Witcher 2 Performance

  • 199 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#101 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I am getting about 10-15 fps on my single GTX470 on everything ULTRA and resolution 1804x1004 (tv overscan issues so running resized res).

When i turn on SLI with both GTX470's, there is minimal improvement if any. I got from like 10-15 fps to like 15-20fps

Sys specs:

i7-930 @ 2.8

6GB ram

GTX470sli

humpmasterflex
Did you turn off uber sampling and reinstall the drivers while leaving 3D Vision driver unchecked?
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18260 Posts

[QUOTE="osan0"][QUOTE="SouthyClare"]

Im really dissapointed atm. I love the game so far but im getting 20-30 fps on high with uber turned off. Would of though I would of got a better performance from my pc.

Roland123_basic

crossfire isnt supported yet..AMD still have to make a profile. at the mo your 2 GPUs may be working against you. i dont use CF so i dont know how do this for that setup...but if you disable one of the GPUs you may get better performance. it should be supported in the next round of GPU drivers and CF profiles and all that good stuff.

and for those of us not using CF, on Nvidia GPUs that are well above the recommended, and of which the game is supposed to be optimized for, and are still getting horrid performance?

this is like dragon age 2s DX11 mode all over again. im sorry but there is just no excuse. you cant tell me the game left their office working fine on GTX400 series and above GPUs and suddenly works like **** retail.

considering the recommended is a GTX 260... i dont even see how this would be playable on the lowest settings on a GTX 260.

my only saving grace for this game is that im only about 75% through the first witcher game, and want to beat that first. this will hopefully give nvidia and the devs time to patch and get better drivers out there so the game isnt a miserable failure in the performance department.

what res are you playing at? i can tell you that on my rig if i leave the ubersampeling off and put pretty much everything else to max settings then its fine at 1280X1024. i dont have a FPS figure but the game is very smooth and playable. i have heard from comments on the official site (but not from a dev) that nvidia are on it. the current drivers are not happy with the game for some reason. nothing solid though. also do keep your expectations in check. if your thinking your rig is good enough to play this at 1080P at max settings with a smooth framerate then think again. the GPU was not designed for that. its just a bit more powerful than my card and i know my card cant run this game at 1080P at max settings.
Avatar image for SouthyClare
SouthyClare

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 SouthyClare
Member since 2009 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]

[QUOTE="osan0"] crossfire isnt supported yet..AMD still have to make a profile. at the mo your 2 GPUs may be working against you. i dont use CF so i dont know how do this for that setup...but if you disable one of the GPUs you may get better performance. it should be supported in the next round of GPU drivers and CF profiles and all that good stuff.osan0

and for those of us not using CF, on Nvidia GPUs that are well above the recommended, and of which the game is supposed to be optimized for, and are still getting horrid performance?

this is like dragon age 2s DX11 mode all over again. im sorry but there is just no excuse. you cant tell me the game left their office working fine on GTX400 series and above GPUs and suddenly works like **** retail.

considering the recommended is a GTX 260... i dont even see how this would be playable on the lowest settings on a GTX 260.

my only saving grace for this game is that im only about 75% through the first witcher game, and want to beat that first. this will hopefully give nvidia and the devs time to patch and get better drivers out there so the game isnt a miserable failure in the performance department.

what res are you playing at? i can tell you that on my rig if i leave the ubersampeling off and put pretty much everything else to max settings then its fine at 1280X1024. i dont have a FPS figure but the game is very smooth and playable. i have heard from comments on the official site (but not from a dev) that nvidia are on it. the current drivers are not happy with the game for some reason. nothing solid though. also do keep your expectations in check. if your thinking your rig is good enough to play this at 1080P at max settings with a smooth framerate then think again. the GPU was not designed for that. its just a bit more powerful than my card and i know my card cant run this game at 1080P at max settings.

The 5870 is capable of running the game at 1080p high-ultra as I have been speaking to people with the card and they are getting 40-60 fps. I even spoke to someone with the same card as you who was running it nicely at 1080p high settings. Hopefully its going to be sorted fairly soon.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

After turning off supersampling the game is pretty playable on my 5850, still what else can I turn off to make it totally smooth. Maybe turn down the objects that cast shadows?

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]so much for the red engine being optimized to run well across many system types.... it doesnt run well on ANY system type. and ATI/CF users arent the only ones getting screwed here. Nvidia GPUs are fairing just as bad as ATI cards are.

More than playable on my system...
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]

[QUOTE="osan0"] crossfire isnt supported yet..AMD still have to make a profile. at the mo your 2 GPUs may be working against you. i dont use CF so i dont know how do this for that setup...but if you disable one of the GPUs you may get better performance. it should be supported in the next round of GPU drivers and CF profiles and all that good stuff.osan0

and for those of us not using CF, on Nvidia GPUs that are well above the recommended, and of which the game is supposed to be optimized for, and are still getting horrid performance?

this is like dragon age 2s DX11 mode all over again. im sorry but there is just no excuse. you cant tell me the game left their office working fine on GTX400 series and above GPUs and suddenly works like **** retail.

considering the recommended is a GTX 260... i dont even see how this would be playable on the lowest settings on a GTX 260.

my only saving grace for this game is that im only about 75% through the first witcher game, and want to beat that first. this will hopefully give nvidia and the devs time to patch and get better drivers out there so the game isnt a miserable failure in the performance department.

what res are you playing at? i can tell you that on my rig if i leave the ubersampeling off and put pretty much everything else to max settings then its fine at 1280X1024. i dont have a FPS figure but the game is very smooth and playable. i have heard from comments on the official site (but not from a dev) that nvidia are on it. the current drivers are not happy with the game for some reason. nothing solid though. also do keep your expectations in check. if your thinking your rig is good enough to play this at 1080P at max settings with a smooth framerate then think again. the GPU was not designed for that. its just a bit more powerful than my card and i know my card cant run this game at 1080P at max settings.

that would be true if i wasnt running an extremely overclocked GTX 460. stock GTX 460 yeah, not that great. overclocked like mine is? it performs on par with GTX 480s.... 900mhz core, 2300mem.... the game should not be running poorly at all, there is honestly no excuse. especially considering im running a 2500k at 4.6ghz and 8gigs of ram. there are plenty of resources for the game to consume there.
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]so much for the red engine being optimized to run well across many system types.... it doesnt run well on ANY system type. and ATI/CF users arent the only ones getting screwed here. Nvidia GPUs are fairing just as bad as ATI cards are.

More than playable on my system...

playable and running well are completely different things. i can make the game playable on the lowest possible settings, that doesnt mean it runs well. if people with dual 580s and i5s/i7s are only getting like 40-50FPS on this game on ultra, it does not run well.... not in the slightest.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="osan0"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]

and for those of us not using CF, on Nvidia GPUs that are well above the recommended, and of which the game is supposed to be optimized for, and are still getting horrid performance?

this is like dragon age 2s DX11 mode all over again. im sorry but there is just no excuse. you cant tell me the game left their office working fine on GTX400 series and above GPUs and suddenly works like **** retail.

considering the recommended is a GTX 260... i dont even see how this would be playable on the lowest settings on a GTX 260.

my only saving grace for this game is that im only about 75% through the first witcher game, and want to beat that first. this will hopefully give nvidia and the devs time to patch and get better drivers out there so the game isnt a miserable failure in the performance department.

Roland123_basic

what res are you playing at? i can tell you that on my rig if i leave the ubersampeling off and put pretty much everything else to max settings then its fine at 1280X1024. i dont have a FPS figure but the game is very smooth and playable. i have heard from comments on the official site (but not from a dev) that nvidia are on it. the current drivers are not happy with the game for some reason. nothing solid though. also do keep your expectations in check. if your thinking your rig is good enough to play this at 1080P at max settings with a smooth framerate then think again. the GPU was not designed for that. its just a bit more powerful than my card and i know my card cant run this game at 1080P at max settings.

that would be true if i wasnt running an extremely overclocked GTX 460. stock GTX 460 yeah, not that great. overclocked like mine is? it performs on par with GTX 480s.... 900mhz core, 2300mem.... the game should not be running poorly at all, there is honestly no excuse. especially considering im running a 2500k at 4.6ghz and 8gigs of ram. there are plenty of resources for the game to consume there.

So because you can't max the game it's unoptimized? Turn down some settings man, it will run alot better and still look great.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]so much for the red engine being optimized to run well across many system types.... it doesnt run well on ANY system type. and ATI/CF users arent the only ones getting screwed here. Nvidia GPUs are fairing just as bad as ATI cards are.

More than playable on my system...

playable and running well are completely different things. i can make the game playable on the lowest possible settings, that doesnt mean it runs well. if people with dual 580s and i5s/i7s are only getting like 40-50FPS on this game on ultra, it does not run well.... not in the slightest.

I only have dual 460s and can run ultra at 40-60 frames ez. You just sound salty you can't max the game. What setting are you trying to run?
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#110 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="osan0"] what res are you playing at? i can tell you that on my rig if i leave the ubersampeling off and put pretty much everything else to max settings then its fine at 1280X1024. i dont have a FPS figure but the game is very smooth and playable. i have heard from comments on the official site (but not from a dev) that nvidia are on it. the current drivers are not happy with the game for some reason. nothing solid though. also do keep your expectations in check. if your thinking your rig is good enough to play this at 1080P at max settings with a smooth framerate then think again. the GPU was not designed for that. its just a bit more powerful than my card and i know my card cant run this game at 1080P at max settings.i5750at4Ghz

that would be true if i wasnt running an extremely overclocked GTX 460. stock GTX 460 yeah, not that great. overclocked like mine is? it performs on par with GTX 480s.... 900mhz core, 2300mem.... the game should not be running poorly at all, there is honestly no excuse. especially considering im running a 2500k at 4.6ghz and 8gigs of ram. there are plenty of resources for the game to consume there.

So because you can't max the game it's unoptimized? Turn down some settings man, it will run alot better and still look great.

uh... yeah. that would pretty much be the definition of an unoptimized game.... overkill hardware not being able to max a game = unoptimized... im not saying they wont fix it, and im not saying it is a bad game. i happen to love the witcher 1 and the second looks like it will be just as great. however, there are clearly major performance issues with this new engine. this is reminding me of the Dragon Age 2 DX11 fiasco all over again.
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#111 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] More than playable on my system...

playable and running well are completely different things. i can make the game playable on the lowest possible settings, that doesnt mean it runs well. if people with dual 580s and i5s/i7s are only getting like 40-50FPS on this game on ultra, it does not run well.... not in the slightest.

I only have dual 460s and can run ultra at 40-60 frames ez. You just sound salty you can't max the game. What setting are you trying to run?

yeah, you definitely dont. there are countless reports of people with single 480s, and 580s not being able to run the game at greater than 40FPS on ultra.
Avatar image for SouthyClare
SouthyClare

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 SouthyClare
Member since 2009 • 359 Posts

Turns out I wasnt running the latest drivers :) ooooops. Getting 40-50 outside and upto 70 indoors now.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] that would be true if i wasnt running an extremely overclocked GTX 460. stock GTX 460 yeah, not that great. overclocked like mine is? it performs on par with GTX 480s.... 900mhz core, 2300mem.... the game should not be running poorly at all, there is honestly no excuse. especially considering im running a 2500k at 4.6ghz and 8gigs of ram. there are plenty of resources for the game to consume there.Roland123_basic

So because you can't max the game it's unoptimized? Turn down some settings man, it will run alot better and still look great.

uh... yeah. that would pretty much be the definition of an unoptimized game.... overkill hardware not being able to max a game = unoptimized... im not saying they wont fix it, and im not saying it is a bad game. i happen to love the witcher 1 and the second looks like it will be just as great. however, there are clearly major performance issues with this new engine. this is reminding me of the Dragon Age 2 DX11 fiasco all over again.

Only thing not optimized is the ubersampling and that was done by design. Minus uber, I max the game out just fine.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] playable and running well are completely different things. i can make the game playable on the lowest possible settings, that doesnt mean it runs well. if people with dual 580s and i5s/i7s are only getting like 40-50FPS on this game on ultra, it does not run well.... not in the slightest.

I only have dual 460s and can run ultra at 40-60 frames ez. You just sound salty you can't max the game. What setting are you trying to run?

yeah, you definitely dont. there are countless reports of people with single 480s, and 580s not being able to run the game at greater than 40FPS on ultra.

They would have to have uber on for that to be true. Plus my gtx 460s out match a single 480 or 580.
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#115 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] I only have dual 460s and can run ultra at 40-60 frames ez. You just sound salty you can't max the game. What setting are you trying to run?

yeah, you definitely dont. there are countless reports of people with single 480s, and 580s not being able to run the game at greater than 40FPS on ultra.

They would have to have uber on for that to be true. Plus my gtx 460s out match a single 480 or 580.

yeah... that is with uber on... hence being on ultra. the only REAL difference between high and ultra is uber being on. and how could HORRID, UNPLAYABLE performance for even high end hardware with uber on be "by design"? since when do devs intentionally put settings in their games that cause them to be unplayable?
Avatar image for humpmasterflex
humpmasterflex

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 humpmasterflex
Member since 2003 • 363 Posts

[QUOTE="humpmasterflex"]

I am getting about 10-15 fps on my single GTX470 on everything ULTRA and resolution 1804x1004 (tv overscan issues so running resized res).

When i turn on SLI with both GTX470's, there is minimal improvement if any. I got from like 10-15 fps to like 15-20fps

Sys specs:

i7-930 @ 2.8

6GB ram

GTX470sli

mitu123

Did you turn off uber sampling and reinstall the drivers while leaving 3D Vision driver unchecked?

ok i turned off uber sampling thing and i get like constant 30-35 fps on everything maxed out ultra on a single GPU, never even heard of uber sampling before, wth is that? hell of a system hogger.

They still need to fix the multi gpu scaling, im only gettin 50% gpu usage with sli turned on, which is why i have it off completey.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] yeah, you definitely dont. there are countless reports of people with single 480s, and 580s not being able to run the game at greater than 40FPS on ultra.

They would have to have uber on for that to be true. Plus my gtx 460s out match a single 480 or 580.

yeah... that is with uber on... hence being on ultra. the only REAL difference between high and ultra is uber being on. and how could HORRID, UNPLAYABLE performance for even high end hardware with uber on be "by design"? since when do devs intentionally put settings in their games that cause them to be unplayable?

"Ubersampling: high quality rendering mode under which whole scenes are rendered multiple times to provide the best possible textures, object details and anti-aliasing (superior to anti-alias and anisotropy even on the highest settings). Use with caution, only on top-end computers (best possible in terms of both GPU and CPU)." Straight from the readme file. You are pretty much rendering each frame multiple times. If you know anything about the way GPUs work you'll understand that they knew exactly how taxing this setting would be.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="humpmasterflex"]

I am getting about 10-15 fps on my single GTX470 on everything ULTRA and resolution 1804x1004 (tv overscan issues so running resized res).

When i turn on SLI with both GTX470's, there is minimal improvement if any. I got from like 10-15 fps to like 15-20fps

Sys specs:

i7-930 @ 2.8

6GB ram

GTX470sli

humpmasterflex

Did you turn off uber sampling and reinstall the drivers while leaving 3D Vision driver unchecked?

ok i turned off uber sampling thing and i get like constant 30-35 fps on everything maxed out ultra on a single GPU, never even heard of uber sampling before, wth is that? hell of a system hogger.

They still need to fix the multi gpu scaling, im only gettin 50% gpu usage with sli turned on, which is why i have it off completey.

What drivers are you using? I'm getting a good 80-90% scaling here. How much vram do you have, and what texture memory size are you using?
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#119 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] They would have to have uber on for that to be true. Plus my gtx 460s out match a single 480 or 580.

yeah... that is with uber on... hence being on ultra. the only REAL difference between high and ultra is uber being on. and how could HORRID, UNPLAYABLE performance for even high end hardware with uber on be "by design"? since when do devs intentionally put settings in their games that cause them to be unplayable?

"Ubersampling: high quality rendering mode under which whole scenes are rendered multiple times to provide the best possible textures, object details and anti-aliasing (superior to anti-alias and anisotropy even on the highest settings). Use with caution, only on top-end computers (best possible in terms of both GPU and CPU)." Straight from the readme file. You are pretty much rendering each frame multiple times. If you know anything about the way GPUs work you'll understand that they knew exactly how taxing this setting would be.

oh jesus... im not even going to get into this "if you knew anything about anything" argument.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#120 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] I only have dual 460s and can run ultra at 40-60 frames ez. You just sound salty you can't max the game. What setting are you trying to run?i5750at4Ghz
yeah, you definitely dont. there are countless reports of people with single 480s, and 580s not being able to run the game at greater than 40FPS on ultra.

They would have to have uber on for that to be true. Plus my gtx 460s out match a single 480 or 580.

I don't have uber-sampling on any more and I'm only getting 40-55fps on ultra settings. The problem is that this game's frame rate is all over the place, just like Dragon Age 2 on DX11 high and... let's not even talk about very high.
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] yeah... that is with uber on... hence being on ultra. the only REAL difference between high and ultra is uber being on. and how could HORRID, UNPLAYABLE performance for even high end hardware with uber on be "by design"? since when do devs intentionally put settings in their games that cause them to be unplayable?

"Ubersampling: high quality rendering mode under which whole scenes are rendered multiple times to provide the best possible textures, object details and anti-aliasing (superior to anti-alias and anisotropy even on the highest settings). Use with caution, only on top-end computers (best possible in terms of both GPU and CPU)." Straight from the readme file. You are pretty much rendering each frame multiple times. If you know anything about the way GPUs work you'll understand that they knew exactly how taxing this setting would be.

oh jesus... im not even going to get into this "if you knew anything about anything" argument.

It wasn't a knock on you. Just really if you understand whats going on you will understand that there is absolutely know thought of optimization when doing multiple passes on each frame.
Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#122 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
When I was on facebook, I saw a link saying that updating to the latest nvidia drivers can improve performance. I dont know for ATI users though. But..this sounds like another game with has been developed for hardware that doesnt even exist yet, utterly ridiculous
Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
Darnnn, you guys are getting 15-20 fps on GTX 480s, i guess me and my GTX 275 dont stand a chance ;( I will get the game regardless and play it when i get my GTX 570 8)
Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#124 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Darnnn, you guys are getting 15-20 fps on GTX 480s, i guess me and my GTX 275 dont stand a chance ;( I will get the game regardless and play it when i get my GTX 570 8)Solid_Tango

It will run fine, just make sure you uninstall Nvidia 3DVision Drivers with control panel like I said on page 4 and have ubersampling turned off.

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]Darnnn, you guys are getting 15-20 fps on GTX 480s, i guess me and my GTX 275 dont stand a chance ;( I will get the game regardless and play it when i get my GTX 570 8)pelvist

It will run fine, just make sure you uninstall Nvidia 3DVision Drivers with control panel like I said on page 4 and have ubersampling turned off.

and by fine he means you will be lucky to get 30fps. that is about what im getting on high with uber off on my gtx 460
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts
[QUOTE="pelvist"]

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]Darnnn, you guys are getting 15-20 fps on GTX 480s, i guess me and my GTX 275 dont stand a chance ;( I will get the game regardless and play it when i get my GTX 570 8)Roland123_basic

It will run fine, just make sure you uninstall Nvidia 3DVision Drivers with control panel like I said on page 4 and have ubersampling turned off.

and by fine he means you will be lucky to get 30fps. that is about what im getting on high with uber off on my gtx 460

Then lower setting if you're not happy, or upgrade.
Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="pelvist"]

It will run fine, just make sure you uninstall Nvidia 3DVision Drivers with control panel like I said on page 4 and have ubersampling turned off.

i5750at4Ghz

and by fine he means you will be lucky to get 30fps. that is about what im getting on high with uber off on my gtx 460

Then lower setting if you're not happy, or upgrade.

Ok :) I m cool with 30fps

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"][QUOTE="pelvist"]

It will run fine, just make sure you uninstall Nvidia 3DVision Drivers with control panel like I said on page 4 and have ubersampling turned off.

i5750at4Ghz

and by fine he means you will be lucky to get 30fps. that is about what im getting on high with uber off on my gtx 460

Then lower setting if you're not happy, or upgrade.

i shouldnt need to... and you are going to be hard pressed to find anyone that would agree with you.

Avatar image for da_bomb123
da_bomb123

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 da_bomb123
Member since 2004 • 178 Posts

Wow good job guys....now I'm scared to run this game on my 5770...ugh

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#130 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

Wow good job guys....now I'm scared to run this game on my 5770...ugh

da_bomb123
it will run, just on low-med and around 30-40FPS....
Avatar image for humpmasterflex
humpmasterflex

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 humpmasterflex
Member since 2003 • 363 Posts
[QUOTE="humpmasterflex"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Did you turn off uber sampling and reinstall the drivers while leaving 3D Vision driver unchecked?i5750at4Ghz

ok i turned off uber sampling thing and i get like constant 30-35 fps on everything maxed out ultra on a single GPU, never even heard of uber sampling before, wth is that? hell of a system hogger.

They still need to fix the multi gpu scaling, im only gettin 50% gpu usage with sli turned on, which is why i have it off completey.

What drivers are you using? I'm getting a good 80-90% scaling here. How much vram do you have, and what texture memory size are you using?

i rolled back my drivers to 266.58 because people said the newest drivers gave issues with the game
Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="humpmasterflex"]

ok i turned off uber sampling thing and i get like constant 30-35 fps on everything maxed out ultra on a single GPU, never even heard of uber sampling before, wth is that? hell of a system hogger.

They still need to fix the multi gpu scaling, im only gettin 50% gpu usage with sli turned on, which is why i have it off completey.

humpmasterflex

What drivers are you using? I'm getting a good 80-90% scaling here. How much vram do you have, and what texture memory size are you using?

i rolled back my drivers to 266.58 because people said the newest drivers gave issues with the game

They lied to you.

Avatar image for mulac2910
mulac2910

826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 mulac2910
Member since 2004 • 826 Posts
Playing on: AMD Phenom II 865 3.4Ghz 8g RAM 480GTX 1.5 Gb everything is set at highest with ubersampling on. Playing at 1360 x 768. The game has been smooth as hell not dropped below 32 fps and hitting 70 in some areas. The latest NVIDIA drivers gave a drop of around 5frames when upgrading from 267.24 beta.
Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts

Is anyone else getting this weird glitch? Every time the area changes after a cutscene, geralt goes back to using this default curvy sword instead of the temerian sword i found, also, any enhancements i put on my raven armor disappear into thin air and the things i had equiped to my pockets return to the inventory

oh and my gauntlets dequip

Avatar image for PTMags
PTMags

783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 PTMags
Member since 2006 • 783 Posts

Ugh, was worried about this given the state of the first game at launch. Downloading now, hope my 5850 can keep up. Any advice from other amd users? I turned off adaptive AA and set everything else to application controlled.

Avatar image for Mattizzle815
Mattizzle815

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#136 Mattizzle815
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

Now I'm worried that my 6850 won't be able to keep up

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#137 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I get probably 45 fps on ultra settings without ubersampling or SSAO

Oh yeah my card is a slightly overclocked GTX 460.

Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

[QUOTE="da_bomb123"]

Wow good job guys....now I'm scared to run this game on my 5770...ugh

Roland123_basic

it will run, just on low-med and around 30-40FPS....

-__- only low-med with a 5770? 30-40 fps isnt really all that fun. Going to have to upgrade, hopefully by the time I have enough money the witcher 2 will be down to $5 on steam :p

Avatar image for 145ty
145ty

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 145ty
Member since 2005 • 564 Posts

40-50 FPS w/o Ubersampling. Runs great so far, 2-3 hours into it and loving it. Great game so far, great improvement over the first!

RPG Graphics king as well

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#140 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Just a note: Not installing 3D vision drivers didn't improve performance for me. Tried that with the WHQL drivers and the new beta one. But disabling uber-sampling seems to be the best performance booster so far. I'll try using a different texture memory size.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#141 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
Running everything on high with upped texture quality and enabled the Fancy DoF in cutscenes. Runs good: Athlon x4 640 @3.3ghz GTX 280 Superclocked 4gb DDR2-800 ram.
Avatar image for aooga12
aooga12

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 aooga12
Member since 2004 • 41 Posts

wow good thing i came across this thread, i mean i can't even put in my serial key, it's got the "small text" problem. but seeing that everyone else is having issues i'll just wait for a patch to fix all these activation/performance issues. damnit though, i was reallllly looking to pour the rest of my evening/night into this game.

edit: oh well, I guess it's time to watch the dev diary dvd :D and read the user manual XD

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#143 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

wow good thing i came across this thread, i mean i can't even put in my serial key, it's got the "small text" problem. but seeing that everyone else is having issues i'll just wait for a patch to fix all these activation/performance issues. damnit though, i was reallllly looking to pour the rest of my evening/night into this game.

edit: oh well, I guess it's time to watch the dev diary dvd :D and read the user manual XD

aooga12
ctrl+copy from website where you purchased your copy of The Witcher, and then ctrl+paste into the activation box. If you have a retail box version, type it on to the notepad with the dashes, as is, copy and paste into the box. Worked twice for me, because I had to reinstall the game twice due to some texture issues that couldn't be resolved. If you have tried that already, disregard my message.
Avatar image for Metaw
Metaw

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#144 Metaw
Member since 2010 • 387 Posts

I'm using Phenom II x4 965 3.4Ghz, 4850 512mb, 4gb ram and well....at 1680x1050 even on lowest settings I was getting around 24-35fps, so I switched to my other screen 1280x1024 and now it's more playable 35-60fps.

GPU starting to show its age I guess.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#145 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Update. I decided to overclock my GPU since I was able to get very playable frame rates anyways, and it definitely kicked the fps in higher gear. Never dropping below 50fps now. Still crazy for this game to demand so much GPU power though. Question lies within the optimization.
Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#146 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts

well i had made a thread about my performance cause i forgot about this one.

anyway, i can run witcher at above 30 on all highs (no aa or vsynch) with a gtx 260 and an E8500 cpu. though for some reason, when i run the game on low, the frame rate is total garbadge. it runs better on the high settings. no idea how that could be tbh

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

I plan on getting this game in like a month. How do you think it will run on my system?

Core 2 Duo 6600@2.4GHz

2 gigs or ram

9800GT 1GB

Windows Vista 32-bit

I plan on building a new PC later this year, but I really don't want to have to wait til then to play this game.

P.S. I forgot to mention it will be running at 1920x1080.

Avatar image for HotFemale
HotFemale

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 HotFemale
Member since 2011 • 42 Posts
Install the new Nvidia beta drivers and turn off ubersampling and the game will run fine. It now runs at a steady 35-40fps maxed out with no ubersampling at 1080p on my GTX 460.
Avatar image for PTMags
PTMags

783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 PTMags
Member since 2006 • 783 Posts

Well, I played for an hour tonight and averaged about 40-50 fps on high settings at 1920x1080 with a 5850 1gb and 955 phenom II. Turned off ubersampling, SSAO, and motion-blur, everything else is on. Not as bad as I thought it would be, and it never dipped down below 30 fps even during heavy action.

Avatar image for trijity
trijity

813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#150 trijity
Member since 2008 • 813 Posts

Yup, Im getting a consistent mid 50's+ fps with everything on Ultra after turning off ubersampling. Must say though, at first I had ubersampling on and it brought me down to a chug, but simply turning that off added 30+ frames.

Using an i7 920@4.2 and just OC'd my 570 a bit more for performance. Must admit, one would expect it to run smoother I suppose.