We don't get mods but we do get a stripped down port or what the devs like to call a streamlined system... Taking away freedoms/customizations/abilities/ etc, that I previously had and should still have is bull, plain and simple...

It's not streamlined; it's neutered, it's simple, and it's shallow... all facets of console games...

And companies want to know why people pirate games like this...

Erratic_Knight
you'd be more believable if you were talking about bad company 2 instead...ME2 is a great game and version on pc
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#36 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Erratic_Knight"]

This is pathetic imo...

It's clear that ME2 was MADE for consoles, its throws achievement messages in your face, it chops up the game into small chapters with end reports, and it strips away any freedom that pc gamers take for granted.

Hell that's why we play on PC, freedom, control and graphics. We don't get mods but we do get a stripped down port or what the devs like to call a streamlined system... Taking away freedoms/customizations/abilities/ etc, that I previously had and should still have is bull, plain and simple...

It's not streamlined; it's neutered, it's simple, and it's shallow... all facets of console games...

And companies want to know why people pirate games like this...kevy619

100% agree with the tc, i say 100% because he also made the same point i made on the fact that people pirate games becuase the pc version is too consolish to bother. Anyway i guess i most definetly not the only one who thinks that the pc version quality of ME2 is worse than the first!!

omg, just get out. sell your pc get a console and leave the pc forums alone.

So i am complaining that the pc version quality is lowered from the previous game and you dont have superior full control and customazation on graphical capabilities in order to set the graphics higher than the console version, and you telling me to sell my pc and get the game for a console where its known that the graphics in consoles are not as good as the pc version because of the sole reason being able to adjuct the settings higher than the consoles!!

Nice, vey nice indeed :roll:!!

Avatar image for dos4gw82
dos4gw82

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 dos4gw82
Member since 2006 • 1896 Posts
The elitism and extreme ignorance is so overwhelming that I don't even know where to start here.mo0ksi
No joke. I for one can't see where all this complaining is going and what it's even good for. I think we're all aware of the problems with multiplatform or ported titles; release delays, pricing, DRM, the attention the PC version of games get, etc. But really, things are not going to change unless the PC catches up in sales. Developers and publishers aren't going to give special attention to PC versions just out of the kindness of their hearts, and it's unreasonable to expect them to. Boycotting, whining, signing petitions, or pirating out of spite won't change things. Increased sales will. So how can we change things? Perhaps if we tell our friends about how great it is to game on the PC rather than mock them for playing a console? Maybe we could celebrate what we do have instead of always feeling sorry for ourselves? I still consider the PC the best platform for gaming, regardless of all its problems. Please, people. Can't we just move past all this pointless cynicism and bitterness?
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"] 100% agree with the tc, i say 100% because he also made the same point i made on the fact that people pirate games becuase the pc version is too consolish to bother. Anyway i guess i most definetly not the only one who thinks that the pc version quality of ME2 is worse than the first!!dakan45

omg, just get out. sell your pc get a console and leave the pc forums alone.

So i am complaining that the pc version quality is lowered from the previous game and you dont have superior full control and customazation on graphical capabilities in order to set the graphics higher than the console version, and you telling me to sell my pc and get the game for a console where its known that the graphics in consoles are not as good as the pc version because of the sole reason being able to adjuct the settings higher than the consoles!!

Nice, vey nice indeed :roll:!!

except the quality isnt lower in the sequel, overall its actually higher. In the end you're agreeing with the tc saying that this is a sign of the end of pc gaming, if you really think that you need to reevaluate being a pc gamer.
Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

Wow talk about a dramatic statement, no Mass Effect 2 doesn't "mark the beginning of the end for PC gaming". The problems with ME 2 are purely down to a few bad design decisions on Bioware's part. These decisions are not limited to the PC version, the console version also has some pretty bad design decisions. In many ways the PC control scheme makes ME 2 massively better on the PC than the console, you just need to look at the number of xbox users complain about the planet scanning (on the PC it is a breeze, boring but still a breeze).

We can complain as much as we like but at the end of the day Mass Effect 2 is still BETTER on the PC. The console version runs at 1280 x 720 and 30fps with no AA. On my modest PC (quad with GTX260) I can get 1680 x 1050 @ 60fps with 4xAA and yes the PC version does look a hell of a lot better for it. Not to mention that aiming and shooting in the game is much more enjoyable with a mouse and keyboard.

Hopefully with the final Mass Effect Bioware will take on board the criticisms and correct the design decisions they made in both versions. This is a fantastic game on the PC which has a few blemishes that need correcting.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="kevy619"] omg, just get out. sell your pc get a console and leave the pc forums alone.kevy619

So i am complaining that the pc version quality is lowered from the previous game and you dont have superior full control and customazation on graphical capabilities in order to set the graphics higher than the console version, and you telling me to sell my pc and get the game for a console where its known that the graphics in consoles are not as good as the pc version because of the sole reason being able to adjuct the settings higher than the consoles!!

Nice, vey nice indeed :roll:!!

except the quality isnt lower in the sequel, overall its actually higher. In the end you're agreeing with the tc saying that this is a sign of the end of pc gaming, if you really think that you need to reevaluate being a pc gamer.

:roll: You have no idea what the hell i was talking about. What i said is that quality of the pc version is worse than the previous version. The gamedevelopers put less effort on the pc version than the previous game. All gamedevelopers do that and thats the reason games dont sell well to pc. But you mind is stuck on the game itself and not on the game as a product on the pc. I am not saying that "overall" ME2 is worst game than the first or the pc version is worse than the console version or god knows what else you think i am saying! What i am saying is that the pc version could have been better as a pc product but your minds are stuck on ME bein riddicusly awesome. My post in this thread has nothing to do towards hating mass effect 2 as a game. I was pointing out that the pc version is not that good (not that its bad, or its not the best, just that its not that good) Now why i did that? Because of one of the previous post in a thread that you called "missinformation" So lets not go there again!!

So yeah i need to reevaluate being a pc gamer for wanting superior capabilities on the pc version and wanting the gamedevelopers to bother more with the pc version to make it more suitable for pc crowd with various tweaks on graphics, control, ui, gameplay, etc,etc. That and there is no need to remove stuff like the invenotry and other stuff they REMOVED from mass effect 2!! But you are right, i should get the game on console instead when i wont have the ability to tweak the settings. Besides thats what bioware did, they REMOVED stuff and the ability to tweak settings;). So who knows maybe you ME2 fans are right, removing features from a game makes it better and improve the overall experiance as a game and a product!!! :lol:

Avatar image for eagle63
eagle63

537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 eagle63
Member since 2004 • 537 Posts

oh come on dude.why dont you just print a sign and stand on a street corner and scream at passersby like all the normal prophets od doom

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
truly speaking most PC gamers now a days prefer simplified games (see : Oblivion - user score : 9.3) , so as people are getting what they want, how is it the end ?
Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts

PC gaming... Happily dying since 1985.

Avatar image for TruedUp
TruedUp

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 TruedUp
Member since 2002 • 691 Posts

Wait wasnt Halo 1 going to the Xbox the beggining of the end for the PC?

Man you prophets gotta step your game up. Predict soemthing right for once.

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#45 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
truly speaking most PC gamers now a days prefer simplified games (see : Oblivion - user score : 9.3) , so as people are getting what they want, how is it the end ?naval
obilvion has a good balance of accessibility and depth, its not as hard to get into or deep as morrowind (or as good as), but it has a much wider appeal.
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"]

So i am complaining that the pc version quality is lowered from the previous game and you dont have superior full control and customazation on graphical capabilities in order to set the graphics higher than the console version, and you telling me to sell my pc and get the game for a console where its known that the graphics in consoles are not as good as the pc version because of the sole reason being able to adjuct the settings higher than the consoles!!

Nice, vey nice indeed :roll:!!dakan45

except the quality isnt lower in the sequel, overall its actually higher. In the end you're agreeing with the tc saying that this is a sign of the end of pc gaming, if you really think that you need to reevaluate being a pc gamer.

:roll: You have no idea what the hell i was talking about. What i said is that quality of the pc version is worse than the previous version. The gamedevelopers put less effort on the pc version than the previous game. All gamedevelopers do that and thats the reason games dont sell well to pc. But you mind is stuck on the game itself and not on the game as a product on the pc. I am not saying that "overall" ME2 is worst game than the first or the pc version is worse than the console version or god knows what else you think i am saying! What i am saying is that the pc version could have been better as a pc product but your minds are stuck on ME bein riddicusly awesome. My post in this thread has nothing to do towards hating mass effect 2 as a game. I was pointing out that the pc version is not that good (not that its bad, or its not the best, just that its not that good) Now why i did that? Because of one of the previous post in a thread that you called "missinformation" So lets not go there again!!

So yeah i need to reevaluate being a pc gamer for wanting superior capabilities on the pc version and wanting the gamedevelopers to bother more with the pc version to make it more suitable for pc crowd with various tweaks on graphics, control, ui, gameplay, etc,etc. That and there is no need to remove stuff like the invenotry and other stuff they REMOVED from mass effect 2!! But you are right, i should get the game on console instead when i wont have the ability to tweak the settings. Besides thats what bioware did, they REMOVED stuff and the ability to tweak settings;). So who knows maybe you ME2 fans are right, removing features from a game makes it better and improve the overall experiance as a game and a product!!! :lol:

they removed nothing that was done well. They removed a pointless inventory and pointless side quests, so what is your point? There wasn't many settings you could tweak in me1 either, look into it and you will see. But if you think removing completely pointless features is horrible, then go right ahead. Its just a poor argument, the game hasnt been consolized anymore than the first in the series was. Now if you were talking about mw2, id agree to an extent... but besides that game... not buying it.

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#47 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts

[QUOTE="Aslyum_Beast"]

As far as i know, the Original Mass effect was for 360 only until about a year later. So yeah, its supposed to feel like it came from a console. think that stopped anyone from playing it? No, because its still a good game. Seriously, I love my PC and all, but people like you, TC, need to get off your high horse and understand gaming is for everyone and its not seperated by what platform you play on. What's fun is fun.

Erratic_Knight

Has nothing to do with a high horse, has to do with mindless people accepting inferior products... ME2 is just good enough rather than as good as it could be... It's streamlined with less features not because it makes the game better, but because they can get away with less and people will still buy it... No inventory system, no free planet exploration, the list goes on... The fact that the things removed weren't perfect in ME1 doesn't mean that they should be removed rather it means they should be fixed and tweaked... Instead they were stripped, and we received a lesser product...

I do agree with you that they should of fixed the free planet exploration rather than remove it completely. Exploration was boring 'cause the planets were practically devoid of anything interesting worth exploring. Seems to me they should of made it more interesting, added more things to see and do, not remove it completely. To hear people say that removing it completely was good move by Bioware has me scratching my head.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

[QUOTE="naval"]truly speaking most PC gamers now a days prefer simplified games (see : Oblivion - user score : 9.3) , so as people are getting what they want, how is it the end ?kevy619
obilvion has a good balance of accessibility and depth, its not as hard to get into or deep as morrowind (or as good as), but it has a much wider appeal.

umm.. I would say Oblivion has much depth as a puddle where is you cannot immerse even your toe :P. Seriously speaking, Oblivion is easily the moist simplified RPG out of all the ones I remember playing (not that this will alone makes it a bad game)

Edit : For ex:-

Combat : Button click fest

Character C1asses - Not really important, can become anything you want

Challennge - None due to scaling

Consequences - none Really

Exploration - Extremely simplified with quick travel an all.

Where is this depth ?

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#49 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts
[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"]

except the quality isnt lower in the sequel, overall its actually higher. In the end you're agreeing with the tc saying that this is a sign of the end of pc gaming, if you really think that you need to reevaluate being a pc gamer.kevy619

:roll: You have no idea what the hell i was talking about. What i said is that quality of the pc version is worse than the previous version. The gamedevelopers put less effort on the pc version than the previous game. All gamedevelopers do that and thats the reason games dont sell well to pc. But you mind is stuck on the game itself and not on the game as a product on the pc. I am not saying that "overall" ME2 is worst game than the first or the pc version is worse than the console version or god knows what else you think i am saying! What i am saying is that the pc version could have been better as a pc product but your minds are stuck on ME bein riddicusly awesome. My post in this thread has nothing to do towards hating mass effect 2 as a game. I was pointing out that the pc version is not that good (not that its bad, or its not the best, just that its not that good) Now why i did that? Because of one of the previous post in a thread that you called "missinformation" So lets not go there again!!

So yeah i need to reevaluate being a pc gamer for wanting superior capabilities on the pc version and wanting the gamedevelopers to bother more with the pc version to make it more suitable for pc crowd with various tweaks on graphics, control, ui, gameplay, etc,etc. That and there is no need to remove stuff like the invenotry and other stuff they REMOVED from mass effect 2!! But you are right, i should get the game on console instead when i wont have the ability to tweak the settings. Besides thats what bioware did, they REMOVED stuff and the ability to tweak settings;). So who knows maybe you ME2 fans are right, removing features from a game makes it better and improve the overall experiance as a game and a product!!! :lol:

they removed nothing that was done well. They removed a pointless inventory and pointless side quests, so what is your point? There wasn't many settings you could tweak in me1 either, look into it and you will see. But if you think removing completely pointless features is horrible, then go right ahead.

Why not make those things better? I don't think Bioware should be praised for stripping out features that could of been improved.
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"]

:roll: You have no idea what the hell i was talking about. What i said is that quality of the pc version is worse than the previous version. The gamedevelopers put less effort on the pc version than the previous game. All gamedevelopers do that and thats the reason games dont sell well to pc. But you mind is stuck on the game itself and not on the game as a product on the pc. I am not saying that "overall" ME2 is worst game than the first or the pc version is worse than the console version or god knows what else you think i am saying! What i am saying is that the pc version could have been better as a pc product but your minds are stuck on ME bein riddicusly awesome. My post in this thread has nothing to do towards hating mass effect 2 as a game. I was pointing out that the pc version is not that good (not that its bad, or its not the best, just that its not that good) Now why i did that? Because of one of the previous post in a thread that you called "missinformation" So lets not go there again!!

So yeah i need to reevaluate being a pc gamer for wanting superior capabilities on the pc version and wanting the gamedevelopers to bother more with the pc version to make it more suitable for pc crowd with various tweaks on graphics, control, ui, gameplay, etc,etc. That and there is no need to remove stuff like the invenotry and other stuff they REMOVED from mass effect 2!! But you are right, i should get the game on console instead when i wont have the ability to tweak the settings. Besides thats what bioware did, they REMOVED stuff and the ability to tweak settings;). So who knows maybe you ME2 fans are right, removing features from a game makes it better and improve the overall experiance as a game and a product!!! :lol:

Gooeykat

they removed nothing that was done well. They removed a pointless inventory and pointless side quests, so what is your point? There wasn't many settings you could tweak in me1 either, look into it and you will see. But if you think removing completely pointless features is horrible, then go right ahead.

Why not make those things better? I don't think Bioware should be praised for stripping out features that could of been improved.

it could have been done better, but I believe the limitations of the xbox 360 stopped that from happening (both hardware and user base). Remember this is a 360 game with a pc version.