First charges in Mueller investigation filed, arrests might come as soon as Monday. UPDATE - it's Manafort

I have linked and i never said the election i said collusion between Clinton and Russia, why do you think Moskva paid Clinton 500k for a speaking engagement. And that is not taking all the other things that happened with the Uran deal.

Link as to the reason since you have made a judgment on it........

Check the thread.

It´s already multiple times been linked. Also the WSJ, BBC and NY Times (Yes that times) have had stories on it.

Ah but they aren't saying what you're saying. So I want your link to verify your statements. If it's true it should be simple enough for you..........if not then I guess you won't link.

2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation);

Schweizer said, "Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state."

We're not checking Schweizer's suggestion that the increased speaking fees were part of a plan to curry favor in his wife's State Department. But on the specific numbers, Schweitzer is correct.

Hillary Clinton’s financial disclosure forms from 2001 through the end of 2012 confirm Schweizer’s claim. We rate it True.

@Jacanuk: That isn't evidence of anything. Do you know what collusion is? Because that isn't it dude. Evidence is showing a link.

Of course it´s not evidence for you.

Could you be more bias or do you work hard on it?

No it shows no collusion. You have to show me collusion if you want me to take you seriously.

LOL come on if that was Trump you would be all over it

Let's see my stance on this investigation is to continue and see where it leads. I have not stated at any point that trump himself colluded. Wouldn't surprise me if he knew. I mean a few days after the emails to his campaign about her emails he's chirping about them on stage. There is reason to believe something went on in that campaign.

However, an ex president being paid to speak does not inherently link to any collusion. Were they colluding to make her lose the election? Because I don't see an end game here and your link hasn't provided anything substance to give one pause.

You are correct that if this was any other country and the ex-president no one would be digging into it, but now this is Russia and you think they only begun their campaign in the last year.

But this is Russia and this ex-presidents wife was the sec of state and shortly after Russia got a hold of a major stake in the us uran

And if russia meddled today it´s a very good bet that they also tried it back then.

If you want me to care about Russia and the Clintons you have to show me a reason. There is nothing in evidence that anything happened. You can't just make things up.

Bubububut uranium!!!!!!111112one

Post trolling, you don't like the truth. Speaking of truth have you listened to Donna Brazile talking about the Clintons and Obama in her book.

Donna Brazile's accusations regarding the DNC nomination have no bearing on this thread or the specific post I refuted.

So no defense then.............