This topic is locked from further discussion.
ps3s exclusives alone are enough for me to not bother with the 360, that console is on life support right now, i can get better quality with the ps3, those arguments you made are grasping for straws, and is soooo 2007 ;)
PS3 top 25 highest rated games has a better rating than the top 25 xbox games on metacritic. In fact only reason xbox has higher rated games is because they have more games so it's just like a monkey with a typewriter but PS3 has a much higher average than the xbox's games. The only thing I agree about is the music thing and slightly the multiplat thing but the xbox has only a very slight a advantage there and it can't compensate for lack of good exclusives. What good exclusives does the xbox have anyway?
Now ps3:
And in multiplat the only game I care about slightly that is noticably better on the xbox is AC I & II
wow, just wow, a lot of opinion in there, false information (90% multiplats look bette ron x360 is wrong, even lemsoftruth has a lower percentage and you can play music from you HDD in most games that released the past 1-2 years) and of corse the x360 has more A-AAA titles if it released a year earlier :S
1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time. 2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) 3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online And superior multiplats experience its wells worth it 4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games) 5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then move 6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS) 7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing. 8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4 9.Is cheaper to develop for 10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds. KauroShinjo
1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time.2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) Not bothering to look up, so ok. But the PS3 seems to have a more promising upcoming lineup
3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online This be subjective
4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games) Again not bothering to look up
5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then move It is an original concept? Ever hear of the Eyetoy?
6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS) No one was expecting the PS3 to play xbox games
7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing.
8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4
9.Is cheaper to develop for Proof?
10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds. Or how bout just a gaming PC since once you have one you really don't need a 360KauroShinjo
TC you really should change the title to '8 personal opinions why xbox 360 is better than PS3'
a couple of them though debatable due to personal preferences are still true..
1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time.Who honestly cares, i play multiplats on any system, as long as it runs2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) I play my ps3 more, so that really isnt an issue for anyone who does not care about scores3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online And superior multiplats experience its wells worth itNot really4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games)Again with scores 5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then moveLeave the casuals to argue with that 6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS)Does it ?7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing.True 8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4 9.Is cheaper to develop forAnd again with scores10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds.I answered with an opinion post with mines, so i guess it means its a factKauroShinjoMy take cutie
i love how all the ps3 fanboys say stuff like tc is a troll, ok and cool theoy when deep down they kno wat the tc sayin is true
Keep dreaming buddyi love how all the ps3 fanboys say stuff like tc is a troll, ok and cool theoy when deep down they kno wat the tc sayin is true
max-Emadness
i love how all the ps3 fanboys say stuff like tc is a troll, ok and cool theoy when deep down they kno wat the tc sayin is true
Keep dreaming buddy see just my point[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="max-Emadness"]Keep dreaming buddy see just my pointi love how all the ps3 fanboys say stuff like tc is a troll, ok and cool theoy when deep down they kno wat the tc sayin is true
max-Emadness
cool i love both the PS3 and the 360....i dont care bout marginal diffrences in multiplat graphics and multiplayer is something thats good for certain games but by god terrible and should die in others.
I will agree on the bc since i do have a nice wee xbox collection i have found myself having a quick shot of from time to time.
But tbh both are equal both have pro's and cons.
i love how all the ps3 fanboys say stuff like tc is a troll, ok and cool theoy when deep down they kno wat the tc sayin is true
max-Emadness
I'm a PC elitist that also games on the PS1, PS2, SNES and Wii.
The XBOX360 has become a worthless "console" (factually it's a patheticaly gimped PC with minuscule features), simply because:
AT LEAST, the PS3's 2011 lineup looks beautiful, and it's 2010 was solid. I'm actually going to consider buying one for it's exclusives. I don't hate on the PS3 as i used to.
Lmao @ Xbox360's fanboys that are in denial with their craptastic lineup.
And superiour multiplats = PC. So what's the reason of even buying a 360 again?
Now come at me, bro.
PS3 top 25 highest rated games has a better rating than the top 25 xbox games on metacritic. In fact only reason xbox has higher rated games is because they have more games so it's just like a monkey with a typewriter but PS3 has a much higher average than the xbox's games. The only thing I agree about is the music thing and slightly the multiplat thing but the xbox has only a very slight a advantage there and it can't compensate for lack of good exclusives. What good exclusives does the xbox have anyway?
- GoW=PC (only first one)
- Mass Effect 1=PC
- Alan Wake=lol
- Halo=lol
Now ps3:
- Uncharted
- Demon's Souls=lol
- Infamous
- Killzone=lol
- LBP=lol
- Heavy Rain=lol
- Resistance=lol
- GoW=lol
- GT5=lol
And in multiplat the only game I care about slightly that is noticably better on the xbox is AC I & II
charlesdarwin55
Those are my opinions, but they all scored great, just like the ones you pointed out with "lol".
lol @ 6... Also 9 is becoming redundant as xbox needs **** loads of optimizing to beat a PS3 exclusive, look at Gears 3 it's just a graphics race now i just hope graphics don't fill up the disc as i want a decent campaign on gears 3.[QUOTE="KauroShinjo"]1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time.
2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) Not bothering to look up, so ok. But the PS3 seems to have a more promising upcoming lineup
3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online This be subjective
4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games) Again not bothering to look up
5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then move It is an original concept? Ever hear of the Eyetoy?
6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS) No one was expecting the PS3 to play xbox games
7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing.
8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4
9.Is cheaper to develop for Proof?
10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds. Or how bout just a gaming PC since once you have one you really don't need a 360ferret-gamer
1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time. 2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) 3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online And superior multiplats experience its wells worth it 4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games) 5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then move 6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS) 7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing. 8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4 9.Is cheaper to develop for 10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds. KauroShinjo
More like 10 sad reasons to own an Xbox over PS3:lol:
1.Superior multiplats let's face it what's the majority of a consoles library ? The multiplats.So why have a better 10% when you can have a better 90% ? 360 multiplats look better and have better framerate almost all the time. 2.More Single A double A and triple A games (A-AA-AAA) This is factual the xbox 360 has more critically acclaimed games both retail and downloadable (more quality games) 3.Superior Online sure you have to pay for it but its worth it, you can't toss out wopper money every month ? For superior online And superior multiplats experience its wells worth it 4.XBLA gets more A-AA-AAA games Then PSN every year this isn't arguable the numbers speak for themselves(more quality downloadable games) 5.Kinect has more Critically acclaimed games then move and is more original concept then move 6.BC with xbox games(UNLIKE CURRENT PS3 MODELS) 7.Can play music while gaming How many times you wanted to listen to some tunes but couldn't on the ps3 ? you'd have to use a external device to get the same experience while on the 360 you just need 1 thing. 8.More games overall XBLA kicks the **** out of psn in games numbers every year with developer support and independent developers.In metacritic 360 game library is 14 pages long while ps3's is 4 9.Is cheaper to develop for 10.Outselling ps3 Sure sales doesn't equal quality but sales equals more developer support .The superior multiplats and pc/360 multiplats not on ps3 shows that. If it weren't for Sony's first party studios the ps3's library would be in a **** fest right now.And if you say ''Oh I'll just play those pc multiplats on my pc'' Then you admit you need another device to satisfy you while you only need a 360 to get the best out of both worlds. KauroShinjo
1. 90% of multiplats are virtually identical. Things like controller preference and whether you want to up your Trophy count or gamerscore more make a far bigger difference than supposed graphical differences that can't even be seen without frame by frame side by side comparisons. That said, Sony's deals lately to give PS3 owners extra content on the disc for no extra charge (Dante's Inferno, Medal of Honor, Dead Space 2, etc) actually provide a REAL reason to buy one version over the other. So why have a virtually identical multiplat 90% of the time, when you can still have those virtually identical multiplats, plus the ones that give you free content, plus the better first-party line-up?
2. So going by the "Official Spreadsheet" (which isn't completely up-to-date, btw, off the top of my head I noticed ME2, DS2, and DCU missing from PS3, and DS2 missing from 360), PS3 has 2 AAAA, 33 AAA, 102 AA. Adding in ME2 and DS2 makes 34 AAA and 103 AA. 360 has 1, 36, and 126 AAAA, AAA, and AAs respectively. Adding in DS2 makes 127 AA. So, you're correct. 360 has more AAA and AA (less AAAA) than PS3. What's more important to me as a gamer than how many games came out 5 years ago, is how many new quality games come out each year. Looking at the announced line-ups for this year, I'd say PS3 has that one, but that's just one year. Let's look at historical averages. 34 AAAs (PS3) over 4 years is an average of 8.5 AAA games a year. 36 AAA games (360) over 5 years is an average of 7.2. 103 AAs (PS3) in 4 years is an average of 25.75 per year. 127 (360) is an average of 25.4. So the PS3, on average, gets about the same number (though marginally higher) of AA games as the 360, but comes out ahead in AAA games (and AAAA games). That's total games. What about exclusives? Well, PS3 has gotten 1 AAAAE in 4 years, versus none in 5 years. They both have 8 AAAEs, which comes out to 2 a year for PS3 and just over 1.5 a year for 360. AAEs come out to be about the same, 3.5 per year for PS3, 3.4 per year for 360.
3. I've played games on both, and for that actual purpose (playing games online), they are pretty much identical. The only real difference I noticed is that I seem to hear more people talking with mics on PS3. So much for cross-game chat being a GOOD thing, at least if you like to actually talk to your team-mates in an online game. When you factor in that Live costs as much as buying a new game every year, that seals the deal (I guess it makes it okay that PS3 averages 1 more AAA per year, since 360 gamers spent the money for that 1 extra game on Live anyway).
4. Yeah, XBLA does get a few more high rated games than PSN. As for exclusives, they both have 1 AAAE, and XBLA leads PSN 18 to 8 in AAEs (according to the spreadsheet). As for non-exclusives, I was momentarily blown away by the number of XBLA games... until I noticed that the spreadsheet included full-release titles that are downloadable (Gears of War, Dead Space, Assassin's Creed, etc, etc). I guess whoever is adding the games on demand didn't notice that you can download selected full release PS3 games too, since they aren't listed on the PSN spreadsheet...
5. Kinect may have slightly more criticall acclaimed Kinect-only titles than Move has, but Move can also be played with games like Resident Evil 5, Heavy Rain, Killzone 3. I'm a whole lot more interested in what REAL games I might could play with a motion controller than which has more casual party and fitness games.
6. Current model PS3s, even without PS2 playback, are still BC with more titles than Xbox 360. Plus, what about the xbox games that 360 is NOT compatible with? If you don't still have an old xbox, you can never play them again. If my PS2 dies, and I don't have a launch ps3, I can still go out and buy a PS2.
7. Some ps3 games support custom playlists, some don't, but as for a universal feature, you're right. 360 has it, PS3 doesn't. I've never once wanted the feature personally, as I prefer to listen to the music that goes with the game, but it is still a feature 360 has PS3 doesn't. Like blu-ray playback is a feature PS3 has that 360 doesn't. Or an internet browser. Or remote play with a PSP. Or Home. Or region free gaming (can import games). Or 7 player local multiplayer (I think there's only 1 or two games that have 7 player, but support for 7 controllers is there for any devs that want to take advantage of it).
8. This is basically a repeat of 1 and 4, except using Metascores instead of GS scores. I'm not going through the full list, but looking at just the 90+, PS3 has 29 in 4 years (7.25 a year), 360 has 35 in 4 years (7 a year). Of course of those 90+ games only 5 are 360 exclusives. Compared to 6 for PS3. Which is better, 6 90+ exclusives in 4 years, or 5 in 5 years?
9. What is this? I don't even...
10. PS3 has been outselling 360 since launch. At the end of 2006, PS3 was 8.7 million behind 360. At the end of 2010, it was 3 million behind, after outselling 360 by 2.4 million for the year, despite 360 having it's best sales quarter ever due to Kinect and the redesign. If those couldn't keep PS3 from steamrolling 360 in sales for the year, what's it gonna pull out this year, to counter PS3's monster line-up of heavy-hitting exclusives?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment