Over 13 games (that's one more since I am not sure if you know how to subtract), he had 643 yards and 3 TDs. This was without great recievers taking away coverage for Watson while Clark benefitted from Pro-bowlers Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne. Watson had...Reche Caldwell and Doug Gabriel.... This is what I am basing on.
Okay...so when Watson has worse stats than Clark this year, it's BECAUSE he has such great weapons to compete with. But when Clark had worse stats than Watson last year, it's DESPITE having great weapons to compete with. When Watson produces worse with great recievers this year, he's doing it despite them taking away PRODUCTION. When Clark produced worse last year with great recievers, he did it despite them taking away COVERAGE. Nice double standards you have.
BTW, I'd appreciate it if you'd keep the mindless, petty insults to a minimum. It makes you look really immature.
manningbowl135
First of all, learn English. I am an Asian and I can write better than you already. Second of all, Please no more, no more. This is torture. This thing you call writing doesn't even make sense.
When Watson produces worse with great recievers this year, he's doing it despite them taking away PRODUCTION.
So, if I translate this to a more readable form: "When Watson's stats were worse with great recievers this year, Watson is having a bad season despite the three great WRs taking away production." This doesn't even make sense. Read it for yourself, you said the same thing twice.
When Clark produced worse last year with great recievers, he did it despite them taking away COVERAGE.
So, if I again translate this: "When Clark's stats were worse last year with Reggie Wayne and Marvin Harrison, Clark had a bad season despite Reggie Wayne and Marvin Harrison taking away coverage." So, when Clark's stats were bad, he had a bad season despite those two taking away coverage? This again doesn't make sense. You said the same thing twice.
when Watson has worse stats than Clark this year, it's BECAUSE he has such great weapons to compete with. But when Clark had worse stats than Watson last year, it's DESPITE having great weapons to compete with.
These first two sentences were better, I actually understood it. So, I will translate again: "When Watson has worse stats than Clark this year, it's because Watson has such great weapons to compete with. But when Clark had worse statistic than that of Watson last year, it's because Clark doesn't have to compete with great weapons to compete with." This again proves your point invalid. Clark has ALWAYS had great weapons. Clark, this season had them. Marvin Harrison only missed a game while this is the first year in which Watson actually played with great recievers. Despite them coming in to take away production from him, he was actually on a pace to beat his record from last year, and much, much better than Dallas Clark's last season. Thus, Watson produced and was going to produce better when Watson DID have great recievers this year than Dallas did last year WITH great recievers. Tell me why is that? Simple, Watson is just better.
Also, there is no double standard here because Dallas has never been in a situation remotely closely as that of Watson because Dallas always had an amazing group of WRs. Watson had no WRs on last year's team and drew double-coverage every game while Dallas has never had a game where he was double-covered continously. I can't even remember a single Pats v. Colts game where Belichick would double-cover Dallas Clark. This is the first season Watson ever had a great group of WRs.
Double Standard? Honestly, is this the best arguement you can come up with? Try again, please be my guest.
Log in to comment