Who here would pay for a better online service?

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for austin_is_god
austin_is_god

635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 austin_is_god
Member since 2003 • 635 Posts

[QUOTE="austin_is_god"]The main advantage of live over the PSN is that developers don't have to pay to have an online service in their game where as they on the PSN. This is why we see some PS3 games without online play whereas the 360 version has it. Yes, I would pay for a better online service. I can't believe sony fanboys moan about $50 so much, be lucky that is all YOU have to pay for it. In Australia it is more like $100 which is a joke.jwat4

Oddly enough we are not lucky, we are smart enough to know better. We choose to use a free service that is just fine instead of paying $50 USD or $4100 AUD

Yea whatever. I am saying that you lot bi*ch and moan about the price of everything when it really isn't that expensive.

Avatar image for Tidida1
Tidida1

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Tidida1
Member since 2003 • 30 Posts
I wouldnt .I like it as it is .It could be somewhat better and surely will with time given ,but I dont approve or will ever enter the subscription model MS is trying to impose over gamers to have their pockets full of our money.No way .PSN FTW !