Playstation 3 ALREADY profitable!!! Wow!!

  • 129 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mus1523
mus1523

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 mus1523
Member since 2005 • 204 Posts

Says Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYWkGuoeuipo&refer=home

Clearing up the trouble made PlayStation 3 profitable several months ago, giving the company room to cut prices, analyst Doherty said. M********t still loses money on each X*** 3** it sells, he said.

``Any price cut they try to make puts them more into the red,'' Doherty said.

Avatar image for EvilZero86
EvilZero86

324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 EvilZero86
Member since 2005 • 324 Posts

Im....speechless.

Avatar image for FireFalkon
FireFalkon

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FireFalkon
Member since 2004 • 866 Posts

Says Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYWkGuoeuipo&refer=home

Clearing up the trouble made PlayStation 3 profitable several months ago, giving the company room to cut prices, analyst Doherty said. M********t still loses money on each X*** 3** it sells, he said.

``Any price cut they try to make puts them more into the red,'' Doherty said.

mus1523
you must remember that MS's pockets are nearly bottomless, even if they lose more they can cut the price to make it cheaper than the ps3.
Avatar image for LaserGunzPewPew
LaserGunzPewPew

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LaserGunzPewPew
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts
Interesting... Gogogo Sony
Avatar image for longhorn7
longhorn7

4637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 longhorn7
Member since 2007 • 4637 Posts
wow i actually was not expecting that coming from bloomberg
Avatar image for EdSquareCat
EdSquareCat

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 EdSquareCat
Member since 2005 • 236 Posts
Wow I did not know they were profiting this early! This seems a good sign!
Avatar image for mnmnanu
mnmnanu

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mnmnanu
Member since 2005 • 148 Posts
hmm. hope it works for sony
Avatar image for phoonbaba098
phoonbaba098

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 phoonbaba098
Member since 2006 • 393 Posts
Dosen't surprize me to be honest. Sony is a hardware company. Making electronics cheaper and smaller as time goes on is one of their biggest strengths.
Avatar image for The_Gunslinger_
The_Gunslinger_

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 The_Gunslinger_
Member since 2007 • 427 Posts
Wow, great news, things can only get better from here I think. :D
Avatar image for Redfingers
Redfingers

4510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Redfingers
Member since 2005 • 4510 Posts

So, not only are the "competitors" losing money on each console sold, they're losing $1 billion on warranty extensions?

This is unbelievably good news. Unbelievably good.

Avatar image for G-Legend
G-Legend

7387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 G-Legend
Member since 2005 • 7387 Posts
Actually the Wii was profitable from the start, but this is good news for the PS3 and future price drops as well as sales, hopefully once the games start rolling out the sales of the System will boost.
Avatar image for GIJesse77
GIJesse77

3034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 GIJesse77
Member since 2006 • 3034 Posts
500$ is still a lot to save up for though.
Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts
im stunned.
Avatar image for Crazy87
Crazy87

2900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Crazy87
Member since 2005 • 2900 Posts

500$ is still a lot to save up for though.GIJesse77

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts

I have to wonder how an analyst would know which companies are profitable and which ones aren't? And if Sony were profitable months ago, why wait until now to cut prices? I don't believe that the PS3 is actually profitable any more than I believe the 360 is or isn't.

The great thing is that at $499 the PS3 is starting to become a greater value.

Avatar image for myxylplyx
myxylplyx

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 myxylplyx
Member since 2003 • 519 Posts

A few years ago Kutaragi stated that Sony was aggressively making an effort to become less dependent on 3rd party components in their hardware. The goal was to have as many parts as possible in the Playstation (as well as other hardware) being made in-house to reduce costs. It is almost impossible to know how much each PS3 costs Sony to make.

Avatar image for azzezino
azzezino

4570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 azzezino
Member since 2002 • 4570 Posts

Wow, great news, things can only get better from here I think. :DThe_Gunslinger_

Me thinks too.

Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.Crazy87

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.
Avatar image for mikeslemonade
mikeslemonade

3624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 mikeslemonade
Member since 2006 • 3624 Posts
[QUOTE="mus1523"]

Says Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYWkGuoeuipo&refer=home

Clearing up the trouble made PlayStation 3 profitable several months ago, giving the company room to cut prices, analyst Doherty said. M********t still loses money on each X*** 3** it sells, he said.

``Any price cut they try to make puts them more into the red,'' Doherty said.

FireFalkon

you must remember that MS's pockets are nearly bottomless, even if they lose more they can cut the price to make it cheaper than the ps3.

In 2006 MS as a whole a made profit 12.6 billion dollars. 1.15 billion is alot for repairing 360s and refunding warranty is a lot. That is 1/12th of their income. Xbox1 project was a $4 billion loss. Also if MS is not profitable in the gaming industry then why stay. MS is not here to lose money they are here to establish a brand and make money.

Anyway i think the article is only addressing the blu-ray diodes. There's noway the PS3 is making money. If they're then why doesn't Sony drop the price even more. Sony doesn't even make that much with the PS2 as far as the system goes, so why are they trying to make money off the PS3. This is why i don't believe they're making money.

Avatar image for longhorn7
longhorn7

4637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 longhorn7
Member since 2007 • 4637 Posts
[QUOTE="Crazy87"]

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.bdhoff

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.

And only an idiot would think that there is only 3 good games out for the ps3 insted of looking at the very near future(this year actually) when at least 4 AAA titles are going to be released along with quite a few AA's. THe truth is if someone is mature enough they can save up for the thing that they want.
Avatar image for Correyov31
Correyov31

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 Correyov31
Member since 2005 • 358 Posts

I have to wonder how an analyst would know which companies are profitable and which ones aren't? And if Sony were profitable months ago, why wait until now to cut prices? I don't believe that the PS3 is actually profitable any more than I believe the 360 is or isn't.

The great thing is that at $499 the PS3 is starting to become a greater value.

bdhoff

I think that most companies report their profits for analysts to see. That is why they know everything before the public gets a hold of the information. Sony wouldn't have cut the price months ago when they started making a profit because they wanted to have some cushion. Why wouldn't Nintendo reduce their price if they have been making an enormous profit on each system. They could have completely demolished the competition.

Avatar image for SageJMP
SageJMP

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 SageJMP
Member since 2004 • 4210 Posts

And if Sony were profitable months ago, why wait until now to cut prices?bdhoff

Maybe to actually try to make some of thier money back that they lost before it became profitable? You really think companies are going to drop prices as soon as something becomes profitable?

Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts
[QUOTE="bdhoff"][QUOTE="Crazy87"]

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.longhorn7

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.

And only an idiot would think that there is only 3 good games out for the ps3 insted of looking at the very near future(this year actually) when at least 4 AAA titles are going to be released along with quite a few AA's. THe truth is if someone is mature enough they can save up for the thing that they want.

Actually, only an idiot would spend money now for a promise of what is to come. You have no idea if the titles that are going to be released will be AAA or not. Everyone said Motorstorm would be AAA, but it wasn't. Everyone said Resistance would be AAA, but it wasn't. You sure like to throw that "mature" word around. A mature consumer makes informed decisions. When you look at what is available right now, today, for the PS3, it doesn't make sense to me to have paid $600 for it. Especially when you could get most of the same games with better quailty on a less expensive console. When good games actually do hit the console, then I can see spending the money. But not until.
Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts

[QUOTE="bdhoff"] And if Sony were profitable months ago, why wait until now to cut prices?SageJMP

Maybe to actually try to make some of thier money back that they lost before it became profitable? You really think companies are going to drop prices as soon as something becomes profitable?

If their product isn't selling and has the lowest market penetration, then yes. Sony made the right decision to cut the price. But if they could have done it sooner they should have.
Avatar image for Correyov31
Correyov31

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 Correyov31
Member since 2005 • 358 Posts
[QUOTE="longhorn7"][QUOTE="bdhoff"][QUOTE="Crazy87"]

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.bdhoff

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.

And only an idiot would think that there is only 3 good games out for the ps3 insted of looking at the very near future(this year actually) when at least 4 AAA titles are going to be released along with quite a few AA's. THe truth is if someone is mature enough they can save up for the thing that they want.

Actually, only an idiot would spend money now for a promise of what is to come. You have no idea if the titles that are going to be released will be AAA or not. Everyone said Motorstorm would be AAA, but it wasn't. Everyone said Resistance would be AAA, but it wasn't. You sure like to throw that "mature" word around. A mature consumer makes informed decisions. When you look at what is available right now, today, for the PS3, it doesn't make sense to me to have paid $600 for it. Especially when you could get most of the same games with better quailty on a less expensive console. When good games actually do hit the console, then I can see spending the money. But not until.

Just because one site doesn'trate a game as AAA doesn't mean it isn't a AAA game. Maybe not Motorstorm but Resistance is considered AAA material by most game reviewers.

Avatar image for theiceman08
theiceman08

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 theiceman08
Member since 2007 • 498 Posts

go PS3

Avatar image for mikeslemonade
mikeslemonade

3624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 mikeslemonade
Member since 2006 • 3624 Posts

A few years ago Kutaragi stated that Sony was aggressively making an effort to become less dependent on 3rd party components in their hardware. The goal was to have as many parts as possible in the Playstation (as well as other hardware) being made in-house to reduce costs. It is almost impossible to know how much each PS3 costs Sony to make.

myxylplyx

Okay this comment makes the most sense here. This would also explain why the PS3 is like a tank that doesn't break.

Avatar image for 9thwardice
9thwardice

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 9thwardice
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts
[QUOTE="SageJMP"]

[QUOTE="bdhoff"] And if Sony were profitable months ago, why wait until now to cut prices?bdhoff

Maybe to actually try to make some of thier money back that they lost before it became profitable? You really think companies are going to drop prices as soon as something becomes profitable?

If their product isn't selling and has the lowest market penetration, then yes. Sony made the right decision to cut the price. But if they could have done it sooner they should have.

wow so you're sayin that because its not selling as fast as another console that means its not selling? thats knd of a stupid thing to say no offense. especially considering how much it sold compared to the ps2, with only a few good games out at the moment. so who knows how much it'll sell once games like uncharted, ratchet and clank, lair, killzone, MGS4, gran turismo, and final fantasy 13 and versus 13 come out. socom confrontation, socom 4 are out. but yeah if you want to wait a few years to get one then thats you, get it when you feel like it.

Avatar image for aSOUNDofREVENGE
aSOUNDofREVENGE

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 aSOUNDofREVENGE
Member since 2005 • 895 Posts
microsoft stated that on release day of halo 3 they expect for the first time to be in the black meaning not losing money, now how would they possibly be in the black if they were still losing money on every console? cheering because another company to lose money is just stupid, i'm a 360 owner but i don't sit here and celebrate if i hear news that sony is losing money on every console sold. also like some said why would sony wait so long for a price drop and why wouldnt they make it bigger if they aren't losing money on consoles anymore,it just doesn't make sense
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts
[QUOTE="longhorn7"][QUOTE="bdhoff"][QUOTE="Crazy87"]

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.bdhoff

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.

And only an idiot would think that there is only 3 good games out for the ps3 insted of looking at the very near future(this year actually) when at least 4 AAA titles are going to be released along with quite a few AA's. THe truth is if someone is mature enough they can save up for the thing that they want.

Actually, only an idiot would spend money now for a promise of what is to come. You have no idea if the titles that are going to be released will be AAA or not. Everyone said Motorstorm would be AAA, but it wasn't. Everyone said Resistance would be AAA, but it wasn't. You sure like to throw that "mature" word around. A mature consumer makes informed decisions. When you look at what is available right now, today, for the PS3, it doesn't make sense to me to have paid $600 for it. Especially when you could get most of the same games with better quailty on a less expensive console. When good games actually do hit the console, then I can see spending the money. But not until.

Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.
Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts
Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.2beers_in_hand
So just because I don't agree with you I have to take my opinions somewhere else? If you think about it, what did you early adopters get that someone that buys one for $100 less this week won't get? I mean, other than a copy of Talladega Nights and shafted?
Avatar image for mikeslemonade
mikeslemonade

3624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 mikeslemonade
Member since 2006 • 3624 Posts

microsoft stated that on release day of halo 3 they expect for the first time to be in the black meaning not losing money, now how would they possibly be in the black if they were still losing money on every console? cheering because another company to lose money is just stupid, i'm a 360 owner but i don't sit here and celebrate if i hear news that sony is losing money on every console sold. also like some said why would sony wait so long for a price drop and why wouldnt they make it bigger if they aren't losing money on consoles anymore,it just doesn't make senseaSOUNDofREVENGE

MS themselve have delayed when they will get into the black until fiscal 2008. This is because they will lose 1.15 billion dollars to repairs and warrantys.

Avatar image for Correyov31
Correyov31

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 Correyov31
Member since 2005 • 358 Posts

microsoft stated that on release day of halo 3 they expect for the first time to be in the black meaning not losing money, now how would they possibly be in the black if they were still losing money on every console? cheering because another company to lose money is just stupid, i'm a 360 owner but i don't sit here and celebrate if i hear news that sony is losing money on every console sold. also like some said why would sony wait so long for a price drop and why wouldnt they make it bigger if they aren't losing money on consoles anymore,it just doesn't make senseaSOUNDofREVENGE

You go in the black and still lose money for every console. That is why Sony knew they would have to make their money thorugh software sales when the console was loosing so much money on each system. Microsoft expects HALO 3 to be a world wide sell out which will make the company alot of money.

Avatar image for aSOUNDofREVENGE
aSOUNDofREVENGE

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 aSOUNDofREVENGE
Member since 2005 • 895 Posts
I just don't think it's possible that the 360 is still losing money after being out as long as its been out and somehow the ps3 is now making money on each console after being out such a short time. If it was that easy for the ps3 to become profitable they never would have started with price points as high as they did bein 500 and 600. The bottom line is if somehow the ps3 is making money on each console then you can be sure that the 360 is also making money on each console.
Avatar image for Correyov31
Correyov31

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Correyov31
Member since 2005 • 358 Posts
Does anyone remember when Sony started taking out the EE chips from the consoles to reduce production cost. They could have been working to lower production costs so they wouldn't lose so much money. Remember that Sony is a hardware company and this is what they do best.
Avatar image for stygiansanity
stygiansanity

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 stygiansanity
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

[QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.bdhoff
So just because I don't agree with you I have to take my opinions somewhere else? If you think about it, what did you early adopters get that someone that buys one for $100 less this week won't get? I mean, other than a copy of Talladega Nights and shafted?

can't wait to see his reponse to that :P

but what I find funny is how so many people have faith in a company that's only goal is to profit...like, how could you get excited about a sixaxis with rumble after sony said that it's undoable and now you'll be forced to buy new controllers, DMC4 probably going multi-plat, and the possibility of MGS4/MGS game going multi-plat.

Avatar image for clarkportmanken
clarkportmanken

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 clarkportmanken
Member since 2003 • 1714 Posts
um wasn't xbox 360 making a 75 dollar profit per console and wasn't sony loosing like 50 per console. i understand sony making a profit now but i don't see Microsoft loosing money on their console except for maybe the warranty but thats it each of there console is turning a profit. i kind of have respect for sony just starting to make a profit on there console and then reducing the price even further kind of makes me not so angry at how quickly they dropped the price begin and early adopter
Avatar image for TelcharXI
TelcharXI

1189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 TelcharXI
Member since 2006 • 1189 Posts
the horrible pungent smell of system wars has already permeated this thread
Avatar image for deebo_x
deebo_x

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 deebo_x
Member since 2003 • 941 Posts
[QUOTE="mus1523"]

Says Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYWkGuoeuipo&refer=home

Clearing up the trouble made PlayStation 3 profitable several months ago, giving the company room to cut prices, analyst Doherty said. M********t still loses money on each X*** 3** it sells, he said.

``Any price cut they try to make puts them more into the red,'' Doherty said.

FireFalkon

you must remember that MS's pockets are nearly bottomless, even if they lose more they can cut the price to make it cheaper than the ps3.

But you must remember that MSOFTis a majorsoftware company not a major hardware company so their pockets are not bottomless when it comes to hardware. They have their limits as far as the X360 is concerned. Especially considering how much they make from Windows and office they really don't even need to be in the console selling business its almost like a hobby for them or lab experiment.

Avatar image for Omnisystem
Omnisystem

613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Omnisystem
Member since 2007 • 613 Posts

500$ is still a lot to save up for though.GIJesse77

$500.00 is like 2 weeks of work even if you work for minimum wage. Next person I see complain about it being too much will be sterilyzed. Go out and get a job, even if only for 2-3 weeks.

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts
[QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.bdhoff
So just because I don't agree with you I have to take my opinions somewhere else? If you think about it, what did you early adopters get that someone that buys one for $100 less this week won't get? I mean, other than a copy of Talladega Nights and shafted?

Well it's simple us early adopters bought what we knew was a fantastic system. So I have now regrets on purchasing one early. And good for anybody who was waiting for a price drop before buying one you won't be disapointed in you desisision. Nowe let me ask you a question do you own a PS3. I don't believe you do for the simple fact that Resistance and Motorstorm are great games, while you say what their not worth it what because they didn't get AAA here give me a break. Oh and last time I checked that cheaper system can't even give their cunsomers a machine that works correctly. So here's a tissue dry your eye's its okay if it still to expensive you can always wait for the next price drop.
Avatar image for deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1
deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1
Member since 2006 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="mus1523"]

Says Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYWkGuoeuipo&refer=home

Clearing up the trouble made PlayStation 3 profitable several months ago, giving the company room to cut prices, analyst Doherty said. M********t still loses money on each X*** 3** it sells, he said.

``Any price cut they try to make puts them more into the red,'' Doherty said.

FireFalkon
you must remember that MS's pockets are nearly bottomless, even if they lose more they can cut the price to make it cheaper than the ps3.


I thought there was some law to prevent companies from selling their products too cheap, and then putting other companies out of bisnuess, I dunno, correct me if I'm wrong.
Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

[QUOTE="bdhoff"][QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.stygiansanity

So just because I don't agree with you I have to take my opinions somewhere else? If you think about it, what did you early adopters get that someone that buys one for $100 less this week won't get? I mean, other than a copy of Talladega Nights and shafted?

can't wait to see his reponse to that :P

but what I find funny is how so many people have faith in a company that's only goal is to profit...like, how could you get excited about a sixaxis with rumble after sony said that it's undoable and now you'll be forced to buy new controllers, DMC4 probably going multi-plat, and the possibility of MGS4/MGS game going multi-plat.

Whats even funnier is the con called X-box live points, I bet you love getting hosed. Oh and I'm glad your warrenty got extended you will be needing it in the near future. Whats with the damage control about guys starting to get worried or what. And give the MGS4 rumor a rest its getting old.
Avatar image for mikeslemonade
mikeslemonade

3624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 mikeslemonade
Member since 2006 • 3624 Posts

um wasn't xbox 360 making a 75 dollar profit per console and wasn't sony loosing like 50 per console. i understand sony making a profit now but i don't see Microsoft loosing money on their console except for maybe the warranty but thats it each of there console is turning a profit. i kind of have respect for sony just starting to make a profit on there console and then reducing the price even further kind of makes me not so angry at how quickly they dropped the price begin and early adopterclarkportmanken

MS spends a lot of money trying to get games for the 360. These are things that MS bought on the top of my head that isn't 1st party:

Ninja Gaiden 2 exclusive

Paid the creator of FF1 to make RPGs exclusve to 360

Bioshock exclusive for 360 and PC

GTA investmeant (50 million)

Rare

Eternal Sonata

Basically everything that is Japanese MS will have to pay more money because they don't close relations and the 360 isn't selling well in Japan. Sony doesn't have to pay as much because they're established in everywhere.

1st party:

$1 billion towards repairs and warranty

the 360 at launch cost $625 to make and people bought the 360 at $400 so even if they're making $100 right now it doesn't balance the cost of what the 360 cost to make at launch.
Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts
[QUOTE="Crazy87"]

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.bdhoff

not if you have a job i hate ppl that complain about the price cause they dont have a job and cant pay for it its anonnying

That comment was totally uncalled for. Not everyone who complained about the price did so because they couldn't afford it. People with common sense aren't going to pay $600 without being able to justify it. You know why most people complained about the price? Because there weren't enough good games to justify the price, no matter how much cutting edge tech was in the box. $500 is still a lot of money to justify a purchase for maybe 3 good games.

$500 is a lot of more. And so is $400, and so is $300, and so is $200 and so is $129. Good games are subjective. People like whatever they like. Some like pokemon, some like fps, some like card dueling, etc. And some just want a reliable piece of hardware.

Avatar image for clarkportmanken
clarkportmanken

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 clarkportmanken
Member since 2003 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="GIJesse77"]500$ is still a lot to save up for though.Omnisystem

$500.00 is like 2 weeks of work even if you work for minimum wage. Next person I see complain about it being too much will be sterilyzed. Go out and get a job, even if only for 2-3 weeks.

well people need money to live too lol so thats probably what they are talking about sure u can make 500 in 2 weeks but you still got bills and people have a nasty habit of wanting to eat every now and then lol.

look i luv my ps3 as much as the next person but making fun of people who can't afford one is just isn't right. if they complain about the price it is because they want one but just can't afford it yet, and i feel for them and hope one day they can afford one

also if you think 360 and Wii fanboys are just plain rude and jerks then try not to behave like them. civility is what separates us from our enemies. i do understand though were your coming form the forum is flooded with "its to expensive" threads and post but when u see one just simple not respond

Avatar image for PiPbOY0
PiPbOY0

147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 PiPbOY0
Member since 2006 • 147 Posts
Its great that the ps3 has finally become profitable. Maybe the sales will pick up? I would be happy to see the ps3 continue bc I will definitely have something for tekken 6 lol. Hang in there sony.
Avatar image for GTA_Vice_City
GTA_Vice_City

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 GTA_Vice_City
Member since 2003 • 37 Posts
[QUOTE="bdhoff"][QUOTE="2beers_in_hand"]Wow you got to be joking or are you really thet clueless. Resistance and Motorstorm are must have game's so keep your biased opinions to yourself. And your line about beinga informed consumer, well lets see all of us early adopters were right. We chose the right format for movies so don't feel to bad you will get a great add on in about a year and a half. So please take you opinions some where else.2beers_in_hand
So just because I don't agree with you I have to take my opinions somewhere else? If you think about it, what did you early adopters get that someone that buys one for $100 less this week won't get? I mean, other than a copy of Talladega Nights and shafted?

Well it's simple us early adopters bought what we knew was a fantastic system. So I have now regrets on purchasing one early. And good for anybody who was waiting for a price drop before buying one you won't be disapointed in you desisision. Nowe let me ask you a question do you own a PS3. I don't believe you do for the simple fact that Resistance and Motorstorm are great games, while you say what their not worth it what because they didn't get AAA here give me a break. Oh and last time I checked that cheaper system can't even give their cunsomers a machine that works correctly. So here's a tissue dry your eye's its okay if it still to expensive you can always wait for the next price drop.


dude, you're such a dick. first off, this is a forum, where gamers (i assume) come to congregate and discuss and rationalize the article. congratulations on being an early adopter.  congratulations on blu-ray becoming the HD standard (most likely.)  that's no reason to get pompous or overtly self-important, or to try to shove this guy off the message board because you THINK that he's an xbox fanboy.  i havent seen anything that indicates he's an xbox fanboy.  so how about you "keep your biased opinions to yourself."
Avatar image for venomdeo
venomdeo

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 venomdeo
Member since 2003 • 615 Posts
Hmmm interesting bit of news IMO.
Avatar image for minox2109
minox2109

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 minox2109
Member since 2006 • 144 Posts
wow... i cant believe this artical... sony is already makin a profit wow... wel.. this is gonna push the 360... n ms will lower ther price makin the 360 even worth less for the company... n pushin ms into the corner...