Performance issues with BatmanAC?

  • 132 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

I am having low frame rate issues with this game even with a GTX580. It does not seem to matter if i lower settings, turn off Physx/ 3D or reduce resolution. How well is the game running for everone else?

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

I hear tessellation nukes performance as much as it did in crysis 2. Try lowering that setting.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

turn off dx11 and then enjoy.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

forums are bugging out for me bad.

Avatar image for Grovilis
Grovilis

3728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#8 Grovilis
Member since 2008 • 3728 Posts

It can't run on max even with a 580? I was planning on getting the game myself, but this a bummer. :/

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
75% of time I can't even get to the menu screen. Whenever it goes into the Batman screen and asks you to click to Start, the audio goes away and clicking everything doesn't do anything. UGH
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

It can't run on max even with a 580? I was planning on getting the game myself, but this a bummer. :/

Grovilis
its only the dx11 effects that are messed, other wise it runs fantastic.
Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22696 Posts

[QUOTE="Grovilis"]

It can't run on max even with a 580? I was planning on getting the game myself, but this a bummer. :/

TerrorRizzing

its only the dx11 effects that are messed, other wise it runs fantastic.

So you can pretty much max out the settings on a GTX580, with DX9 turned on??

Why did we have to wait 5 weeks extra for????? Very disappointing...

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

Hmm Hopefully a patch will come out for it that will fix the DX11 performance issues with it. I will wait a bit then, before I get it.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="TerrorRizzing"][QUOTE="Grovilis"]

It can't run on max even with a 580? I was planning on getting the game myself, but this a bummer. :/

hrt_rulz01

its only the dx11 effects that are messed, other wise it runs fantastic.

So you can pretty much max out the settings on a GTX580, with DX9 turned on??

Why did we have to wait 5 weeks extra for????? Very disappointing...

pretty much max on a 460 without dx11.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

Hmm Hopefully a patch will come out for it that will fix the DX11 performance issues with it. I will wait a bit then, before I get it.

Lach0121

of course one will

Avatar image for IZoMBiEI
IZoMBiEI

6477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 IZoMBiEI
Member since 2002 • 6477 Posts

they delay the game a month and it already needs patching?

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

they delay the game a month and it already needs patching?

IZoMBiEI

Yea game is terrible, shame on them, they should do like every other company that releases a multiplatform game (even PC exclusives), enhance it but not fast then fix it later, they should give us the game after an year.

As everyone already said, game works fine, what doesn't, yet, is the "way beyond" the "multiplatform" version settings.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22696 Posts
I seriously can't understand how a game is released like this when it obviously has serious performance issues?!?! Don't the developers do testing on it before it's released? Surely they would've picked this up? I just don't get it.
Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#18 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11655 Posts

I heard ATI put out some new drivers that improve DX 11 performance. Might help those with ATI cards.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

Yea, I have the same issue with a gtx580, average is 30 in the benchmark everything maxed dx11 high, physics normal. I was expecting much better performance. I guess we have to wait for new drivers fron nivida, this is really getting annoying EVERY game nowadays is released with some kinda of major issue.

Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
I have a gtx 580 with a gtx 460 for physx and the performance is complete crap in DX11. No I see why the game was delayed, it's not finished.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Again with crappy PC version launches. sigh
Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts

I have an ati card and the dx11 features cripple my performance as well. Haven't tried the new drivers yet; hopefully they fix the issues.

Avatar image for Grovilis
Grovilis

3728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#23 Grovilis
Member since 2008 • 3728 Posts

I have a gtx 580 with a gtx 460 for physx and the performance is complete crap in DX11. No I see why the game was delayed, it's not finished.FPSfan1985
Wow, that's ridiculous. It's one thing for the game to be poorly optimized, but this sounds like straight up laziness on the developers' part.

Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

Wasn't Arkham Asylum unplayable right at launch? Not saying it justifies anything, but not sure why everyone is surprised. :?

Avatar image for heatfanman101
heatfanman101

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 heatfanman101
Member since 2008 • 2877 Posts

I heard ATI put out some new drivers that improve DX 11 performance. Might help those with ATI cards.

with_teeth26

When did they release this? I checked their website and didn't see any new drivers (last CCC was from 11/15 and last CAP was from 11/18)

Avatar image for VeryBumpy
VeryBumpy

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 VeryBumpy
Member since 2008 • 1718 Posts

Maybe they released the reviewer copy .

Proves delays are not to optimize PC version, its to sell as many console copies as they can first.

Avatar image for KillerJuan77
KillerJuan77

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 KillerJuan77
Member since 2007 • 3823 Posts

People, stop blaming consoles for the delay and the performance issues, the developers have the blame, not the other systems. Under the same logic Cryostasis should be perfectly playable because it's a PC exclusive.

Anyways, I'll wait for a patch or new drivers.

Wasn't Arkham Asylum unplayable right at launch? Not saying it justifies anything, but not sure why everyone is surprised. :?

Cwagmire21

You could play AA on launch without PhysX perfectly, but my poor GTX 260 couldn't even run the game at max settings, no AA, 1440X900 and PhysX on medium at more than 30-40 FPS (Even though the launcher says that it's recommended to use a GTX 260 for PhysX on medium).

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#28 with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11655 Posts

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

I heard ATI put out some new drivers that improve DX 11 performance. Might help those with ATI cards.

heatfanman101

When did they release this? I checked their website and didn't see any new drivers (last CCC was from 11/15 and last CAP was from 11/18)

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/Catalyst1111aperformance.aspx

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Oh crap.... is the game out???
Avatar image for heatfanman101
heatfanman101

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 heatfanman101
Member since 2008 • 2877 Posts

[QUOTE="heatfanman101"]

[QUOTE="with_teeth26"]

I heard ATI put out some new drivers that improve DX 11 performance. Might help those with ATI cards.

with_teeth26

When did they release this? I checked their website and didn't see any new drivers (last CCC was from 11/15 and last CAP was from 11/18)

http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/Catalyst1111aperformance.aspx

Ah, awesome thanks... good to see skyrim fixes on there too.

Avatar image for heatfanman101
heatfanman101

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 heatfanman101
Member since 2008 • 2877 Posts

Oh crap.... is the game out???FelipeInside

It came out in North America, I think everyone else gets it 25th if I'm not mistaken

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Oh crap.... is the game out???heatfanman101

It came out in North America, I think everyone else gets it 25th if I'm not mistaken

Somebody hurry and "lend" me their wallet...
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

they should of just removed dx11, now they will have pc elitists swearing at them. They could of patched it in when it was ready, like crysis 2 or shogun 2.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts
[QUOTE="heatfanman101"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Oh crap.... is the game out???FelipeInside

It came out in North America, I think everyone else gets it 25th if I'm not mistaken

Somebody hurry and "lend" me their wallet...

i got it for right cheap from someone who got it free with their gpu :) I havent even played much, skyrim is hard to leave alone.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#35 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
I don't get it , does the game run fine without DX11 or not?
Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts
I don't get it , does the game run fine without DX11 or not? GeneralShowzer
50-60fps for me with everything turned on and detail set to very high(physx is at normal and dxll is turned off). 1920x1080 FXAA(High) GTX 570 PHENOM II 955 at 3.8GHz
Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22696 Posts
Quick question guys... I just bought a retail copy, but it doesn't come up in my Steam library. I thought this was a GFWL & Steam game?? I was hoping not to have to use the DVD to play it all the time??
Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

Quick question guys... I just bought a retail copy, but it doesn't come up in my Steam library. I thought this was a GFWL & Steam game?? I was hoping not to have to use the DVD to play it all the time?? hrt_rulz01

It's been stated that only the Steam version uses Steam, but still has to use GFWL as well (weird if you ask me). All other copies including retail use GFWL exclusively.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]I don't get it , does the game run fine without DX11 or not? MFDOOM1983
50-60fps for me with everything turned on and detail set to very high(physx is at normal and dxll is turned off). 1920x1080 FXAA(High) GTX 570 PHENOM II 955 at 3.8GHz

Yep, I turned off dx11 and it runs great, and honestly didnt notice a difference, much like metro33 its not worth the performance hit. I am annoyed, I bought a dx11 card because I wanted to be up to date on my gaming rig, but I should have just stuck with my gtx285 for a while longer seeing how most games are still dx9 and dx 11 seems to not do much or run like crap. I have learned my lesson.
Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22696 Posts

[QUOTE="hrt_rulz01"]Quick question guys... I just bought a retail copy, but it doesn't come up in my Steam library. I thought this was a GFWL & Steam game?? I was hoping not to have to use the DVD to play it all the time?? Cwagmire21

It's been stated that only the Steam version uses Steam, but still has to use GFWL as well (weird if you ask me). All other copies including retail use GFWL exclusively.

Damn. It's annoying having to put the DVD in everytime to play it. Anyway, it's worth it.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#44 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

[QUOTE="hrt_rulz01"]Quick question guys... I just bought a retail copy, but it doesn't come up in my Steam library. I thought this was a GFWL & Steam game?? I was hoping not to have to use the DVD to play it all the time?? hrt_rulz01

It's been stated that only the Steam version uses Steam, but still has to use GFWL as well (weird if you ask me). All other copies including retail use GFWL exclusively.

Damn. It's annoying having to put the DVD in everytime to play it. Anyway, it's worth it.

Yeah, Batman Arkham Asylum was the same way. Pretty archaic. The last game I had to put in the disc drive was Resident Evil 4 by Ubisoft. :P
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

another unoptimized console port with shoehorned in DX11 and Tessalation, where have i seen this before? "Cough" Metro 2033 and Crysis 2

Avatar image for Masculus
Masculus

2878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Masculus
Member since 2009 • 2878 Posts

The game is a (technical) mess, no wonder there was zero info before the release. I should have gotten Serious Sam 3 instead.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0

4928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5ef52b89b6fd0
Member since 2009 • 4928 Posts

The game is a (technical) mess, no wonder there was zero info before the release. I should have gotten Serious Sam 3 instead.

Masculus
Turn off dx11 and there is no problems, still looks fantastic, I wouldnt call it a technical mess by any means.
Avatar image for DabsTight703
DabsTight703

1966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 DabsTight703
Member since 2008 • 1966 Posts

Yeah it's pretty lame they'll release this game in this state. I'm going to wait until they fix the optimization issues with DX10/11.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22696 Posts
Still looks fantastic running it with DX9... But still get a slight stutter every now & then. I read somewhere that nVidia are working on a fix (new Beta driver I assume), and will release it soon.
Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts
[QUOTE="Masculus"]

The game is a (technical) mess, no wonder there was zero info before the release. I should have gotten Serious Sam 3 instead.

Advid-Gamer
Turn off dx11 and there is no problems, still looks fantastic, I wouldnt call it a technical mess by any means.

But it is in fact a mess.