I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]WHAT!!!! NY got cheated!theone86
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]WHAT!!!! NY got cheated!MoonMarvel
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs.
I'm not saying it was right or wrong, I'm saying it wasn't obvious.
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
theone86
It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs.
I'm not saying it was right or wrong, I'm saying it wasn't obvious.
IMO it was wrong. I dont think you overturn a TD based such small things. Doesnt matter, NY lost anyway.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs.MoonMarvel
I'm not saying it was right or wrong, I'm saying it wasn't obvious.
IMO it was wrong. I dont think you overturn a TD based such small things. Doesnt matter, NY lost anyway.
You don't overturn a call that someone's out of bounds based on the fact that his foot's on the line?
What an awesome game. Alone at the top of the division again! And Manningham was definitely out of bounds. You could clearly see his foot was out in the replay.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]WHAT!!!! NY got cheated!theone86
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]WHAT!!!! NY got cheated!MoonMarvel
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs. Then the refs were right. They aren't sensitive, they are making the right call.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="theone86"]No. He was in end of story. [QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="theone86"]
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]WHAT!!!! NY got cheated!monkeytoes61
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
He was clearly out.He was clearly in. No debate. Time to move on, he was in end of. I wont change my mind so why bother?
I wouldn't say cheated. It was close, but it looked like he was barely on the line. Either way, cheated would infer that the call was blatantly wrong, which it was anything but.
monkeytoes61
It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs. Then the refs were right. They aren't sensitive, they are making the right call.IYO. Doesnt mean everybody on earth has to agree.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]It was wrong. Atleast NY just got 7. But manningham was in bounds, his foot barely even touched the white, it was like his toe touching the outside of it. Sensitive refs.MoonMarvel
Then the refs were right. They aren't sensitive, they are making the right call.IYO. Doesnt mean everybody on earth has to agree. Yes you do, it's in the freaking rules.
[QUOTE="MoonMarvel"][QUOTE="monkeytoes61"] Then the refs were right. They aren't sensitive, they are making the right call.
Chutebox
IYO. Doesnt mean everybody on earth has to agree. Yes you do, it's in the freaking rules.Nice try, not funny. Now back on topic. Eagles are in first, hopefully not for long.
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="MoonMarvel"]IYO. Doesnt mean everybody on earth has to agree.MoonMarvel
Yes you do, it's in the freaking rules.Nice try, not funny. Now back on topic. Eagles are in first, hopefully not for long. What's funny? You admitted to his toes touching the line. His toes are part of his foot so he was out of bounds. I don't even know why there is a discussion about this.
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] Yes you do, it's in the freaking rules.Chutebox
Nice try, not funny. Now back on topic. Eagles are in first, hopefully not for long. What's funny? You admitted to his toes touching the line. His toes are part of his foot so he was out of bounds. I don't even know why there is a discussion about this.Stop twisting my words and stay on topic please. The only reason there is discussion because so many wont let it go. You want the discussion to stop? STOP DISCUSSING IT. Simple. Now on topic again.....Eagles first place...How long.
Log in to comment