MOH Beta!!!...is not good, at all.

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts

After seeing the E3 multiplayer trailer, I was extremely excited. I preordered it to get into the beta, and now I am extremely disappointed. Before everyone gets sensitive and starts saying "It's only a beta...FAIL!", realize that the game is only a few months away from release. I played the Bad Company 2 beta for both PS3 and 360, and though it had bugs, it was still a great game at heart. This is just avery mediocre game. All bugs and glitches aside, the choices DICE made were poor.

I cannot stress enough that gamers should be warned that this game has little to nothing in common with Bad Company 2, and is more like a poorly designed Modern Warfare 1. The guns have zero recoil, maps are small and cramped, headshots are extremely overpowered in relation to bodyshots being useless(reminds me of Metal Gear Online but worse), "fixed" weapon selection based on team is irritating, and hitmarkers are really flawed. Anything short of a headshot takes almost a full mag to kill.

I made it about 30 minutes before I went back to playing Bad Company 2 and Modern Warfare 2. And as I stated, these aren't BETA problems, the game just isn't very good. I hope the Campaign is great, because I am extremely disappointed. I will be cancelling my pre-order and waiting to see the very mediocre review scores this game will get if the multiplayer doesn't get a complete overhaul. DICE really let me down on this one. And I am really questioning those who actually like the BETA (EDIT : It's starting to get a little better as days pass, but still freezes often). I feel like they own neither BFBC2 or COD games. Or they just have blind allegiance to EA and DICE, because I went in with a very open mind, but this is just a mess (and yes, I did very well during the time I played, because I realized early on that headshots are the key to winning.It just got boring quick, so don't start the comments that I'm not very good at the game).

Just thought I would let people know that the trailer is very misleading based on this stage of the BETA. And I am focusing on design choices, not any bugs that will be fixed. My problems will most likely still be in the final version. I'm thinking this game gets a 7 tops, unless the campaign is amazing. And I'm not smiling while I say this, I'm frowning because I remember the glory days of MoH and was really looking forward to this title.

Avatar image for NatsumeKonno
NatsumeKonno

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 NatsumeKonno
Member since 2009 • 350 Posts

Yea i hate the freezing too when i play. Hopefully it will be fix by the 21st thats when more people will come. The freezing happens alot when i play mission. Team deathmatch just has that screen lag when you die.

Avatar image for GrandJury
GrandJury

15396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 GrandJury
Member since 2009 • 15396 Posts
Well it is a Beta...
Avatar image for parvie
parvie

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 parvie
Member since 2008 • 2168 Posts

strong words-- We will see upon release if what you say is indeed true.

Avatar image for fighter91
fighter91

1293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 fighter91
Member since 2005 • 1293 Posts
I believe you and I haven't even tried the game. Many people will say "it is only a beta" but the beta will give you a general outlook of how the game would be. Many games that had poor betas turned out to be terrible. Games that had rather enjoyable betas turned out well.
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#6 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

Legitimate complaints aside from "headshots are extremely overpowered". What? Unless a bullet whizzing by them counts then I don't see your point. Both Modern Warfare 2 and Bad Company 2 both feature one headshot kills... as it should be. B:BC2 players will argue that headshots aren't 1-hit kill but they are, it just isn't instant. If you walk up to someone, pull out your handgun, and shoot them in the back of the head they will die, just a second later. Me and a friend tested this for a little while and it works at virtually every range with whatever gun. Headshot, wait a second, you get the kill and experience for it.

But yeah the rest of it seemed like actual problems that I hope are addressed.

Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts
[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

Legitimate complaints aside from "headshots are extremely overpowered". What? Unless a bullet whizzing by them counts then I don't see your point. Both Modern Warfare 2 and Bad Company 2 both feature one headshot kills... as it should be. B:BC2 players will argue that headshots aren't 1-hit kill but they are, it just isn't instant. If you walk up to someone, pull out your handgun, and shoot them in the back of the head they will die, just a second later. Me and a friend tested this for a little while and it works at virtually every range with whatever gun. Headshot, wait a second, you get the kill and experience for it.

But yeah the rest of it seemed like actual problems that I hope are addressed.

I probably should have went into more detail at that part. It's overpowered in the sense that its a one shot kill, whereas body markers are essentially useless. It reminded me so much of Metal Gear Online, which was often 2 players facing off, moving side to side, missing a majority of bullets trying to sink a headshot simply because shots on body / extremeties were useless. It takes damn near a whole mag to kill someone in MOH Beta. And once again, i'm not hating on MOH just to hate. I enjoyed Airborne and have been super psyched for this game since the reveal trailer. It almost felt like a kick to the balls after about 5 minutes into the Beta, because I had a smile from ear to ear while installing it I was so excited. I was hoping for a better version of Bad Company 2, mixed with more Modern Warfare 2 elements. Unfortunatly, both of those titles feel worlds ahead of MOH at this point (in my opinion).
Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts

I would also like to add, after playing it a little more, I found out (the hard way) that there is almost no radius on explosions. Grenades and grenade launchers have to be within inches (in-game relative to character size inches, not screen inches)to even get the X hit marker to appear. To get a kill, it has to be a direct hit for the most part. I can understand the choice somewhat, due to Bad Company 2 Assault Class spamming grenades for easy kills (particularly on Hardcore) but I would rather have overpowered explosives rather than nerfed explosives, much to my suprise.

I must say that the graphics are quite good though. Take into account that almost every Beta uses scaled down graphics (something to due with server testing - as it was explained to me before), and I think this will end up being a very pretty game. You dont see any jaggies like in Bad Company 2, and character movement is much more fluent and realistic than in Modern Warfare 2. The weapons are also very well detailed and rendered. It's good to see that the EOtech Holographic sight is made correctly (a 65 MOA dot with a 1 MOA dot in the center *for any gun enthusiasts*instead of MW2's much closer version). I just really wish that shooting the weapons felt better. The movement and aim is much smoother than Bad Company 2 and almost on par with Modern Warfare 2, but when you pull the trigger it feels more like your character has an Airsoft gun. There really isn't any recoil, sound seems lacking, rumble is lacking, and the reloads are about the only thing that feel realistic about the weapons' functions. BC2 had the most realistic weapons and recoil systems I have ever seen in a game. I think it oftened scared off people new to the series because of how strong recoil could be, so I can see the reason that DICE toned things down. But that leads to my overall problem with the multiplayer. It feels very dumbed down from DICE's previous efforts.

Once again, I'm just giving some constructive criticism on the game. I'm not trying to dissuade those who like the Beta and plan on buying the game, but for anyone who hasn't played it and is looking forward to preordering it for the Beta code, I would start with only putting $5 down on it, because there is a good chance that it may not be your cup of tea and will decide on a refund.

I REALLY hope DICE fixes the game, but at this point I just feel they will have to almost start from scratch for it to even come close to matching their previous success of Bad Company 2.

Avatar image for ubpoker123
ubpoker123

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ubpoker123
Member since 2007 • 877 Posts

I didn't think anything good of this game to begin with. I actually don't even own Battlefield Bad Company 2 yet, so i'd purchase that first anyways.

Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
Disappointing if that is true. Makes the choice between shooters a bit easier, as MOH was looking like my second choice. Now it looks like KZ3, unless Black Ops or Socom 4 are amazing. For Black Ops to be amazing, Killstreaks need to be seriously toned down, there needs to be a good progression system, and lots of weapons etc. It needs an awesome Nazi Zombie (Commie Zombie?) mode. Socom 4 needs to cater to the hardcore, I'm expecting very tactical play with a good progression system, reasons to keep playing and for the game to be based very much on skill. KZ3 will probably have to do something wrong for me not to get it though. Move support, gorgeous graphics (even without 3D), skill based gameplay, progression systems, good multiplayer, varied environments, health/gameplay somewhere in the middle of Resistance and COD.
Avatar image for IPWNDU2
IPWNDU2

2535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 IPWNDU2
Member since 2006 • 2535 Posts

Sadly dissapointing

Avatar image for Khadaj32
Khadaj32

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Khadaj32
Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts

I believe you and I haven't even tried the game. Many people will say "it is only a beta" but the beta will give you a general outlook of how the game would be. Many games that had poor betas turned out to be terrible. Games that had rather enjoyable betas turned out well.fighter91

And many games that had horrible betas turned out awesome (WoW comes to mind, awful awful beta.) And same for some great betas, games turn out mediocre. Beta's should never be an indication of the final product. Even if this is mostly a "check it out" beta, they're still tweaking the gameplay. They're recording datafrom the matches, tweaks will be made, people need to calm down.

Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#13 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

Legitimate complaints aside from "headshots are extremely overpowered". What? Unless a bullet whizzing by them counts then I don't see your point. Both Modern Warfare 2 and Bad Company 2 both feature one headshot kills... as it should be. B:BC2 players will argue that headshots aren't 1-hit kill but they are, it just isn't instant. If you walk up to someone, pull out your handgun, and shoot them in the back of the head they will die, just a second later. Me and a friend tested this for a little while and it works at virtually every range with whatever gun. Headshot, wait a second, you get the kill and experience for it.

But yeah the rest of it seemed like actual problems that I hope are addressed.

BigBoss96fs

I probably should have went into more detail at that part. It's overpowered in the sense that its a one shot kill, whereas body markers are essentially useless. It reminded me so much of Metal Gear Online, which was often 2 players facing off, moving side to side, missing a majority of bullets trying to sink a headshot simply because shots on body / extremeties were useless. It takes damn near a whole mag to kill someone in MOH Beta. And once again, i'm not hating on MOH just to hate. I enjoyed Airborne and have been super psyched for this game since the reveal trailer. It almost felt like a kick to the balls after about 5 minutes into the Beta, because I had a smile from ear to ear while installing it I was so excited. I was hoping for a better version of Bad Company 2, mixed with more Modern Warfare 2 elements. Unfortunatly, both of those titles feel worlds ahead of MOH at this point (in my opinion).

Ah, gotcha. I'll chalk that up as misunderstanding on my part. So it's Halo? You waste 30 rounds into someone with an assault rifle only for them to headshot you with a sniper rifle? That doesn't belong in a modern age shooter.

Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
Yup, that's a beta for you. That's why I never sign up for those things anymore. I can't see how people would want to play a broken version of a game just so they can say they played it early. Every beta that I was in always had crashing problems. I stay away from them now.
Avatar image for Khadaj32
Khadaj32

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Khadaj32
Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts

According to some people I know the beta is quite fun, the only problems being the freezing and the radius of explosives are a bit too small.

Avatar image for Tsuanthony
Tsuanthony

909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Tsuanthony
Member since 2009 • 909 Posts

this is why you don't go make bold assumptions about a game that hasn't even come out yet!

looks nice, plays horrible...

and a day or two ago you were all giddy about MOH looking better then Black ops

you simply can't judge a game buy it's trailer or what you see on E3

not finalized!

sorry if I'm trolling or lashing out, but seriously people have got to understand that

Avatar image for Khadaj32
Khadaj32

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Khadaj32
Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts

this is why you don't go make bold assumptions about a game that hasn't even come out yet!

looks nice, plays horrible...

and a day or two ago you were all giddy about MOH looking better then Black ops

you simply can't judge a game buy it's trailer or what you see on E3

not finalized!

sorry if I'm trolling or lashing out, but seriously people have got to understand that

Tsuanthony

I actually havne no real interest in MOH as it will run on EA servers, and that never goes well. Black Ops might be okay, however, I hate killstreaks. I'm leaning towards some Transformers/Uncharted 2/GoldenEye for MP until Killzone 3 comes out.

Avatar image for ryrulez
ryrulez

11605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 ryrulez
Member since 2008 • 11605 Posts
Even with the problems I'm actually liking it quite a lot. Most of the problems should be fixed by launch as nothing's really that big.
Avatar image for Tsuanthony
Tsuanthony

909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Tsuanthony
Member since 2009 • 909 Posts

[QUOTE="Tsuanthony"]

this is why you don't go make bold assumptions about a game that hasn't even come out yet!

looks nice, plays horrible...

and a day or two ago you were all giddy about MOH looking better then Black ops

you simply can't judge a game buy it's trailer or what you see on E3

not finalized!

sorry if I'm trolling or lashing out, but seriously people have got to understand that

Khadaj32

I actually havne no real interest in MOH as it will run on EA servers, and that never goes well. Black Ops might be okay, however, I hate killstreaks. I'm leaning towards some Transformers/Uncharted 2/GoldenEye for MP until Killzone 3 comes out.

good :P well really the only shooter that should be worth picking up would be crysis 2 and kz3

and of course you know I was talking to everyone right? :P

Avatar image for GrandJury
GrandJury

15396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 GrandJury
Member since 2009 • 15396 Posts
I liked the game but as I said before, it is a beta, expect problems.
Avatar image for mackey25
mackey25

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mackey25
Member since 2010 • 66 Posts

You say not to tell you that its a beta b/c this is how its going to play. Thats not true at all. A beta fixes bugs yes but it also lets you tell them what doesnt work. Everything you mentioned can be fixed. Hitmarkers, how many bullets it takes to kill someone, grenade radius, gun selection and so on. wait till its closer to release to judge it. All that said i dont think the game is goin to be that good. It looks like cod4. It also looks souless to me. Something just seems off to me. Hope im wrong though.

Avatar image for gulyan23
gulyan23

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 gulyan23
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Guys you have to understand that this game is different from MW2 in that it doesn't have the ridiculous amounts of killstreaks to mooch of off for kills. This is why I appreciate what this game is trying to do, instead of joining a game only for it to be frustrating and end with a nuke its allowing a fair amount of killstreaks with that aren't that overpowered. This game reminds me a bit of COD4, DICE knows what its doing. DICE is aware that it is taking elements from MW2 but not overusing them, unlike MW2 where there are AC-130's every 5 min. Whenever i play battlefield i feel like i need an experience similar to MW2 but without all the ridiculous killstreaks and insane arcade style shooting, MOH will be that experience. I hate to say it, but this is just a beta so far...
Avatar image for meteo_ryte
meteo_ryte

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#23 meteo_ryte
Member since 2005 • 1962 Posts
I like the MOH series. I've got nearly all of them spanning back to PS1. They were never really on par with the more realistic shooters, especially nowadays with COD owning that market. I'm still eager to see the latest MOH regardless of some petty beta multiplayer. Not a fan of multiplayers, anyway.
Avatar image for Nerkle01
Nerkle01

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Nerkle01
Member since 2007 • 1254 Posts
Guys you have to understand that this game is different from MW2 in that it doesn't have the ridiculous amounts of killstreaks to mooch of off for kills. This is why I appreciate what this game is trying to do, instead of joining a game only for it to be frustrating and end with a nuke its allowing a fair amount of killstreaks with that aren't that overpowered. This game reminds me a bit of COD4, DICE knows what its doing. DICE is aware that it is taking elements from MW2 but not overusing them, unlike MW2 where there are AC-130's every 5 min. Whenever i play battlefield i feel like i need an experience similar to MW2 but without all the ridiculous killstreaks and insane arcade style shooting, MOH will be that experience. I hate to say it, but this is just a beta so far...gulyan23
what every one is saying here is true. But when u get past all of the very annoying issues that the beta has, when its running right and your palying good, it is actually quite enjoyable. But they need to fix the hit detection because most of the rounds that are shot dont get registered, also when you getting shot at and are in a gun battle some wierd cinematic prevents you from doing anything helpful before you die because you literally cant DO anything, you get gunned down. Also something else thats annoying is when your in a gun battle with some one and they kill you and you're both shelling rounds at each other, as soon as you die the bullets u just fired have ZERO effect. Its like shooting at some one then all of a sudden all of the bullet dmage disappears, or better yet its like the bukllets them selves dissapear function wise which is a real pain.But im confident that by July 17 or 18th, before the beta comes to a close, alot of these issues hopefully will be resolved.
Avatar image for Nerkle01
Nerkle01

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Nerkle01
Member since 2007 • 1254 Posts
also the game devs should check out this thread, because everyting that is being said for the most part is on par with whats actually going on.
Avatar image for ReaperV7
ReaperV7

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ReaperV7
Member since 2008 • 6756 Posts
yeah. MOH is like a crappier version of battlefield bad company 2.
Avatar image for Champ1234343
Champ1234343

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Champ1234343
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I am buying MOH for the single player, Multiplayer is just a bonus.
Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

I like the MOH series. I've got nearly all of them spanning back to PS1. They were never really on par with the more realistic shooters, especially nowadays with COD owning that market. I'm still eager to see the latest MOH regardless of some petty beta multiplayer. Not a fan of multiplayers, anyway.meteo_ryte

Did you just call COD realistic? :lol:

Avatar image for firefluff3
firefluff3

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 firefluff3
Member since 2010 • 2073 Posts

Beta's aren't for entertainment, they're to fix and adress these problems.

Avatar image for Racer_XLR
Racer_XLR

21664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Racer_XLR
Member since 2008 • 21664 Posts
The E3 footage is what turned me off. I was excited that DICE was making the multiplayer, but it sounds like they have a lot of work ahead of them.
Avatar image for Cruxis27
Cruxis27

2057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 Cruxis27
Member since 2006 • 2057 Posts

It's just a Beta, man. Also I'm not reading that.

Avatar image for anime_gamer007
anime_gamer007

6142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 anime_gamer007
Member since 2007 • 6142 Posts

Legitimate complaints aside from "headshots are extremely overpowered". What? Unless a bullet whizzing by them counts then I don't see your point. Both Modern Warfare 2 and Bad Company 2 both feature one headshot kills... as it should be. B:BC2 players will argue that headshots aren't 1-hit kill but they are, it just isn't instant. If you walk up to someone, pull out your handgun, and shoot them in the back of the head they will die, just a second later. Me and a friend tested this for a little while and it works at virtually every range with whatever gun. Headshot, wait a second, you get the kill and experience for it.

But yeah the rest of it seemed like actual problems that I hope are addressed.

IndianaPwns39
Neither BC2 or MW2 have one shot headshots unless you're talking about snipers. The reason for this is because it reduces the chance of getting a lucky instant kill from someone who is just spraying their gun everywhere like for example, Metal Gear Online.
Avatar image for TehSonofUgly
TehSonofUgly

1643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 TehSonofUgly
Member since 2008 • 1643 Posts

I've played in a few betas and none of them were close to this buggy. It froze on me 4 times in twenty minutes (that includes the time it took to restart my ps3).

I can't find a game in play if I try to choose Mission or Team Deathmatch (w/e they're called), Only can get into a playable game if I choose 'Any'.

It's pretty laggy aswell, not as bad as BFBC2 is right now.

The game itself is just a weird crossbreed of MW2 and BFBC2, its obvious EA is trying to take away players from CoD (which I'm all for), but it just doesn't work. Really this was just a tactic of copying infinityward/treyarch, and picking up sales because it's 'Medal of Honor.'

Avatar image for PreparationH123
PreparationH123

415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 PreparationH123
Member since 2009 • 415 Posts

today I went into a game, shot one person, and my ps3 froze. I'm done till I hear of a patch to fix it lol

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#35 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

how do you get on teh beta?

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

I didn't believe this thread. Didn't think it was possible given how the Battlefield games have always been rock solid. Guess Dice just didn't give a $h@$ developing a game for someone else, like it was a little meaningless side project.

After trying it out, sadly I have to agree 100% with the assessment of the OP. The multi-player is going to be so poor I think I'm going to cancel my pre-order. Bad Company 2 beta was very much indicative of the final game. Sure some bugs will be fixed and the textures were probably a little higher grade in final form, but the Port Valdez map played very much the same as in the final release, the game was largely the same. I was hoping they'd have some creative new modes for Medal of Honor. The beta is a team deathmatch on a map even smaller than most maps in Modern Warfare. Only the controls are more sluggish than in BFBC2, more like the original Bad Company. Combined with the news there are "killstreaks" like in MW and this ends up looking like a sad imitation with more glitches and bugs than should make it through to beta code.

Avatar image for JoKeR_421
JoKeR_421

8920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 JoKeR_421
Member since 2006 • 8920 Posts

[QUOTE="Tsuanthony"]

this is why you don't go make bold assumptions about a game that hasn't even come out yet!

looks nice, plays horrible...

and a day or two ago you were all giddy about MOH looking better then Black ops

you simply can't judge a game buy it's trailer or what you see on E3

not finalized!

sorry if I'm trolling or lashing out, but seriously people have got to understand that

Khadaj32

I actually havne no real interest in MOH as it will run on EA servers, and that never goes well. Black Ops might be okay, however, I hate killstreaks. I'm leaning towards some Transformers/Uncharted 2/GoldenEye for MP until Killzone 3 comes out.

only EA game i will ever buy or published or w.e by EA is going to be dead space and dead space 2 thats about it, cuz honestly i had bad experience with EA and their damn servers that i game up on them in general

Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts

You say not to tell you that its a beta b/c this is how its going to play. Thats not true at all. A beta fixes bugs yes but it also lets you tell them what doesnt work. Everything you mentioned can be fixed. Hitmarkers, how many bullets it takes to kill someone, grenade radius, gun selection and so on. wait till its closer to release to judge it. All that said i dont think the game is goin to be that good. It looks like cod4. It also looks souless to me. Something just seems off to me. Hope im wrong though.

mackey25
That actually sums it up perfect. The game has an almost "souless" feel to it. I understand Beta's are very buggy, and thats why I didn't mention any of the true bugs (although hit detection could be argued as one at this point). It just feels very tacked-on and mediocre. Once again, not trying to offend anyone or disuade them from the campaign, and I actually suggest everyone play the Beta. They will clean it up I'm sure, but I just feel like its a mediocre and watered down love-child of Bad Company 2 and Modern Warfare 1. Ive kept playing, and all bugs aside, the gameplay just isn't fun and feels flawed. The killstreaks are there, but they are not so overpowered. They are often hard to even notice until you achieve one. I just really really hope they delay the game, scrap the small maps and current play style, and choose either a Bad Company direction or a Modern Warfare direction. It's almost like they took away the best parts of both series while combining them. But hey, ITS JUST A BETA.
Avatar image for zbdyx
zbdyx

2055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#39 zbdyx
Member since 2007 • 2055 Posts

I love the game. Oh and a tip, when you get put on the insurgents quit out. They are the main reason my game freezes. I find it extremely fun. It also barely takes me any bullets to kill anyone. Headshots should always take 1 shot. I drop people like it's nothing in the beta. I think the beta is fine. The only time I have problems is when it freezes. If I aim on someone, they are dead.

Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

I believe you and I haven't even tried the game. Many people will say "it is only a beta" but the beta will give you a general outlook of how the game would be. Many games that had poor betas turned out to be terrible. Games that had rather enjoyable betas turned out well.fighter91

yeah like MAG and SC2...

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

[QUOTE="BigBoss96fs"][QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

Legitimate complaints aside from "headshots are extremely overpowered". What? Unless a bullet whizzing by them counts then I don't see your point. Both Modern Warfare 2 and Bad Company 2 both feature one headshot kills... as it should be. B:BC2 players will argue that headshots aren't 1-hit kill but they are, it just isn't instant. If you walk up to someone, pull out your handgun, and shoot them in the back of the head they will die, just a second later. Me and a friend tested this for a little while and it works at virtually every range with whatever gun. Headshot, wait a second, you get the kill and experience for it.

But yeah the rest of it seemed like actual problems that I hope are addressed.

IndianaPwns39

I probably should have went into more detail at that part. It's overpowered in the sense that its a one shot kill, whereas body markers are essentially useless. It reminded me so much of Metal Gear Online, which was often 2 players facing off, moving side to side, missing a majority of bullets trying to sink a headshot simply because shots on body / extremeties were useless. It takes damn near a whole mag to kill someone in MOH Beta. And once again, i'm not hating on MOH just to hate. I enjoyed Airborne and have been super psyched for this game since the reveal trailer. It almost felt like a kick to the balls after about 5 minutes into the Beta, because I had a smile from ear to ear while installing it I was so excited. I was hoping for a better version of Bad Company 2, mixed with more Modern Warfare 2 elements. Unfortunatly, both of those titles feel worlds ahead of MOH at this point (in my opinion).

Ah, gotcha. I'll chalk that up as misunderstanding on my part. So it's Halo? You waste 30 rounds into someone with an assault rifle only for them to headshot you with a sniper rifle? That doesn't belong in a modern age shooter.

No, it only takes about 4 shots to the body to kill someone. I got the beta on PC, and with the increased accuracy, I can kill 3 people with 1 clip usually. Although sometimes, it seems like they take more, it's just bullets not registering or missing. It seems to be a hit and miss. Sometimes guys will take a lot of shots, but most of the time it's only 2 or 3.

He is right though, this game is no where near as good as Bad Company 2.

Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#42 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts

This is what I think of the game.

Avatar image for tbs76
tbs76

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 tbs76
Member since 2004 • 479 Posts

ITS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE JUST LIKE BFBC2. Honestly, If I see people compare it over and over I am going to puke. Yes, the mp is made by DICE and sure it bares resembleance to BC but its not suppose to be an exact copy and I never expected it to be. I love it because it is fast, fun and feels like a hybrid between MW and BC. I think thats a good thing. This game has much easier aiming than most and the weapon balance seems better than most games. I prefer the snipers in this game cause they don't float all over the place you are trying to shoot from a boat on water. It has graphics similar to BC but it has cleaner textures I believe and I am digging the whole Marines vs Taliban ordeal. Gives a sense of realism that other games neglect by adding fake militias to fight.

My only gripe so far with the beta has been the constant freezing, which is far worse than any minor gameplay bugs. Its happened so often to me that I dread rebooting my PS3 to play this. How can they release the beta knowing about this MAJOR problem. I am sure it will be fixed before launch but I hope they fix it by the end of the week or my playtime with this beta will be short.

If you don't like MOH..cool. Stop playing it and go back to BFBC2 or MW2 or whatever it is that floats your boat. The rest of us will be quite happy to be fraggin each other for another few weeks on MOH.

Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts
[QUOTE="tbs76"]

ITS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE JUST LIKE BFBC2. Honestly, If I see people compare it over and over I am going to puke. Yes, the mp is made by DICE and sure it bares resembleance to BC but its not suppose to be an exact copy and I never expected it to be. I love it because it is fast, fun and feels like a hybrid between MW and BC. I think thats a good thing. This game has much easier aiming than most and the weapon balance seems better than most games. I prefer the snipers in this game cause they don't float all over the place you are trying to shoot from a boat on water. It has graphics similar to BC but it has cleaner textures I believe and I am digging the whole Marines vs Taliban ordeal. Gives a sense of realism that other games neglect by adding fake militias to fight.

My only gripe so far with the beta has been the constant freezing, which is far worse than any minor gameplay bugs. Its happened so often to me that I dread rebooting my PS3 to play this. How can they release the beta knowing about this MAJOR problem. I am sure it will be fixed before launch but I hope they fix it by the end of the week or my playtime with this beta will be short.

If you don't like MOH..cool. Stop playing it and go back to BFBC2 or MW2 or whatever it is that floats your boat. The rest of us will be quite happy to be fraggin each other for another few weeks on MOH.

I hear what your saying, but the E3 trailer looked like it was a Bad Company 2 patch, not to mention the 900 times they mention its from the makers of Bad Company 2. Due to that, I think a lot of people are looking forward to a similar experience. I'm not one of the people who hates Bad Company 2 but loves Modern Warfare 2, or vise versa, I like them both and feel they have very different styles. I just don't feel like the blend worked well, but the fact that the trailer clearly attempts to portray it as a Bad Company successor, I think a lot of players will be tricked if they just pick the game up based off the trailer. There is considerably less to do in this game ( at this point) than either Modern shooters. The nice thing about the freezing, it almost always happens when I score a long range headshot, which kinda gives me a nice freeze frame so I can walk in the other room, get my roommate, and show off my shot.
Avatar image for Tikicobra
Tikicobra

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#45 Tikicobra
Member since 2009 • 2058 Posts

After seeing the E3 multiplayer trailer, I was extremely excited. I preordered it to get into the beta, and now I am extremely disappointed. Before everyone gets sensitive and starts saying "It's only a beta...FAIL!", realize that the game is only a few months away from release. I played the Bad Company 2 beta for both PS3 and 360, and though it had bugs, it was still a great game at heart. This is just a bad game. All bugs and glitches aside, the choices DICE made were poor. I cannot stress enough thatgamers should be warned that this game has little to nothing in common with Bad Company 2, and is more like a poorly designed Modern Warfare 1. The guns have zero recoil, maps are small and cramped, headshots are extremely overpowered (reminds me of Metal Gear Online but worse), "fixed" weapon selection based on team is irritating, and hitmarkers are really flawed. Anything short of a headshot takes almost a full mag to kill. I made it about 30 minutes before I went back to playing Bad Company 2 and Modern Warfare 2. And as I stated, these aren't BETA problems, the game just isn't very good. I hope the Campaign is great, because I am extremely disappointed. I will be cancelling my pre-order and waiting to see the very mediocre review scores this game will get if the multiplayer doesn't get a complete overhaul. DICE really let me down on this one. And I am really questioning those actually like the BETA. I feellike they own neither BFBC2 orCOD games. Or they just have blind allegiance to EA and DICE, because I went in with a very open mind, but thisis just a mess (and yes, I did very well during the time I played, because I realized early on that headshots are the key to winning. It just got boring quick, so don't start the comments that I'm not very good at the game). Just thought I would let people know that the trailer is very misleading based on this stage of the BETA. And I am focusing on design choices, not any bugs that will be fixed. My problems will most likely still be in the final version. I'm thinking this game gets a 7 tops, unless the campaign is amazing.

BigBoss96fs
Please use paragraphs. It's hard to read your post when it's all together like that.
Avatar image for rammetal7
rammetal7

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 rammetal7
Member since 2009 • 26 Posts

I was hoping at the EA conference that they would show Timesplitters 4, but I was disappointed that they showed MOH instead since I never played that series.

Avatar image for AJC3317
AJC3317

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#47 AJC3317
Member since 2003 • 2546 Posts
i have had no problems killing people so far. i have much more problems killing people in bc2 than i do in this game. also, calling headshots overpowered is kinda a dumb argument since they're supposed to be one shot kills. the biggest problem i have right now is the explosive damage, or lack there of, but i'm sure they can adjust those things
Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts
[QUOTE="Tikicobra"][QUOTE="BigBoss96fs"]

After seeing the E3 multiplayer trailer, I was extremely excited. I preordered it to get into the beta, and now I am extremely disappointed. Before everyone gets sensitive and starts saying "It's only a beta...FAIL!", realize that the game is only a few months away from release. I played the Bad Company 2 beta for both PS3 and 360, and though it had bugs, it was still a great game at heart. This is just a bad game. All bugs and glitches aside, the choices DICE made were poor. I cannot stress enough thatgamers should be warned that this game has little to nothing in common with Bad Company 2, and is more like a poorly designed Modern Warfare 1. The guns have zero recoil, maps are small and cramped, headshots are extremely overpowered (reminds me of Metal Gear Online but worse), "fixed" weapon selection based on team is irritating, and hitmarkers are really flawed. Anything short of a headshot takes almost a full mag to kill. I made it about 30 minutes before I went back to playing Bad Company 2 and Modern Warfare 2. And as I stated, these aren't BETA problems, the game just isn't very good. I hope the Campaign is great, because I am extremely disappointed. I will be cancelling my pre-order and waiting to see the very mediocre review scores this game will get if the multiplayer doesn't get a complete overhaul. DICE really let me down on this one. And I am really questioning those actually like the BETA. I feellike they own neither BFBC2 orCOD games. Or they just have blind allegiance to EA and DICE, because I went in with a very open mind, but thisis just a mess (and yes, I did very well during the time I played, because I realized early on that headshots are the key to winning. It just got boring quick, so don't start the comments that I'm not very good at the game). Just thought I would let people know that the trailer is very misleading based on this stage of the BETA. And I am focusing on design choices, not any bugs that will be fixed. My problems will most likely still be in the final version. I'm thinking this game gets a 7 tops, unless the campaign is amazing.

Please use paragraphs. It's hard to read your post when it's all together like that.

yea sorry meant to go back and do that. prolly should edit it. the game seems better some today. hit detection is cleaned up a bit. It had a terrible glitch where I knifed a dude 3 times while he killed my teammate, finally had to shoot him. If this gets cleaned up, and the maps lose a bit of the linear feel, it could end up being a good game. Can't wait til i stop getting the freeze-frames showing off my kills (so sick of resetting my ps3). Also killstreaks are very unclear. I thought they were standard gear until i couldn't call a mortar strike right after a respawn. I'll keep playin it and posting improvements or things wrong with it. I'm trying to avoid complaining about actual bugs, simply because DICE will have those fixed by october.
Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts
i have had no problems killing people so far. i have much more problems killing people in bc2 than i do in this game. also, calling headshots overpowered is kinda a dumb argument since they're supposed to be one shot kills. the biggest problem i have right now is the explosive damage, or lack there of, but i'm sure they can adjust those thingsAJC3317
When i say overpowered I meant in relation to body or extremety shots. It seems much better today, but the first few days, either the hit detection was off or they had the damage settings way too low. Bad Company 2 has settings very low for body damage, thats why I like Hardcore, but this was really unpredictable. I could get kills with 2 bullets sometimes, and others a whole magazine wouldn't drop anyone. And once again, i love the look of the EOtech Holographic sight in this game. I have one on my AR-15, and its almost spot on. The reticle just just isn't that clear in the real.
Avatar image for BigBoss96fs
BigBoss96fs

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 BigBoss96fs
Member since 2009 • 212 Posts
Sorry for the triple-post, but i just realized that the "90/100" and such "20/40" are for the killstreaks. That is actually more convenient than MW2.