@silentchief said:
Hearing you mention conservatives don't know what free speech is only for you to show you have no clue what free speech is 🤣🤣.
I was literally speaking on a purely objective level. Free speech does not apply to a private company's TOS and moderation in nearly every case/instance, including this one.
I'm not giving you my opinion or arguing with you. I'm telling you a straight up fact.
@silentchief said:
How is removing googles ability to block political viewpoints removing their free speech?
Google is using their Terms of Service, as they are allowed to do. Truth Social lacks moderation and violates their TOS. They are legally allowed to do this. If the cesspool that is Storm Front 2.0 (Truth Social) wants to get back in Google Play Store, it has to hire more moderators. Play by the rules, clean your shit out.
Trump’s Truth Social ‘Free Speech’ Motto Hides Filter Issue - Bloomberg
In a somewhat related case Texas tried to use your false definition, and failed.
Texas social media law blocked by U.S. Supreme Court | The Texas Tribune
The two industry trade groups that represent companies such as Google and Twitter sued to block the law last fall. In December, a federal district court judge ruled in favor of the groups and prevented the law from going into effect, reasoning that the First Amendment protects a company’s right to moderate content and calling parts of the law “prohibitively vague.”
P.S. The irony!
Truth Social Is Shadow Banning Posts Despite Promise of Free Speech (businessinsider.com)
Trump's "free speech" platform Truth Social bans users who post footage from Jan. 6 hearings | Salon.com
Log in to comment